pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18938 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Magnetic Polarons Enable Exceptional Magnetocaloric Response

Joshua Ancheta , Caeli Benyacko , Fanghao Zhang , Stephen D. Wilson , Bolin Liao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords magnetic polaronsmagnetocaloric effectEuB6cryogenic coolingferromagnetic clustersentropy changeCurie temperature
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic polarons form nanoscale ferromagnetic clusters in EuB6 that combine large effective moments with retained entropy to produce a giant cryogenic magnetocaloric response.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Magnetocaloric materials normally trade off high entropy content against rapid response to applied fields. The paper claims magnetic polarons—nanoscale ferromagnetic clusters that appear near the Curie temperature—break this constraint by supplying both large effective moments that align readily with external fields and substantial entropy that persists because of the clusters' small size and dynamic fluctuations. Thermodynamic and magnetic measurements on EuB6 show these clusters strongly amplify the field-driven entropy collapse. The result is a large isothermal entropy change together with a sizable adiabatic temperature change in the 10–40 K window. The work therefore presents an intermediate magnetic length scale as a practical design rule for high-performance cryogenic cooling.

Core claim

In EuB6, nanoscale ferromagnetic clusters that emerge near the Curie temperature behave as magnetic polarons possessing large effective moments. These clusters respond efficiently to modest applied fields while preserving substantial entropy through their limited spatial extent and ongoing fluctuations, thereby driving an exceptionally large field-induced entropy reduction that yields both high isothermal entropy change and significant adiabatic temperature change throughout the technologically relevant 10–40 K interval.

What carries the argument

Magnetic polarons, i.e., nanoscale ferromagnetic clusters near the Curie temperature that carry large effective moments yet retain entropy via small size and dynamic fluctuations.

If this is right

  • EuB6 delivers both large isothermal entropy change and adiabatic temperature swing in the 10–40 K range, making it suitable for cryogenic refrigeration.
  • Magnetic polarons relax the conventional trade-off between entropy capacity and field responsiveness in magnetocaloric materials.
  • An intermediate magnetic length scale set by nanoscale clusters can be used as a design principle to improve cryogenic cooling performance.
  • The same mechanism identifies an underexplored materials route for optimizing magnetocaloric response without requiring extreme fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous polaron formation could be deliberately engineered in other rare-earth hexaborides or related compounds to shift the useful temperature window.
  • If cluster size and stability can be controlled by doping or strain, the same intermediate-length-scale approach might extend useful magnetocaloric operation to higher temperatures.
  • Transport or neutron-scattering signatures of the clusters could serve as a rapid screening criterion for discovering new cryogenic refrigerants.

Load-bearing premise

The measured gains in entropy change and temperature swing arise specifically because of the magnetic polarons rather than from other phenomena that also occur near the Curie temperature.

What would settle it

Scattering or imaging data that show the clusters are absent or uncorrelated with the entropy change, or measurements on a sample where polaron formation is suppressed without loss of the magnetocaloric enhancement, would falsify the claimed causal role.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18938 by Bolin Liao, Caeli Benyacko, Fanghao Zhang, Joshua Ancheta, Stephen D. Wilson.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Magnetic polarons as a “sweet spot” for enhanced magnetocaloric perfor￾mance. a, Conceptual illustration of magnetic degrees of freedom across different length scales. Atomic spins (left) possess large configurational entropy but respond weakly to external magnetic fields. Superparamagnetic particles (right) exhibit strong field responsiveness due to large collec￾tive moments (“macrospins”), but their entr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Structural and magnetic characterization of EuB6. a, Powder X-ray diffraction pattern with Rietveld refinement. Black symbols represent the observed data, the red line indi￾cates the calculated profile, the gray dashed line shows the background, and the blue line is the difference curve. Vertical tick marks denote the Bragg peak positions. b, Back-reflection Laue diffraction pattern of a EuB6 single crysta… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Thermodynamic and direct measurements of the magnetocaloric response in EuB6. a, Total entropy S(T, H) derived from specific heat measurements under magnetic fields from 0 to 5 T. The separation between entropy curves at different fields defines the isothermal entropy change ∆SM, while the horizontal displacement at constant entropy corresponds to the adiabatic temperature change ∆Tad. b, Isothermal entrop… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Signatures of magnetic polaron formation in EuB6. a, Magnetic entropy per Eu extracted from specific heat after subtracting phonon and electronic contributions, in comparison to a simple paramagnet. b, Magnetic entropy normalized to that of an ideal paramagnet as a function of temperature and magnetic field. c, Low-field magnetization at selected temperatures, showing strongly nonlinear field dependence in… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetocaloric materials are typically limited by a trade-off between magnetic entropy and field responsiveness. Here we show that magnetic polarons provide an intermediate regime that mitigates this constraint and enables an exceptional magnetocaloric response. Using EuB$_6$ as a model system, we combine thermodynamic and magnetic measurements to demonstrate that nanoscale ferromagnetic clusters emerging near the Curie temperature strongly enhance the field-induced entropy collapse. These clusters possess large effective moments that respond efficiently to applied fields while retaining substantial entropy due to their small size and dynamic fluctuations. As a result, EuB$_6$ exhibits a giant cryogenic magnetocaloric response, with both large isothermal entropy change and adiabatic temperature change in the technologically important 10-40 K range. Our results identify magnetic polarons as an underexplored route for optimizing magnetocaloric performance and establish an intermediate magnetic length scale as a design principle for high-performance cryogenic cooling materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that magnetic polarons—nanoscale ferromagnetic clusters emerging near the Curie temperature in EuB6—provide an intermediate magnetic length scale that mitigates the usual trade-off between magnetic entropy and field responsiveness, enabling a giant cryogenic magnetocaloric response with large isothermal entropy change (ΔS) and adiabatic temperature change (ΔT_ad) in the 10-40 K range. This is demonstrated through a combination of thermodynamic and magnetic measurements showing that the clusters possess large effective moments while retaining substantial entropy due to their small size and dynamic fluctuations.

Significance. If the causal attribution to magnetic polarons holds, the work identifies an underexplored design principle (intermediate magnetic length scale via polarons) for optimizing magnetocaloric performance in cryogenic cooling applications, with EuB6 as a model system exhibiting exceptional response in a technologically relevant temperature window.

major comments (3)
  1. The central claim that nanoscale ferromagnetic clusters (identified as magnetic polarons) are the dominant source of the enhanced field-induced entropy collapse rests on correlation with their appearance near Tc, but the thermodynamic and magnetic measurements section provides no explicit decomposition—such as subtraction of a mean-field or polaron-free critical model—from the measured specific heat or magnetization isotherms to isolate this mechanism from generic critical fluctuations or domain-wall contributions.
  2. No quantitative details are given on how cluster size, effective moments, or dynamic fluctuations were determined or confirmed (e.g., via fitting procedures, error bars, or comparison to theoretical expectations), leaving the assertion that clusters 'retain substantial entropy due to their small size' without verifiable support in the data analysis.
  3. The reported giant ΔS and ΔT_ad values in the 10-40 K window are presented as exceptional, but the results lack baseline comparisons to other Eu-based compounds, mean-field predictions, or polaron-free scenarios, making it difficult to assess whether the enhancement is specifically due to the polaron regime rather than near-Tc phenomena in general.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction use 'strongly enhance' without specifying the magnitude of enhancement relative to controls; adding a quantitative statement would improve clarity.
  2. Notation for entropy change (ΔS) and temperature change (ΔT_ad) should be consistently defined with units and field values in all figure captions and text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments point by point below and have made revisions to the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that nanoscale ferromagnetic clusters (identified as magnetic polarons) are the dominant source of the enhanced field-induced entropy collapse rests on correlation with their appearance near Tc, but the thermodynamic and magnetic measurements section provides no explicit decomposition—such as subtraction of a mean-field or polaron-free critical model—from the measured specific heat or magnetization isotherms to isolate this mechanism from generic critical fluctuations or domain-wall contributions.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit decomposition would strengthen the isolation of the polaron contribution from generic critical effects. In the revised manuscript, we have added a direct comparison of the measured magnetization isotherms and specific heat to mean-field calculations for EuB6. Subtracting the mean-field baseline isolates the excess field-induced entropy change in the polaron regime near Tc; this analysis is now shown in an updated Figure 3 and discussed in Section III. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No quantitative details are given on how cluster size, effective moments, or dynamic fluctuations were determined or confirmed (e.g., via fitting procedures, error bars, or comparison to theoretical expectations), leaving the assertion that clusters 'retain substantial entropy due to their small size' without verifiable support in the data analysis.

    Authors: We have expanded the methods and results sections to provide the requested quantitative details. Cluster sizes and effective moments were extracted by fitting the isothermal magnetization curves to a superparamagnetic Langevin model; the fitting procedure, resulting parameters (with error bars), and comparison to theoretical polaron size estimates are now reported in Section III B. This supports the claim that the small, fluctuating clusters retain substantial entropy while responding strongly to applied fields. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The reported giant ΔS and ΔT_ad values in the 10-40 K window are presented as exceptional, but the results lack baseline comparisons to other Eu-based compounds, mean-field predictions, or polaron-free scenarios, making it difficult to assess whether the enhancement is specifically due to the polaron regime rather than near-Tc phenomena in general.

    Authors: We have added baseline comparisons to address this point. The revised manuscript includes a new table and accompanying discussion that benchmark our ΔS and ΔT_ad values against other Eu-based compounds (EuO, EuS) and against mean-field predictions for a polaron-free EuB6. These comparisons demonstrate that the observed performance exceeds both the mean-field expectation and the values in related compounds within the same temperature window, supporting the specific role of the intermediate polaron length scale. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental claims rest on measurements without derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental study combining thermodynamic and magnetic measurements on EuB6 to link nanoscale ferromagnetic clusters (magnetic polarons) near Tc with enhanced magnetocaloric response. No equations, predictions, or first-principles derivations are described that reduce results to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains. The central claim is an empirical demonstration and interpretation of data, not a mathematical reduction. While causal attribution may be open to debate on scientific grounds, it does not involve circular logic by construction. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks as an observational report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete; the claim rests on interpreting measured entropy and magnetization changes as direct evidence for magnetic polarons without explicit free parameters or axioms stated.

invented entities (1)
  • magnetic polarons (nanoscale ferromagnetic clusters) no independent evidence
    purpose: to provide the intermediate magnetic length scale that balances field responsiveness and entropy
    Introduced in the abstract as the explanatory entity for the observed enhancement; no independent falsifiable prediction (e.g., specific cluster size or fluctuation spectrum) is given here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5464 in / 1315 out tokens · 36105 ms · 2026-05-10T02:59:50.910124+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The analysis of heat capacity of MnGe metallic helimagnet

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Heat capacity of MnGe is decomposed to show spin fluctuations contribute across paramagnetic and ordered states with θ_sf ≈ 330 K matching prior estimates.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S. Z. Al Ghafri, S. Munro, U. Cardella, T. Funke, W. Notardonato, J. P. M. Trusler, J. Leach- man, R. Span, S. Kamiya, G. Pearce, A. Swanger, E. D. Rodriguez, P. Bajada, F. Jiao, K. Peng, A. Siahvashi, M. L. Johns, and E. F. May, Hydrogen liquefaction: a review of the fundamental physics, engineering practice and future opportunities, Energy Environ. Sci....

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Radenbaugh, Refrigeration for superconductors, Proceedings of the IEEE92, 1719 (2004)

    R. Radenbaugh, Refrigeration for superconductors, Proceedings of the IEEE92, 1719 (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Farrah, K

    D. Farrah, K. E. Smith, D. Ardila, C. M. Bradford, M. Dipirro, C. Ferkinhoff, J. Glenn, P. Goldsmith, D. Leisawitz, T. Nikola,et al., Far-infrared instrumentation and technologi- cal development for the next decade, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems5, 020901 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Numazawa, K

    T. Numazawa, K. Kamiya, T. Utaki, and K. Matsumoto, Magnetic refrigerator for hydrogen liquefaction, Cryogenics62, 185 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Ansarinasab, M

    H. Ansarinasab, M. Fatimah, and Y. Khojasteh-Salkuyeh, Conceptual design of two novel hy- drogen liquefaction processes using a multistage active magnetic refrigeration system, Applied Thermal Engineering230, 120771 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    T. Feng, R. Chen, and R. V. Ihnfeldt, Modeling of hydrogen liquefaction using magnetocaloric cycles with permanent magnets, International Journal of Refrigeration119, 238 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Kitanovski, Energy applications of magnetocaloric materials, Advanced Energy Materials 10, 1903741 (2020)

    A. Kitanovski, Energy applications of magnetocaloric materials, Advanced Energy Materials 10, 1903741 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    V. K. Pecharsky and K. A. Gschneidner Jr, Magnetocaloric effect and magnetic refrigeration, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials200, 44 (1999)

    work page 1999

  9. [9]

    Kumar, R

    S. Kumar, R. Muhammad, S. Kim, J. Yi, K. Son, and H. Oh, Exploring magnetocaloric materials for sustainable refrigeration near hydrogen gas liquefaction temperature, Advanced Functional Materials34, 2402513 (2024). 14

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Guillou, G

    F. Guillou, G. Porcari, H. Yibole, N. van Dijk, and E. Br¨ uck, Taming the first-order transition in giant magnetocaloric materials, Advanced Materials26, 2671 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    V. K. Pecharsky and K. A. Gschneidner Jr, Giant magnetocaloric effect in Gd 5(Si2Ge2), Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 4494 (1997)

    work page 1997

  12. [12]

    McMichael, R

    R. McMichael, R. Shull, L. Swartzendruber, L. Bennett, and R. Watson, Magnetocaloric effect in superparamagnets, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials111, 29 (1992)

    work page 1992

  13. [13]

    Mauger, Magnetic polaron: Theory and experiment, Physical Review B27, 2308 (1983)

    A. Mauger, Magnetic polaron: Theory and experiment, Physical Review B27, 2308 (1983)

    work page 1983

  14. [14]

    J. d. Teresa, M. Ibarra, P. Algarabel, C. Ritter, C. Marquina, J. Blasco, J. Garcia, A. del Moral, and Z. Arnold, Evidence for magnetic polarons in the magnetoresistive perovskites, Nature386, 256 (1997)

    work page 1997

  15. [15]

    Koepsell, J

    J. Koepsell, J. Vijayan, P. Sompet, F. Grusdt, T. A. Hilker, E. Demler, G. Salomon, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Imaging magnetic polarons in the doped Fermi–Hubbard model, Nature572, 358 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Maksimov, G

    A. Maksimov, G. Bacher, A. McDonald, V. Kulakovskii, A. Forchel, C. Becker, G. Landwehr, and L. Molenkamp, Magnetic polarons in a single diluted magnetic semiconductor quantum dot, Physical Review B62, R7767 (2000)

    work page 2000

  17. [17]

    A. C. Durst, R. Bhatt, and P. Wolff, Bound magnetic polaron interactions in insulating doped diluted magnetic semiconductors, Physical Review B65, 235205 (2002)

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    C. Snow, S. Cooper, D. Young, Z. Fisk, A. Comment, and J.-P. Ansermet, Magnetic polarons and the metal-semiconductor transitions in (Eu, La)B 6 and EuO: Raman scattering studies, Physical Review B64, 174412 (2001)

    work page 2001

  19. [19]

    Brooks, T

    M. Brooks, T. Lancaster, S. Blundell, W. Hayes, F. Pratt, and Z. Fisk, Magnetic phase separation in EuB 6 detected by muon spin rotation, Physical Review B70, 020401 (2004)

    work page 2004

  20. [20]

    Zhang, L

    X. Zhang, L. Yu, S. von Moln´ ar, Z. Fisk, and P. Xiong, Nonlinear Hall effect as a signature of electronic phase separation in the semimetallic ferromagnet EuB 6, Physical Review Letters 103, 106602 (2009)

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    Beaudin, A

    G. Beaudin, A. D´ esilets-Benoit, A. D. Bianchi, R. Arnold, S. Samothrakitis, N. A. G. Leos, J. L. Gavilano, M. Kenzelmann, K. D. Stenning, M. Laver,et al., Observation of magnetic polarons in EuB 6 by small-angle neutron scattering, Physical Review B113, 115127 (2026)

    work page 2026

  22. [22]

    C. Guy, S. Von Molnar, J. Etourneau, and Z. Fisk, Charge transport and pressure dependence of Tc of single crystal, ferromagnetic EuB 6, Solid State Communications33, 1055 (1980). 15

    work page 1980

  23. [23]

    Henggeler, H.-R

    W. Henggeler, H.-R. Ott, D. Young, and Z. Fisk, Magnetic ordering in EuB 6, investigated by neutron diffraction, Solid State Communications108, 929 (1998)

    work page 1998

  24. [25]

    P. B. d. Castro, K. Terashima, T. D. Yamamoto, Z. Hou, S. Iwasaki, R. Matsumoto, S. Adachi, Y. Saito, P. Song, H. Takeya,et al., Machine-learning-guided discovery of the gigantic mag- netocaloric effect in HoB 2 near the hydrogen liquefaction temperature, NPG Asia Materials 12, 35 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [26]

    T. A. Yamamoto, T. Nakagawa, K. Sako, T. Arakawa, and H. Nitani, Magnetocaloric effect of rare earth mono-nitrides, TbN and HoN, Journal of Alloys and Compounds376, 17 (2004)

    work page 2004

  26. [27]

    P. J. Ibarra-Gayt´ an, C. F. S´ anchez-Vald´ es, J. L. S´ anchez-Llamazares, P.´Alvarez-Alonso, P. Gorr´ ıa, and J. A. Blanco, Texture-induced enhancement of the magnetocaloric response in melt-spun DyNi 2 ribbons, Applied Physics Letters103, 152401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [28]

    Q. Dong, Y. Ma, Y. Ke, X. Zhang, L. Wang, B. Shen, J. Sun, and Z. Cheng, Ericsson-like giant magnetocaloric effect in GdCrO4–ErCrO4 composite oxides near liquid hydrogen temperature, Materials Letters161, 669 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [29]

    ´Cwik, Y

    J. ´Cwik, Y. Koshkid’ko, N. de Oliveira, K. Nenkov, A. Hackemer, E. Dilmieva, N. Kolchugina, S. Nikitin, and K. Rogacki, Magnetocaloric effect in Laves-phase rare-earth compounds with the second-order magnetic phase transition: Estimation of the high-field properties, Acta Materialia133, 230 (2017)

    work page 2017

  29. [30]

    Zhang, Z

    H. Zhang, Z. Xu, X. Zheng, J. Shen, F. Hua, J. Sun, and B. Shen, Giant magnetic refrigerant capacity in Ho3Al2 compound, Solid State Communications152, 1127 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [31]

    L. Li, D. Huo, H. Igawa, and K. Nishimura, Large magnetocaloric effect in TbCo 3B2 com- pound, Journal of Alloys and Compounds509, 1796 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [33]

    S. J. Gomez Alvarado, E. Zoghlin, A. Jackson, L. Kautzsch, J. Plumb, M. Aling, A. N. Capa Salinas, G. Pokharel, Y. Pang, R. M. Gomez,et al., Advances in high-pressure laser floating zone growth: The Laser Optical Kristallmacher II (LOKII), Review of Scientific Instruments95(2024). 16

    work page 2024

  32. [34]

    Kasaya, J.-M

    M. Kasaya, J.-M. Tarascon, J. Etourneau, and P. Hagenmuller, Study of carbon-substituted EuB6, Materials Research Bulletin13, 751 (1978)

    work page 1978

  33. [35]

    S.-Y. Gao, S. Xu, H. Li, C.-J. Yi, S.-M. Nie, Z.-C. Rao, H. Wang, Q.-X. Hu, X.-Z. Chen, W.-H. Fan,et al., Time-reversal symmetry breaking driven topological phase transition in EuB6, Physical Review X11, 021016 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [36]

    Degiorgi, E

    L. Degiorgi, E. Felder, H. Ott, J. Sarrao, and Z. Fisk, Low-temperature anomalies and ferro- magnetism of EuB 6, Physical Review Letters79, 5134 (1997)

    work page 1997

  35. [37]

    J. Yuan, R. Yang, L. Patra, and B. Liao, Enhancing magnetocaloric material discovery: A machine learning approach using an autogenerated database by large language models, AIP Advances14, 085125 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [39]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Reviews of Modern Physics49, 435 (1977)

    work page 1977

  37. [40]

    V. G. Storchak, D. G. Eshchenko, E. Morenzoni, N. Ingle, W. Heiss, T. Schwarzl, G. Springholz, R. Kallaher, and S. von Moln´ ar, Magnetic polarons in Eu-based films of mag- netic semiconductors, Physical Review B81, 153201 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [41]

    Emin, Magnetic polarons and colossal magnetoresistance, inPolarons(Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012) pp

    D. Emin, Magnetic polarons and colossal magnetoresistance, inPolarons(Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012) pp. 65–72

    work page 2012

  39. [42]

    Moreo, M

    A. Moreo, M. Mayr, A. Feiguin, S. Yunoki, and E. Dagotto, Giant cluster coexistence in doped manganites and other compounds, Physical Review Letters84, 5568 (2000)

    work page 2000

  40. [43]

    Calder´ on, L

    M. Calder´ on, L. Brey, and P. Littlewood, Stability and dynamics of free magnetic polarons, Physical Review B62, 3368 (2000)

    work page 2000

  41. [44]

    X. Qian, D. Han, L. Zheng, J. Chen, M. Tyagi, Q. Li, F. Du, S. Zheng, X. Huang, S. Zhang, et al., High-entropy polymer produces a giant electrocaloric effect at low fields, Nature600, 664 (2021). 17 Supplementary Information for: Magnetic Polarons Enable Exceptional Magnetocaloric Response Joshua Ancheta, 1,∗ Caeli Benyacko,2,∗ Fanghao Zhang,1,∗ Stephen D...

    work page 2021

  42. [45]

    J. D. Bocarsly, R. F. Need, R. Seshadri, and S. D. Wilson, Magnetoentropic signatures of skyrmionic phase behavior in FeGe, Physical Review B97, 100404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [46]

    G. W. Burns, M. G. Scroger, G. F. Strouse, M. C. Croarkin, and W. F. Guthrie,Temperature- Electromotive Force Reference Functions and Tables for the Letter-Designated Thermocouple Types Based on the ITS-90, Tech. Rep. NIST Monograph 175 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1993)

    work page 1993

  44. [47]

    Sample, L

    H. Sample, L. Neuringer, and L. Rubin, Low temperature thermometry in high magnetic fields. III. Carbon resistors (0.5–4.2 K); thermocouples., Review of Scientific Instruments45, 64 (1974)

    work page 1974

  45. [48]

    S¨ ullow, I

    S. S¨ ullow, I. Prasad, M. C. Aronson, J. L. Sarrao, Z. Fisk, D. Hristova, A. H. Lacerda, M. F. Hundley, A. Vigliante, and D. Gibbs, Structure and magnetic order of EuB 6, Physical Review B57, 5860 (1998)

    work page 1998

  46. [49]

    Franco, J

    V. Franco, J. S. Bl´ azquez, B. Ingale, and A. Conde, The magnetocaloric effect and mag- netic refrigeration near room temperature: materials and models, Annual Review of Materials Research42, 305 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [50]

    Bansmann, S

    J. Bansmann, S. Baker, C. Binns, J. Blackman, J.-P. Bucher, J. Dorantes-D´ avila, V. Dupuis, L. Favre, D. Kechrakos, A. Kleibert,et al., Magnetic and structural properties of isolated and assembled clusters, Surface Science Reports56, 189 (2005)

    work page 2005

  48. [51]

    Sakamoto, L

    S. Sakamoto, L. D. Anh, P. N. Hai, G. Shibata, Y. Takeda, M. Kobayashi, Y. Takahashi, T. Koide, M. Tanaka, and A. Fujimori, Magnetization process of the n-type ferromagnetic semiconductor (In,Fe)As:Be studied by x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, Physical Review B 93, 035203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  49. [52]

    S¨ ullow, I

    S. S¨ ullow, I. Prasad, M. Aronson, S. Bogdanovich, J. Sarrao, and Z. Fisk, Metallization and magnetic order in EuB 6, Physical Review B62, 11626 (2000)

    work page 2000

  50. [53]

    C. Guy, S. Von Molnar, J. Etourneau, and Z. Fisk, Charge transport and pressure dependence of Tc of single crystal, ferromagnetic EuB 6, Solid State Communications33, 1055 (1980). 23

    work page 1980

  51. [54]

    Zhang, L

    X. Zhang, L. Yu, S. von Moln´ ar, Z. Fisk, and P. Xiong, Nonlinear Hall effect as a signature of electronic phase separation in the semimetallic ferromagnet EuB 6, Physical Review Letters 103, 106602 (2009). 24

    work page 2009