arxiv: 2604.14041 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

Seek-and-Solve: Benchmarking MLLMs for Visual Clue-Driven Reasoning in Daily Scenarios

Xiaomin Li , Tala Wang , Zichen Zhong , Ying Zhang , Zirui Zheng , Takashi Isobe , Dezhuang Li , Huchuan Lu

show 2 more authors

You He Xu Jia

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords DailyClue benchmarkvisual clue-driven reasoningmultimodal large language modelsdaily scenariosMLLM evaluationvisual perceptionreasoning benchmark

0 comments

The pith

DailyClue benchmark requires MLLMs to identify decisive visual clues before reasoning about everyday scenes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents DailyClue as a benchmark that forces multimodal large language models to actively locate and use specific visual details in realistic daily images rather than answering from prior knowledge or basic perception. Questions are built around four domains and sixteen subtasks drawn from authentic activities, so that correct answers depend on first finding the right clues in the image. Evaluations of existing MLLMs and agentic systems show they largely fail at this step. A sympathetic reader cares because current benchmarks rarely isolate the step of clue-seeking from simple recognition, leaving open whether models can handle the filtering and selection that real-world visual reasoning demands.

Core claim

DailyClue is constructed so that its questions compel MLLMs to explore suitable visual clues within images of daily activities and then leverage those clues for subsequent reasoning steps, rather than relying on surface-level perception or pre-existing knowledge alone. The dataset covers four major daily domains and sixteen distinct subtasks, and testing across multiple models reveals that accurate identification of visual clues is essential for robust performance on the benchmark.

What carries the argument

DailyClue benchmark, which curates image-question pairs grounded in authentic daily activities so that solving them requires first locating and using decisive visual clues.

If this is right

Accurate identification of visual clues is required for robust reasoning on the benchmark.
Current MLLMs and agentic models encounter substantial difficulty when forced to seek visual clues before reasoning.
Benchmarks limited to perceptual understanding or memorized knowledge leave the clue-seeking step untested.
Future model improvements must address the gap between recognizing objects and selecting the decisive details for a given query.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Training regimes could add explicit supervision for localizing and ranking visual evidence before generating answers.
The benchmark could be extended to non-daily domains to measure how well the same clue-seeking skill transfers.
Poor model performance may stem from weak coupling between visual search and language reasoning modules rather than from insufficient world knowledge.

Load-bearing premise

The curated questions and images truly demand more than surface-level perception and cannot be solved by pre-existing knowledge or simple recognition alone.

What would settle it

An experiment in which a model achieves high accuracy on DailyClue questions while producing no evidence of having located or referenced the specific visual clues in the provided images.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14041 by Dezhuang Li, Huchuan Lu, Takashi Isobe, Tala Wang, Xiaomin Li, Xu Jia, Ying Zhang, You He, Zichen Zhong, Zirui Zheng.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Overview of DailyClue. The left panel shows the hierarchical distribution (labels abbreviated for clarity), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Overview of the DailyClue construction pipeline. The process comprises three stages: (i) image collection [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: System and user prompts for the spatial rela [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Overview of DailyClue examples. DailyClue features four daily life scenarios across 16 reasoning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Comparison of answer generation under differ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Impact of visual-clue-reasoning on accuracy. Our Clue-guided CoT (Purple) consistently outperforms baselines across all models. Qwen-2.5 72B Claude-3.7 Gemini-2.5 Pro 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Accuracy (%) 38.89 -1.95% 39.94 -1.2% 56.46 -0.44% Rigorous Eval Drop [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Accuracy comparison between General and Rigorous Evaluation Protocols. The purple region denotes the Rigorous accuracy, whereas the full bar height (including the gray ‘Drop’ area) corresponds to the General accuracy. correct but irrelevant objects). As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: System prompt used for rigorous evaluation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Qualitative visualization of visual clues under the Rigorous Evaluation Protocol. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: System prompt for constructing question-clue-answer triplets in Daily Commonsense Reasoning. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: System prompt for constructing question-clue-answer triplets in Spatial Relationship Reasoning. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: System prompt for constructing question-clue-answer triplets in Scientific Commonsense Reasoning. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: Comparison of answer generation under different clue contexts. We feed Claude-3.7 with visual clues [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: Illustrative examples of the 16 subtasks, with four colors representing four scenarios. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_15.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Daily scenarios are characterized by visual richness, requiring Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to filter noise and identify decisive visual clues for accurate reasoning. Yet, current benchmarks predominantly aim at evaluating MLLMs' pre-existing knowledge or perceptual understanding, often neglecting the critical capability of reasoning. To bridge this gap, we introduce DailyClue, a benchmark designed for visual clue-driven reasoning in daily scenarios. Our construction is guided by two core principles: (1) strict grounding in authentic daily activities, and (2) challenging query design that necessitates more than surface-level perception. Instead of simple recognition, our questions compel MLLMs to actively explore suitable visual clues and leverage them for subsequent reasoning. To this end, we curate a comprehensive dataset spanning four major daily domains and 16 distinct subtasks. Comprehensive evaluation across MLLMs and agentic models underscores the formidable challenge posed by our benchmark. Our analysis reveals several critical insights, emphasizing that the accurate identification of visual clues is essential for robust reasoning.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

DailyClue is a new benchmark for visual clue-driven reasoning in daily scenes, but it lacks the checks needed to confirm questions actually require the images rather than prior knowledge.

read the letter

DailyClue is a new benchmark aimed at visual clue-driven reasoning in everyday situations, and the authors have put together a dataset across four domains with sixteen subtasks. The idea is to move beyond simple perception or knowledge recall to something that requires finding the right visual details first. The paper does a decent job of laying out why this matters. Current benchmarks often let models coast on pre-trained knowledge or basic object recognition, but real daily reasoning needs filtering noise and using specific clues. The construction principles of grounding in authentic activities and designing challenging queries that need more than surface perception are clear, and the low performance numbers on existing models back up that it's not trivial. Where it falls short is in proving that the questions truly demand those visual clues. The abstract talks about strict grounding and challenging design, but there's no data on text-only performance, no knowledge leakage tests, and no inter-annotator agreement figures. If a decent chunk of the items can be answered by common sense or pattern matching without the image, then the benchmark isn't isolating clue-driven reasoning as claimed. That assumption is load-bearing, and without checks it's hard to trust the results fully. This is for researchers in multimodal AI who are looking for better ways to evaluate practical reasoning skills. Someone building agentic systems or fine-tuning MLLMs might find the subtasks useful as inspiration, but they'd want to see more validation before relying on the scores. I think it deserves a serious referee. The topic is relevant and the gap it targets is real, so peer review could help tighten the methodology and make the benchmark more reliable.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces DailyClue, a benchmark for visual clue-driven reasoning in daily scenarios by MLLMs. It curates questions across four major daily domains and 16 subtasks, guided by principles of authentic grounding and challenging queries that require identifying and leveraging specific visual clues rather than surface-level perception or pre-existing knowledge. Comprehensive evaluations of MLLMs and agentic models show low performance, with analysis claiming that accurate visual clue identification is essential for robust reasoning.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the benchmark could help diagnose gaps in MLLM reasoning capabilities beyond perception in realistic settings. The creation of a new dataset spanning authentic daily activities is a constructive step toward more targeted evaluation, though its utility hinges on demonstrating that the questions truly isolate clue-driven reasoning.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (Dataset Construction): The paper states that questions 'compel MLLMs to actively explore suitable visual clues' and 'necessitate more than surface-level perception,' but provides no quantitative controls such as text-only LLM accuracy, image-ablated baselines, or human verification that clues are indispensable. Without these, the claim that DailyClue measures clue-driven reasoning rather than recognition or recall remains unverified and load-bearing for the benchmark's validity.
[§4] §4 (Experiments and Analysis): The reported low model performance is presented as evidence of the benchmark's challenge, yet without inter-annotator agreement scores, difficulty calibration metrics, or checks for knowledge leakage, it is unclear whether the results reflect genuine reasoning deficits or artifacts of question design. This directly affects the interpretation of the 'critical insights' on visual clue identification.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract and introduction could more explicitly define the four domains and 16 subtasks with a table or figure for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful and constructive review. The feedback highlights important aspects of validating that DailyClue isolates visual clue-driven reasoning, and we will strengthen the manuscript accordingly by adding the suggested controls and metrics.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (Dataset Construction): The paper states that questions 'compel MLLMs to actively explore suitable visual clues' and 'necessitate more than surface-level perception,' but provides no quantitative controls such as text-only LLM accuracy, image-ablated baselines, or human verification that clues are indispensable. Without these, the claim that DailyClue measures clue-driven reasoning rather than recognition or recall remains unverified and load-bearing for the benchmark's validity.

Authors: We agree that quantitative controls are necessary to rigorously substantiate the benchmark's focus on clue-driven reasoning. In the revised manuscript, we will expand §3 to include: (1) text-only LLM performance on the full question set to demonstrate that visual clues are required beyond textual knowledge, (2) image-ablated baselines (e.g., masking or removing key visual regions) showing performance drops when clues are unavailable, and (3) human verification studies where annotators confirm that specific clues are indispensable for solving each question. These additions will directly address the verification concern. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 (Experiments and Analysis): The reported low model performance is presented as evidence of the benchmark's challenge, yet without inter-annotator agreement scores, difficulty calibration metrics, or checks for knowledge leakage, it is unclear whether the results reflect genuine reasoning deficits or artifacts of question design. This directly affects the interpretation of the 'critical insights' on visual clue identification.

Authors: We concur that these metrics are essential for reliable interpretation of the results. We will add to §4: inter-annotator agreement scores for question creation and annotation, human performance baselines for difficulty calibration across subtasks, and explicit knowledge leakage checks (e.g., model accuracy on text-only or clue-perturbed versions). This will clarify that the observed low performance and insights on visual clue identification reflect genuine MLLM limitations rather than design artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: benchmark curation is independent of fitted results or self-referential definitions

full rationale

The paper introduces DailyClue as a new benchmark via explicit curation principles (strict grounding in daily activities, challenging queries requiring visual clues) and reports empirical evaluations across MLLMs. No equations, parameter fittings, or derivations are present that could reduce to inputs by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and the central claim rests on the dataset itself rather than renaming prior patterns or smuggling ansatzes. This is a standard benchmark paper whose validity hinges on external verification of the data (e.g., whether questions truly require images), not internal circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the domain assumption that carefully authored questions can isolate clue-seeking behavior from perception and knowledge; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Authentic daily images and questions can be authored such that surface perception or prior knowledge is insufficient to answer correctly.
This premise underpins the claim that the benchmark measures reasoning rather than recognition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5504 in / 1217 out tokens · 28097 ms · 2026-05-10T13:02:10.216247+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Ego-InBetween: Generating Object State Transitions in Ego-Centric Videos
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

EgoIn uses a fine-tuned vision-language model to infer transition steps and a conditioning module plus auxiliary supervision to generate coherent egocentric video sequences of object state changes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

[1]

LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Training

Llava-onevision-1.5: Fully open framework for democratized multimodal training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23661. Anthropic. 2024. The claude 3 model family: Opus, sonnet, haiku. https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/ de8ba9b01c9ab7cbabf5c33b80b7bbc618857627/ Model_Card_Claude_3.pdf. Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, Xionghui Chen, Zesen Cheng, Liangh...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[2]

InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency

Measuring multimodal mathematical reason- ing with math-vision dataset.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:95095–95169. Weiyun Wang, Zhangwei Gao, Lixin Gu, Hengjun Pu, Long Cui, Xingguang Wei, Zhaoyang Liu, Linglin Jing, Shenglong Ye, Jie Shao, and 1 others. 2025c. In- ternvl3. 5: Advancing open-source multimodal mod- els in versatility...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[3]

Pyvision: Agentic vision with dynamic tooling

Pyvision: Agentic vision with dynamic tooling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.07998. Xinhan Zheng, Huyu Wu, Xueting Wang, and Haiyun Jiang. 2025a. Unveiling intrinsic text bias in multi- modal large language models through attention key- space analysis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.26721. Ziwei Zheng, Michael Yang, Jack Hong, Chenxiao Zhao, Guohai Xu, Le Yang, Cha...

work page arXiv 2025
[4]

An advertisement is visible on the side of the white and red bus
[5]

The Dark Knight Rises

The advertisement is for the movie "The Dark Knight Rises" Question: In the locatio n where the phenomenon shown in the picture occurs, what season is it during Christmas? Answer: Winter Illusionary C lue: 1.The image shows a starry night sky. 2.A prominent cluster of stars, resembling the Pleiades , is visible. 3.The backgroun d is dark, indicating a nig...
[6]

There are five distinct bright stars forming a "W" shape
[7]

Sherlock Holmes-style

This is the famous constellation Cassiop eia." General Evaluation Protocol: Rigorous Evaluation Protocol: General Evaluation Protocol: Rigorous Evaluation Protocol: Figure 10: Qualitative visualization of visual clues under the Rigorous Evaluation Protocol. You are an expert Visual Reasoning Benchmark Tester. Your goal is to assess an MLLM's ability to pe...
[8]

Observe a subtle visual clue
[9]

Infer a physical/environmental condition (First-Order Reasoning)
[10]

Strong wind or light comes from Direction X

Apply that condition to a new scenario/object to solve the problem (Second-Order Reasoning). The Reasoning Hierarchy (Strictly Follow) You must design the reasoning chain as follows: • Visual Clue: A specific detail in the image (e.g., asymmetric tree rings, condensation, shadow angle). • Step 1: First-Order Reasoning (The Cause): Deduce the hidden enviro...
[11]

bent," "wet,

Absolute Stealth (Text-Visual Decoupling): • The Question must NEVER use words describing the visual appearance (e.g., avoid "bent," "wet," "shiny," "red"). • The Options must use abstract concepts, coordinates, or codes (e.g., "Direction A," "High Pressure Zone," "Condition X") rather than visual descriptions
[12]

The question should seem unrelated to the image until the visual logic is cracked

Indispensability: • Upon reading the question text alone, a human should feel confused. The question should seem unrelated to the image until the visual logic is cracked
[13]

Uniqueness: • The answer must be objective and uniquely derived from [Image Evidence] + [Scientific Common Sense]
[14]

Trap Option

Strong Distractor Design: • Include a "Trap Option" that is factually correct in general knowledge but wrong in this specific context. This tests if the model is reasoning contextually or just retrieving memorized facts. Output Format Please generate the output in the following structure:
[15]

Visual Clue: [Describe the subtle detail]
[16]

Reasoning Chain: [Visual Clue] → [1st Order: Environmental Cause] → [2nd Order: Application to Question]
[17]

Question: [The stealthy, multi-step question]
[18]

[Correct Answer] B

Options: A. [Correct Answer] B. [Strong Distractor - Factually true elsewhere, false here] C. [Weak Distractor] D. [Weak Distractor] 5.Answer: [Correct Option] Figure 13: System prompt for constructing question-clue-answer triplets in Scientific Commonsense Reasoning. Question: In which country and within which first-level administrative region of that co...
[19]

The classical architectural style of the building
[20]

The road markings and vehicle styles
[21]

The presence of a clock tower
[22]

Claude Clue GT Clue

The suburban or small town setting. Claude Clue GT Clue
[23]

The two-story red brick building with a clock tower and verandas, characteristic of a late 19th-century Australian public building (the former St Arnaud Post Office)
[24]

The war memorial obelisk standing in front of the main building
[25]

The presence of large eucalyptus trees, which are native to Australia
[26]

The unique road layout where the street forks around the central buildings on a triangular island
[27]

The smaller, classical-style building next to the main one, identified as the St Arnaud Court House
[28]

Left-side driving road markings
[29]

Colonial brick building with clock tower
[30]

Eucalyptus-looking trees
[31]

Wide street and roundabout-style road divider
[32]

Australian-style street lamps
[33]

This two-story red-brick building with a clock tower and a corridor
[34]

A war memorial obelisk stands in front of the main building
[35]

Tall eucalyptus trees grow all around
[36]

The road layout is quite unique, with streets extending in a forked pattern around the central building situated on a triangular roundabout. Answer： Australia, Victoria Ground_truth: australia,victoria Answer：Australia, South Australia Answer： Australia, Western Australia Answer： Australia, Victoria Question: If the man in the white T-shirt decides to exi...
[37]

The area around the door is clear
[38]

Claude Clue GT Clue

There are no objects or people obstruct- ing the path to the door. Claude Clue GT Clue
[41]

A white, expandable baby gate or pet gate is placed in the lower half of the doorway, blocking the passage
[42]

Man in white T-shirt standing in kitchen area near a counter
[43]

Door located slightly left in the background with a window and a doorknob
[44]

Open floor space between man and door with no visible furniture or object blocking the path
[45]

Other furniture including chairs and table are further back and do not block the immediate door area
[46]

No people or obstacles physically standing in front of the door
[47]

A man in a white T-shirt is standing in the background of the room
[48]

To the right of the man, there is a doorway that appears to lead outside
[49]

Answer：No Ground_truth: No Answer: Yes Answer: Yes Answer：No Figure 14: Comparison of answer generation under different clue contexts

A white, expandable baby gate or pet gate is placed in the lower half of the doorway, blocking the passage. Answer：No Ground_truth: No Answer: Yes Answer: Yes Answer：No Figure 14: Comparison of answer generation under different clue contexts. We feed Claude-3.7 with visual clues from varying sources as additional context. Answer: Egypt,Cairo Governorate/ ...