pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12592 · v1 · pith:JCBNHXQXnew · submitted 2026-05-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Incommensurate Spin-Density Waves in a Frustrated Maple-Leaf Lattice Ferromagnet

Paul L. Ebert , Yasir Iqbal , Alexander Wietek This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 20:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords maple-leaf latticeHeisenberg modelincommensurate spin-density wavesfrustrated magnetismexact diagonalizationphase diagramspin nematic
0
0 comments X

The pith

Exact diagonalization finds an extended regime of incommensurate spin-density-wave correlations with continuously evolving ordering vector at the ferromagnetic boundary of the maple-leaf lattice Heisenberg model, rather than a spin-nematic

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the breakdown of ferromagnetism in the spin-1/2 nearest-neighbor Heisenberg model on the maple-leaf lattice, with ferromagnetic J_t and J_d couplings and antiferromagnetic J_h. Exact diagonalization on finite clusters shows that the ferromagnetic boundary hosts no zero-field spin-nematic phase but instead an extended regime of incommensurate spin-density-wave correlations whose ordering vector changes continuously with parameters. The phase diagram also contains collinear Néel, canted 120-degree, and hexagonal-singlet regimes, with some interior regions remaining hard to classify. Variational tests of Gutzwiller-projected Abrikosov-fermion states find no competitive spin-liquid description for those unresolved areas, though a projected Z_2 state works well on a related ruby-lattice boundary point.

Core claim

Exact diagonalization demonstrates that the ferromagnetic boundary does not feature a zero-field spin-nematic phase on the clusters studied here, but an extended regime of incommensurate spin-density-wave correlations with continuously evolving ordering vector. The phase diagram also contains collinear Néel, canted 120°, and hexagonal-singlet regimes, separated by regions that remain difficult to classify from exact diagonalization alone. Variational tests of fully symmetric Gutzwiller-projected Abrikosov-fermion U(1) and Z_2 states find no competitive spin-liquid description of the interior unresolved regions.

What carries the argument

Incommensurate spin-density-wave correlations detected in exact diagonalization, identified by a continuously evolving ordering vector across parameter space at the ferromagnetic boundary.

If this is right

  • The ferromagnetic boundary hosts a broad region of incommensurate spin-density waves instead of nematic order on the studied clusters.
  • Other phases include collinear Néel order, canted 120° order, and a hexagonal-singlet regime.
  • Unresolved interior regions lack competitive variational spin-liquid descriptions from symmetric Gutzwiller-projected fermionic states.
  • A projected Z_2 Ansatz accurately reproduces energy and spin correlations at one specific point on the ruby-lattice boundary.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Real materials realizing the maple-leaf lattice with mixed ferro- and antiferromagnetic exchanges may exhibit tunable incommensurate magnetic order accessible by varying external parameters.
  • The continuous evolution of the ordering vector suggests a possible Lifshitz point or sliding phase that could be probed by neutron scattering in candidate compounds.
  • Similar incommensurate behavior might appear on other frustrated lattices with competing interactions when studied beyond small-cluster limits.

Load-bearing premise

The finite clusters studied are large enough and representative enough that the observed incommensurate spin-density-wave regime and absence of spin-nematic order persist in the thermodynamic limit.

What would settle it

A calculation on much larger clusters or with a different method that shows either a stable spin-nematic phase or a discontinuous jump in the ordering vector at the same boundary would falsify the continuous incommensurate regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12592 by Alexander Wietek, Paul L. Ebert, Yasir Iqbal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Maple-leaf lattice with three nearest-neighbor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a): Color-coded ternary ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Lowest energy levels along the two cuts illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Ground state correlators on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Spin-spin correlations in the ED ground state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a): Map of reciprocal-lattice vectors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study how ferromagnetism breaks down in the spin-$\tfrac12$ nearest-neighbor Heisenberg model on the maple-leaf lattice with ferromagnetic $J_t,J_d$ and antiferromagnetic $J_h$, motivated by the mixed ferro-antiferromagnetic interactions in Na$_2$Mn$_3$O$_7$. Exact diagonalization shows that the ferromagnetic boundary does not feature a zero-field spin-nematic phase on the clusters studied here, but an extended regime of incommensurate spin-density-wave correlations with continuously evolving ordering vector. The phase diagram also contains collinear N\'eel, canted $120^\circ$, and hexagonal-singlet regimes, separated by regions that remain difficult to classify from exact diagonalization alone. Variational tests of fully symmetric Gutzwiller-projected Abrikosov-fermion U(1) and $\mathbb{Z}_2$ states find no competitive spin-liquid description of the interior unresolved regions. By contrast, on the ruby-lattice boundary we identify a point between the collinear N\'eel and hexagonal-singlet phases where a projected $\mathbb{Z}_2$ Ansatz reproduces the finite-size energy and spin correlations with good accuracy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the spin-1/2 nearest-neighbor Heisenberg model on the maple-leaf lattice with ferromagnetic J_t and J_d and antiferromagnetic J_h, motivated by Na2Mn3O7. Using exact diagonalization on finite clusters, it reports that the ferromagnetic boundary hosts an extended regime of incommensurate spin-density-wave correlations with a continuously evolving ordering vector rather than a zero-field spin-nematic phase. The phase diagram also contains collinear Néel, canted 120°, and hexagonal-singlet regimes, with some unresolved regions; variational Gutzwiller-projected Abrikosov-fermion states are tested and found non-competitive except at one identified point on the ruby-lattice boundary.

Significance. If the reported incommensurate SDW regime and absence of spin-nematic order survive the thermodynamic limit, the work provides concrete numerical evidence for a non-nematic route to ferromagnetism breakdown on the maple-leaf lattice and supplies a benchmark for future studies of Na2Mn3O7. The direct, parameter-free ED results on finite clusters constitute a clear strength, as does the explicit qualification that claims hold “on the clusters studied here.”

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and main text: the central claim of a continuously evolving incommensurate ordering vector rests on the observed drift of structure-factor peaks across finite clusters. On finite lattices the allowed wave-vectors are discrete; the manuscript must demonstrate that the apparent continuity is not produced by level crossings between nearby commensurate points, for example by showing the peak position versus 1/N for multiple cluster shapes and by providing the raw structure-factor data for the largest clusters.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that there is “no zero-field spin-nematic phase on the clusters studied here” is load-bearing for the main conclusion. The diagnosis relies on the simultaneous absence of dipolar order and presence of quadrupolar correlations; both quantities converge slowly with size. A systematic finite-size scaling of the nematic susceptibility (or at least its maximum eigenvalue) across all studied clusters and boundary conditions is required before the absence can be asserted even on finite clusters.
  3. [phase-diagram section] Main text (phase-diagram section): the unresolved regions are classified only by the absence of clear order parameters from ED. The variational tests of U(1) and Z2 Gutzwiller-projected states are reported to be non-competitive, but the energy differences and overlap values with the ED ground state must be tabulated for the largest clusters so that the reader can judge how decisively the spin-liquid Ansätze are ruled out.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript should specify the exact cluster sizes and geometries (e.g., 12-, 18-, 24-site clusters) used for each reported phase boundary and include a supplementary table of the corresponding Hilbert-space dimensions.
  2. Notation for the three exchange couplings (J_t, J_d, J_h) is clear in the abstract but should be restated with a figure or equation when the Hamiltonian is first written in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive suggestions. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested finite-size analyses and quantitative data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and main text: the central claim of a continuously evolving incommensurate ordering vector rests on the observed drift of structure-factor peaks across finite clusters. On finite lattices the allowed wave-vectors are discrete; the manuscript must demonstrate that the apparent continuity is not produced by level crossings between nearby commensurate points, for example by showing the peak position versus 1/N for multiple cluster shapes and by providing the raw structure-factor data for the largest clusters.

    Authors: We agree that the discrete nature of allowed wavevectors on finite clusters requires explicit checks against level-crossing artifacts. In the revised manuscript we will add plots of the structure-factor peak position versus 1/N for multiple cluster shapes (rectangular and hexagonal) and sizes. We will also include the raw structure-factor intensities for the largest clusters (either as a new figure or in the supplementary material) so that readers can directly verify the continuous drift. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that there is “no zero-field spin-nematic phase on the clusters studied here” is load-bearing for the main conclusion. The diagnosis relies on the simultaneous absence of dipolar order and presence of quadrupolar correlations; both quantities converge slowly with size. A systematic finite-size scaling of the nematic susceptibility (or at least its maximum eigenvalue) across all studied clusters and boundary conditions is required before the absence can be asserted even on finite clusters.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a systematic scaling analysis is needed to support the finite-cluster claim. We will add a new figure (or subsection) presenting the nematic susceptibility and its maximum eigenvalue versus system size for all clusters and boundary conditions studied. This will quantify the convergence behavior and strengthen the statement that no zero-field spin-nematic phase appears on the clusters examined. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [phase-diagram section] Main text (phase-diagram section): the unresolved regions are classified only by the absence of clear order parameters from ED. The variational tests of U(1) and Z2 Gutzwiller-projected states are reported to be non-competitive, but the energy differences and overlap values with the ED ground state must be tabulated for the largest clusters so that the reader can judge how decisively the spin-liquid Ansätze are ruled out.

    Authors: We will include a new table in the revised manuscript that lists the variational energy differences (relative to ED) and ground-state overlaps for the U(1) and Z2 Gutzwiller-projected states on the largest clusters in the unresolved regions. This will allow readers to assess quantitatively how non-competitive the spin-liquid ansatze are. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: results follow from direct numerical computation

full rationale

The manuscript's primary results are obtained by exact diagonalization of the spin-1/2 Heisenberg Hamiltonian on finite maple-leaf clusters and by variational energy minimization of Gutzwiller-projected Abrikosov-fermion states. These procedures evaluate the model directly from its microscopic parameters without introducing fitted quantities that are later relabeled as predictions, without self-definitional loops, and without load-bearing reliance on prior self-citations whose validity is presupposed. The text explicitly qualifies statements as holding on the studied clusters and reports no parameter tuning or ansatz smuggling that would collapse the claimed phase boundaries to the input data by construction. Consequently the derivation chain remains non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The study rests on the standard nearest-neighbor Heisenberg Hamiltonian with fixed signs for the three couplings; no additional free parameters are introduced beyond varying the relative strengths of J_t, J_d, and J_h.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The system is governed by the spin-1/2 nearest-neighbor Heisenberg model with ferromagnetic J_t, J_d and antiferromagnetic J_h.
    This is the standard microscopic model for quantum magnets with competing interactions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5518 in / 1294 out tokens · 45149 ms · 2026-05-14T20:38:36.121223+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Large-flavor route to a stable U(1) Dirac spin liquid on the maple-leaf lattice

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Maple-leaf lattice realizes U(1) Dirac spin liquid with N_f=12, where five symmetry-trivial charge-one monopoles may be dynamically irrelevant, providing a large-flavor platform to test compact QED3 stability.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    O. A. Starykh and L. Balents, Dimerized phase and tran- sitions in a spatially anisotropic square lattice antiferro- magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 127202 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Shannon, T

    N. Shannon, T. Momoi, and P. Sindzingre, Nematic Or- der in Square Lattice Frustrated Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 027213 (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Iqbal, P.Ghosh, R.Narayanan, B

    Y. Iqbal, P.Ghosh, R.Narayanan, B. Kumar, J. Reuther, and R. Thomale, Intertwined nematic orders in a frus- trated ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B94, 224403 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Richter, R

    J. Richter, R. Darradi, J. Schulenburg, D. J. J. Farnell, and H. Rosner, Frustrated spin-1 2 J1−J2 Heisenberg fer- romagnet on the square lattice studied via exact diago- nalization and coupled-cluster method, Phys. Rev. B81, 174429 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    O. A. Starykh, Unusual ordered phases of highly frus- trated magnets: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.78, 052502 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Jiang, J

    S. Jiang, J. Romhányi, S. R. White, M. E. Zhitomirsky, and A. L. Chernyshev, Where is the Quantum Spin Ne- matic?, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 116701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Jiang, S

    S. Jiang, S. R. White, and A. L. Chernyshev, Quan- tum phases in the honeycomb-latticeJ 1–J3 ferro- antiferromagnetic model, Phys. Rev. B108, L180406 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    A. M. Läuchli, J. Sudan, and A. Lüscher, The frustrated ferromagneticS= 1/2Heisenberg chain in a magnetic field – How multipolar spin correlations emerge from magnetically ordered states, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.145, 012057 (2009)

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    Momoi, P

    T. Momoi, P. Sindzingre, and N. Shannon, Octupolar Or- der in the Multiple Spin Exchange Model on a Triangular Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 257204 (2006)

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Derzhko, J

    O. Derzhko, J. Richter, and M. Maksymenko, Strongly correlated flat-band systems: The route from Heisenberg spins to Hubbard electrons, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B29, 1530007 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    M. E. Zhitomirsky and H. Tsunetsugu, Exact low- temperature behavior of a kagomé antiferromagnet at high fields, Phys. Rev. B70, 100403 (2004)

    work page 2004

  12. [12]

    Betts, A new two-dimensional lattice of coordination number five, Proc

    D. Betts, A new two-dimensional lattice of coordination number five, Proc. N. S. Inst. Sci.40, 95 (1995)

    work page 1995

  13. [13]

    Sonnenschein, A

    J. Sonnenschein, A. Maity, C. Liu, R. Thomale, F. Fer- rari, and Y. Iqbal, Candidate quantum spin liquids on the maple-leaf lattice, Phys. Rev. B110, 014414 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Ghosh, T

    P. Ghosh, T. Müller, and R. Thomale, Another exact ground state of a two-dimensional quantum antiferro- magnet, Phys. Rev. B105, L180412 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    D. J. J. Farnell, R. Darradi, R. Schmidt, and J. Richter, Spin-half Heisenberg antiferromagnet on two Archime- dian lattices: From the bounce lattice to the maple-leaf lattice and beyond, Phys. Rev. B84, 104406 (2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    D. J. J. Farnell, O. Götze, J. Richter, R. F. Bishop, and P. H. Y. Li, Quantums= 1 2 antiferromagnets on Archimedean lattices: The route from semiclassical mag- netic order to nonmagnetic quantum states, Phys. Rev. B89, 184407 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Ghosh, Phase diagram of theJ−Jd Heisenberg model on the maple leaf lattice: Neural networks and density matrix renormalization group, Phys

    J.Beck, J.Bodky, J.Motruk, T.Müller, R.Thomale,and P. Ghosh, Phase diagram of theJ−Jd Heisenberg model on the maple leaf lattice: Neural networks and density matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B109, 184422 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Gresista, C

    L. Gresista, C. Hickey, S.Trebst,and Y. Iqbal,Candidate quantum disordered intermediate phase in the Heisen- berg antiferromagnet on the maple-leaf lattice, Phys. Rev. B108, L241116 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Gresista, D

    L. Gresista, D. Kiese, S. Trebst, and Y. Iqbal, Uncon- ventional orders in the maple-leaf ferro-antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model, Z. Naturforsch. A (2026)

    work page 2026

  20. [20]

    Gembé, L

    M. Gembé, L. Gresista, H.-J. Schmidt, C. Hickey, Y.Iqbal,andS.Trebst,Noncoplanarordersandquantum disordered states in maple-leaf antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 085151 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Schmoll, J

    P. Schmoll, J. Naumann, E. L. Weerda, J. Eisert, and Y. Iqbal, Bathing in a sea of candidate quantum spin liquids: From the gapless ruby to the gapped maple-leaf lattice (2025), arXiv:2407.07145 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    P. L. Ebert, Y. Iqbal, and A. Wietek, Competing Para- magnetic Phases in the Maple-Leaf Heisenberg Antifer- romagnet, arXiv (2026), 2601.05308

    work page arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    Ghosh, Chiral crossroads in Ho3ScO6: Competing in- teractions on the maple-leaf lattice, Phys

    P. Ghosh, Chiral crossroads in Ho3ScO6: Competing in- teractions on the maple-leaf lattice, Phys. Rev. B111, 224431 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Aguilar-Maldonado, R

    C. Aguilar-Maldonado, R. Feyerherm, K. Prokeš, L. Keller, and B. Lake, Structure and magnetic prop- erties of the maple leaf antiferromagnet Ho3ScO6, Phys. Rev. B111, 094439 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Haraguchi, A

    Y. Haraguchi, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, and Z. Hiroi, Frus- trated magnetism of the maple-leaf-lattice antiferromag- net MgMn3O7·3H2O, Phys. Rev. B98, 064412 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    B. Saha, A. K. Bera, S. M. Yusuf, and A. Hoser, Two- dimensional short-range spin-spin correlations in the lay- eredspin- 3 2 mapleleaflatticeantiferromagnetNa 2Mn3O7 with crystal stacking disorder, Phys. Rev. B107, 064419 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Spin excitation of the Heisenberg antiferromagnet with frustration: from the bounce-lattice antiferromagnet through the maple-leaf-lattice antiferromagnet to the exact-dimer system

    H. Nakano and T. Sakai, Spin excitation of the Heisenberg antiferromagnet with frustration: from the bounce-lattice antiferromagnet through the maple-leaf- lattice antiferromagnet to the exact-dimer system (2026), arXiv:2604.24055 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Ghosh, J

    P. Ghosh, J. Seufert, T. Müller, F. Mila, and R. Thomale, Maple leaf antiferromagnet in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B108, L060406 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Ghosh, T

    P. Ghosh, T. Müller, Y. Iqbal, R. Thomale, and H. O. Jeschke, Effective spin-1 breathing kagome Hamiltonian induced by the exchange hierarchy in the maple leaf min- eral bluebellite, Phys. Rev. B110, 094406 (2024), pub- lisher: American Physical Society. 7

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Schmoll, H

    P. Schmoll, H. Jeschke, and Y. Iqbal, Tensor network analysis of the maple-leaf antiferromagnet spangolite, Commun Mater6

    work page

  31. [31]

    Venkatesh, B

    C. Venkatesh, B. Bandyopadhyay, A. Midya, K. Ma- halingam, V. Ganesan, and P. Mandal, Magnetic proper- ties of the one-dimensionalS= 3 2 Heisenberg antiferro- magnetic spin-chain compound Na2Mn3O7, Phys. Rev. B101, 184429 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Haraguchi, A

    Y. Haraguchi, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, and Z. Hiroi, Quan- tum antiferromagnet bluebellite comprising a maple-leaf lattice made of spin-1/2 Cu2+ ions, Phys. Rev. B104, 174439 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Schäfer, P

    R. Schäfer, P. L. Ebert, N. Hassan, J. Reuther, D. J. Luitz, and A. Wietek, Thermodynamics of the Heisen- berg antiferromagnet on the maple-leaf lattice, Z. Natur- forsch. A (2026)

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    Borutta, T

    H. Borutta, T. Müller, R. Thomale, H. O. Jeschke, and Y. Iqbal, Crystallography-driven moleculariza- tion of a two-dimensional spin-3/2magnet (2026), arXiv:2602.22005 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Ghosh, Where is the spin liquid in maple-leaf quantum magnet? (2024), arXiv:2401.09422 [cond-mat.str-el]

    P. Ghosh, Where is the spin liquid in maple-leaf quantum magnet? (2024), arXiv:2401.09422 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    S. J. Mills, A. R. Kampf, A. G. Christy, R. M. Housley, G.R.Rossman, R.E.Reynolds,andJ.Marty,Bluebellite andMojaveite, twonewmineralsfromthecentralMojave Desert, California, USA, Mineralog. Mag.78, 1325–1340 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Fennell, J

    T. Fennell, J. O. Piatek, R. A. Stephenson, G. J. Nilsen, and H. M. Rønnow, Spangolite: an s = 1/2 maple leaf lattice antiferromagnet?, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter23, 164201 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Wietek, L

    A. Wietek, L. Staszewski, M. Ulaga, P. L. Ebert, H. Karlsson, S. Sarkar, L. Shackleton, A. Sinha, and R. D. Soares, XDiag: Exact diagonalization for quan- tum many-body systems, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 70 (2026)

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    Wietek, L

    A. Wietek, L. Staszewski, M. Ulaga, P. L. Ebert, H. Karlsson, S. Sarkar, L. Shackleton, A. Sinha, and R. D. Soares, Codebase release 0.4 for XDiag, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 70 (2026)

    work page 2026

  40. [40]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for two-magnon interaction data, ground state energies overS, the employed finite size clusters and a table of all surveyed points and ground state energies

    work page

  41. [41]

    Recall that the maple-leaf lattice can be obtained by a one-seventh site depletion of the triangular lattice

    work page

  42. [42]

    Wietek and A

    A. Wietek and A. M. Läuchli, Valence bond solid and possible deconfined quantum criticality in an extended kagome lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B102, 020411 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Penc and A

    K. Penc and A. M. Läuchli, Spin Nematic Phases in Quantum Spin Systems, inIntroduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory, edited by C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila (Springer Berlin Hei- delberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011) pp. 331–362

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    Iqbal, F

    Y. Iqbal, F. Becca, S. Sorella, and D. Poilblanc, Gap- less spin-liquid phase in the kagome spin-1 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B87, 060405 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Wietek, S

    A. Wietek, S. Capponi, and A. M. Läuchli, Quantum Electrodynamics in2 + 1Dimensions as the Organizing Principle of a Triangular Lattice Antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. X14, 021010 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vish- wanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Prob- ing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science374, 1242 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Giudici, M

    G. Giudici, M. D. Lukin, and H. Pichler, Dynamical Preparation of Quantum Spin Liquids in Rydberg Atom Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 090401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Samajdar, D

    R. Samajdar, D. G. Joshi, Y. Teng, and S. Sachdev, EmergentZ 2 Gauge Theories and Topological Excita- tions in Rydberg Atom Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 043601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Incommensurate Spin-Density Waves in a Frustrated Maple-Leaf Lattice Ferromagnet

    P. S. Tarabunga, F. M. Surace, R. Andreoni, A. An- gelone, and M. Dalmonte, Gauge-Theoretic Origin of Rydberg Quantum Spin Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 195301 (2022). S-1 Supplemental Material for “Incommensurate Spin-Density Waves in a Frustrated Maple-Leaf Lattice Ferromagnet” Paul L. Ebert , Yasir Iqbal , Alexander Wietek May 14, 2026 Appendix A: Two-...

    work page 2022