Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Elevated HCN-to-HCO+ flux ratios in ULIRG nuclei originate from resolved outflows in seven galaxies and from AGN or unresolved outflows in nine others.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-05-11 01:15 UTC

load-bearing objection New ALMA resolved HCN/HCO+ maps in 18 ULIRGs extend prior work, but the PPV geometry classifications rest on untested visual assignments to physical origins. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2605.06842 v1 submitted 2026-05-07 astro-ph.GA

Spectrally and spatially resolved (sub)millimeter HCN-to-HCO⁺ flux ratios in nearby ultraluminous infrared galaxies

Masatoshi Imanishi (1) , Yuri Nishimura (2) , Shunsuke Baba (3) , Kouichiro Nakanishi (1) , Takuma Izumi (1) ((1) NAOJ , (2) University of Tsukuba , (3) JAXA) This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords ultraluminous infrared galaxiesHCNHCO+molecular outflowsAGNALMAflux ratiosgalaxy nuclei
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper maps the three-dimensional geometry of regions showing elevated HCN-to-HCO+ flux ratios in 18 nearby ultraluminous infrared galaxies using ALMA data at roughly 500 pc resolution. It visually sorts those elevated-ratio regions in position-position-velocity space into spherical-shell, spectrally distinct compact, and filled morphologies. The classification is then tied directly to physical mechanisms: resolved outflows for the shell type, AGN or unresolved outflows for the compact type, and AGN or confined outflows for the filled type. A sympathetic reader would care because these distinctions refine how we interpret the high infrared luminosities of ULIRGs as mixtures of starburst-driven winds, AGN activity, and molecular feedback rather than a single blended process.

Core claim

By examining spectrally and spatially resolved HCN-to-HCO+ flux ratios at J=2-1, 3-2, and 4-3, the authors classify elevated-ratio geometries in PPV space into spherical shell (spectrally and spatially distinct), spectrally distinct and spatially compact, and filled (spectrally filled and spatially compact) types. These correspond respectively to spatially resolved outflows, AGN and/or spatially unresolved outflows with separated velocity components, and AGN and/or spatially confined outflows. Signatures of the first type appear in seven ULIRGs and the second type in nine ULIRGs; in the resolved-outflow cases the elevated ratios preferentially appear at modest velocities relative to the full

What carries the argument

Visual classification of elevated HCN-to-HCO+ flux ratio geometries into spherical shell, spectrally distinct compact, and filled types within position-position-velocity space.

Load-bearing premise

The three visual geometry classes in PPV space correctly correspond to distinct physical origins of resolved outflow, AGN or unresolved outflow, and confined outflow.

What would settle it

Finding a ULIRG in which a spherical-shell geometry of elevated ratios shows no kinematic match to an outflow in independent tracers such as CO or OH line wings would falsify the mapping.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In the seven galaxies with resolved-outflow signatures, spaxels showing elevated ratios preferentially sample modest-velocity rather than maximum-velocity outflow material.
  • The resolved-ratio approach supplies additional constraints on physical origin that spatially or velocity integrated measurements alone cannot provide.
  • Nine galaxies exhibit geometries consistent with AGN or spatially unresolved outflows.
  • The same classification can be applied to future higher-resolution data on more distant ULIRGs to track how outflow and AGN contributions evolve with redshift.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method may help separate starburst-driven feedback from AGN-driven feedback in statistical samples of infrared-luminous galaxies.
  • Cross-matching these ratio maps with independent outflow indicators could test whether the modest-velocity preference is a general feature of resolved molecular winds.
  • If the classification holds, many ULIRG nuclei may host co-existing resolved outflows and compact AGN contributions rather than a single dominant mechanism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents ALMA observations of spectrally and spatially resolved HCN-to-HCO+ flux ratios (J=2-1, 3-2, and/or 4-3) in 18 nearby (z<0.15) ULIRGs at ≲0.2″ resolution. Elevated-ratio regions (>3σ detections) in PPV space are visually classified into three geometry types—spherical shell, spectrally distinct compact, and filled—which are interpreted as arising from (i) spatially resolved outflows, (ii) AGN and/or unresolved outflows, and (iii) AGN and/or confined outflows, respectively. The work reports such signatures in seven ULIRGs for resolved-outflow cases and nine for AGN/unresolved-outflow cases, and argues that the resolved analysis supplies additional physical-origin information beyond integrated studies.

Significance. If the visual-to-physical mapping can be placed on firmer quantitative footing, the approach supplies a new spatially-spectrally resolved diagnostic for separating outflow and AGN contributions in ULIRG nuclei. The use of multiple transitions and sub-arcsecond ALMA data is a clear strength relative to prior integrated analyses.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and classification section] Abstract and classification description: the central counts (7 ULIRGs with resolved-outflow signatures, 9 with AGN/unresolved-outflow signatures) rest on assigning the three visual PPV geometry categories to distinct physical mechanisms. The text states only that the geometries “can naturally be explained by” those origins, without radiative-transfer simulations, mock ALMA cubes, quantitative classification criteria, inter-observer tests, or cross-checks against independent tracers (e.g., OH absorption or [O III] kinematics). This renders the reported tallies interpretive rather than demonstrated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and results do not define quantitative thresholds or velocity ranges for “modest-velocity components” or “elevated” ratios beyond the >3σ detection criterion, nor do they report uncertainties or reproducibility metrics for the visual classifications.
  2. [Figures and methods] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the exact velocity integration ranges and spatial masking criteria used to construct the PPV diagrams shown for each source.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 2 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for highlighting the interpretive aspects of our visual classification. We address the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to clarify the basis and limitations of our approach.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and classification section] Abstract and classification description: the central counts (7 ULIRGs with resolved-outflow signatures, 9 with AGN/unresolved-outflow signatures) rest on assigning the three visual PPV geometry categories to distinct physical mechanisms. The text states only that the geometries “can naturally be explained by” those origins, without radiative-transfer simulations, mock ALMA cubes, quantitative classification criteria, inter-observer tests, or cross-checks against independent tracers (e.g., OH absorption or [O III] kinematics). This renders the reported tallies interpretive rather than demonstrated.

    Authors: We agree that the reported counts of 7 and 9 ULIRGs derive from visual classification of PPV geometries and that the physical interpretations are suggested rather than quantitatively demonstrated. The manuscript already employs the phrasing 'can naturally be explained by' and 'visually classified' to signal this. In the revised version we have added an explicit paragraph in the classification section stating that the assignments are qualitative and visual, discussing the absence of radiative-transfer simulations or mock cubes in the present work, and noting that quantitative criteria and inter-observer tests lie beyond the current scope. Where literature cross-checks with OH absorption or [O III] kinematics exist for individual sources we have referenced them; a systematic comparison for the full sample is not available. Full radiative-transfer modeling and mock ALMA observations would require a separate, computationally intensive study and cannot be completed within the revisions to this observational paper. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Conducting new radiative-transfer simulations and generating mock ALMA cubes to place the geometry-to-mechanism mapping on quantitative footing
  • Developing quantitative classification criteria and performing inter-observer reliability tests for the PPV geometries

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational classification of ALMA data features with no fitted parameters or self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper reports direct measurements of HCN-to-HCO+ flux ratios from ALMA (sub)millimeter data in 18 ULIRGs and performs visual classification of elevated-ratio geometries in PPV space into three categories (spherical shell, spectrally distinct compact, filled). These are tallied as 7 ULIRGs showing resolved-outflow signatures and 9 showing AGN/unresolved-outflow signatures. The text states that the geometries 'can naturally be explained by' the listed physical origins but provides no equations, model fits, or derivations that reduce the classifications or counts to the input data by construction. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing steps. The analysis is self-contained against the observed cubes and does not rename known results or smuggle assumptions via prior work by the same authors.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is observational and relies on standard astrophysical interpretations of molecular line ratios rather than new derivations or postulates.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Elevated HCN-to-HCO+ flux ratios trace regions influenced by AGN radiation or shocks in outflows
    Invoked when linking the three geometric classes to physical origins; standard in extragalactic molecular astrophysics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5693 in / 1302 out tokens · 49146 ms · 2026-05-11T01:15:20.020346+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the results of our investigations of spectrally and spatially resolved (sub)millimeter HCN-to-HCO$^{+}$ flux ratios at J=2-1, J=3-2, and/or J=4-3 in 18 nearby ($z <$ 0.15) ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs), using ALMA $\lesssim$0.2" ($\lesssim$500 pc) resolution data. The geometry of elevated HCN-to-HCO$^{+}$ flux ratios (with $>$3$\sigma$ detections for both molecular lines) in position-position-velocity (PPV) space is visually classified into (i) spherical shell (spectrally and spatially distinct), (ii) spectrally distinct and spatially compact, and (iii) filled (spectrally filled and spatially compact). These can naturally be explained by the elevation of the flux ratio due to (i) a spatially resolved outflow, (ii) an AGN and/or a spatially unresolved outflow with blueshifted and redshifted emission components, and (iii) an AGN and/or a spatially confined outflow with not clearly separated blueshifted and redshifted velocity components, respectively. Signatures of elevated HCN-to-HCO$^{+}$ flux ratios originated from (a) spatially resolved outflow and (b) AGN and/or spatially unresolved outflow are seen in seven and nine ULIRGs, respectively. In the former spatially resolved outflow-origin case, modest-velocity components relative to the maximum outflow velocity tend to be probed by spaxels with elevated HCN-to-HCO$^{+}$ flux ratios. The spectrally and spatially resolved HCN-to-HCO$^{+}$ flux ratios can provide additional information on the physical origin of the elevated flux ratios in nearby ULIRG nuclei, compared to previously conducted spatially integrated and/or velocity-integrated analyses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06842 by (2) University of Tsukuba, (3) JAXA), Kouichiro Nakanishi (1), Masatoshi Imanishi (1), Shunsuke Baba (3), Takuma Izumi (1) ((1) NAOJ, Yuri Nishimura (2).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: PPV plot of the (sub)millimeter HCN-to-HCO+ flux ratios at J=2–1, J=3–2, and J=4–3, with a velocity resolution of 20 km s−1 and a pixel scale of 0. ′′02 pixel−1 for IRAS 00091−0738. The HCN-to-HCO+ flux ratios are calculated in brightness temperature (K). (This is virtually identical to the ratio in flux density (Jy ∝ K × ν 2 ), because the HCN and HCO+ frequencies differ only by a factor of ∼1.006 at the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Advancing extragalactic spectral line studies with the Square Kilometre Array Observatory

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 accept novelty 3.0

    SKAO will extend maser, molecular, recombination-line and isotope studies across cosmic time, with AA4 and a high-frequency extension enabling transformative surveys including possible HeH+ detection.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2012, A&A, 546, A68

    Aalto, S., Muller, S., Sakamoto, K., et al. 2012, A&A, 546, A68

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    2018, A&A, 617, A20

    Aladro, R., Konig, S., Aalto, S., et al. 2018, A&A, 617, A20

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    2015, A&A, 579, A101

    Aladro, R., Martin, S., Riquelme, D., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A101

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    J., & Kotilainen, J

    Alonso-Herrero, A., Ward, M. J., & Kotilainen, J. K. 1997, MNRAS, 288, 977

    work page 1997

  5. [5]

    Antonucci, R. R. J. & Miller, J. S. 1985, ApJ, 297, 621

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    2007, ApJ, 656, 148 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A

    Armus, L., Charmandaris, V., Bernard-Salas, J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 148 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    1997, ApJL, 487, L93

    Bachiller, R., & Perez Gutierrez, M. 1997, ApJL, 487, L93

    work page 1997

  8. [8]

    A., et al

    Barcos-Munoz, L., Aalto, S., Thompson, T. A., et al. 2018, ApJL, 853, L28

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    K., Evans, A

    Barcos-Munoz, L., Leroy, A. K., Evans, A. S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 843, 117

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    I., Gracia-Carpio, J., et al

    Burtscher, L., Davies, R. I., Gracia-Carpio, J., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A28

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    2022, A&A, 667, A131

    Butterworth, J., Holdship, J., Viti, S., & Garcia-Burillo, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A131

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    2025, A&A, 697, A18

    Butterworth, J., Viti, S., & Wang, Y. 2025, A&A, 697, A18

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    2014, A&A, 562, 21

    Cicone, C., Maiolino, R., Sturm, E., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, 21

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    I., et al

    Costagliola, F., Aalto, S., Rodriguez, M. I., et al. 2011, A&A, 528, 30

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    2010, ApJ, 723, 993

    Diaz-Santos, T., Charmandaris, V., Armus, L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 723, 993

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    2021, A&A, 649, A105

    Falstad, N., Aalto, S., Konig, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A105

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    2019, A&A, 623, A29

    Falstad, N., Hallqvist, F., Aalto, S., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A29

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    2019, MNRAS, 483, 4586 AASTEX ULIRG 3D23

    Fluetsch, A.; Maiolino, R.; Carniani, S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 4586 AASTEX ULIRG 3D23

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    1998, ApJ, 498, 579

    Genzel, R., Lutz, D., Sturm, E., et al. 1998, ApJ, 498, 579

    work page 1998

  20. [20]

    Gonzalez-Alfonso, E., Fischer, J., Spoon, H. W. W., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 11

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    2008, A&A, 479, 703

    Gracia-Carpio, J., Garcia-Burillo, S., Planesas, P., Fuente, A., & Usero, A. 2008, A&A, 479, 703

    work page 2008

  22. [22]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Hildebrand, R. H. 1983, QJRAS, 24, 267

    work page 1983

  24. [24]

    F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., et al. 2006, ApJS, 163, 1

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., & Keres, D. 2008, ApJS, 175, 356

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    2019, ApJ, 870, 31

    Ichikawa, K., Ricci, C., Ueda, Y., et al. 2019, ApJ, 870, 31

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    2011, AJ, 141, 156

    Imanishi, M., Imase, K., Oi, N., & Ichikawa, K. 2011, AJ, 141, 156

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    2008, PASJ, 60, S489

    Imanishi, M., Nakagawa, T., Ohyama, Y., et al. 2008, PASJ, 60, S489

    work page 2008

  30. [30]

    2010, ApJ, 721, 1233

    Onaka, T. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1233

    work page 2010

  31. [31]

    2013, AJ, 146, 91

    Imanishi, M., & Nakanishi, K. 2013, AJ, 146, 91

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    2014, AJ, 148, 9

    Imanishi, M., & Nakanishi, K. 2014, AJ, 148, 9

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    2017, ApJ, 849, 29

    Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2017, ApJ, 849, 29

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    2018, ApJ, 856, 143

    Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2018, ApJ, 856, 143

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    2019, ApJS, 241, 19

    Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2019, ApJS, 241, 19

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., Tamura, Y., & Peng, C. -H. 2009, AJ, 137, 3581

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    D., Wada, K., et al

    Imanishi, M., Nguyen, D. D., Wada, K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 902, 99

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    2025, ApJ, 995, 211

    Imanishi, M., Vollmer, B., Hagiwara, Y., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 211

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Israel, F. P. 2023, A&A, 671, A59

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    2016, ApJ, 818, 42

    Izumi, T., Kohno, K., Aalto, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 818, 42

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    2013, PASJ, 65, 100

    Izumi, T., Kohno, K., Martin, S., et al. 2013, PASJ, 65, 100

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    -C., & Sanders, D

    Kim, D. -C., & Sanders, D. B. 1998, ApJS, 119, 41

    work page 1998

  43. [43]

    2005, in AIP Conf

    Kohno, K. 2005, in AIP Conf. Ser. 783, The Evolution of Starbursts, ed. S. H¨ uttemeister, E. Manthey, D. Bomans, & K. Weis (New York: AIP), 203 (astro-ph/0508420)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2005

  44. [44]

    2008, ApJ, 677, 262

    Krips, M., Neri, R., Garcia-Burillo, S., Martin, S., Combes, F., Gracia-Carpio, J., & Eckart, A. 2008, ApJ, 677, 262

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    2022, A&A, 668, A45

    Lamperti, I., Pereira-Santaella, M., Perna, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 668, A45

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    E., Aalto, S., Muller, S., et al

    Lindberg, J. E., Aalto, S., Muller, S., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, A15

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    2020, A&A, 633, A134

    Lutz, D., Sturm, E., Janssen, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A134

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    2022, MNRAS, 516, 2876

    Mizukoshi, S., Minezaki, T., Tsunetsugu, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 2876

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    2008, MNRAS, 385, L130

    Nardini, E., Risaliti, G., Salvati, M., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 385, L130

    work page 2008

  50. [50]

    2009, MNRAS, 399, 1373

    Nardini, E., Risaliti, G., Salvati, M., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 1373

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    2010, MNRAS, 405, 2505

    Nardini, E., Risaliti, G., Watabe, Y., Salvati, M., & Sani, E. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2505

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    D, et al

    Nishimura, Y., Aalto, S., Gorski, M. D, et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A48

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    2018, A&A, 616, A171

    Pereira-Santaella, M., Colina, L., Garcia-Burillo, S., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A171

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    2021, A&A, 651, A42

    Pereira-Santaella, M., Colina, L., Garcia-Burillo, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A42

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    C., Aalto, S., Falstad, N., et al

    Privon, G. C., Aalto, S., Falstad, N., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 213

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    C., Herrero-Illana, R., Evans, A

    Privon, G. C., Herrero-Illana, R., Evans, A. S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 39

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    C., Ricci, C., Aalto, S., et al

    Privon, G. C., Ricci, C., Aalto, S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 893, 149

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    E., Treister, E., et al

    Ricci, C., Bauer, F. E., Treister, E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 1273

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    C., Pfeifle, R

    Ricci, C., Privon, G. C., Pfeifle, R. W., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 5935

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Rigopoulou, D., Spoon, H. W. W., Genzel, R., et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 1625

    work page 1999

  61. [61]

    2022, ApJ, 935, 155

    Saito, T., Takano, S., Harada, N., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 155

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    J., et al

    Sakamoto, K., Martin, S., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 240

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    B., & Mirabel, I

    Sanders, D. B., & Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749

    work page 1996

  64. [64]

    2017, A&A, 604, A2

    Sliwa, K., & Downes, D. 2017, A&A, 604, A2

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    T., Neugebauer, G., Matthews, K., et al

    Soifer, B. T., Neugebauer, G., Matthews, K., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 509

    work page 2000

  66. [66]

    Spoon, H. W. W., Farrah, D., Lebouteiller, V., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 127 24Imanishi et al

    work page 2013

  67. [67]

    H., Rigby, J

    Teng, S. H., Rigby, J. R., Stern, D,. et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 56 The CASA Team, et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    D., Lutz, D., Genzel, R., et al

    Tran, Q. D., Lutz, D., Genzel, R., et al. 2001, ApJ, 552, 527

    work page 2001

  69. [69]

    2025, MNRAS, 538, 426

    Varnava, C., Efstathiou, A., Farrah, D., & Rigopoulou, D. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 426

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    -C., & Sanders, D

    Veilleux, S., Kim, D. -C., & Sanders, D. B. 1999, ApJ, 522, 113

    work page 1999

  71. [71]

    Veilleux, S., & Osterbrock, D. E. 1987, ApJS, 63, 295

    work page 1987

  72. [72]

    2013, ApJ, 776, 27

    Veilleux, S., Melendez, M., & Sturm, E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 776, 27

    work page 2013

  73. [73]

    Veilleux, S., Rupke, D. S. N., Kim, D.-C., et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 628

    work page 2009

  74. [74]

    2014, A&A, 570, A28

    Viti, S., Garcia-Burillo, S., Fuente, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A28

    work page 2014

  75. [75]

    I., Gratier, P., et al

    Vollmer, B., Davies, R. I., Gratier, P., et al. 2022, A&A, 665, A102

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    2024, A&A, 687, A193

    Wu, Z., Sotnikova, Y., Mufakharov, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A193

    work page 2024