pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22295 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 🪐 quant-ph

Certification of genuine non-Gaussian entanglement

Luk\'a\v{s} Lachman , Carlos E. Lopetegui-Gonz\'alez , Massimo Frigerio , Mattia Walschaers This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 12:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords non-Gaussian entanglementcertificationGaussian operationsFock stateshybrid statesquantum non-Gaussianityentanglement theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

A certification method identifies entangled states that no Gaussian process on separable inputs can produce.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a framework for distinguishing entanglement that requires non-Gaussian operations from entanglement achievable through Gaussian evolution alone. It shows that certain entangled states lie outside the reach of Gaussian processes applied to separable starting points, thereby exposing limits of Gaussian operations and positioning non-Gaussianity as a distinct resource. The authors convert this distinction into a practical certification procedure tailored to states that current quantum-optics experiments can prepare. They apply the procedure to several entangled Fock states and hybrid entangled states, confirming that the method correctly flags their genuine non-Gaussian character.

Core claim

We characterize entanglement in the context of Gaussian and non-Gaussian processes and identify entangled states that cannot be produced by any Gaussian evolution acting on separable states. This distinction exposes intrinsic limitations of Gaussian operations and highlights the role of non-Gaussian operations as an important resource. We apply this framework to develop a certification method that connects entanglement theory with quantum non-Gaussianity. Our approach tailors the certification to experimentally relevant states that can be produced in current quantum optics experiments. We demonstrate this certification for recognizing the genuine non-Gaussian entanglement of various Fock and

What carries the argument

The distinction between entangled states reachable versus unreachable by Gaussian evolution on separable inputs, which directly certifies genuine non-Gaussian entanglement.

If this is right

  • Gaussian operations are intrinsically limited in the entangled states they can generate from separable inputs.
  • Non-Gaussian operations become necessary to reach certain classes of entangled states.
  • The certification procedure can be applied directly to states produced in current quantum-optics setups.
  • Demonstrations confirm the method works for multiple entangled Fock states and hybrid entangled states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method supplies a concrete experimental test for deciding whether a given entangled state genuinely requires non-Gaussian resources.
  • It may be extended to certify non-Gaussian entanglement in other continuous-variable platforms beyond optics.
  • The same reachability criterion could inform resource accounting in quantum information protocols that mix Gaussian and non-Gaussian gates.

Load-bearing premise

The framework correctly identifies which entangled states lie outside the set generatable by Gaussian operations on separable inputs.

What would settle it

An explicit sequence of Gaussian operations applied to a separable input state that reproduces one of the paper's example Fock or hybrid states would falsify the certification claim for that state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22295 by Carlos E. Lopetegui-Gonz\'alez, Luk\'a\v{s} Lachman, Massimo Frigerio, Mattia Walschaers.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: We tackle the question of identifying whether a given state has entanglement that cannot be undone by view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a) Thresholds for the genuine non-Gaussian view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: a) Thresholds for the genuine non-Gaussian view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) Threshold for the certification of mode-intrinsic entanglement using single-photon subtracted states view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Entanglement is a key resource for many quantum applications. Understanding fundamental properties of entangled states is an important step towards their practical exploitation. We characterize entanglement in the context of Gaussian and non-Gaussian processes and identify entangled states that cannot be produced by any Gaussian evolution acting on separable states. This distinction exposes intrinsic limitations of Gaussian operations and highlights the role of non-Gaussian operations as an important resource. We apply this framework to develop a certification method that connects entanglement theory with quantum non-Gaussianity - an advanced quantum feature that is essential for several quantum applications. Our approach tailors the certification to experimentally relevant states that can be produced in current quantum optics experiments. We demonstrate this certification for recognizing the genuine non-Gaussian entanglement of various entangled Fock states and hybrid entangled states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a framework characterizing entanglement under Gaussian versus non-Gaussian processes, identifying states unreachable by Gaussian evolution on separable inputs. It uses this to construct a certification method linking entanglement theory to quantum non-Gaussianity, tailored for experimentally relevant states, and demonstrates the approach on entangled Fock states and hybrid entangled states.

Significance. If the certification witnesses and demonstrations are robust, the work usefully connects two active areas (entanglement certification and non-Gaussian resources) and emphasizes the necessity of non-Gaussian operations for certain entangled states. The focus on states accessible in current quantum-optics experiments is a practical strength; the distinction from Gaussian processes is standard and correctly applied without evident circularity.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'various entangled Fock states' is vague; the main text should explicitly list the specific states (e.g., |n,m> or particular superpositions) used in the demonstrations so readers can immediately assess relevance.
  2. The manuscript should include a brief comparison table or paragraph contrasting the new certification with existing non-Gaussianity witnesses (e.g., those based on Wigner negativity or photon-number moments) to clarify incremental advance.
  3. Notation: ensure consistent use of symbols for Gaussian operations (e.g., G) versus non-Gaussian resources throughout; a short nomenclature table would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the accurate summary of its contributions, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's core framework identifies entangled states unreachable by Gaussian evolution acting on separable inputs, then uses this to certify genuine non-Gaussian entanglement for Fock and hybrid states. This distinction follows directly from the established property that Gaussian operations preserve Gaussianity, without any reduction of a claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain. The certification method is tailored to experimentally relevant states but does not rename known patterns or smuggle ansatzes via citation; the derivation remains self-contained against standard quantum optics benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no identifiable free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work appears to rest on standard quantum optics assumptions without new postulates visible here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5439 in / 1029 out tokens · 62532 ms · 2026-05-08T12:08:35.243194+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-Gaussian Entanglement Hierarchy Based on the Schmidt Number

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces witness E_NG whose ceiling bounds the Gaussian-irreducible Schmidt number, defining a hierarchy of non-Gaussian entanglement in continuous-variable systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Quantum communication

    Nicolas Gisin and Rob Thew. “Quantum communication”. Nat. Photonics1, 165– 171 (2007)

    2007

  2. [2]

    The quantum technologies roadmap: a Eu- ropean community view

    Antonio Acín, Immanuel Bloch, Harry Buhrman, Tommaso Calarco, Christopher Eichler, Jens Eisert, Daniel Esteve, Nicolas Gisin, Steffen J Glaser, Fedor Jelezko, Ste- fan Kuhr, Maciej Lewenstein, Max F Riedel, Piet O Schmidt, Rob Thew, Andreas Wall- raff, Ian Walmsley, and Frank K Wilhelm. “The quantum technologies roadmap: a Eu- ropean community view”. New ...

    2018

  3. [3]

    Motional Fock states for quantum-enhanced amplitude and phase measurements with trapped ions

    Fabian Wolf, Chunyan Shi, Jan C. Heip, Manuel Gessner, Luca Pezzè, Augusto Smerzi, MariusSchulte, KlemensHammerer, and Piet O. Schmidt. “Motional Fock states for quantum-enhanced amplitude and phase measurements with trapped ions”. Nat. Commun.10(2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    Quantum-enhanced sensing of a single-ion mechanical oscillator

    Katherine C. McCormick, Jonas Keller, Shaun C. Burd, David J. Wineland, An- drew C. Wilson, and Dietrich Leibfried. “Quantum-enhanced sensing of a single-ion mechanical oscillator”. Nature572, 86– 90 (2019). 8

    2019

  5. [5]

    Heisenberg-limited single-mode quantum metrology in a superconducting circuit

    W. Wang, Y. Wu, Y. Ma, W. Cai, L. Hu, X. Mu, Y. Xu, Zi-Jie Chen, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, H. Yuan, C.-L. Zou, L.-M. Duan, and L. Sun. “Heisenberg-limited single-mode quantum metrology in a superconducting circuit”. Nat. Commun.10(2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Real- ization of versatile and effective quantum metrology using a single bosonic mode

    Xiaozhou Pan, Tanjung Krisnanda, An- drea Duina, Kimin Park, Pengtao Song, Clara Yun Fontaine, Adrian Copetudo, Radim Filip, and Yvonne Y. Gao. “Real- ization of versatile and effective quantum metrology using a single bosonic mode”. PRX Quantum6, 010304 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Genuine quantum non-Gaussianity and metrological sensitivity of Fock states prepared in a me- chanical resonator

    Q. Rumman Rahman, Igor Kladarić, Max- Emanuel Kern, Lukáš Lachman, Yiwen Chu, Radim Filip, and Matteo Fadel. “Genuine quantum non-Gaussianity and metrological sensitivity of Fock states prepared in a me- chanical resonator”. Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 180801 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Advances in quantum cryptography

    S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. En- glund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, J. L. Pereira, M. Razavi, J. Shamsul Shaari, M. Tomamichel, V. C. Usenko, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, and P. Wallden. “Advances in quantum cryptography”. Adv. Opt. Photon. 12, 1012 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    Quantum internet: Technologies, protocols, and re- search challenges

    Vinay Kumar, Claudio Cicconetti, Marco Conti, and Andrea Passarella. “Quantum internet: Technologies, protocols, and re- search challenges”. Int. J. Netw. Distrib. Comput.13(2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation

    AndrewJ.Daley, ImmanuelBloch, Christian Kokail, Stuart Flannigan, Natalie Pearson, MatthiasTroyer, andPeterZoller. “Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation”. Nature607, 667–676 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    Fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computing with continuous-variable cluster states

    Nicolas C. Menicucci. “Fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computing with continuous-variable cluster states”. Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 120504 (2014)

    2014

  12. [12]

    The futureofquantumcomputingwithsupercon- ducting qubits

    Sergey Bravyi, Oliver Dial, Jay M. Gam- betta, Darío Gil, and Zaira Nazario. “The futureofquantumcomputingwithsupercon- ducting qubits”. J. Appl. Phys.132(2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    Quantum computa- tional advantage with a programmable pho- tonic processor

    Lars S. Madsen, Fabian Laudenbach, Mohsen Falamarzi. Askarani, Fabien Ror- tais, Trevor Vincent, Jacob F. F. Bul- mer, Filippo M. Miatto, Leonhard Neuhaus, Lukas G. Helt, Matthew J. Collins, Adri- ana E. Lita, Thomas Gerrits, Sae Woo Nam, Varun D. Vaidya, Matteo Menotti, Ish Dhand, Zachary Vernon, Nicolás Quesada, and Jonathan Lavoie. “Quantum computa- ti...

    2022

  14. [14]

    IBM quantum computers: evolution, performance, and fu- ture directions

    Muhammad AbuGhanem. “IBM quantum computers: evolution, performance, and fu- ture directions”. J. Supercomput.81(2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Toward quantum ad- vantage with photonic state injection

    Léo Monbroussou, Eliott Z. Mamon, Hugo Thomas, Verena Yacoub, Ulysse Chabaud, and Elham Kashefi. “Toward quantum ad- vantage with photonic state injection”. Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033051 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Integrated photonic source of Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill qubits

    M. V. Larsen, J. E. Bourassa, S. Koc- sis, J. F. Tasker, R. S. Chadwick, C. González-Arciniegas, J. Hastrup, C. E. Lopetegui-González, F. M. Miatto, A. Mo- tamedi, R. Noro, G. Roeland, R. Baby, H. Chen, P. Contu, I. Di Luch, C. Drago, M. Giesbrecht, T. Grainge, I. Krasnokut- ska, M. Menotti, B. Morrison, C. Puvi- raj, K. Rezaei Shad, B. Hussain, J. McMa- ...

    2025

  17. [17]

    Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computa- tion with propagating light

    Shunya Konno, Warit Asavanant, Fumiya Hanamura, Hironari Nagayoshi, Kosuke Fukui, Atsushi Sakaguchi, Ryuhoh Ide, Fu- mihiro China, Masahiro Yabuno, Shigehito Miki, Hirotaka Terai, Kan Takase, Mamoru Endo, Petr Marek, Radim Filip, Peter van Loock, and Akira Furusawa. “Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computa- tion with propagating light”. Science3...

    2024

  18. [18]

    Robust preparation of Wigner-negative states with optimized SNAP-displacement sequences

    Marina Kudra, Mikael Kervinen, Ingrid Strandberg, Shahnawaz Ahmed, Marco Scigliuzzo, Amr Osman, Daniel Pérez Lozano, Mats O. Tholén, Riccardo Bor- gani, David B. Haviland, Giulia Ferrini, Jonas Bylander, Anton Frisk Kockum, Fer- nando Quijandría, Per Delsing, and Si- mone Gasparinetti. “Robust preparation of Wigner-negative states with optimized SNAP-disp...

    2022

  19. [19]

    Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechan- ical oscillator

    C. Flühmann, T. L. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, 9 V. Negnevitsky, K. Mehta, and J. P. Home. “Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechan- ical oscillator”. Nature566, 513–517 (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    PositiveWignerfunc- tions render classical simulation of quantum computationefficient

    A.MariandJ.Eisert. “PositiveWignerfunc- tions render classical simulation of quantum computationefficient”. Phys.Rev.Lett.109, 230503 (2012)

    2012

  21. [21]

    Resources for bosonic quantum computa- tional advantage

    Ulysse Chabaud and Mattia Walschaers. “Resources for bosonic quantum computa- tional advantage”. Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 090602 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    Non-Gaussian quantum states and where to find them

    Mattia Walschaers. “Non-Gaussian quantum states and where to find them”. PRX Quan- tum2, 030204 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    Quantum non-gaussianity of light and atoms

    Lukáš Lachman and Radim Filip. “Quantum non-gaussianity of light and atoms”. Prog. Quantum Electron.83, 100395 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Faith- ful hierarchy of genuine n-photon quantum non-Gaussian light

    Lukáš Lachman, Ivo Straka, Josef Hloušek, Miroslav Ježek, and Radim Filip. “Faith- ful hierarchy of genuine n-photon quantum non-Gaussian light”. Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 043601 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    Stellar representation of non-Gaussian quantum states

    Ulysse Chabaud, Damian Markham, and Frédéric Grosshans. “Stellar representation of non-Gaussian quantum states”. Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 063605 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    Quantum non-Gaussianity of mul- tiphonon states of a single atom

    L. Podhora, L. Lachman, T. Pham, A. Lešundák, O. Číp, L. Slodička, and R. Filip. “Quantum non-Gaussianity of mul- tiphonon states of a single atom”. Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 013602 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Colloquium: Quantum coherence as a resource

    Alexander Streltsov, Gerardo Adesso, and Martin B. Plenio. “Colloquium: Quantum coherence as a resource”. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041003 (2017)

    2017

  28. [28]

    New class of quantum error-correcting codes for a bosonic mode

    Marios H. Michael, Matti Silveri, R. T. Brierley, Victor V. Albert, Juha Salmilehto, Liang Jiang, and S. M. Girvin. “New class of quantum error-correcting codes for a bosonic mode”. Phys. Rev. X6, 031006 (2016)

    2016

  29. [29]

    Hierarchi- cal verification of non-Gaussian coherence in bosonic quantum states

    Beate E. Asenbeck, Lukáš Lachman, Am- broise Boyer, Priyanka Giri, Alban Urvoy, Radim Filip, and Julien Laurat. “Hierarchi- cal verification of non-Gaussian coherence in bosonic quantum states”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 233604 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Hierar- chies of quantum non-Gaussian coherences for bosonic systems: A theoretical study

    Lukáš Lachman, Beate E. Asenbeck, Am- broise Boyer, Priyanka Giri, Alban Urvoy, Julien Laurat, and Radim Filip. “Hierar- chies of quantum non-Gaussian coherences for bosonic systems: A theoretical study”. Phys. Rev. A111(2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Entanglement-assisted quantum commu- nication with simple measurements

    Amélie Piveteau, Jef Pauwels, Emil Håkansson, Sadiq Muhammad, Mo- hamed Bourennane, and Armin Tavakoli. “Entanglement-assisted quantum commu- nication with simple measurements”. Nat. Commun.13(2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    Quantum metrology with non- classical states of atomic ensembles

    Luca Pezzè, Augusto Smerzi, Markus K. Oberthaler, Roman Schmied, and Philipp Treutlein. “Quantum metrology with non- classical states of atomic ensembles”. Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035005 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    Beating the standard quantum limit with four-entangled photons

    Tomohisa Nagata, Ryo Okamoto, Jeremy L. O’Brien, Keiji Sasaki, and Shigeki Takeuchi. “Beating the standard quantum limit with four-entangled photons”. Science316, 726– 729 (2007)

    2007

  34. [34]

    Quantum su(1,1) interferometers: Basic principles and appli- cations

    Z. Y. Ou and Xiaoying Li. “Quantum su(1,1) interferometers: Basic principles and appli- cations”. APL Photonics5(2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    Quantum enhanced multiple-phase estimation with multi-mode N00N states

    Seongjin Hong, Junaid ur Rehman, Yong- Su Kim, Young-Wook Cho, Seung-Woo Lee, HojoongJung, SungMoon, Sang-WookHan, and Hyang-Tag Lim. “Quantum enhanced multiple-phase estimation with multi-mode N00N states”. Nat. Commun.12(2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    Quantum supremacy using a pro- grammable superconducting processor

    Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Ryan Bab- bush, Dave Bacon, Joseph C. Bardin, Rami Barends, Rupak Biswas, Sergio Boixo, Fer- nando G. S. L. Brandao, David A. Buell, Brian Burkett, Yu Chen, Zijun Chen, Ben Chiaro, Roberto Collins, William Courtney, Andrew Dunsworth, Edward Farhi, Brooks Foxen, AustinFowler, CraigGidney, Marissa Giustina, Rob Graff, Keith Guerin, ...

    2019

  37. [37]

    Mode- independent quantum entanglement for light

    Jan Sperling, Armando Perez-Leija, Kurt Busch, and Christine Silberhorn. “Mode- independent quantum entanglement for light”. Phys. Rev. A100, 062129 (2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    Holomorphic representation of quantum computations

    Ulysse Chabaud and Saeed Mehraban. “Holomorphic representation of quantum computations”. Quantum6, 831 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    Statistical signa- tures of multimode single-photon-added and -subtracted states of light

    Mattia Walschaers, Claude Fabre, Valentina Parigi, and Nicolas Treps. “Statistical signa- tures of multimode single-photon-added and -subtracted states of light”. Phys. Rev. A96, 053835 (2017)

    2017

  40. [40]

    Geomet- ric characterization of non-Gaussian entan- glement for finite stellar rank states

    Carlos E. Lopetegui-Gonzalez, Massimo Frigerio, and Mattia Walschaers. “Geomet- ric characterization of non-Gaussian entan- glement for finite stellar rank states” (2025). arXiv:2511.02076

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Complexity of quan- tum tomography from genuine non-gaussian entanglement

    Xiaobin Zhao, Pengcheng Liao, Francesco Anna Mele, Ulysse Chabaud, and Quntao Zhuang. “Complexity of quan- tum tomography from genuine non-gaussian entanglement”. Nat. Commun. (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    De- tection of mode-intrinsic quantum entangle- ment

    Carlos E. Lopetegui, Mathieu Isoard, Nico- las Treps, and Mattia Walschaers. “De- tection of mode-intrinsic quantum entangle- ment”. Opt. Quantum3, 312 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    The canonical form of an antisymmetric tensor anditsapplicationtothetheoryofsupercon- ductivity

    Claude Bloch and Albert Messiah. “The canonical form of an antisymmetric tensor anditsapplicationtothetheoryofsupercon- ductivity”. Nucl. Phys.39, 95–106 (1962)

    1962

  44. [44]

    Squeezing as an irreducible resource

    Samuel L. Braunstein. “Squeezing as an irreducible resource”. Phys. Rev. A71, 055801 (2005)

    2005

  45. [45]

    Separable multipartite mixed states: Operational asymptotically neces- sary and sufficient conditions

    Fernando G. S. L. Brandão and Reinaldo O. Vianna. “Separable multipartite mixed states: Operational asymptotically neces- sary and sufficient conditions”. Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 220503 (2004)

    2004

  46. [46]

    The cma evolution strat- egy: A comparing review

    Nikolaus Hansen. “The cma evolution strat- egy: A comparing review”. Pages 75–102. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Berlin, Heidel- berg (2006)

    2006

  47. [47]

    Optical quantum com- puting

    Jeremy L. O’Brien. “Optical quantum com- puting”. Science318, 1567–1570 (2007)

    2007

  48. [48]

    Perce- val: A Software Platform for Discrete Vari- able Photonic Quantum Computing

    Nicolas Heurtel, Andreas Fyrillas, Gré- goire de Gliniasty, Raphaël Le Bihan, Sébastien Malherbe, Marceau Pailhas, Eric Bertasi, Boris Bourdoncle, Pierre-Emmanuel Emeriau, RawadMezher, LukaMusic, Nadia Belabas, Benoît Valiron, Pascale Senellart, Shane Mansfield, and Jean Senellart. “Perce- val: A Software Platform for Discrete Vari- able Photonic Quantum ...

    2023

  49. [49]

    Mul- tiphoton interference outperforms pairwise overlaps for distinguishability characteriza- tion

    S. N. van den Hoven, M. C. Anguita, S. Marzban, and J. J. Renema. “Mul- tiphoton interference outperforms pairwise overlaps for distinguishability characteriza- tion” (2025). arXiv:2512.04903

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Optimal multiple-phase estimation with multi-mode NOON states against photon loss

    Min Namkung, Dong-Hyun Kim, Seongjin Hong, Yong-Su Kim, Changhyoup Lee, and Hyang-Tag Lim. “Optimal multiple-phase estimation with multi-mode NOON states against photon loss”. New J. Phys.26, 073028 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Photon catalysis for gen- eral multimode multi-photon quantum state preparation

    Andrei Aralov, Émilie Gillet, Viet Nguyen, Andrea Cosentino, Mattia Walschaers, and Massimo Frigerio. “Photon catalysis for gen- eral multimode multi-photon quantum state preparation” (2025). arXiv:2507.19397

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Heralded three-photon entanglement from a single- photon source on a photonic chip

    Si Chen, Li-Chao Peng, Y.-P. Guo, X.-M. Gu, X. Ding, R.-Z. Liu, J.-Y. Zhao, X. You, J. Qin, Y.-F. Wang, Yu-Ming He, Jelmer J. Renema, Yong-Heng Huo, Hui Wang, Chao- Yang Lu, and Jian-Wei Pan. “Heralded three-photon entanglement from a single- photon source on a photonic chip”. Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 130603 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    Creation of large-photon-number path entanglement conditioned on photode- tection

    Pieter Kok, Hwang Lee, and Jonathan P. Dowling. “Creation of large-photon-number path entanglement conditioned on photode- tection”. Phys. Rev. A65, 052104 (2002)

    2002

  54. [54]

    A quantum- bit encoding converter

    TomDarras, BeateElisabethAsenbeck, Gio- vanni Guccione, Adrien Cavaillès, Hanna Le Jeannic, and Julien Laurat. “A quantum- bit encoding converter”. Nat. Photonics17, 165–170 (2022)

    2022

  55. [55]

    Fault-tolerant quantum compu- tation by hybrid qubits with bosonic cat code and single photons

    Jaehak Lee, Nuri Kang, Seok-Hyung Lee, Hyunseok Jeong, Liang Jiang, and Seung- Woo Lee. “Fault-tolerant quantum compu- tation by hybrid qubits with bosonic cat code and single photons”. PRX Quantum 5, 030322 (2024). 11

    2024

  56. [56]

    Metrological detection of entanglement generated by non-Gaussian operations

    David Barral, Mathieu Isoard, Giacomo Sorelli, Manuel Gessner, Nicolas Treps, and Mattia Walschaers. “Metrological detection of entanglement generated by non-Gaussian operations”. NewJ.Phys.26, 083012(2024). A Decomposition of two-mode Gaus- sian dynamics The Bloch-Messiah decomposition parametrizes any Gaussian dynamic ˜Gof two bosonic modes as: ˜G=U BS(...

    2024