pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22463 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 🪐 quant-ph · q-fin.CP

Recognition: unknown

Quantum analog-encoding for correlated Gaussian vectors and their exponentiation with application to rough volatility

Tassa Thaksakronwong , Koichi Miyamoto
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 11:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph q-fin.CP
keywords quantum state preparationcorrelated Gaussian vectorsrough volatilityfractional Brownian motioncovariance matrix loaderamplitude encodingquantum algorithmsfinancial modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum algorithms prepare amplitude-encoded correlated Gaussian vectors and their exponentials with gate complexity based on covariance matrix properties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces quantum algorithms to prepare quantum states that represent a normalized sample from a multivariate normal distribution with covariance matrix Σ, along with the state for the element-wise exponential of that sample. These algorithms rely on the availability of a quantum data loader for Σ that uses only polylogarithmic depth in the dimension N. The resulting gate depths are expressed in terms of the Frobenius norm of Σ, its largest eigenvalue, and its condition number. The methods are then applied to simulating sample paths of rough volatility models, including the rough Bergomi process, where quantum amplitude estimation can be used to compute the integrated variance. If the loader exists and the matrix properties scale mildly with N, the approach promises computational savings compared to classical methods that rely on Cholesky factorization for large path lengths.

Core claim

We propose quantum algorithms for preparing the quantum states |x⟩ = x / ||x|| where x is a correlated Gaussian vector with covariance Σ and |e^x⟩ = e^x / ||e^x||. Given an O(polylog N)-depth quantum data loader for Σ, the preparation of |x⟩ requires Õ(||Σ||_F / λ_max ⋅ κ^{1.5}) elementary gate depth, and |e^x⟩ requires an additional factor of ||x||. For covariance matrices corresponding to Riemann-Liouville fractional Brownian motion, standard fractional Brownian motion, and stationary fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes, under conditions where ||Σ||_F/λ_max and κ depend only weakly on N, this achieves subcubic complexity in N, indicating a quantum advantage over classical Cholesky -ba

What carries the argument

The O(polylog N)-gate-depth quantum data loader for the covariance matrix Σ, which enables efficient preparation of the Gaussian state |x⟩ and its exponentiated version through quantum operations.

If this is right

  • Under the stated conditions, the encoding of paths for Riemann-Liouville fractional Brownian motion achieves sub-cubic gate complexity in the number of discretization points N.
  • The same holds for standard fractional Brownian motion and fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes used in rough volatility modeling.
  • Quantum amplitude estimation can be applied to extract the integrated variance from the encoded rough Bergomi variance process state.
  • This framework provides foundational primitives for quantum-enhanced simulation of financial models involving exponentiated Gaussian processes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If efficient quantum data loaders for covariance matrices are developed, this method could extend to simulating other high-dimensional Gaussian processes in physics and engineering.
  • Combining this state preparation with quantum algorithms for optimization or machine learning might enable new approaches to derivative pricing in rough volatility environments.
  • A practical test would involve constructing the loader for small-dimensional fractional process covariances and verifying the predicted gate depths on quantum hardware simulators.
  • The approach suggests that quantum computers could handle the path generation step in Monte Carlo simulations for exotic options more scalably.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that an efficient quantum data loader for the covariance matrix Σ with only polylogarithmic gate depth in N exists for the arbitrary matrices encountered in these models.

What would settle it

A proof or empirical evidence that no quantum data loader for general covariance matrices can achieve O(polylog N) depth, or explicit computation showing that for the fractional processes the quantity ||Σ||_F / λ_max grows faster than linearly with N, leading to overall super-cubic scaling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22463 by Koichi Miyamoto, Tassa Thaksakronwong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Characteristics of a Riemann-Liouville fBM covariance matrix of path values view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Characteristics of a standard fBM covariance matrix of path values view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Characteristics of a stationary fOU covariance matrix of path values view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Characteristics of Riemann-Liouville fBM covariance matrix of increments view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Characteristics of standard fBM covariance matrix of increments view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Characteristics of stationary fOU covariance matrix of increments view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of overall cost required, when simulate using Σ view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum computing may speed up numerical problems involving large matrices that are demanding for classical computers, and active research on this possibility is ongoing. In this work, we propose quantum algorithms for the exact simulation of a normalised correlated Gaussian random vector $|x\rangle=\vec{x}/\lVert\vec{x}\rVert$, $\vec{x}\sim\mathcal{N}(0,\Sigma)$, and its exponentiation $|e^{\vec{x}} \rangle= e^{\vec{x}}/\lVert e^{\vec{x}}\rVert$. When an $O(\mathrm{polylog} N)$-gate-depth quantum data loader for the covariance matrix $\Sigma\in\mathbb{R}^{N\times N}$ is available, preparing $|x\rangle$ and $|e^{\vec{x}}\rangle$ require $\widetilde{O}\left(\frac{\lVert\Sigma\rVert_F}{\lambda_{\max}}\kappa^{1.5}\right)$ and $\widetilde{O}\left(\lVert\vec{x}\rVert\frac{\lVert\Sigma\rVert_F}{\lambda_{\max}}\kappa^{1.5}\right)$ elementary gate depth respectively, where $\lVert\Sigma\rVert_F$, $\lambda_{\max}$, $\kappa$ denote the Frobenius norm, maximal eigenvalue, and condition number of $\Sigma$. Motivated by financial applications, we provide an end-to-end resource analysis when $\vec{x}$ represents a sample path of a Riemann-Liouville or standard fractional Brownian motion, or of a stationary fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. As a concrete example, we construct the quantum state encoding the rough Bergomi variance process and analyse the extraction of the integrated variance via quantum amplitude estimation. Under specific conditions, the dependence of $\lVert\Sigma\rVert_F/\lambda_{\max}$ and $\kappa$ on $N$ is small, and subcubic complexity in $N$ is achieved, indicating a quantum advantage over classical Cholesky-based sampling methods. To our knowledge, this constitutes the first quantum algorithmic framework for the amplitude encoding of exponentiated Gaussian processes, providing foundational primitives for quantum-enhanced financial modelling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes quantum algorithms for analog-encoding of normalized correlated Gaussian random vectors |x⟩ where x ~ N(0, Σ) and their exponentiations |e^x⟩. Conditional on an O(polylog N)-depth quantum data loader for the covariance matrix Σ, the gate complexities are given as Õ(‖Σ‖_F / λ_max ⋅ κ^{1.5}) for |x⟩ and Õ(‖x‖ ⋅ ‖Σ‖_F / λ_max ⋅ κ^{1.5}) for |e^x⟩. The work applies this to rough volatility modeling, constructing the quantum state for the rough Bergomi variance process and using quantum amplitude estimation for integrated variance extraction, claiming potential quantum advantage for specific fractional processes when the condition number and norm ratios scale favorably with N.

Significance. If the results hold, this provides the first quantum algorithmic framework for amplitude encoding of exponentiated Gaussian processes, offering primitives that could enhance quantum financial modeling, particularly for rough volatility models. The end-to-end resource analysis for Riemann-Liouville, fBM, and fOU processes is a positive aspect, as is the concrete example with amplitude estimation. However, the significance is tempered by the reliance on an unconstructed data loader.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: The stated complexities for preparing |x⟩ and |e^x⟩ are explicitly conditional on the availability of an O(polylog N)-gate-depth quantum data loader for Σ. For the dense covariance matrices arising from the Riemann-Liouville, fractional Brownian motion, and fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes (with entries K(i,j) involving |t-s|^{2H-1} or integrals), the manuscript does not provide a construction achieving polylog depth independent of N. This assumption is load-bearing for the subcubic complexity claim and the indicated quantum advantage over classical Cholesky-based sampling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. The primary concern is the conditional nature of our complexity claims on an unconstructed quantum data loader for the covariance matrix. We address this point directly below, acknowledging its validity while clarifying the manuscript's scope and outlining targeted revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The stated complexities for preparing |x⟩ and |e^x⟩ are explicitly conditional on the availability of an O(polylog N)-gate-depth quantum data loader for Σ. For the dense covariance matrices arising from the Riemann-Liouville, fractional Brownian motion, and fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes (with entries K(i,j) involving |t-s|^{2H-1} or integrals), the manuscript does not provide a construction achieving polylog depth independent of N. This assumption is load-bearing for the subcubic complexity claim and the indicated quantum advantage over classical Cholesky-based sampling.

    Authors: We agree with this assessment. The abstract and introduction explicitly condition the gate complexities Õ(‖Σ‖_F / λ_max ⋅ κ^{1.5}) and Õ(‖x‖ ⋅ ‖Σ‖_F / λ_max ⋅ κ^{1.5}) on the existence of an O(polylog N)-depth quantum data loader for Σ. No explicit construction is provided for the dense, structured covariance matrices of the Riemann-Liouville, fBM, or fOU processes. This assumption is indeed load-bearing for the subcubic-in-N scaling and any claimed quantum advantage relative to classical Cholesky factorization. For these Toeplitz-like matrices (entries depending only on |i-j|), structured quantum loading techniques (e.g., via low-rank approximations or efficient circuit constructions for correlation functions) may exist, but developing and verifying such a loader lies outside the present scope. We will revise the abstract, introduction, and discussion sections to more prominently emphasize the conditional nature of the results, qualify the quantum-advantage statements, and note this as an important direction for future work. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Providing an explicit construction of an O(polylog N)-depth quantum data loader for the dense covariance matrices of the Riemann-Liouville, fractional Brownian motion, and fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims conditional on external primitive

full rationale

The paper explicitly conditions its gate-depth bounds on the existence of an O(polylog N) quantum data loader for Σ and then applies standard quantum linear-algebra primitives (block-encoding, singular-value estimation, amplitude estimation) whose costs are expressed in terms of ||Σ||_F, λ_max and κ. These quantities are taken directly from the covariance definitions of the Riemann-Liouville, fBM and fOU processes; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The derivation therefore remains self-contained once the loader primitive is granted, yielding a score of 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the existence of efficient quantum data loaders (a non-trivial but standard assumption in quantum algorithms) and on the favorable scaling of covariance matrix properties for the listed fractional processes, which are taken as given from prior stochastic process literature.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption An O(polylog N)-gate-depth quantum data loader exists for the covariance matrix Σ.
    Invoked directly to bound the state preparation costs for both |x⟩ and |e^x⟩.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5693 in / 1531 out tokens · 99498 ms · 2026-05-08T11:51:30.594349+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum algorithm for solving high-dimensional linear stochastic differential equations via amplitude encoding of the noise term

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Quantum algorithms achieve polylog(N) complexity for high-dimensional linear SDEs by amplitude-encoding the solution and noise via Dyson series or Euler-Maruyama approximations plus quantum linear systems solvers.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Anderson

    Theodore W. Anderson. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis . Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, 3rd edition, 2003

    2003

  2. [2]

    Multilevel M onte C arlo simulation for VIX options in the rough B ergomi model

    Florian Bourgey and Stefano De Marco. Multilevel M onte C arlo simulation for VIX options in the rough B ergomi model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.05356 , 2021

    work page arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    A quantum spectral method for simulating stochastic processes, with applications to Monte Carlo.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06719, 2023

    Adam Bouland, Aditi Dandapani, and Anupam Prakash. A quantum spectral method for simulating stochastic processes, with applications to M onte C arlo. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06719 , 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Rational C hebyshev approximations for the inverse of the error function

    JM Blair, CA Edwards, and J Howard Johnson. Rational C hebyshev approximations for the inverse of the error function. Mathematics of Computation , 30(136):827--830, 1976

    1976

  5. [5]

    Rough volatility

    Christian Bayer, Peter K Friz, Masaaki Fukasawa, Jim Gatheral, Antoine Jacquier, and Mathieu Rosenbaum. Rough volatility . SIAM, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    Pricing under rough volatility

    Christian Bayer, Peter K Friz, and Jim Gatheral. Pricing under rough volatility. Quantitative Finance , 16(6):887--904, 2016

    2016

  7. [7]

    Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation

    Gilles Brassard, Peter Hoyer, Michele Mosca, and Alain Tapp. Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation. Contemporary Mathematics , 305:53--74, 2002

    2002

  8. [8]

    Bounds for expected maxima of G aussian processes and their discrete approximations, 2015

    Konstantin Borovkov, Yuliya Mishura, Alexander Novikov, and Mikhail Zhitlukhin. Bounds for expected maxima of G aussian processes and their discrete approximations, 2015

    2015

  9. [9]

    Fractional Brownian Motion: Approximations and Projections

    Oksana Banna, Yuliia Mishura, Kostiantyn Ralchenko, and Sergiy Shklyar. Fractional Brownian Motion: Approximations and Projections . John Wiley & Sons, 04 2019

    2019

  10. [10]

    The power of block-encoded matrix powers: improved regression techniques via faster H amiltonian simulation

    Shantanav Chakraborty, András Gilyén, and Stacey Jeffery. The power of block-encoded matrix powers: improved regression techniques via faster H amiltonian simulation. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2019

    2019

  11. [11]

    Fractional O rnstein- U hlenbeck processes

    Patrick Cheridito, Hideyuki Kawaguchi, and Makoto Maejima. Fractional O rnstein- U hlenbeck processes. Electronic Journal of Probability , 8:1--14, 2003

    2003

  12. [12]

    Long memory in continuous-time stochastic volatility models

    Fabienne Comte and Eric Renault. Long memory in continuous-time stochastic volatility models. Mathematical finance , 8(4):291--323, 1998

    1998

  13. [13]

    Refinement by reducing and reusing random numbers of the H ybrid scheme for B rownian semistationary processes

    Masaaki Fukasawa and Asuto Hirano. Refinement by reducing and reusing random numbers of the H ybrid scheme for B rownian semistationary processes. Quantitative Finance , 21(7):1127--1146, 2021

    2021

  14. [14]

    Wiener spiral for volatility modeling

    Masaaki Fukasawa. Wiener spiral for volatility modeling. Theory of Probability & Its Applications , 68(3):481--500, 2023

    2023

  15. [15]

    A brief history of long memory: H urst, M andelbrot and the road to ARFIMA , 1951--1980

    Timothy Graves, Robert Gramacy, Nicholas Watkins, and Christian Franzke. A brief history of long memory: H urst, M andelbrot and the road to ARFIMA , 1951--1980. Entropy , 19(9):437, 2017

    1951

  16. [16]

    Volatility is rough

    Jim Gatheral, Thibault Jaisson, and Mathieu Rosenbaum. Volatility is rough. Quantitative finance , 18(6):933--949, 2018

    2018

  17. [17]

    Architectures for a quantum random access memory

    Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone. Architectures for a quantum random access memory. Phys. Rev. A , 78:052310, Nov 2008

    2008

  18. [18]

    Nonlinear transformation of complex amplitudes via quantum singular value transformation

    Naixu Guo, Kosuke Mitarai, and Keisuke Fujii. Nonlinear transformation of complex amplitudes via quantum singular value transformation. Physical Review Research , 6(4):043227, 2024

    2024

  19. [19]

    Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics

    András Gilyén, Yuan Su, Guang Hao Low, and Nathan Wiebe. Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing , STOC ’19, page 193–204. ACM, June 2019

    2019

  20. [20]

    Quantum computing for finance

    Dylan Herman, Cody Googin, Xiaoyuan Liu, Yue Sun, Alexey Galda, Ilya Safro, Marco Pistoia, and Yuri Alexeev. Quantum computing for finance. Nature Reviews Physics , 5(8):450--465, 2023

    2023

  21. [21]

    Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations

    Aram W Harrow, Avinatan Hassidim, and Seth Lloyd. Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. Physical Review Letters , 103(15), October 2009

    2009

  22. [22]

    Matrix Analysis

    Roger A Horn and Charles R Johnson. Matrix Analysis . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York, 2nd edition, 2013

    2013

  23. [23]

    Volatility options in rough volatility models

    Blanka Horvath, Antoine Jacquier, and Peter Tankov. Volatility options in rough volatility models. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics , 11(2):437--469, 2020

    2020

  24. [24]

    On the E uler integral representations of hypergeometric functions in several variables

    Akio Hattori and Tosihusa Kimura. On the E uler integral representations of hypergeometric functions in several variables. Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan , 26(1):1--16, 1974

    1974

  25. [25]

    Decompositions of n-qubit toffoli gates with linear circuit complexity

    Yong He, Ming-Xing Luo, E Zhang, Hong-Ke Wang, and Xiao-Feng Wang. Decompositions of n-qubit toffoli gates with linear circuit complexity. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , 56(7):2350--2361, 2017

    2017

  26. [26]

    Nearest centroid classification on a trapped ion quantum computer

    Sonika Johri, Shantanu Debnath, Avinash Mocherla, Alexandros Singk, Anupam Prakash, Jungsang Kim, and Iordanis Kerenidis. Nearest centroid classification on a trapped ion quantum computer. npj Quantum Information , 7(1):122, 2021

    2021

  27. [27]

    Quantum Recommendation Systems

    Iordanis Kerenidis and Anupam Prakash. Quantum Recommendation Systems . In Christos H. Papadimitriou, editor, 8th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2017) , volume 67 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) , pages 49:1--49:21, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2017. Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f \"u r Informatik. f...

    work page arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Hamiltonian simulation by uniform spectral amplification

    Guang Hao Low and Isaac L Chuang. Hamiltonian simulation by uniform spectral amplification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.05391 , 2017

    work page arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Fractional B rownian motion and multifractional B rownian motion of R iemann- L iouville type

    SC Lim. Fractional B rownian motion and multifractional B rownian motion of R iemann- L iouville type. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , 34(7):1301, 2001

    2001

  30. [30]

    On the self-similar nature of ethernet traffic

    Will E Leland, Murad S Taqqu, Walter Willinger, and Daniel V Wilson. On the self-similar nature of ethernet traffic. In Conference proceedings on Communications architectures, protocols and applications , pages 183--193, 1993

    1993

  31. [31]

    Quantum speedup of M onte C arlo methods

    Ashley Montanaro. Quantum speedup of M onte C arlo methods. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 471(2181):20150301, 2015

    2015

  32. [32]

    Turbocharging M onte C arlo pricing for the rough B ergomi model

    Ryan McCrickerd and Mikko S Pakkanen. Turbocharging M onte C arlo pricing for the rough B ergomi model. Quantitative Finance , 18(11):1877--1886, 2018

    2018

  33. [33]

    Grand unification of quantum algorithms

    John M Martyn, Zane M Rossi, Andrew K Tan, and Isaac L Chuang. Grand unification of quantum algorithms. PRX Quantum , 2(4):040203, 2021

    2021

  34. [34]

    Selected aspects of fractional Brownian motion , volume 4

    Ivan Nourdin. Selected aspects of fractional Brownian motion , volume 4. Springer, 2012

    2012

  35. [35]

    Fast phase factor finding for quantum signal processing

    Hongkang Ni and Lexing Ying. Fast phase factor finding for quantum signal processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06409 , 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Tables of Mellin Transforms

    Fritz Oberhettinger. Tables of Mellin Transforms . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1974

    1974

  37. [37]

    Asymptotics and Mellin-Barnes Integrals , volume 85

    Richard B Paris and David Kaminski. Asymptotics and Mellin-Barnes Integrals , volume 85. Cambridge University Press, 2001

    2001

  38. [38]

    Quantum option pricing via the K arhunen- L o\` e ve expansion

    Anupam Prakash, Yue Sun, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Charlie Che, Aditi Dandapani, Dylan Herman, Niraj Kumar, Shree Hari Sureshbabu, Ben Wood, Iordanis Kerenidis, et al. Quantum option pricing via the K arhunen- L o\` e ve expansion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10132 , 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Quantum computational finance: M onte C arlo pricing of financial derivatives

    Patrick Rebentrost, Brajesh Gupt, and Thomas R Bromley. Quantum computational finance: M onte C arlo pricing of financial derivatives. Physical Review A , 98(2):022321, 2018

    2018

  40. [40]

    A remark on S tirling's formula

    Herbert Robbins. A remark on S tirling's formula. The American mathematical monthly , 62(1):26--29, 1955

    1955

  41. [41]

    Non-Linear Transformations of Quantum Amplitudes: Exponential Improvement, Generalization, and Applications

    Arthur G Rattew and Patrick Rebentrost. Non-linear transformations of quantum amplitudes: Exponential improvement, generalization, and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.09839 , 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Principles of Mathematical Analysis

    Walter Rudin. Principles of Mathematical Analysis . International series in pure and applied mathematics. McGraw-Hill, 3rd edition, 1976

    1976

  43. [43]

    Option pricing using quantum computers

    Nikitas Stamatopoulos, Daniel J Egger, Yue Sun, Christa Zoufal, Raban Iten, Ning Shen, and Stefan Woerner. Option pricing using quantum computers. Quantum , 4:291, 2020

    2020

  44. [44]

    The H itchhiker's G uide to QSP pre-processing

    SE Skelton. The H itchhiker's G uide to QSP pre-processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05977 , 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Linear-depth quantum circuits for n-qubit toffoli gates with no ancilla

    Mehdi Saeedi and Massoud Pedram. Linear-depth quantum circuits for n-qubit toffoli gates with no ancilla. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , 87(6):062318, 2013

    2013

  46. [46]

    Complex analysis , volume II of Princeton Lectures in Analysis

    Elias M Stein and Rami Shakarchi. Complex analysis , volume II of Princeton Lectures in Analysis . Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 2003

    2003

  47. [47]

    Gaussian random number generators

    David B Thomas, Wayne Luk, Philip HW Leong, and John D Villasenor. Gaussian random number generators. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , 39(4):11--es, 2007

    2007

  48. [48]

    High-dimensional probability: An introduction with applications in data science , volume 47

    Roman Vershynin. High-dimensional probability: An introduction with applications in data science , volume 47. Cambridge university press, 2018

    2018

  49. [49]

    Optimal quantum circuits for general two-qubit gates

    Farrokh Vatan and Colin Williams. Optimal quantum circuits for general two-qubit gates. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , 69(3):032315, 2004

    2004

  50. [50]

    Quantum linear system algorithm for dense matrices

    Leonard Wossnig, Zhikuan Zhao, and Anupam Prakash. Quantum linear system algorithm for dense matrices. Physical review letters , 120(5):050502, 2018

    2018

  51. [51]

    Eigenvalues of several tridiagonal matrices

    Wen-Chyuan Yueh. Eigenvalues of several tridiagonal matrices. Applied Mathematics E-Notes [electronic only] , 5:66--74, 2005

    2005