arxiv: 2604.24970 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

Core Collapse Supernova Modeling: The Next Ten Years

Anthony Mezzacappa

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 17:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE

keywords collapsecoresupernovamodelingneutrinobeencomponentsequation

0 comments

The pith

Core collapse supernova models have demonstrated the neutrino shock reheating mechanism in three dimensions but require substantially more rigorous treatments of neutrino kinetics, fluid instabilities, magnetic fields, strong gravity, and nuclear physics to achieve quantitative predictive power.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Core collapse supernovae occur when the cores of massive stars run out of fuel and collapse under their own gravity, then explode. For decades, scientists have used computer simulations to understand these events. The simulations must track neutrinos, swirling fluids, magnetic fields, and the extreme gravity near the collapsed core. Recent three-dimensional models have begun to predict gravitational wave signals that could be detected on Earth. The paper states that the basic idea of neutrinos reheating the stalled shock wave to cause the explosion has been shown to work in these models. However, the outcomes still change a lot depending on exactly how the neutrinos interact with matter or how magnetic fields are included. To make the models accurate enough to compare with real observations, the authors say modelers must improve both the large-scale physics like gravity and the small-scale physics like nuclear reactions, and they must work together with experts in stellar evolution and nuclear theory.

Core claim

The efficacy of the neutrino shock reheating mechanism for core collapse supernovae has been demonstrated.

Load-bearing premise

That increased sophistication in the treatment of both macroscopic and microscopic components, combined with interdisciplinary cooperation, will deliver the required quantitative predictive capability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24970 by Anthony Mezzacappa.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Head to head comparison from M¨uller et al. (2012) of one- and two-dimensional simulations using an effective potential approach (M15) versus general relativity (G15). Plotted are the angle-averaged shock trajectories. proper treatment of stellar matter not in nuclear statistical equilibrium (NSE). In the longer term, advancement will require grappling with the challenging problems, to say the least, of ne… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Illustration of ray-by-ray neutrino kinetics. Two spherically symmetric problems are shown. Neutrino heating at A3 is computed as if the thermodynamic conditions at A are the same over the entire surface between A1 and A2. Similarly, neutrino heating at B3 is computed as if the thermodynamic conditions at B are the same over the entire surface between B1 and B2. The more the thermodynamic conditions differ… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Realizable domains for Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics [left panel (Chu et al., 2019)] and Fermi–Dirac statistics (right panel). In the left panel, the realizable domain is shaded in red, where the flux, H, is related to the energy density, I, by H ≤ I. Also included in the left panel is the realizable domain for zero fluid velocity and Fermi–Dirac statistics. The zeroth angular moment is bounded by the fact … view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Eddington factor versus flux factor for four different values of the number density (Chu et al., 2019) In each case, four different closures are considered. The upper and lower bounds, Eqn. (17), are plotted (solid black curves), as well. At low number density (upper left panel), Minerbo closure agrees with closures that derive from Fermi–Dirac statistics [e.g., Chernohorsky–Bludman (CB) closure] and remai… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Plots of average shock radii (left panels) and explosion energies (right panels) for the one- and two-dimensional models of Nav´o et al. (2023) using different treatments of nuclear burning in non-NSE matter—in particular, nuclear networks with 16 and 94 nuclear species. Of particular note are the plots corresponding to their two-dimensional models. ∂t √ γFεi + ∂j √ γ(αPε j i − β jFεi ) − √ γα∂ε view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The length scale, LSI, is the length scale corresponding to neutrino–neutrino forward scattering, responsible for fast flavor transformation in core collapse supernovae, plotted here as a function of radius at the time of maximum shock radius in the one-dimensional simulation from which the data were drawn (Johns et al., 2025). On the other hand, the length scale, Hρ, is the density scale height, a length … view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Diagrammatic representation of the Hartree–Fock corrections to the single-particle dispersion relations (single-particle masses) resulting from forward scattering (bubble diagrams) and exchange scattering (oyster diagrams) of a nucleon in the mean field created by all of the other nucleons in the medium. where χ = χ(J , |H| ⃗ ) is the Eddington factor. Levermore (1984) and Larecki & Banach (2011) demonstra… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Sum of all ring diagrams to all orders of perturbation theory in the random phase approximation, the leading order approximation to the response of nuclear matter to a neutrino interacting with it. The interaction lines in this case are W/Z-mediated weak interactions, which can excite particle–hole pairs in the medium, which in turn can produce W/Z bosons when deexcited, and so on, creating long-range inte… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Electron-neutrino absorption on a free neutron via a W+-mediated weak interaction (left panel) and on a mean-field–dressed neutron via an effective W+-mediated weak interaction in the RPA approximation (right panel). 3 The Far Term 3.1 Neutrino Flavor Transformation The discovery of the fast flavor instability by Sawyer (2005) for neutrino flavor transformation and the expectation that it may occur below t… view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Differences in the neutrino inverse mean free path for charged- and neutral-current interactions, separated into vector and axial-vector components (Lin et al., 2023), given variations in the equation of state resulting from variations in the nucleon–nucleon interaction adopted (EOS-Skyrme) or given variations in how the neutrino opacities are calculated (mb). The points labeled “mb” correspond to the mag… view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Plot of the nuclear symmetry energy parameters S0 and L (capturing the change in the energy of nuclear matter as we move away from symmetric nuclear matter, which comprises equal numbers of neutrons and protons) for a number of nuclear equations of state, a subset of which have been implemented in core collapse supernova simulations. The gray shaded region is excluded by terrestrial experiment and astrono… view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Regions in the frequency–time domain corresponding to different slopes of the high-frequency, gf-feature in a core collapse supernova gravitational wave spectrogram, and their uncertainties, for different equations of state, at three different distances, taken from Murphy et al. (2024). The results at 1 kpc, which are expected for 10 kpc in next-generation detectors, indicate that discernment of equations… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Core collapse supernova modeling has advanced considerably since the first numerical simulations were performed sixty years ago. In particular, the last decade has brought us sophisticated three-dimensional models with significant predictive capabilities -- e.g., for core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission. The six decades of modeling have shown us the importance of individual components of these general relativistic neutrino radiation magnetohydrodynamics events -- specifically, the importance of neutrino kinetics, fluid instabilities, magnetic fields, strong gravity, and the nuclear equation of state and neutrino--matter interactions calculated in a manner consistent with the equation of state. They have also shown us that simulation outcomes are sensitive to variations in the treatment of these ingredients, demanding a level of rigor that has not yet been consistently met by modelers. The efficacy of the neutrino shock reheating mechanism for core collapse supernovae has been demonstrated. The models now require an improved quantitative predictive capability, which will be achieved through increased sophistication in the treatment of model components, both macroscopic (e.g., strong-field gravity) and microscopic (e.g., neutrino--matter interactions). Advancement of core collapse supernova theory will also require the cooperation of modelers in other fields, especially stellar evolution and nuclear theory, to meet the level of rigor required to make the most of the eventuality of a Galactic core collapse supernova and its multimessenger emissions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This perspective recaps 60 years of CCSN modeling and flags the need for tighter rigor plus cross-field input, but its claim that neutrino reheating efficacy is demonstrated sits in tension with its own warnings on sensitivity and inconsistent standards.

read the letter

The paper is a high-level perspective that walks through the main physical pieces—neutrino transport, fluid instabilities, magnetic fields, strong gravity, and consistent nuclear EOS plus interactions—and notes how outcomes shift when any of them are approximated differently. It correctly flags that three-dimensional models have reached the point where they can make useful predictions for gravitational-wave signals, and it stresses that a galactic supernova will only be fully useful if the models reach quantitative reliability. That part is straightforward and useful as a reminder of what the community still needs to tighten up before the next nearby event.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. This perspective paper summarizes six decades of core collapse supernova modeling, highlighting advancements in 3D simulations with predictive power for gravitational waves. It underscores the critical roles of neutrino kinetics, fluid instabilities, magnetic fields, strong gravity, and consistent microphysics (nuclear EOS and neutrino-matter interactions). The text notes sensitivity of simulation outcomes to these treatments and the need for greater rigor, states that the neutrino shock reheating mechanism has demonstrated efficacy, and calls for more sophisticated treatments of macroscopic and microscopic components plus interdisciplinary collaboration to achieve quantitative predictive capabilities for a Galactic event and its multimessenger signals.

Significance. The manuscript offers a forward-looking assessment of the field that, if accurate, could serve as a useful guide for prioritizing research directions in supernova theory. By stressing the requirement for consistency and rigor in modeling, it identifies a path toward reliable predictions that would be valuable for interpreting future observations of a nearby core collapse supernova.

major comments (1)

The claim that 'The efficacy of the neutrino shock reheating mechanism for core collapse supernovae has been demonstrated' (Abstract) is presented as a key conclusion but stands in contrast to the observation that 'simulation outcomes are sensitive to variations in the treatment of these ingredients, demanding a level of rigor that has not yet been consistently met by modelers' (Abstract). This creates an internal inconsistency for the central narrative: if rigor has not been consistently met, the successful explosions in existing models may not robustly demonstrate the mechanism's efficacy independent of specific approximations in neutrino transport, instabilities, or microphysics. The paper should either provide evidence that the cited 3D models meet the advocated rigor standards or qualify the demonstration claim accordingly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying a potential inconsistency in the abstract. We address the major comment below and outline the revisions we intend to implement.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The claim that 'The efficacy of the neutrino shock reheating mechanism for core collapse supernovae has been demonstrated' (Abstract) is presented as a key conclusion but stands in contrast to the observation that 'simulation outcomes are sensitive to variations in the treatment of these ingredients, demanding a level of rigor that has not yet been consistently met by modelers' (Abstract). This creates an internal inconsistency for the central narrative: if rigor has not been consistently met, the successful explosions in existing models may not robustly demonstrate the mechanism's efficacy independent of specific approximations in neutrino transport, instabilities, or microphysics. The paper should either provide evidence that the cited 3D models meet the advocated rigor standards or qualify the demonstration claim accordingly.

Authors: We agree that the abstract statements, as currently phrased, can appear in tension. The assertion that the efficacy of the neutrino shock reheating mechanism has been demonstrated is intended to convey that three-dimensional simulations incorporating neutrino transport have produced successful explosions via this process, in contrast to one-dimensional models where the shock fails to revive. This outcome has been obtained across multiple independent codes and groups. At the same time, we recognize that these successes remain sensitive to the specific treatments of neutrino kinetics, instabilities, and microphysics, and that the full level of rigor advocated in the paper has not been uniformly achieved. To resolve the inconsistency, we will revise the abstract to qualify the demonstration claim explicitly, for instance by stating that the mechanism has been demonstrated in current three-dimensional models while emphasizing that quantitative predictive power requires further advancements in both macroscopic and microscopic physics. This change will be incorporated in the revised manuscript. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Perspective review with no derivation chain or fitted predictions

full rationale

This is a forward-looking perspective article summarizing six decades of core-collapse supernova modeling progress and outlining requirements for the next decade. It contains no new derivations, equations, first-principles calculations, or quantitative predictions that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. The statement that neutrino reheating efficacy 'has been demonstrated' is presented as a summary of prior simulation results rather than a result derived within this manuscript. No self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that close on themselves are present. The text is self-contained as a review and call for interdisciplinary work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The perspective rests on standard domain knowledge in astrophysics and nuclear physics with no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Neutrino shock reheating is the operative explosion mechanism in core collapse supernovae
Stated as demonstrated by existing models in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5525 in / 1145 out tokens · 70751 ms · 2026-05-07T17:54:13.162857+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

The jet-shaped pipe morphology in planetary nebulae and core-collapse supernova remnants
astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

Morphological similarity between pipe structures in planetary nebulae and supernova remnants, plus a jet simulation, indicates that jittering jets shaped both.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Banerjee , A

A. Banerjee , A. Dighe & G. Raffelt (2011), Linearized flavor-stability analysis of dense neutrino streams , Phys. Rev. D, 84 053013

2011
[2]

S. W. Bruenn (1985), Stellar core collapse - Numerical model and infall epoch , Ap.J. Suppl., 58 771--841

1985
[3]

Burrows, D

A. Burrows, D. Radice & D. Vartanyan (2019), Three-dimensional supernova explosion simulations of 9-, 10-, 11-, 12-, and 13- M_ stars , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 485 3153--3168

2019
[4]

Burrows & R

A. Burrows & R. F. Sawyer (1998), Effects of correlations on neutrino opacities in nuclear matter , Phys. Rev. C, 58 554--571

1998
[5]

Burrows & R

A. Burrows & R. F. Sawyer (1999), Many-body corrections to charged-current neutrino absorption rates in nuclear matter , Phys. Rev. C, 59 510--514

1999
[6]

Burrows & D

A. Burrows & D. Vartanyan (2021), Core-collapse supernova explosion theory , Nature, 589 29--39

2021
[7]

R. Chu , E. Endeve , C. D. Hauck & A. Mezzacappa (2019), Realizability-preserving DG-IMEX method for the two-moment model of fermion transport, Journ. Comp. Phys., 389 62 -- 93

2019
[8]

S. A. Colgate & R. H. White (1966), The Hydrodynamic Behavior of Supernovae Explosions , Ap.J., 143 626

1966
[9]

C. E. Fields & S. M. Couch (2020), On the Development of Multidimensional Progenitor Models for Core-collapse Supernovae , Ap.J., 901 33

2020
[10]

C. E. Fields & S. M. Couch (2021), Three-dimensional Hydrodynamic Simulations of Convective Nuclear Burning in Massive Stars Near Iron Core Collapse , Ap.J., 921 28

2021
[11]

R. Glas, O. Just, H.-T. Janka & M. Obergaulinger (2019), Three-dimensional Core-collapse Supernova Simulations with Multidimensional Neutrino Transport Compared to the Ray-by-ray-plus Approximation, Ap.J., 873 45

2019
[12]

Hempel & J

M. Hempel & J. Schaffner-Bielich (2010), A statistical model for a complete supernova equation of state , Nucl. Phys. A, 837 210--254

2010
[13]

W. R. Hix , O. E. B. Messer , A. Mezzacappa , M. Liebend \"o rfer , J. M. Sampaio , K. Langanke , D. J. Dean & G. Martinez-Pinedo (2003), Consequences of Nuclear Electron Capture in Core Collapse Supernovae , Phys. Rev. Lett., 91 201102

2003
[14]

Iwakami , H

W. Iwakami , H. Okawa , H. Nagakura , A. Harada , S. Furusawa , K. Sumiyoshi , H. Matsufuru & S. Yamada (2020), Simulations of the Early Postbounce Phase of Core-collapse Supernovae in Three-dimensional Space with Full Boltzmann Neutrino Transport , Ap.J., 903 82

2020
[15]

Janka (2012), Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 62 407--451

H.-T. Janka (2012), Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 62 407--451

2012
[16]

Janka (2025), Long-Term Multidimensional Models of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Progress and Challenges , Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 75 425--461

H.-T. Janka (2025), Long-Term Multidimensional Models of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Progress and Challenges , Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 75 425--461

2025
[17]

Johns , S

L. Johns , S. Richers & M.-R. Wu (2025), Neutrino Oscillations in Core-Collapse Supernovae and Neutron Star Mergers , Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 75 399--423

2025
[18]

Kuroda (2021), Impact of a Magnetic Field on Neutrino-Matter Interactions in Core-collapse Supernovae , Ap.J., 906 128

T. Kuroda (2021), Impact of a Magnetic Field on Neutrino-Matter Interactions in Core-collapse Supernovae , Ap.J., 906 128

2021
[19]

Laiu , E

M. Laiu , E. Endeve , J. Austin Harris , Z. Elledge & A. Mezzacappa (2025), DG-IMEX method for a two-moment model for radiation transport in the O(v/c) limit , J. Comp. Phys., 520 113477

2025
[20]

Langanke , G

K. Langanke , G. Mart \' nez-Pinedo , J. M. Sampaio , D. J. Dean , W. R. Hix , O. E. Messer , A. Mezzacappa , M. Liebend \"o rfer , H.-T. Janka & M. Rampp (2003), Electron Capture Rates on Nuclei and Implications for Stellar Core Collapse , Phys. Rev. Lett., 90 241102

2003
[21]

Laraib & S

Z. Laraib & S. Richers (2025), Many-body simulations of the fast flavor instability , Phys. Rev. D, 112 L101304

2025
[22]

Larecki & Z

W. Larecki & Z. Banach (2011), Entropic Derivation of the Spectral Eddington Factors , Journ. Quant. Spect. Rad. Trans., 112 2486--2506

2011
[23]

C. D. Levermore (1984), Relating Eddington factors to flux limiters. , Journ. Quant. Spect. Rad. Trans., 31 149--160

1984
[24]

Liebend \"o rfer , O

M. Liebend \"o rfer , O. E. B. Messer , A. Mezzacappa , S. W. Bruenn , C. Y. Cardall & F. K. Thielemann (2004), A Finite Difference Representation of Neutrino Radiation Hydrodynamics in Spherically Symmetric General Relativistic Spacetime , Ap.J. Suppl., 150 263--316

2004
[25]

Liebend \"o rfer , M

M. Liebend \"o rfer , M. Rampp , H.-T. Janka & A. Mezzacappa (2005), Supernova Simulations with Boltzmann Neutrino Transport: A Comparison of Methods , Ap.J., 620 840--860

2005
[26]

Z. Lin , G. Col\` o , A. Steiner & A. Stinson (2026), Bayesian Inference of the Landau Parameter from Joint Gamow-Teller Measurements , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.05564

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[27]

Z. Lin , A. W. Steiner & J. Margueron (2023), Uncertainty quantification for neutrino opacities in core-collapse supernovae and neutron star mergers , Phys. Rev. C, 107 015804

2023
[28]

Marek , H

A. Marek , H. Dimmelmeier , H.-T. Janka , E. M \"u ller & R. Buras (2006), Exploring the relativistic regime with Newtonian hydrodynamics: an improved effective gravitational potential for supernova simulations , Astron. Astrophys., 445 273--289

2006
[29]

Mezzacappa , E

A. Mezzacappa , E. Endeve , O. E. B. Messer & S. W. Bruenn (2020), Physical, numerical, and computational challenges of modeling neutrino transport in core-collapse supernovae , Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, 6 4

2020
[30]

M \"u ller (2020), Hydrodynamics of core-collapse supernovae and their progenitors , Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, 6 3

B. M \"u ller (2020), Hydrodynamics of core-collapse supernovae and their progenitors , Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, 6 3

2020
[31]

M \"u ller , H.-T

B. M \"u ller , H.-T. Janka & H. Dimmelmeier (2010), A New Multi-dimensional General Relativistic Neutrino Hydrodynamic Code for Core-collapse Supernovae. I. Method and Code Tests in Spherical Symmetry , Ap.J. Suppl., 189 104--133

2010
[32]

M \"u ller , H.-T

B. M \"u ller , H.-T. Janka & A. Marek (2012), A New Multi-Dimensional General Relativistic Neutrino Hydrodynamics Code for Core-Collapse Supernovae II. Relativistic Explosion Models of Core-Collapse Supernovae , Ap.J., 756 84

2012
[33]

M \"u ller , T

B. M \"u ller , T. Melson , A. Heger & H.-T. Janka (2017), Supernova simulations from a 3D progenitor model - Impact of perturbations and evolution of explosion properties , Mon. Not. Roy. Ast. Soc., 472 491--513

2017
[34]

M \"u ller , M

B. M \"u ller , M. Viallet , A. Heger & H.-T. Janka (2016), The Last Minutes of Oxygen Shell Burning in a Massive Star , Ap.J., 833 124

2016
[35]

R. D. Murphy , A. Casallas-Lagos , A. Mezzacappa , M. Zanolin , R. E. Landfield , E. J. Lentz , P. Marronetti , J. M. Antelis & C. Moreno (2024), Dependence of the reconstructed core-collapse supernova gravitational wave high-frequency feature on the nuclear equation of state in real interferometric data , Phys. Rev. D, 110 083006

2024
[36]

Nav \'o , M

G. Nav \'o , M. Reichert , M. Obergaulinger & A. Arcones (2023), Core-collapse Supernova Simulations with Reduced Nucleosynthesis Networks , Ap.J., 951 112

2023
[37]

Rampp & H.-T

M. Rampp & H.-T. Janka (2002), Radiation hydrodynamics with neutrinos. Variable Eddington factor method for core-collapse supernova simulations , Astron. Astrophys., 396 361--392

2002
[38]

Reddy , M

S. Reddy , M. Prakash & J. M. Lattimer (1998), Neutrino interactions in hot and dense matter , Phys. Rev. D, 58 013009

1998
[39]

Reddy , M

S. Reddy , M. Prakash , J. M. Lattimer & J. A. Pons (1999), Effects of strong and electromagnetic correlations on neutrino interactions in dense matter , Phys. Rev. C, 59 2888--2918

1999
[40]

Richers & M

S. Richers & M. Sen (2022), Fast Flavor Transformations , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.03561

work page arXiv 2022
[41]

L. F. Roberts , S. Reddy & G. Shen (2012), Medium modification of the charged-current neutrino opacity and its implications , Phys. Rev. C, 86 065803

2012
[42]

Rrapaj , J

E. Rrapaj , J. W. Holt , A. Bartl , S. Reddy & A. Schwenk (2015), Charged-current reactions in the supernova neutrino-sphere , Phys. Rev. C, 91 035806

2015
[43]

R. F. Sawyer (2005), Speed-up of neutrino transformations in a supernova environment , Phys. Rev. D, 72 045003

2005
[44]

Tamborra & S

I. Tamborra & S. Shalgar (2021), New Developments in Flavor Evolution of a Dense Neutrino Gas , Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 71 165--188

2021
[45]

Tews , J

I. Tews , J. M. Lattimer , A. Ohnishi & E. E. Kolomeitsev (2017), Symmetry Parameter Constraints from a Lower Bound on Neutron-matter Energy , Ap.J., 848 105

2017
[46]

Vartanyan , A

D. Vartanyan , A. Burrows , D. Radice , M. A. Skinner & J. Dolence (2018), Revival of the fittest: exploding core-collapse supernovae from 12 to 25 M _ , Mon. Not. Roy. Ast. Soc., 477 3091--3108

2018
[47]

Vartanyan , A

D. Vartanyan , A. Burrows , D. Radice , M. A. Skinner & J. Dolence (2019), A successful 3D core-collapse supernova explosion model , Mon. Not. Roy. Ast. Soc., 482 351--369

2019
[48]

M. C. Volpe (2024), Neutrinos from dense environments: Flavor mechanisms, theoretical approaches, observations, and new directions, Rev. Mod. Phys., 96 025004

2024
[49]

J. R. Wilson (1985), Supernovae and Post-Collapse Behavior , in Numerical Astrophysics, J. M. Centrella , J. M. Leblanc & R. L. Bowers , eds., 422

1985
[50]

Yamada , H

S. Yamada , H. Nagakura , R. Akaho , A. Harada , S. Furusawa , W. Iwakami , H. Okawa , H. Matsufuru & K. Sumiyoshi (2024), Physical mechanism of core-collapse supernovae that neutrinos drive , Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B, 100 190--233

2024
[51]

Yoshida , T

T. Yoshida , T. Takiwaki , K. Kotake , K. Takahashi , K. Nakamura & H. Umeda (2021), Three-dimensional Hydrodynamics Simulations of Precollapse Shell Burning in the Si- and O-rich Layers , Ap.J., 908 44

2021