Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Curvature of optimal transport with respect to the cost and applications to inverse optimal transport

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read With smooth positive densities, inverse optimal transport has strict curvature and is locally identifiable from a single plan—unlike the discrete case.

desk verdict We only have the abstract of the inverse-OT curvature paper; the attached full text is a different manuscript (kilonova RT), so the second-variation claims cannot be checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.22670 v2 pith:BHK6NXJI submitted 2026-04-24 math.OC math.PR

Gabriel Peyré , Clarice Poon , Oscar Tron This is my paper
classification math.OCmath.PR MSC 49Q2290C0849K4049N45
keywords inverseoptimaltransportgroundcostrecoverysecondvariationcurvatureidentifiabilityMahalanobiscostsentropicregularizationHölderspaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Recovering the ground cost from an observed optimal transport plan is classically ill-posed: in discrete settings it collapses to inverse linear programming, with flat directions and non-identifiability. This paper shows that continuous marginals with smooth positive densities change the geometry of the inverse problem. The second variation of the optimal-transport cost functional with respect to the ground cost is non-degenerate in Hölder spaces, up to the natural invariances of transport, so the inverse map has genuine curvature. That curvature yields local identifiability and stability. For bilinear (Mahalanobis) costs a single coupling recovers the cost uniquely under a spanning condition, and the property is generic under tiny marginal perturbations—though affine maps (Gaussians, ellipticals) stay degenerate. Entropic regularization comes with explicit bias and variance bounds. The structural message is a parallel to the forward theory: regularity of the marginals produces smooth maps going forward, and non-degeneracy of the plan produces invertibility going backward.

What carries the argument

The second variation of the optimal-transport functional with respect to the ground cost, analyzed in Hölder spaces and shown non-degenerate modulo natural transport invariances; this curvature operator is what converts a continuous plan into local invertibility of the inverse problem.

What would settle it

Exhibit smooth positive densities and a cost perturbation orthogonal to the natural invariances for which the second variation vanishes, or a bilinear cost and spanning coupling where two distinct Mahalanobis matrices induce the same optimal plan.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Assuming smooth positive source and target densities, the second variation of the optimal transport functional with respect to the ground cost is non-degenerate in Hölder spaces modulo the natural transport invariances. This strict curvature, absent in discrete transport, implies local identifiability and stability of inverse optimal transport; for bilinear Mahalanobis costs a single optimal coupling recovers the cost uniquely up to invariances under a natural spanning condition.

Load-bearing premise

The source and target measures must have smooth positive densities; if densities vanish, are only weakly regular, or the setting is effectively discrete, the claimed non-degeneracy need not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Local recovery of the ground cost from one continuous optimal coupling is stable in Hölder topology once invariances are quotiented out.
  • Bilinear (Mahalanobis) costs are uniquely determined up to invariances from a single plan whenever a natural spanning condition holds.
  • Identifiability is generic: arbitrarily small smooth perturbations of the marginals destroy degeneracies that arise for affine maps.
  • Gaussian and other elliptical marginal pairs remain non-identifiable for this inverse problem because their optimal maps stay affine.
  • Entropic regularization of inverse OT admits quantitative bias and statistical variance bounds usable for practical estimation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Practitioners who currently fit discrete inverse OT may need continuous or finely discretized models if they want the curvature-based uniqueness the theory promises.
  • The genericity result suggests that synthetic experiments should avoid Gaussian or elliptical test cases when claiming recovery of Mahalanobis costs.
  • A natural next test is whether the same second-variation non-degeneracy survives for costs outside the bilinear family or for multi-marginal plans.
  • The forward–inverse parallel invites checking whether other regularity regimes (e.g., densities with free boundaries) produce intermediate curvature properties.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript (as described by its abstract) studies inverse optimal transport: recovering a ground cost from an observed optimal coupling. It argues that, unlike the discrete case (inverse LP, non-identifiable with flat directions), continuous OT with smooth positive source/target densities has a second variation of the OT functional with respect to the cost that is non-degenerate in Hölder spaces modulo natural transport invariances, yielding strict curvature, local identifiability, and stability. For bilinear (Mahalanobis) costs it claims unique recovery up to invariances from a single coupling under a spanning condition, genericity under small marginal perturbations, degeneracy when the OT map is affine (e.g. Gaussians), and bias/variance bounds under entropic regularization. A structural parallel with forward OT is drawn: regularity of marginals gives smooth maps forward, and non-degeneracy of the plan gives curvature inverse.

Significance. If the second-variation non-degeneracy, the precise kernel of invariances, the spanning-condition uniqueness for bilinear costs, and the entropic bias/variance bounds are correctly proved, the work would be a substantial contribution to inverse OT and to the analytic theory of cost-dependent OT. The discrete-to-continuous structural break and the genericity statement under marginal perturbations would be particularly useful for applications that currently treat inverse OT as an ill-posed LP. The abstract alone, however, does not supply machine-checked proofs, code, or explicit formulae, so significance remains conditional on the missing analytic content.

major comments (3)
  1. The supplied full manuscript text is not the paper under review: it is the unrelated Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript on 3D kilonova radiative transfer (arXiv:2604.22671). No theorems, second-variation formulae, Hölder estimates, spanning-condition statements, or entropic bias/variance derivations for inverse OT appear. The central claims of non-degeneracy modulo transport invariances and local invertibility therefore cannot be checked against any proof or equation in the provided text.
  2. From the abstract alone, the load-bearing claim is that the second variation of the OT functional with respect to the ground cost is non-degenerate in Hölder spaces modulo natural invariances when the marginals have smooth positive densities. Without the actual second-variation operator, its kernel characterization, and the Hölder-space estimates, it is impossible to verify that the kernel is exactly the stated invariances, that there are no further flat directions, or that the discrete-to-continuous structural break holds as claimed.
  3. The uniqueness result for bilinear/Mahalanobis costs under a 'natural spanning condition' and the genericity claim under arbitrarily small marginal perturbations are stated only at the level of the abstract. The precise definition of the spanning condition, the topology in which genericity is taken, and the treatment of the known degenerate cases (affine OT maps, Gaussians/ellipticals) are not available for inspection; these are load-bearing for the structured-cost applications.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract is clear and well structured, but several technical terms (natural transport invariances, spanning condition, precise Hölder indices) are left undefined; they would need explicit definitions in the body once the correct manuscript is supplied.
  2. The claimed parallel between forward and inverse OT is rhetorically attractive; once the correct text is available it should be tied to a specific theorem rather than left as a concluding slogan.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detectable: abstract states a standard second-variation / local-invertibility program; supplied full text is a different paper (kilonova RT), so no load-bearing OT derivation chain is available to reduce.

full rationale

The claimed result is a mathematical characterization: under smooth positive densities, the second variation of the OT cost functional w.r.t. the ground cost is non-degenerate in Hölder spaces modulo natural transport invariances, implying local identifiability/stability of inverse OT, and unique recovery for bilinear (Mahalanobis) costs under a spanning condition. From the abstract alone this is a standard first-principles curvature argument (forward regularity of maps ↔ inverse non-degeneracy of the plan), not a fit renamed as prediction, not a self-definitional loop, and not a uniqueness theorem imported solely by author self-citation. The CACHEABLE full manuscript is arXiv:2604.22671 (3D kilonova radiative transfer), not 2604.22670; no theorems, second-variation formulae, Hölder estimates, or spanning-condition proofs for the OT paper are present. Without those equations, no reduction of the form “Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction” can be exhibited. Per the hard rules, absence of quotable circular steps yields score 0 and empty steps. Residual risk is ordinary dependence on prior OT theory and the smooth-density premise, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review of 2604.22670; the cached full text is a different manuscript. Ledger entries are those the abstract makes load-bearing for the curvature and inverse-OT claims.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Source and target measures have smooth positive densities.
    Stated as the assumption that changes the inverse problem relative to discrete OT; all continuous curvature claims rest on it.
  • ad hoc to paper Second variation of the OT functional in the ground cost is analyzed in Hölder spaces and is non-degenerate modulo natural transport invariances.
    This is the paper's central analytic claim, treated as established in the abstract without accessible proof here.
  • domain assumption Natural transport invariances of the cost (the usual gauge freedom under which OT plans are unchanged) are the only kernel of the second variation.
    Identifiability is only claimed 'modulo' these invariances; the precise form is standard in OT but not spelled out in the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper For bilinear/Mahalanobis costs, a natural spanning condition on the coupling yields uniqueness up to invariances.
    Structured recovery result; spanning condition is not detailed in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Affine optimal maps (e.g. Gaussian or elliptical marginals) leave the inverse problem degenerate.
    Used as the main counterexample class where curvature fails.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Curvature of optimal transport with respect to the cost and applications to inverse optimal transport." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BHK6NXJI

@misc{pith2026260422670,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Curvature of optimal transport with respect to the cost and applications to inverse optimal transport},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BHK6NXJI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.22670}
}
read the original abstract

We study the inverse optimal transport problem of recovering the ground cost from an optimal transport plan. In discrete settings, this problem reduces to inverse linear programming and is intrinsically ill-posed, exhibiting non-identifiability and flat directions. We show that in the continuous setting, the regularity of the marginals fundamentally alters the structure of the inverse problem. Assuming smooth positive densities for the source and target measures, we characterize the second variation of the optimal transport functional with respect to the ground cost in H\"older spaces. In particular, we show that it is non-degenerate modulo the natural transport invariances, yielding a strict curvature property that is absent in discrete transport. As a consequence, we obtain local identifiability and stability results for inverse optimal transport. For the structured family of bilinear costs (i.e. Mahalanobis parametrizations), the ground cost can be uniquely recovered up to the intrinsic invariances from a single optimal coupling under a natural spanning condition. We further show that this identifiability property is generic under arbitrarily small perturbations of the marginals, while settings where the optimal transport map is affine (for instance Gaussian or elliptical marginals) remain degenerate. Finally, we establish precise bounds on the bias and statistical variance of inverse optimal transport under entropic regularization. These results reveal a structural parallel between forward and inverse optimal transport: regularity of the marginals ensures smooth optimal maps in the forward problem, while non-degeneracy of the induced transport plan yields curvature and local invertibility in the inverse problem.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22670 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. L n 0 on the diagonal for Gaussian to Gaussian (blue) and Gaussian to Perturbed Gaussian (red) iOT (a) n = 5 samples (b) n = 10 samples (c) n = 20 samples (d) n = 30 samples view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. L n 0 on the diagonal for the Gaussian to Perturbed Gaussian setting. Numerical illustration In view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. L n 0 on the diagonal for Gaussian/Gaussian (blue) and Gaussian/annulus (red) iOT view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: displays the transport map TA for the previous Gaussian/annulus case as arrows acting on n = 1000 samples for different matrices A = diag(u, 1 − u) for u ∈ {0.5, 0.9, 0.1}. The map for u = 0.5 transports the middle of the Gaussian quite uniformly to the annulus, wherea…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Jε on [0, 1]2 with R = ∥∥∗ Conclusion This work establishes a sharp contrast between inverse OT regimes: from a single coupling, the problem is intrinsically degenerate in discrete/polyhedral or highly symmetric settings, while smooth continuous marginals can restore l…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Computational and Statistical Guarantees of the \textit{c}-Rectified flow

    stat.ML 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Iterative c-rectified flow converges to optimal transport under regularity assumptions, and score-based plug-in estimation yields near-optimal transport-map rates.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, L13

    2017

  2. [2]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2017, Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 161101

    2017

  3. [3]

    T., Just, O., & Bauswein, A

    Ardevol-Pulpillo, R., Janka, H. T., Just, O., & Bauswein, A. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 4754 ARTIS Collaboration, Sim, S., Kromer, M., et al. 2025, ARTIS

    2019

  4. [4]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.05812

    Arya, A., Damgaard, R., Sneppen, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.05812

    arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    2013, ApJ, 773, 78

    Bauswein, A., Goriely, S., & Janka, H.-T. 2013, ApJ, 773, 78

    2013

  6. [6]

    2010, Phys

    Bauswein, A., Oechslin, R., & Janka, H. 2010, Phys. Rev. D, 81, 024012

    2010

  7. [7]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.18364

    Brethauer, D., Kasen, D., Margutti, R., & Chornock, R. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.18364

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    A., & Kromer, M

    Bulla, M., Sim, S. A., & Kromer, M. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 967

    2015

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.05703

    Chiba, K., Tanaka, M., Wanajo, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.05703

    2026 arXiv

  2. [10]

    E., Bauswein, A., Sim, S

    Collins, C. E., Bauswein, A., Sim, S. A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 1858

    2023

  3. [11]

    E., Shingles, L

    Collins, C. E., Shingles, L. J., Bauswein, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 1333

    2024

  4. [12]

    & Siegel, D

    Combi, L. & Siegel, D. M. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.12284

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    A., Foley, R

    Coulter, D. A., Foley, R. J., Kilpatrick, C. D., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1556

    2017

  6. [14]

    S., Berger, E., Villar, V

    Cowperthwaite, P. S., Berger, E., Villar, V . A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, L17

    2017

  7. [15]

    Dhawan, S., Bulla, M., Goobar, A., Sagués Carracedo, A., & Setzer, C. N. 2020, ApJ, 888, 67

    2020

  8. [16]

    2022, ApJ, 939, 8

    Domoto, N., Tanaka, M., Kato, D., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 8

    2022

  9. [17]

    2021, ApJ, 913, 26

    Domoto, N., Tanaka, M., Wanajo, S., & Kawaguchi, K. 2021, ApJ, 913, 26

    2021

  10. [18]

    2025, ApJ, 978, 99

    Domoto, N., Wanajo, S., Tanaka, M., Kato, D., & Hotokezaka, K. 2025, ApJ, 978, 99

    2025

  11. [19]

    R., Piro, A

    Drout, M. R., Piro, A. L., Shappee, B. J., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1570 Fernández, R. & Metzger, B. D. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 502 Flörs, A., da Silva, R. F., Marques, J. P., Sampaio, J. M., & Martínez-Pinedo, G. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 063041

    2017

  12. [20]

    D., Haas, R., et al

    Foucart, F., Duez, M. D., Haas, R., et al. 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 107, 103055

    2023

  13. [21]

    2021, Phys

    Foucart, F., Mösta, P., Ramirez, T., et al. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 104, 123010

    2021

  14. [22]

    2018, ApJ, 860, 64

    Fujibayashi, S., Kiuchi, K., Nishimura, N., Sekiguchi, Y ., & Shibata, M. 2018, ApJ, 860, 64

    2018

  15. [23]

    H., Flors, A., & Ferreira da Silva, R

    Gillanders, J. H., Flors, A., & Ferreira da Silva, R. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.24257

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    H., Sim, S

    Gillanders, J. H., Sim, S. A., Smartt, S. J., Goriely, S., & Bauswein, A. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 2918

    2024

  17. [25]

    Gillanders, J. H. & Smartt, S. J. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 1663

    2025

  18. [26]

    H., Smartt, S

    Gillanders, J. H., Smartt, S. J., Sim, S. A., Bauswein, A., & Goriely, S. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 631

    2022

  19. [27]

    Hillier, D. J. 1990, A&A, 231, 111

    1990

  20. [28]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, L155

    Hotokezaka, K., Tanaka, M., Kato, D., & Gaigalas, G. 2023, MNRAS, 526, L155

    2023

  21. [29]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.12410

    Jerkstrand, A., Pognan, Q., Banerjee, S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.12410

    2025

  22. [30]

    Just, O., Bauswein, A., Ardevol Pulpillo, R., Goriely, S., & Janka, H. T. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 541

    2015

  23. [31]

    2022, MNRAS, 510, 2820

    Just, O., Kullmann, I., Goriely, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 2820

    2022

  24. [32]

    2023, ApJ, 951, L12

    Just, O., Vijayan, V ., Xiong, Z., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, L12

    2023

  25. [33]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.09040

    Just, O., Xiong, Z., & Martínez-Pinedo, G. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.09040

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Kasen, D., Fernández, R., & Metzger, B. D. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 1777

    2015

  27. [35]

    2022, ApJ, 933, 22

    Kawaguchi, K., Fujibayashi, S., Hotokezaka, K., Shibata, M., & Wanajo, S. 2022, ApJ, 933, 22

    2022

  28. [36]

    2021, ApJ, 913, 100

    Kawaguchi, K., Fujibayashi, S., Shibata, M., Tanaka, M., & Wanajo, S. 2021, ApJ, 913, 100

    2021

  29. [37]

    & Sim, S

    Kromer, M. & Sim, S. A. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 1809 5 https://github.com/artis-mcrt/artis/ 6 https://github.com/artis-mcrt/artistools/

    2009

  30. [38]

    2022, MNRAS, 510, 2804

    Kullmann, I., Goriely, S., Just, O., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 2804

    2022

  31. [39]

    Kurucz, R. L. 2006, in EAS Publications Series, V ol. 18, Radiative Transfer and Applications to Very Large Telescopes, ed. P. Stee (EDP Sciences), 129–155

    2006

  32. [40]

    Kurucz, R. L. 2018, Workshop on Astrophysical Opacities. ASP Conference Se- ries, 515, 47

    2018

  33. [41]

    J., Gompertz, B

    Levan, A. J., Gompertz, B. P., Salafia, O. S., et al. 2024, Nature, 626, 737

    2024

  34. [42]

    Lucy, L. B. 2002, A&A, 384, 725

    2002

  35. [43]

    Lucy, L. B. 2003, A&A, 403, 261

    2003

  36. [44]

    Lucy, L. B. 2005, A&A, 429, 19

    2005

  37. [45]

    2024, ApJ, 974, L5

    Magistrelli, F., Bernuzzi, S., Perego, A., & Radice, D. 2024, ApJ, 974, L5

    2024

  38. [46]

    & Chornock, R

    Margutti, R. & Chornock, R. 2021, ARA&A, 59, 155

    2021

  39. [47]

    A., Collins, C

    McNeill, F., Sim, S. A., Collins, C. E., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 546, stag068

    2026

  40. [48]

    Mendoza-Temis, J. d. J., Wu, M.-R., Langanke, K., et al. 2015, Phys. Rev. C, 92, 055805

    2015

  41. [49]

    M., Ryan, B

    Miller, J. M., Ryan, B. R., Dolence, J. C., et al. 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 100, 023008

    2019

  42. [50]

    P., Anderson, J., & Lu, W

    Mooley, K. P., Anderson, J., & Lu, W. 2022, Nature, 610, 273

    2022

  43. [51]

    2021, ApJ, 906, 98

    Nedora, V ., Bernuzzi, S., Radice, D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 906, 98

    2021

  44. [52]

    2023, Phys

    Neuweiler, A., Dietrich, T., Bulla, M., et al. 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 107, 023016

    2023

  45. [53]

    2002, Phys

    Oechslin, R., Rosswog, S., & Thielemann, F.-K. 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 103005

    2002

  46. [54]

    2017, ApJ, 850, L37

    Perego, A., Radice, D., & Bernuzzi, S. 2017, ApJ, 850, L37

    2017

  47. [55]

    M., et al

    Perego, A., Rosswog, S., Cabezón, R. M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 3134

    2014

  48. [56]

    2022, ApJ, 925, 22

    Perego, A., Vescovi, D., Fiore, A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 925, 22

    2022

  49. [57]

    2017, Nature, 551, 67

    Pian, E., D’Avanzo, P., Benetti, S., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 67

    2017

  50. [58]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 5220

    Pognan, Q., Grumer, J., Jerkstrand, A., & Wanajo, S. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 5220

    2023

  51. [59]

    2025, MNRAS, 536, 2973

    Pognan, Q., Wu, M.-R., Martínez-Pinedo, G., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 2973

    2025

  52. [60]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 869, 130

    Radice, D., Perego, A., Hotokezaka, K., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 869, 130

    2018

  53. [61]

    2025, ApJ, 980, 43

    Rahmouni, S., Tanaka, M., Domoto, N., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 43

    2025

  54. [62]

    2025, MNRAS, 538, 907

    Rosswog, S., Sarin, N., Nakar, E., & Diener, P. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 907

    2025

  55. [63]

    2015, Phys

    Sekiguchi, Y ., Kiuchi, K., Kyutoku, K., & Shibata, M. 2015, Phys. Rev. D, 91, 064059

    2015

  56. [64]

    J., Collins, C

    Shingles, L. J., Collins, C. E., Holas, A., et al. 2026, artistools

    2026

  57. [65]

    J., Collins, C

    Shingles, L. J., Collins, C. E., Vijayan, V ., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, L41

    2023

  58. [66]

    J., Sim, S

    Shingles, L. J., Sim, S. A., Kromer, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 2029

    2020

  59. [67]

    Siegel, D. M. 2019, European Physical Journal A, 55, 203

    2019

  60. [68]

    Siegel, D. M. & Metzger, B. D. 2018, ApJ, 858, 52

    2018

  61. [69]

    Sim, S. A. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 154

    2007

  62. [70]

    J., Chen, T

    Smartt, S. J., Chen, T. W., Jerkstrand, A., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 75

    2017

  63. [71]

    2024, A&A, 692, A134

    Sneppen, A., Damgaard, R., Watson, D., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A134

    2024

  64. [72]

    & Watson, D

    Sneppen, A. & Watson, D. 2023, A&A, 675, A194

    2023

  65. [73]

    W., Hempel, M., & Fischer, T

    Steiner, A. W., Hempel, M., & Fischer, T. 2013, ApJ, 774, 17

    2013

  66. [74]

    & Hotokezaka, K

    Tanaka, M. & Hotokezaka, K. 2013, ApJ, 775, 113

    2013

  67. [75]

    2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 496, 1369

    Tanaka, M., Kato, D., Gaigalas, G., & Kawaguchi, K. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 496, 1369

    2020

  68. [76]

    R., Levan, A

    Tanvir, N. R., Levan, A. J., González-Fernández, C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, L27

    2017

  69. [77]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.13061

    Tarumi, Y ., Hotokezaka, K., Domoto, N., & Tanaka, M. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.13061

    2023 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Typel, S., Röpke, G., Klähn, T., Blaschke, D., & Wolter, H. H. 2010, Phys. Rev. C, 81, 015803

    2010

  71. [79]

    2024, PhD thesis, Heidelberg University, Combined Faculty of Math- ematics, Engineering and Natural Sciences

    Vijayan, V . 2024, PhD thesis, Heidelberg University, Combined Faculty of Math- ematics, Engineering and Natural Sciences

    2024

  72. [80]

    2026, PoS, FAIRness2024, 041

    Vijayan, V ., Bauswein, A., & Martinez-Pinedo, G. 2026, PoS, FAIRness2024, 041

    2026

  73. [81]

    A., Guillochon, J., Berger, E., et al

    Villar, V . A., Guillochon, J., Berger, E., et al. 2017, ApJ, 851, L21

    2017

  74. [82]

    2014, ApJ, 789, L39

    Wanajo, S., Sekiguchi, Y ., Nishimura, N., et al. 2014, ApJ, 789, L39

    2014

  75. [83]

    J., Selsing, J., et al

    Watson, D., Hansen, C. J., Selsing, J., et al. 2019, Nature, 574, 497 Article number, page 16 C. E. Collins et al.: Exploring the diversity of kilonovae with 3D radiative transfer ���� ����Fraction of the total mass ejected in the direction of the pole (given by all model grid...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.