Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

The jet-shaped pipe morphology in planetary nebulae and core-collapse supernova remnants

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Jets shaped the narrow pipe structures seen across some planetary nebulae and core-collapse supernova remnants.

desk verdict This is incremental work in the JJEM series that adds a few PNe examples and one simulation but stays at visual resemblance without numbers or alternative checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.03961 v3 pith:AF2FUD3M submitted 2026-05-05 astro-ph.HE

Jessica Braudo , Noam Soker (Technion , Israel) This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords planetarynebulaecore-collapsesupernovaremnantsjetsmorphologyexplosionmechanismhydrodynamicsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper compares images of planetary nebulae and two core-collapse supernova remnants that both show a narrow faint zone called a pipe running side to side. It presents examples of PNe with pipes or opposite narrow lobes and argues that in some cases the lobes can merge into a single pipe. A three-dimensional hydrodynamical simulation of a massive star exploded by three pairs of jets reproduces narrow opposite lobes that can later merge into a pipe. The authors conclude from the morphological match that the same jet activity shaped the pipes in the observed CCSNRs. This adds to a series of papers arguing that the jittering jets explosion mechanism is the main way core-collapse supernovae occur.

What carries the argument

The pipe, defined as a narrow faint zone extending from side to side, formed when opposite jet-driven lobes merge.

What would settle it

Finding a CCSNR with a clear pipe but no morphological or kinematic signatures of jets, or a simulation of non-jet processes that still produces a comparable pipe.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Qualitative similarity between the pipe morphology in two CCSNRs and jet-shaped PNe, together with a hydrodynamic simulation of three jet pairs that produces merging narrow lobes, indicates that jets shaped the pipes in both classes of objects and thereby supports the jittering jets explosion mechanism as the primary process for core-collapse supernovae.

Load-bearing premise

Visual resemblance between observed pipe and lobe shapes and the output of one jet simulation means the same jet process actually created the observed features rather than other mechanisms or projection effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • More CCSNRs should exhibit pipe or lobe structures traceable to jet activity.
  • The two opposite narrow lobes seen in some PNe can evolve into a single pipe through later merging.
  • Morphological comparisons between PNe and CCSNRs can serve as a diagnostic for the explosion mechanism in supernovae.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If jets dominate the shaping, kinematic maps of CCSNRs should show velocity signatures aligned with the pipe axis.
  • The same jet-pair geometry might appear in other supernova remnant classes if the mechanism is general.
  • Future high-resolution imaging surveys could test whether pipe frequency correlates with progenitor mass or rotation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper compares 'pipe' morphologies (narrow faint zones extending side-to-side) in two core-collapse supernova remnants (CCSNRs) with similar features in jet-shaped planetary nebulae (PNe), presents additional PNe with opposite narrow lobes, and reports a 3D hydrodynamic simulation of a massive-star explosion using three pairs of jets in the jittering jets explosion mechanism (JJEM). It concludes from qualitative image similarity that jets shaped the pipes in the CCSNRs and PNe, and that this supports JJEM as the primary CCSN explosion mechanism.

Significance. If the morphological analogy were supported by quantitative metrics and exclusion of alternatives, the work would add incremental morphological evidence for jet activity in CCSNRs and contribute to the ongoing debate on CCSN mechanisms. As presented, the qualitative nature of the comparisons limits its ability to distinguish JJEM from other processes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and simulation section] Abstract and the section on the hydrodynamic simulation: the claim that the three-pair jet run 'reproduces two opposite narrow lobes' that 'can merge later to form a pipe' rests on visual inspection alone; no quantitative similarity metrics (aspect ratios, surface-brightness profiles, spatial scales, or shape descriptors), parameter values, resolution tests, or time-sequence overlays are reported, rendering the match non-falsifiable.
  2. [Morphology comparison section] The section comparing CCSNR and PN morphologies: the inference that jets shaped the observed pipes in the two CCSNRs is drawn directly from qualitative resemblance to the PNe and the JJEM simulation, without any statistical test or error analysis on the morphological match and without addressing whether Rayleigh-Taylor/Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities, asymmetric ejecta, or line-of-sight projection could produce comparable faint zones.
  3. [Discussion section] Discussion section: the paper interprets the pipe features inside the JJEM framework advocated in prior works by the same authors, but provides no independent test (e.g., predicted velocity fields, abundance patterns, or multi-wavelength signatures) that would break the interpretive loop between assumed jet origin and observed morphology.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'in some cases the two opposite narrow lobes might merge,' but the manuscript does not specify the fraction of PNe for which this occurs or provide observational examples of intermediate stages.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions and text should clarify whether the displayed images are in the same wavelength band and whether any processing (e.g., continuum subtraction) was applied uniformly to CCSNRs and PNe.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful report. We address each major comment below, indicating revisions where appropriate. Our responses focus on the manuscript's scope as a qualitative morphological study within an ongoing series of papers.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and simulation section] Abstract and the section on the hydrodynamic simulation: the claim that the three-pair jet run 'reproduces two opposite narrow lobes' that 'can merge later to form a pipe' rests on visual inspection alone; no quantitative similarity metrics (aspect ratios, surface-brightness profiles, spatial scales, or shape descriptors), parameter values, resolution tests, or time-sequence overlays are reported, rendering the match non-falsifiable.

    Authors: We agree that the simulation comparison is presented qualitatively. In revision we will expand the simulation section to report the specific jet parameters (velocities, opening angles, durations), grid resolution, and a brief description of the time evolution showing lobe formation and potential merging. Quantitative metrics such as aspect ratios are not reported because the simulation and observations operate at vastly different physical scales and involve projection effects that preclude direct numerical comparison; we will add an explicit statement to this effect. The match remains visual by design, consistent with the paper's morphological focus. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Morphology comparison section] The section comparing CCSNR and PN morphologies: the inference that jets shaped the observed pipes in the two CCSNRs is drawn directly from qualitative resemblance to the PNe and the JJEM simulation, without any statistical test or error analysis on the morphological match and without addressing whether Rayleigh-Taylor/Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities, asymmetric ejecta, or line-of-sight projection could produce comparable faint zones.

    Authors: We acknowledge the absence of statistical tests and alternative explanations. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing why Rayleigh-Taylor or Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities are unlikely to produce the observed narrow, side-to-side faint zones (based on their typical morphology in CCSNR simulations) and briefly address projection effects. Statistical tests on small samples with heterogeneous image quality are not feasible here; we will note this limitation explicitly rather than claim a statistical demonstration. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion section] Discussion section: the paper interprets the pipe features inside the JJEM framework advocated in prior works by the same authors, but provides no independent test (e.g., predicted velocity fields, abundance patterns, or multi-wavelength signatures) that would break the interpretive loop between assumed jet origin and observed morphology.

    Authors: The manuscript's stated goal is morphological comparison to strengthen the case for JJEM as one element in a series of papers; it does not claim to provide independent tests such as velocity fields or abundance patterns. Such tests lie outside the present scope and would require new observational data or separate simulations. We will revise the discussion to clarify the paper's limited but complementary role within the broader JJEM argument rather than implying it stands alone. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; morphological analogy stands as independent interpretive step

full rationale

The paper advances its claim solely through qualitative comparison of observed pipe and lobe morphologies in CCSNRs and PNe against a single hydrodynamic simulation initialized with three jet pairs inside the JJEM framework. No equations, fitted parameters, uniqueness theorems, or self-citations are invoked as load-bearing premises that reduce the final suggestion (jets shaped the pipes) back to the inputs by construction. The simulation output is presented as a demonstration that such features are possible under jets, not as a statistical prediction or renamed empirical pattern. The series reference is contextual framing rather than the sole justification for the analogy. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external image data and does not match any enumerated circularity pattern.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the domain assumption that morphological similarity between observed objects and a chosen jet simulation indicates shared physical origin, plus the background premise that the JJEM framework is the appropriate lens for interpreting both PNe and CCSNR shapes.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Morphological similarity to a jet simulation implies that jets physically shaped the observed pipe and lobe structures.
    Invoked when the paper concludes jets shaped the pipes from qualitative resemblance alone.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The jet-shaped pipe morphology in planetary nebulae and core-collapse supernova remnants." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AF2FUD3M

@misc{pith2026260503961,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The jet-shaped pipe morphology in planetary nebulae and core-collapse supernova remnants},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AF2FUD3M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.03961}
}
read the original abstract

We compare images of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) remnants (CCSNRs) and jet-shaped planetary nebulae (PNe) that have a narrow, faint zone extending from side to side, termed a pipe, with a hydrodynamical numerical simulation exploding a massive star with three pairs of jets in the framework of the jittering jets explosion mechanism (JJEM), and conclude that jets shaped the pipes in these CCSNRs and PNe. We present two jet-shaped PNe with a pipe and three PNe with two opposite narrow jet-shaped lobes, and argue that in some cases the two opposite narrow lobes might merge to form one long, faint zone extending from side to side of the PN, namely, a pipe. From the qualitative similarity of the pipe morphology of the two CCSNRs we analyze with the pipe of the PNe, we suggest that jets also shaped the pipe of these CCSNRs. We strengthen this conclusion with a three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulation that reproduces two opposite narrow lobes, similar to those observed in PNe with lobes. These lobes can merge later to form a pipe. This paper is another in a series that strengthen the case for the JJEM as the primary explosion mechanism of CCSNe by comparing CCSNR morphologies with those of jet-shaped PNe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03961 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An image of the Cygnus Loop CCSNR in the visible band adapted from Raymond et al. (2023); the marks in white are from Shishkin et al. (2024), who identified the pipe and a point-symmetric morphology. Soker & Akashi (2025) argued that the cavity is a circum-jet ring. The pipe is the long, dark, north-south region; the white-dashed line covers a short portion of it. claim it was shaped by a pair of opposite jets. It i… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Images of SNR G292.0+1.8. (a) An image from the Chandra site (Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/Penn State/Park et al. 2007; Optical: Pal.Obs. DSS): Red (0.580-710 and 0.880-950 keV), Orange (0.980-1.100 keV), Green (1.280-1.430 keV), Blue (1.810-2.050 and 2.400-2.620 keV); Optical (white). We added labeling for the two ears identified by Bear et al. (2017) as jet-shaped structures, as well as for the north and south filament… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Emission-line maps of PN NGC 6720 adapted from Wesson et al. (2026b), who conducted and analyzed observations by the William Herschel Telescope on La Palma. Each map indicates the emitting species and the associated creation energy. The contours are of [Fe v] emission and represent the iron bar; collisional excitation of Fe4+ (54.8 eV ionization potential) produces this line. Images are on a linear surface brightnes… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Emission-line maps of PN NGC 6720 adapted from Wesson et al. (2026b), who conducted and analyzed observations by the William Herschel Telescope on La Palma. Each map indicates the emitting species and the associated creation energy. The contours are of [Fe v] emission …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An image of the multipolar PN NGC 2371 adapted from G´omez-Gonz´alez et al. (2020). We added the dashed red line to indicate the pipe. Red, green, and blue correspond to [N ii], Hα, and [O iii], respectively. M 1-41
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An image of the multipolar PN NGC 2371 adapted from G´omez-Gonz´alez et al. (2020). We added the dashed red line to indicate the pipe. Red, green, and blue correspond to [N ii], Hα, and [O iii], respectively. Zhang et al. (2012) to emphasize the extended bipolar struct…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: IR JWST images of NGC 6720 adapted from Wesson et al. (2026b) and based on Wesson et al. (2024). We added the marks of the filaments and pipe. (a) MIRI F1000W with contours of [Fe v] 4227 ˚A. (b) MIRI F560W, which emphasizes H2 emission. launch the three jet pairs into…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: IR JWST images of NGC 6720 adapted from Wesson et al. (2026b) and based on Wesson et al. (2024). We added the marks of the filaments and pipe. (a) MIRI F1000W with contours of [Fe v] 4227 ˚A. (b) MIRI F560W, which emphasizes H2 emission. Overall, we argue that the pipe…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: An IR Spitzer image of PN M 1-41 adapted from Zhang et al. (2012): blue, green and red correspond to 3.6 µm, 5.8 µm, and 8.0 µm, respectively. They drew the dashed lines to sketch the extended bipolar structures. We term them filaments and term the pipe. Each of the si…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Planetary nebulae that show two jet-shaped lobes (or more) that we suggest might later evolve to one long pipe. (a) An HST image of the young PN Hen 3-401 (Credit: European Space Agency and Pedro Garcma-Lario at ESA ISO Data Center) (b) A composite image of PN Hen 2-32…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Planetary nebulae that show two jet-shaped lobes (or more) that we suggest might later evolve to one long pipe. (a) An HST image of the young PN Hen 3-401 (Credit: European Space Agency and Pedro Garcma-Lario at ESA ISO Data Center) (b) A composite image of PN Hen 2-32…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Similar to
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A velocity map in the same plane as the upper panel of
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Three-dimensional visualization of the gas den￾sity in the simulation presented in Figures 8 - 10, and at the same time. The image is composed of three equidensity semi-transparent surfaces, as indicated by the color bar, in units of g cm−3 . The black lines are the t…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Long-lived intermittent accretion disks in the jittering jets explosion mechanism (JJEM) of core-collapse supernovae

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Viscous angular-momentum transport and jet feedback can keep intermittent accretion disks around newborn neutron stars alive long enough to launch the energetic jet pairs seen in some supernova remnants.

  2. JWST observations of a planetary nebula support jet-driven explosion of core-collapse supernova remnant RCW 103

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Morphological similarity between JWST images of planetary nebula PMR 1 and X-ray images of CCSN remnant RCW 103 indicates that two pairs of jets shaped RCW 103, supporting the jittering-jets explosion mechanism.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Formation of neutron stars via accretion-induced collapse and core-merger-induced collapse inside planetary nebulae from white dwarf binaries

    Ablimit, I. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.03985, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.03985

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.03985 2024

  2. [2]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 4794, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty029

    Akashi, M., Bear, E., & Soker, N. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 4794, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty029 —. 2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 137, doi: 10.33232/001c.144674

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty029 2018

  3. [3]

    2018, , 481, 2754, 10.1093/mnras/sty2479

    Akashi, M., & Soker, N. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 2754, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2479 —. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.29527. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29527 —. 2026b, in preparation

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2479 2018

  4. [4]

    Parameter Estimation Horizon of Core-Collapse Supernovae with Current and Next-Generation Gravitational-Wave Detectors

    Akhmetali, A., Sultan Abylkairov, Y., Orel, D., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.04896. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04896

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    2022, Galaxies, 10, 47, doi: 10.3390/galaxies10020047

    Alcolea, J., Ag´ undez, M., Bujarrabal, V., et al. 2022, Galaxies, 10, 47, doi: 10.3390/galaxies10020047

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies10020047 2022

  6. [6]

    1987, , 94, 671, 10.1086/114504

    Balick, B. 1987, AJ, 94, 671, doi: 10.1086/114504

    work page doi:10.1086/114504 1987

  7. [7]

    2020, , 889, 13, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5651

    Balick, B., Frank, A., & Liu, B. 2020, ApJ, 889, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5651

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5651 2020

  8. [8]

    2017, MNRAS, 472, 1770, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2125

    Bear, E., Grichener, A., & Soker, N. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 1770, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2125

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2125 2017

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 045008, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/adc24e

    Bear, E., Shishkin, D., & Soker, N. 2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 045008, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/adc24e

    2025 doi

  2. [10]

    2017, MNRAS, 468, 140, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx431 —

    Bear, E., & Soker, N. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 140, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx431 —. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 682, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1053

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    Bhalerao, J., Park, S., Schenck, A., Post, S., & Hughes, J. P. 2019, ApJ, 872, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafafd

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    Boffin, H. M. J., Miszalski, B., Rauch, T., et al. 2012, Science, 338, 773, doi: 10.1126/science.1225386

    2012 doi

  5. [13]

    2025, PASP, 137, 054201, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/add08e —

    Braudo, J., Michaelis, A., Akashi, M., & Soker, N. 2025, PASP, 137, 054201, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/add08e —. 2026, in preparation

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    J., Hix, W

    Chen, C.-H., Lentz, E. J., Hix, W. R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.09906. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09906

    2026 arXiv

  7. [15]

    2022, MNRAS, 516, 2711, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2375

    Clairmont, R., Steffen, W., & Koning, N. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 2711, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2375

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    Clark, N., Peeters, E., Cox, N. L. J., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 1984, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf826

    2025 doi

  9. [17]

    2022, ApJS, 260, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5cca

    Danehkar, A. 2022, ApJS, 260, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5cca

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    2024, MNRAS, 530, 3327, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1013 Eggenberger Andersen, O., O’Connor, E., Kovalenko, L.,

    Derlopa, S., Akras, S., Amram, P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 3327, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1013 Eggenberger Andersen, O., O’Connor, E., Kovalenko, L.,

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Andresen, H., & Couch, S. M. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.01405. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01405

    2026 arXiv

  12. [20]

    F., Esquivel, A., & Raga, A

    Estrella-Trujillo, D., Hern´ andez-Mart´ ınez, L., Vel´ azquez, P. F., Esquivel, A., & Raga, A. C. 2019, ApJ, 876, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab12e1

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    2000, ApJS, 131, 273, doi: 10.1086/317361 12 Garc´ ıa-Segura, G., Manchado, A., Toal´ a, J

    Fryxell, B., Olson, K., Ricker, P., et al. 2000, ApJS, 131, 273, doi: 10.1086/317361 12 Garc´ ıa-Segura, G., Manchado, A., Toal´ a, J. A., Guerrero, M. A., & Castro-Tirado, A. J. 2025, MNRAS, 543, 3867, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1744 Garc´ ıa-Segura, G., Taam, R. E., & Ricker, P....

    2000 doi

  14. [22]

    P., & Williams, T

    Ghavamian, P., Hughes, J. P., & Williams, T. B. 2005, ApJ, 635, 365, doi: 10.1086/497283

    2005 doi

  15. [23]

    S., Blair, W

    Ghavamian, P., Long, K. S., Blair, W. P., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 39, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/39

    2012 doi

  16. [24]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.11796

    Giudici, B., Gabler, M., & Janka, H.-T. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.11796. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11796 G´ omez-Gonz´ alez, V. M. A., Toal´ a, J. A., Guerrero, M. A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 959, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1542

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    2003, ApJL, 583, L91, doi: 10.1086/368122

    Gonzalez, M., & Safi-Harb, S. 2003, ApJL, 583, L91, doi: 10.1086/368122

    2003 doi

  18. [26]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 221, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1449

    Grichener, A. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 221, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1449

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    2017, MNRAS, 468, 1226, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx534

    Grichener, A., & Soker, N. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 1226, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx534

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    A., Cazzoli, S., Rechy-Garc´ ıa, J

    Guerrero, M. A., Cazzoli, S., Rechy-Garc´ ıa, J. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 909, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe2aa

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    A., & Manchado, A

    Guerrero, M. A., & Manchado, A. 1998, ApJ, 508, 262, doi: 10.1086/306407

    1998 doi

  22. [30]

    J., Smith, N., Su, K

    Hrivnak, B. J., Smith, N., Su, K. Y. L., & Sahai, R. 2008, ApJ, 688, 327, doi: 10.1086/591960

    2008 doi

  23. [31]

    2014, ApJ, 787, 25, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/25

    Hsia, C.-H., Chau, W., Zhang, Y., & Kwok, S. 2014, ApJ, 787, 25, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/25

    2014 doi

  24. [32]

    2025, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 75, 425, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-121423-100945

    Janka, H.-T. 2025, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 75, 425, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-121423-100945

    2025 doi

  25. [33]

    2020, Galaxies, 8, 28, doi: 10.3390/galaxies8020028 —

    Jones, D. 2020, Galaxies, 8, 28, doi: 10.3390/galaxies8020028 —. 2025, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 55, 200, doi: 10.31577/caosp.2025.55.3.200

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    H., Moraga Baez, P., Balick, B., et al

    Kastner, J. H., Moraga Baez, P., Balick, B., et al. 2025a, ApJ, 993, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0706

    doi

  27. [35]

    H., Wilner, D

    Kastner, J. H., Wilner, D. J., Ryder, D., et al. 2025b, ApJ, 981, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adace1

    doi

  28. [36]

    2025, NewA, 116, 102346, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2024.102346

    Kumar, A. 2025, NewA, 116, 102346, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2024.102346

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    2024, Galaxies, 12, 39, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12040039

    Kwok, S. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 39, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12040039

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.22999

    Kwok, S., Balick, B., Chu, Y.-H., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.22999. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22999

    2026 arXiv

  31. [39]

    2009, ApJ, 706, 441, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/441

    Lee, H.-G., Koo, B.-C., Moon, D.-S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, 441, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/441

    2009 doi

  32. [40]

    P., et al

    Lee, J.-J., Park, S., Hughes, J. P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 711, 861, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/711/2/861 Lemi` ere, A., Castelletti, G., & Maza, N. L. 2026, A&A, 705, A218, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556224

    2010 doi

  33. [41]

    Q., Morris, M

    Li, Y. Q., Morris, M. R., & Sahai, R. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 44, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12040044

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.10440, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.10440 Liebend¨ orfer, M., Rampp, M., Janka, H

    Li, Z., Wei, D., Jia, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.10440, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.10440 Liebend¨ orfer, M., Rampp, M., Janka, H. T., &

    2026 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    2005, ApJ, 620, 840, doi: 10.1086/427203

    Mezzacappa, A. 2005, ApJ, 620, 840, doi: 10.1086/427203

    2005 doi

  36. [44]

    J., Plucinsky, P

    Long, X., Patnaude, D. J., Plucinsky, P. P., & Gaetz, T. J. 2022, ApJ, 932, 117, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac704b

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    2026, PhRvD, 113, 023024, doi: 10.1103/7ytg-wzl8

    Luo, Y., Zha, S., & Kajino, T. 2026, PhRvD, 113, 023024, doi: 10.1103/7ytg-wzl8

    2026 doi

  38. [46]

    2024, Galaxies, 12, 63, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12050063 —

    Masa, E., Alcolea, J., Santander-Garc´ ıa, M., et al. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 63, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12050063 —. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.12569. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12569

    2024 doi arXiv

  39. [47]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.24970

    Mezzacappa, A. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.24970. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24970

    2026 arXiv

  40. [48]

    F., Torrelles, J

    Miranda, L. F., Torrelles, J. M., Guerrero, M. A., Aaquist, O. B., & Eiroa, C. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 243, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01611.x

    1998 doi

  41. [49]

    F., V´ azquez, R., Olgu´ ın, L., Guill´ en, P

    Miranda, L. F., V´ azquez, R., Olgu´ ın, L., Guill´ en, P. F., & Mat´ ıas, J. M. 2024, A&A, 687, A123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348173

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 1040, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1315 Moraga Baez, P., Kastner, J

    Miszalski, B., Manick, R., Van Winckel, H., & Miko lajewska, J. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 1040, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1315 Moraga Baez, P., Kastner, J. H., Balick, B., Montez, R., &

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    2023, ApJ, 942, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca401

    Bublitz, J. 2023, ApJ, 942, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca401

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    1987, PASP, 99, 1115, doi: 10.1086/132089

    Morris, M. 1987, PASP, 99, 1115, doi: 10.1086/132089

    1987 doi

  45. [53]

    D., Brinkman, E., Richardson, C

    Murphy, R. D., Brinkman, E., Richardson, C. J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21895, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.21895

    2025 doi

  46. [54]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 146, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7e17

    Narita, T., Uchida, H., Vink, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 146, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7e17

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.17499, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.17499

    Orlando, S. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.17499, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.17499

    2026 doi

  48. [56]

    2025a, A&A, 696, A108, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553833 —

    Orlando, S., Janka, H.-T., Wongwathanarat, A., et al. 2025a, A&A, 696, A108, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553833 —. 2025b, A&A, 696, A188, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553902

    doi

  49. [57]

    2025c, A&A, 699, A305, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554862

    Orlando, S., Miceli, M., Ono, M., et al. 2025c, A&A, 699, A305, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554862

    doi

  50. [58]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.25846

    Pan, K.-C., & Li, Y.-F. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.25846. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25846 13

    2026

  51. [59]

    2014, MNRAS, 443, 664, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1129

    Papish, O., & Soker, N. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 664, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1129

    2014 doi

  52. [60]

    A., Vallejo, S., & Coughlin, E

    Paradiso, D. A., Vallejo, S., & Coughlin, E. R. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.05289. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05289

    2026 arXiv

  53. [61]

    P., Slane, P

    Park, S., Hughes, J. P., Slane, P. O., et al. 2007, ApJL, 670, L121, doi: 10.1086/524406 —. 2004, ApJL, 602, L33, doi: 10.1086/382276

    2007 doi

  54. [62]

    Park, S., Roming, P. W. A., Hughes, J. P., et al. 2002, ApJL, 564, L39, doi: 10.1086/338861

    2002 doi

  55. [63]

    A., Acker, A., Frew, D

    Parker, Q. A., Acker, A., Frew, D. J., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 79, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10950.x

    2006 doi

  56. [64]

    L., Winkler, P

    Plunkett, A. L., Winkler, P. F., Long, K. S., & Milisavljevic, D. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae469f

    2026 doi

  57. [65]

    C., Seok, J

    Raymond, J. C., Seok, J. Y., Koo, B.-C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace692 Rechy-Garc´ ıa, J. S., Guerrero, M. A., Duarte Puertas, S., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 1957, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3326 Rechy-Garc´ ıa, J. S., Pe˜ na, M., & Vel´ azquez, P. F. 2019,...

    2023 doi

  58. [66]

    S., Wang, T., & Vartanyan, D

    Rusakov, A., Burrows, A. S., Wang, T., & Vartanyan, D. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.09025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09025

    2026 arXiv

  59. [67]

    D., & Chaffee, F

    Campbell, R. D., & Chaffee, F. H. 2005, ApJL, 622, L53, doi: 10.1086/429586

    2005 doi

  60. [68]

    2007, AJ, 134, 2200, doi: 10.1086/522944

    Sahai, R., Morris, M., S´ anchez Contreras, C., & Claussen, M. 2007, AJ, 134, 2200, doi: 10.1086/522944

    2007 doi

  61. [69]

    Sahai, R., & Trauger, J. T. 1998, AJ, 116, 1357, doi: 10.1086/300504

    1998 doi

  62. [70]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.06038

    Sahai, R., Alcolea, J., Balick, B., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.06038. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06038

    2024

  63. [71]

    Sahai, R., Van de Steene, G., van Hoof, P. A. M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc91c

    2025 doi

  64. [72]

    E., Corradi, R

    Schwarz, H. E., Corradi, R. L. M., & Melnick, J. 1992, A&AS, 96, 23

    1992

  65. [73]

    2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 125018, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ad8ead

    Shen, J.-Y., Bao, B.-W., & Zhang, L. 2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 125018, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ad8ead

    2024 doi

  66. [74]

    2025, ApJ, 992, 190, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0332

    Shishkin, D., Bear, E., & Soker, N. 2025, ApJ, 992, 190, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0332

    2025 doi

  67. [75]

    2024, ApJ, 975, 281, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8138

    Shishkin, D., Kaye, R., & Soker, N. 2024, ApJ, 975, 281, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8138

    2024 doi

  68. [76]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.07913, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.07913

    Shishkin, D., & Michaelis, A. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.07913, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.07913

    2026 doi arXiv

  69. [77]

    1990, AJ, 99, 1869, doi: 10.1086/115465 —

    Soker, N. 1990, AJ, 99, 1869, doi: 10.1086/115465 —. 2022a, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 122003, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ac9782 —. 2022b, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 035019, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ac49e6 —. 2024a, The Open Journal of Astrophysics,...

    1990 doi

  70. [78]

    2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 54770, doi: 10.33232/001c.154770

    Soker, N., & Akashi, M. 2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 54770, doi: 10.33232/001c.154770

    2025 doi

  71. [79]

    2006, MNRAS, 369, 1115, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10313.x

    Soker, N., & Bisker, G. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1115, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10313.x

    2006 doi

  72. [80]

    2017, ApJ, 851, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9c83

    Soker, N., & Gilkis, A. 2017, ApJ, 851, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9c83

    2017 doi

  73. [81]

    2025, PASA, 42, e048, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2025.39

    Soker, N., & Shishkin, D. 2025, PASA, 42, e048, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2025.39

    2025 doi

  74. [82]

    Sowicka, P., Jones, D., Corradi, R. L. M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 3529, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1697

    2017 doi

  75. [83]

    Tafoya, D., Orosz, G., Vlemmings, W. H. T., Sahai, R., & P´ erez-S´ anchez, A. F. 2019, A&A, 629, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834632

    2019 doi

  76. [84]

    C., et al

    Temim, T., Slane, P., Raymond, J. C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 932, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6bf4

    2022 doi

  77. [85]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.18357, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.18357 V´ azquez, R., Toal´ a, J

    Varma, V., & M¨ uller, B. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.18357, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.18357 V´ azquez, R., Toal´ a, J. A., Miranda, L. F., et al. 2026, Galaxies, 14, 15, doi: 10.3390/galaxies14020015

    2026 doi

  78. [86]

    2026, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 26, 032001, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ae2d0e

    Wang, B., Liu, D., Guo, Y., & Han, Z. 2026, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 26, 032001, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ae2d0e

    2026 doi

  79. [87]

    Wang, N. Y. N., Shishkin, D., & Soker, N. 2024, ApJ, 969, 163, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad487f

    2024 doi

  80. [88]

    2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 065016, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/add565

    Wen, X., Peng, Z., & Gao, H. 2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 065016, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/add565

    2025 doi

  81. [89]

    A., et al

    Wesson, R., Matsuura, M., Zijlstra, A. A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 3392, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3670 14

    2024 doi

  82. [90]

    2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.11259, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.11259

    Wesson, R., Gabler, M., Lyons, M., et al. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.11259, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.11259

    doi

  83. [91]

    E., Barlow, M

    Wesson, R., Drew, J. E., Barlow, M. J., et al. 2026b, MNRAS, 546, staf2139, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2139

    doi

  84. [92]

    2026, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 26, 035013, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ae2dec

    Zhang, J., Kang, Y., Zhong, J., et al. 2026, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 26, 035013, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ae2dec

    2026 doi

  85. [93]

    2012, ApJ, 745, 59, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/59

    Zhang, Y., Hsia, C.-H., & Kwok, S. 2012, ApJ, 745, 59, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/59

    2012 doi

  86. [94]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.21759, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.21759

    Zhu, J.-P., & Zhang, B. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.21759, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.21759

    2026 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.