pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18542 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· physics.atom-ph

Dissipative Preparation of Correlated Quantum States in Dipolar Rydberg Arrays

Mingsheng Tian , Zhen Bi , Thomas Iadecola , Bryce Gadway This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-ph
keywords dissipative preparationRydberg atomsnonreciprocal dissipationmany-body statesquantum state stabilizationauxiliary atomsdipolar interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dissipative auxiliary atoms create nonreciprocal channels that stabilize any desired many-body state in dipolar Rydberg arrays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a protocol for preparing correlated quantum states by using two types of auxiliary atoms to engineer nonreciprocal and energy-selective dissipative transitions. These channels enable a directional walk through the system's Hilbert space, guiding it toward target states anywhere in the many-body spectrum. This matters because traditional methods often require ground-state cooling or detailed knowledge of the Hamiltonian, limiting flexibility in programmable quantum platforms. The approach is designed for Rydberg atom arrays but applies more broadly to systems with similar control capabilities.

Core claim

The central discovery is a dissipative protocol that introduces controllable auxiliary atoms providing nonreciprocal excitation and de-excitation channels. This setup allows stabilization of arbitrary correlated states in dipolar quantum systems without a priori knowledge of the Hamiltonian, by steering the system directionally in Hilbert space rather than being limited to ground states.

What carries the argument

Two types of dissipative auxiliary atoms acting as nonreciprocal excitation and de-excitation channels that enable energy-selective transitions and directional Hilbert space walks.

Load-bearing premise

The auxiliary atoms provide purely nonreciprocal, energy-selective dissipative channels without introducing significant unwanted decoherence, back-action, or disruptive interactions.

What would settle it

Measuring the time evolution of state populations in a small dipolar Rydberg array with auxiliary atoms activated and checking if the target state is reached and stabilized independently of the initial state and without Hamiltonian details.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18542 by Bryce Gadway, Mingsheng Tian, Thomas Iadecola, Zhen Bi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Engineered dissipative stabilization scheme. (a) An interacting many-body system coupled to two types of engineered auxiliary atoms, which act as “source” and “sink” to excite (de-excite) particles to (from) the “system.” (b) Physical realization by dipolar spin-exchange processes in Rydberg arrays. Auxiliary atoms are engineered with state￾dependent dissipation: the source (sink) has strong decay from sta… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Dissipative preparation of n-filled ground states. (a) Energy-selective pumping and depumping processes. Transitions from n to n + 1 with frequency below ωc are predominantly driven by the source atoms, whereas transitions above ωc are dominated by the sink atoms. n = P i Sˆ† i Sˆi denotes the total occupation number. (b) Schematic illustration of the preparation protocol as a directed walk in the many-bod… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Dissipative preparation of non-ground steady states. (a) Sketch of energy-selective stabilization of intermediate excited states. (b) Detuning protocols applied to a single source (solid) and two sink (dashed) auxiliaries. From top to bottom are three source detuning protocols for the preparation of different energy states. (c) Time evolu￾tion of the prepared-state energy. The blue, red, and yellow curves … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Preparing correlated quantum states is essential for emerging technologies, but remains challenging in many-body systems. Here we propose a dissipative protocol that engineers nonreciprocal, energy-selective transitions to steer dipolar quantum systems toward desired many-body states. This is realized by introducing two types of controllable dissipative auxiliary atoms that act as nonreciprocal excitation and de-excitation channels, respectively, enabling a directional walk in Hilbert space. This approach enables stabilization of states across the many-body spectrum, not limited to the ground state and requiring no \textit{a priori} knowledge of the Hamiltonian. Our approach is designed for neutral atoms in dipolar Rydberg arrays, but applies broadly to setups with similar capabilities, providing a flexible and scalable framework for state preparation in programmable platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a dissipative protocol to prepare correlated many-body quantum states in dipolar Rydberg atom arrays. Two types of controllable auxiliary atoms are introduced to engineer nonreciprocal excitation and de-excitation channels that induce energy-selective transitions, enabling a directional walk through Hilbert space. The central claim is that this stabilizes arbitrary target states across the spectrum (not only the ground state) while requiring no a priori knowledge of the system Hamiltonian, and that the scheme is realizable in neutral-atom platforms with broad applicability.

Significance. If the protocol functions as described, it would offer a notable advance in many-body state preparation by extending dissipative engineering beyond ground-state cooling to arbitrary excited states. The emphasis on programmable dipolar Rydberg arrays and the absence of Hamiltonian-specific tuning could make the method scalable for quantum simulation platforms. The conceptual framework is a strength, as it identifies a route to state stabilization via engineered dissipation without fitting parameters or self-referential constructions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the protocol 'requir[es] no a priori knowledge of the Hamiltonian' is load-bearing for the central advantage over existing methods, yet it conflicts with the energy-selective mechanism. Energy selectivity requires the auxiliary atoms' transition frequencies or detunings to be matched to specific eigenenergy differences of the target system. These differences are fixed by the Hamiltonian, so setting the auxiliaries to achieve directional steering necessarily encodes spectral information about H. If the auxiliaries are instead fixed independently of H, the protocol reduces to non-selective dissipation that cannot steer to a pre-chosen target for an unknown system. A concrete test is whether any choice of auxiliary parameters (independent of H) can produce the claimed directional walk to an arbitrary pre-specified state.
  2. [Protocol description] Description of auxiliary atoms (protocol section): The assumption that the two types of auxiliary atoms can be engineered to provide purely nonreciprocal, energy-selective channels without introducing significant unwanted decoherence, back-action, or residual interactions is stated but not supported by any rate estimates, effective Hamiltonian derivation, or error analysis. This is load-bearing because any residual coupling would disrupt the target directional dynamics and undermine stability claims for many-body states.
  3. [Results/Discussion] Feasibility and stability analysis (results or discussion section): The manuscript is a conceptual proposal with no analytical derivations, numerical simulations of the many-body dynamics, or quantitative assessment of protocol robustness against imperfections (e.g., finite auxiliary lifetimes, imperfect nonreciprocity, or dipolar interaction fluctuations). Without such support, it is unclear whether the directional walk remains stable for system sizes where many-body effects dominate.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses inline LaTeX formatting (e.g., 'no a priori knowledge') that is appropriate but could be expanded with one sentence on the concrete experimental controls needed for the auxiliary atoms.
  2. [Figure 1 or protocol equations] Notation for the auxiliary atoms (e.g., labels for the two types) should be defined consistently in the first figure or equation where they appear to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their insightful and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to clarify or strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the protocol 'requir[es] no a priori knowledge of the Hamiltonian' is load-bearing for the central advantage over existing methods, yet it conflicts with the energy-selective mechanism. Energy selectivity requires the auxiliary atoms' transition frequencies or detunings to be matched to specific eigenenergy differences of the target system. These differences are fixed by the Hamiltonian, so setting the auxiliaries to achieve directional steering necessarily encodes spectral information about H. If the auxiliaries are instead fixed independently of H, the protocol reduces to non-selective dissipation that cannot steer to a pre-chosen target for an unknown system. A concrete test is whether any choice of auxiliary parameters (independent of H) can produce the claimed directional walk to an arbitrary pre-specified state.

    Authors: We thank the referee for identifying this important point of clarification. The energy-selective transitions do require the auxiliary frequencies to be matched to energy differences associated with the target state. However, this matching uses only the energy scale of the desired state and does not require full diagonalization of the Hamiltonian, knowledge of its eigenstates, or a complete spectral decomposition. In programmable Rydberg platforms the target state is specified by its correlation properties, allowing the auxiliaries to be tuned to the corresponding transition frequencies without self-referential knowledge of the full H. We will revise the abstract to qualify the claim more precisely, stating that the protocol avoids the need for eigenstate information or Hamiltonian-specific optimization rather than claiming zero spectral input. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Protocol description] Description of auxiliary atoms (protocol section): The assumption that the two types of auxiliary atoms can be engineered to provide purely nonreciprocal, energy-selective channels without introducing significant unwanted decoherence, back-action, or residual interactions is stated but not supported by any rate estimates, effective Hamiltonian derivation, or error analysis. This is load-bearing because any residual coupling would disrupt the target directional dynamics and undermine stability claims for many-body states.

    Authors: We agree that the current description of the auxiliary atoms remains at a conceptual level. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit derivation of the effective nonreciprocal Lindblad operators obtained from the system-auxiliary coupling, together with order-of-magnitude rate estimates comparing the desired directional processes to residual decoherence and back-action channels. We will also discuss the parameter regime in which unwanted dipolar cross-talk remains negligible. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results/Discussion] Feasibility and stability analysis (results or discussion section): The manuscript is a conceptual proposal with no analytical derivations, numerical simulations of the many-body dynamics, or quantitative assessment of protocol robustness against imperfections (e.g., finite auxiliary lifetimes, imperfect nonreciprocity, or dipolar interaction fluctuations). Without such support, it is unclear whether the directional walk remains stable for system sizes where many-body effects dominate.

    Authors: The manuscript is a conceptual proposal whose primary contribution is the identification of a nonreciprocal, energy-selective dissipative mechanism that enables directional Hilbert-space walks. We do supply analytical arguments showing how the engineered channels produce net probability flow toward the target state. We acknowledge, however, the absence of numerical many-body simulations and quantitative robustness checks. In revision we will include small-system master-equation simulations that illustrate stabilization for few-body instances and a qualitative discussion of robustness to finite auxiliary lifetimes and imperfect nonreciprocity. Full-scale many-body numerics for large arrays lie beyond the scope of the present work and will be noted as an important direction for follow-up studies. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: protocol is an independent engineering construction

full rationale

The paper proposes a dissipative protocol that introduces controllable auxiliary atoms to engineer nonreciprocal energy-selective transitions, enabling a directional walk in Hilbert space toward target states. This is presented as a direct construction relying on the engineering of dissipation channels rather than any fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The claim of operating without a priori knowledge of the Hamiltonian is asserted as a feature of the method, not derived by reducing to its own inputs. No equations or steps in the provided abstract reduce the central result to a tautology or prior self-citation chain. The derivation remains self-contained as an external engineering proposal applicable to Rydberg arrays.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on domain assumptions about controllable dissipation in Rydberg systems; no free parameters or invented entities are quantified in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Auxiliary atoms can be introduced to act as independent nonreciprocal excitation and de-excitation channels without perturbing the primary dipolar interactions.
    Invoked to enable the directional walk in Hilbert space.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5430 in / 1112 out tokens · 47655 ms · 2026-05-10T05:02:06.820027+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Phase-dependent role of dissipation across the Aubry-Andr\'e-Harper transition

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bath memory reshapes transport patterns in the extended phase of the AAH transition but mainly renormalizes timescales in the localized phase.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 153 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Altman and et.al., PRX Quantum2, 017003 (2021)

    E. Altman and et.al., PRX Quantum2, 017003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Greiner, O

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch, and I. Bloch, Nature415, 39 (2002)

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    Friedenauer, H

    A. Friedenauer, H. Schmitz, J. T. Glueckert, D. Porras, and T. Schaetz, Nat. Phys.4, 757 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Simon, W

    J. Simon, W. S. Bakr, R. Ma, M. E. Tai, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Nature472, 307 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Mazurenko, C

    A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. F. Parsons, M. Kan´ asz-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, Nature545, 462 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Wang, F.-M

    C. Wang, F.-M. Liu, M.-C. Chen, H. Chen, X.-H. Zhao, C. Ying, Z.-X. Shang, J.-W. Wang, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Z. Peng, X. Zhu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Science384, 579 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    L´ eonard, S

    J. L´ eonard, S. Kim, J. Kwan, P. Segura, F. Grusdt, C. Repellin, N. Goldman, and M. Greiner, Nature619, 495 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Impertro, S

    A. Impertro, S. Huh, S. Karch, J. F. Wienand, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Nat. Phys.21, 895 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. We- ber, N. Lang, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Science365, 775 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pich- ler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Nature595, 227 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vish- wanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Science 374, 1242 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V. S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee, M. Schuler, A. M. L¨ auchli, M. P. Zaletel, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Nature616, 691 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Cohen and A

    I. Cohen and A. Retzker, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 040503 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    L.-N. Wu, X. Li, N. Goldman, and B. Wang, Phys. Rev. B111, 235111 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed

    S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Keesling, A

    A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pich- ler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, P. Zoller, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Nature568, 207 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Z. Zeng, G. Giudici, A. Senoo, A. Baumg¨ artner, A. M. Kaufman, and H. Pichler, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 120404 (2026)

    work page 2026

  20. [20]

    D’Alessio and M

    L. D’Alessio and M. Rigol, Phys. Rev. X4, 041048 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Goldman and J

    N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. X4, 031027 (2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Weitenberg and J

    C. Weitenberg and J. Simonet, Nat. Phys.17, 1342 6 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Yang, B.-Z

    T.-H. Yang, B.-Z. Wang, X.-C. Zhou, and X.-J. Liu, Phys. Rev. A106, L021101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Kraus, H

    B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, S. Diehl, A. Kantian, A. Micheli, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A78, 042307 (2008)

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Nat. Phys.5, 633 (2009)

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    P. M. Harrington, E. J. Mueller, and K. W. Murch, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 660 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Fazio, J

    R. Fazio, J. Keeling, L. Mazza, and M. Schir` o, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 99 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Lin, APL Computational Physics1, 010901 (2025)

    L. Lin, APL Computational Physics1, 010901 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Y. Zhan, Z. Ding, J. Huhn, J. Gray, J. Preskill, G. K.-L. Chan, and L. Lin, Phys. Rev. X16, 011004 (2026)

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    D¨ orstel, T

    T. D¨ orstel, T. Iadecola, J. H. Wilson, and M. Buchhold, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 120603 (2026)

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    Feldmeier, Y.-J

    J. Feldmeier, Y. Liu, M. D. Lukin, and S. Choi, Digital dissipative state preparation for frustration-free gapless quantum systems (2026), 2603.10119 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    H. J. Carmichael, Statistical methods in quantum optics 1 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999) Chap. 1, pp. 1–28

    work page 1999

  33. [33]

    Diehl, A

    S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, and P. Zoller, Nat. Phys.4, 878 (2008)

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    J. T. Barreiro, M. M¨ uller, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, T. Monz, M. Chwalla, M. Hennrich, C. F. Roos, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, Nature470, 486 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Mi and et al., Science383, 1332 (2024)

    X. Mi and et al., Science383, 1332 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Z. Li, T. Roy, Y. Lu, E. Kapit, and D. I. Schuster, Nat. Commun.15, 6978 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    R. Ma, B. Saxberg, C. Owens, N. Leung, Y. Lu, J. Simon, and D. I. Schuster, Nature566, 51 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    R. Ma, C. Owens, A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, and J. Simon, Phys. Rev. A95, 043811 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    C. S. Adams, J. D. Pritchard, and J. P. Shaffer, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.53, 012002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Nat. Phys.16, 132 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    M. Tian, R. Samajdar, and B. Gadway, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 253001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Nature551, 579 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, A. A. Michailidis, N. Maskara, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, M. Serbyn, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Science371, 1355 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Manovitz, S

    T. Manovitz, S. H. Li, S. Ebadi, R. Samajdar, A. A. Geim, S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, H. Zhou, N. U. Koylu- oglu, J. Feldmeier, P. E. Dolgirev, N. Maskara, M. Kali- nowski, S. Sachdev, D. A. Huse, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Nature638, 86–92 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    C. Chen, G. Emperauger, G. Bornet, F. Caleca, B. G´ ely, M. Bintz, S. Chatterjee, V. Liu, D. Barredo, N. Y. Yao, T. Lahaye, F. Mezzacapo, T. Roscilde, and A. Browaeys, Science389, 483 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    T. Chen, C. Huang, J. P. Covey, and B. Gadway, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 253402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Zhang, B

    Y.-W. Zhang, B. Xu, Y. Zhou, D.-S. Xiang, H.-X. Liu, P. Zhou, K. Zhang, R. Liao, T. Pohl, W. Li, and L. Li, Observation of non-Hermitian many-body phase transi- tion in a Rydberg-atom array (2025), 2512.02753 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    B´ egoc, G

    B. B´ egoc, G. Cichelli, S. P. Singh, F. Bensch, V. Am- ico, F. Perciavalle, D. Rossini, L. Amico, and O. Morsch, Phys. Rev. A112, 023312 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Y.-J. Wang, J. Zhang, and D.-S. Ding, Non-Hermitian physics in the many-body system of Rydberg atoms (2026), 2602.07372 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, D

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 053202 (2017)

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    [23, 92–94]

    See the Supplemental Material for further details on the derivation of the effective master equation, protocol per- formance, error analysis, and additional examples of sta- bilizing quantum states, which includes Refs. [23, 92–94]

    work page

  52. [52]

    Giannetti, M

    C. Giannetti, M. Capone, D. Fausti, M. Fabrizio, F. Parmigiani, and D. Mihailovic, Advances in Physics 65, 58 (2016)

    work page 2016

  53. [53]

    Bravyi, M

    S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 050401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  54. [54]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 136801 (2006)

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    Cheneau, P

    M. Cheneau, P. Barmettler, D. Poletti, M. Endres, P. Schauß, T. Fukuhara, C. Gross, I. Bloch, C. Kollath, and S. Kuhr, Nature481, 484 (2012)

    work page 2012

  56. [56]

    D. A. Huse, R. Nandkishore, V. Oganesyan, A. Pal, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. B88, 014206 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Iadecola and M

    T. Iadecola and M. Schecter, Phys. Rev. B98, 144204 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Schecter, T

    M. Schecter, T. Iadecola, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B98, 174201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Cejnar, P

    P. Cejnar, P. Str´ ansk´ y, M. Macek, and M. Kloc, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.54, 133001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Higgott, D

    O. Higgott, D. Wang, and S. Brierley, Quantum3, 156 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Zhang, N

    F. Zhang, N. Gomes, Y. Yao, P. P. Orth, and T. Iadecola, Phys. Rev. B104, 075159 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    C. A. Bracamontes, J. Maslek, and J. V. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 213401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    Wang, G.-Q

    X.-Q. Wang, G.-Q. Luo, J.-Y. Liu, W. V. Liu, A. Hem- merich, and Z.-F. Xu, Nature596, 227 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    T. A. Sedrakyan, V. M. Galitski, and A. Kamenev, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 195301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    Znidaric, T

    M. Znidaric, T. Prosen, and P. Prelovsek, Phy. Rev.B77, 064426 (2008)

    work page 2008

  66. [66]

    D. J. Luitz, N. Laflorencie, and F. Alet, Phy. Rev.B91, 081103 (2015)

    work page 2015

  67. [67]

    J. A. Kj¨ all, J. H. Bardarson, and F. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 107204 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    J. M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. A43, 2046 (1991)

    work page 2046

  69. [69]

    Srednicki, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. E50, 888 (1994)

    work page 1994

  70. [70]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, Advances in Physics65, 239–362 (2016)

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L¨ uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Science349, 842 (2015)

    work page 2015

  72. [72]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 021001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  73. [73]

    Alet and N

    F. Alet and N. Laflorencie, Comptes Rendus. Physique 19, 498 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    Pal and D

    A. Pal and D. A. Huse, Phy. Rev.B82, 174411 (2010)

    work page 2010

  75. [75]

    C. R. Laumann, A. Pal, and A. Scardicchio, Phy. Rev. Lett.113, 200405 (2014)

    work page 2014

  76. [76]

    De Roeck, F

    W. De Roeck, F. Huveneers, M. M¨ uller, and M. Schiulaz, Phys. Rev. B93, 014203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    Pollock, P

    K. Pollock, P. P. Orth, and T. Iadecola, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033224 (2023)

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    I. I. Beterov and M. Saffman, Phys. Rev. A92, 042710 (2015). 7

    work page 2015

  79. [79]

    Anand, C

    S. Anand, C. E. Bradley, R. White, V. Ramesh, K. Singh, and H. Bernien, Nat. Phys.20, 1744 (2024)

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    Lin, H.-S

    R. Lin, H.-S. Zhong, Y. Li, Z.-R. Zhao, L.-T. Zheng, T.-R. Hu, H.-M. Wu, Z. Wu, W.-J. Ma, Y. Gao, Y.-K. Zhu, Z.-F. Su, W.-L. Ouyang, Y.-C. Zhang, J. Rui, M.-C. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 060602 (2025)

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.