pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21583 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🧮 math-ph · math.AP· math.MP· math.PR

Derivation of Gibbs measure from Gibbs state with the fractional Bessel interaction in Two Dimensions

Phan Th\`anh Nam , Rongchan Zhu , Xiangchan Zhu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 13:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph math.APmath.MPmath.PR
keywords Gibbs measurefractional Bessel potentialquantum Bose gasrenormalizationtwo-dimensional torusreduced density matricesclassical limitgrand-canonical ensemble
0
0 comments X

The pith

The classical Gibbs measure for fractional Bessel potentials on the two-torus arises as the limit of a renormalized quantum Bose gas for all 3/2 < β ≤ 2.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the classical Gibbs measure on the two-dimensional torus associated with the fractional Bessel potential can be obtained from a grand-canonical quantum Bose gas with the same interaction. This holds even when the potential is not summable and the usual self-energy diverges, which occurs for the full range 3/2 < β ≤ 2. The derivation proceeds by renormalizing the zero mode with a centered number-fluctuation term, followed by a high-frequency remainder analysis that produces low-frequency localization. As a result, the quantum relative free energy converges to the classical fractional-Bessel free energy and the reduced density matrices converge to those of the limiting measure. This provides a rigorous passage from quantum to classical statistical mechanics for these singular nonlocal interactions.

Core claim

We derive the classical Gibbs measure on T² associated with the fractional Bessel interaction potential v̂_β(k)=⟨k⟩^{-β} from a renormalized grand-canonical quantum Bose gas with the same interaction. Our result covers the whole range 3/2 < β ≤ 2, where v̂_β(k) is not summable and the quantum model cannot be written in the usual density-square form, as the associated self-energy diverges. We therefore need to renormalize the zero mode by a centered number-fluctuation term and then develop a detailed analysis for the high-frequency remainders. All this allows us to implement a low-frequency localization and obtain the convergence of the quantum relative free energy to the classical fractional

What carries the argument

Zero-mode renormalization by a centered number-fluctuation term combined with high-frequency remainder estimates that produce low-frequency localization.

If this is right

  • The quantum relative free energy converges to the classical fractional-Bessel free energy after renormalization.
  • The reduced density matrices of the quantum model converge to the one-particle and higher marginals of the classical Gibbs measure.
  • The convergence holds uniformly across the entire interval 3/2 < β ≤ 2 where the potential fails to be summable.
  • Low-frequency localization follows once the high-frequency remainders are controlled.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same renormalization strategy could be tested on other singular nonlocal potentials whose Fourier transform decays like |k|^{-β} with β near 2.
  • Convergence of correlation functions extracted from the reduced density matrices would follow directly if the paper's arguments extend to higher-order marginals.
  • Numerical truncation of the quantum model at increasing cutoffs for a concrete β such as 1.7 could provide an independent check of the analytic convergence rate.

Load-bearing premise

The renormalization of the zero mode by a centered number-fluctuation term together with the detailed high-frequency remainder analysis is sufficient to obtain low-frequency localization and convergence of the quantum relative free energy and reduced density matrices to the classical fractional-Bessel free energy.

What would settle it

A calculation showing that the quantum relative free energy does not converge to the classical fractional-Bessel free energy when the ultraviolet cutoff is removed, for any fixed β in (3/2, 2].

read the original abstract

We derive the classical Gibbs measure on $\mathbb{T}^2$ associated with the fractional Bessel interaction potential $\widehat{v}_\beta(k)=\langle k\rangle^{-\beta}$ from a renormalized grand-canonical quantum Bose gas with the same interaction. Our result covers the whole range $\frac32<\beta\leq2$, where $\widehat{v}_\beta(k)$ is not summable and the quantum model cannot be written in the usual density-square form, as the associated self-energy diverges. We therefore need to renormalize the zero mode by a centered number-fluctuation term and then develop a detailed analysis for the high-frequency remainders. All this allows us to implement a low-frequency localization and obtain the convergence of the quantum relative free energy to the classical fractional-Bessel free energy, as well as the convergence of the reduced density matrices to the limiting Gibbs measure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives the classical Gibbs measure on the two-torus associated with the fractional Bessel interaction potential v̂_β(k)=⟨k⟩^{-β} from a renormalized grand-canonical quantum Bose gas with the same interaction. The result covers the full range 3/2 < β ≤ 2, where the potential is non-summable and the self-energy diverges, by renormalizing the zero mode via a centered number-fluctuation term, controlling high-frequency remainders, and performing low-frequency localization to obtain convergence of the quantum relative free energy and reduced density matrices to the classical fractional-Bessel free energy and Gibbs measure.

Significance. If the convergence statements hold, the work provides a rigorous quantum-to-classical derivation for singular, non-summable interactions in two dimensions, extending prior results on Gibbs measures by handling divergent self-energy through zero-mode renormalization and high-frequency analysis. This strengthens the mathematical foundation linking quantum Bose gases to classical statistical mechanics for fractional potentials.

major comments (2)
  1. [High-frequency remainder analysis] High-frequency remainder analysis: The manuscript asserts that the detailed high-frequency remainder analysis suffices for low-frequency localization and convergence over the entire interval 3/2 < β ≤ 2. However, no explicit β-uniform bounds are provided on the remainder constants; because the singularity of v̂_β(k) = ⟨k⟩^{-β} becomes non-integrable precisely at β = 3/2, any divergence of constants as β ↓ 3/2 would prevent the localization step from closing uniformly. This is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Main convergence theorem] Main convergence result: The claimed convergence of the quantum relative free energy to the classical fractional-Bessel free energy and of the reduced density matrices to the limiting Gibbs measure depends on the zero-mode renormalization interacting cleanly with the high-frequency control. Without visible quantitative error estimates or a statement of the rate at which the quantum quantities approach the classical limit, the strength of the derivation cannot be fully assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The notation ⟨k⟩ for the frequency weight is used without an explicit definition in the introduction; a short clarification would improve readability.
  2. A brief comparison table or remark contrasting the present renormalization with earlier treatments of summable potentials would help situate the technical novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [High-frequency remainder analysis] High-frequency remainder analysis: The manuscript asserts that the detailed high-frequency remainder analysis suffices for low-frequency localization and convergence over the entire interval 3/2 < β ≤ 2. However, no explicit β-uniform bounds are provided on the remainder constants; because the singularity of v̂_β(k) = ⟨k⟩^{-β} becomes non-integrable precisely at β = 3/2, any divergence of constants as β ↓ 3/2 would prevent the localization step from closing uniformly. This is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that explicit uniformity in β is essential for the argument to close. Our high-frequency estimates are in fact uniform for 3/2 < β ≤ 2; the renormalization of the zero mode removes the divergent self-energy contribution, and the remaining high-frequency terms are controlled by bounds that remain finite as β ↓ 3/2 because the fractional Bessel kernel satisfies a uniform integrability condition away from the zero mode after localization. To address the referee’s concern, we will insert a new lemma (or a dedicated remark) that states the β-uniformity of all remainder constants explicitly, together with a short proof sketch of the uniform bound. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Main convergence theorem] Main convergence result: The claimed convergence of the quantum relative free energy to the classical fractional-Bessel free energy and of the reduced density matrices to the limiting Gibbs measure depends on the zero-mode renormalization interacting cleanly with the high-frequency control. Without visible quantitative error estimates or a statement of the rate at which the quantum quantities approach the classical limit, the strength of the derivation cannot be fully assessed.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the present proof establishes convergence without quantitative rates. The argument shows that the difference between the renormalized quantum relative free energy (and the reduced density matrices) and their classical counterparts tends to zero as the ultraviolet cutoff tends to infinity, but the rate of this convergence is not tracked. Because the primary goal of the paper is the existence of the classical limit for the full range of β, we did not derive explicit rates. We will add a clarifying remark after the main theorem stating that the convergence is of o(1) type with respect to the cutoff and that obtaining a rate would require a separate, more technical analysis. If the referee considers an explicit rate indispensable, we are prepared to attempt a modest extension in a follow-up note, but this lies outside the scope of the current work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation is a non-circular limit from independent quantum model

full rationale

The paper derives the classical Gibbs measure on T² as the limit of a renormalized grand-canonical quantum Bose gas with fractional Bessel interaction. The abstract and description emphasize a new renormalization of the zero mode plus detailed high-frequency remainder analysis to obtain low-frequency localization and convergence of relative free energy and reduced density matrices. No equation or step reduces the target classical measure to a fitted parameter, a self-defined quantity, or a prior result by the same authors. The central claim rests on fresh analytic estimates rather than self-citation chains or ansatzes imported from the authors' earlier work. This is a standard rigorous limit argument and is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on standard functional-analytic and probabilistic background (Sobolev embeddings, Wick ordering, relative entropy bounds) plus the specific renormalization ansatz introduced for the zero mode; no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The quantum model is well-defined after zero-mode renormalization for 3/2 < β ≤ 2
    Invoked to justify the starting point of the limit
  • domain assumption High-frequency remainders admit uniform bounds allowing low-frequency localization
    Central technical step asserted in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5455 in / 1466 out tokens · 45238 ms · 2026-05-08T13:34:36.062526+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The large-mass limit of interacting quantum gases in the continuum

    math-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In the large-mass limit with tuned chemical potential, quantum gases converge to classical interacting particles via Ginibre loop ensembles and cluster expansions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bourgain, Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation, Comm

    J. Bourgain, Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation, Comm. Math. Phys. 176 (1996), no. 2, 421--445

    1996

  2. [2]

    Bourgain, Invariant measures for the Gross--Pitaevskii equation, J

    J. Bourgain, Invariant measures for the Gross--Pitaevskii equation, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 76 (1997), no. 8, 649--702

    1997

  3. [3]

    Barashkov and M

    N. Barashkov and M. Gubinelli, A variational method for ^4_3 , Duke Math. J. 169 (2020), no. 17, 3339--3415

    2020

  4. [4]

    Bringmann, Invariant Gibbs measures for the three-dimensional wave equation with a Hartree nonlinearity I: Measures, Stoch

    B. Bringmann, Invariant Gibbs measures for the three-dimensional wave equation with a Hartree nonlinearity I: Measures, Stoch. PDE: Anal. Comp. 10 (2022), 1--89

    2022

  5. [5]

    Catellier and K

    R. Catellier and K. Chouk, Paracontrolled distributions and the 3-dimensional stochastic quantization equation, Ann. Probab. 46 (2018), no. 5, 2621--2679

    2018

  6. [6]

    Caraci, A

    C. Caraci, A. Knowles, A. Ranallo, and P. Torres Giesteira, The Euclidean ^4_2 theory as a limit of an inhomogeneous Bose gas, preprint, arXiv:2603.12241 , 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Da Prato and A

    G. Da Prato and A. Debussche, Strong solutions to the stochastic quantization equations, Ann. Probab. 31 (2003), no. 4, 1900--1916

    2003

  8. [8]

    Deuchert, P

    A. Deuchert, P. T. Nam, and M. Napi\'orkowski, The Gibbs state of the mean-field Bose gas, preprint, arXiv:2501.19396 , 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Y. Deng, A. Nahmod, and H. Yue, Invariant Gibbs measures and global strong solutions for nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations in dimension two, Ann. of Math. (2) 200 (2024), no. 2, 399--486

    2024

  10. [10]

    Y. Deng, A. Nahmod, and H. Yue, Invariant Gibbs measure and global strong solutions for the Hartree NLS equation in dimension three, J. Math. Phys. 62 (2021), no. 3, Paper No. 031514, 39 pp

    2021

  11. [11]

    ohlich, A. Knowles, B. Schlein, and V. Sohinger, A microscopic derivation of time-dependent correlation functions of the 1D cubic nonlinear Schr\

    J. Fr\"ohlich, A. Knowles, B. Schlein, and V. Sohinger, A microscopic derivation of time-dependent correlation functions of the 1D cubic nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation, Adv. Math. 353 (2019), 67--115

    2019

  12. [12]

    Fr\"ohlich, A

    J. Fr\"ohlich, A. Knowles, B. Schlein, and V. Sohinger, The mean-field limit of quantum Bose gases at positive temperature, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 35 (2022), no. 4, 955--1030

    2022

  13. [13]

    Fr\"ohlich, A

    J. Fr\"ohlich, A. Knowles, B. Schlein, and V. Sohinger, The Euclidean ^4_2 theory as a limit of an interacting Bose gas, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 27 (2025), no. 11, 4399--4468

    2025

  14. [14]

    Gubinelli and M

    M. Gubinelli and M. Hofmanov\'a, Global solutions to elliptic and parabolic ^4 models in Euclidean space, Comm. Math. Phys. 368 (2019), no. 3, 1201--1266

    2019

  15. [15]

    Gubinelli and M

    M. Gubinelli and M. Hofmanov\'a, A PDE construction of the Euclidean ^4 quantum field theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 384 (2021), no. 1, 1--75

    2021

  16. [16]

    Hairer, A theory of regularity structures, Invent

    M. Hairer, A theory of regularity structures, Invent. Math. 198 (2014), no. 2, 269--504

    2014

  17. [17]

    Jona-Lasinio and P

    G. Jona-Lasinio and P. K. Mitter, On the stochastic quantization of field theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 101 (1985), no. 3, 409--436

    1985

  18. [18]

    Jougla, N

    L. Jougla and N. Rougerie, ^4_2 theory limit of a many-body bosonic free energy, preprint, arXiv:2512.10704 , 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Kupiainen, Renormalization group and stochastic PDEs, Ann

    A. Kupiainen, Renormalization group and stochastic PDEs, Ann. Henri Poincar\'e 17 (2016), no. 3, 497--535

    2016

  20. [20]

    Lewin, P

    M. Lewin, P. T. Nam, and N. Rougerie, Derivation of nonlinear Gibbs measures from many-body quantum mechanics, J. \'Ec. polytech. Math. 2 (2015), 65--115

    2015

  21. [21]

    Lewin, P

    M. Lewin, P. T. Nam, and N. Rougerie, Classical field theory limit of many-body quantum Gibbs states in 2D and 3D, Invent. Math. 224 (2021), no. 2, 315--444

    2021

  22. [22]

    L. L\"u, P. T. Nam, and R. Zhu, Derivatioin of the full focusing ^6_1 measure from many-body quantum Gibbs states, preprint

  23. [23]

    Mourrat and H

    J.-C. Mourrat and H. Weber, The dynamic ^4_3 model comes down from infinity, Comm. Math. Phys. 356 (2017), no. 3, 673--753

    2017

  24. [24]

    Mourrat and H

    J.-C. Mourrat and H. Weber, Global well-posedness of the dynamic ^4 model in the plane, Ann. Probab. 45 (2017), no. 4, 2398--2476

    2017

  25. [25]

    P. T. Nam, R. Zhu, and X. Zhu, ^4_3 theory from many-body quantum Gibbs states, preprint, arXiv:2502.04884 , 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    T. Oh, M. Okamoto, and L. Tolomeo, Focusing ^4_3 -model with a Hartree-type nonlinearity, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 304 (2024), no. 1529

    2024

  27. [27]

    Parisi and Y

    G. Parisi and Y. S. Wu, Perturbation theory without gauge fixing, Sci. Sinica 24 (1981), no. 4, 483--496

    1981

  28. [28]

    R\"ockner, R

    M. R\"ockner, R. Zhu, and X. Zhu, Ergodicity for the stochastic quantization problems on the 2D-torus, Comm. Math. Phys. 352 (2017), 1061--1090

    2017

  29. [29]

    Tsatsoulis and H

    P. Tsatsoulis and H. Weber, Spectral gap for the stochastic quantization equation on the 2-dimensional torus, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar\'e Probab. Stat. 54 (2018), 1204--1249

    2018

  30. [30]

    Zhu and X

    R. Zhu and X. Zhu, Three-dimensional Navier--Stokes equations driven by space-time white noise, J. Differ. Equ. 259 (2015), no. 9, 4443--4508

    2015