pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21587 · v1 · pith:CXZSUI3Enew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Large-flavor route to a stable U(1) Dirac spin liquid on the maple-leaf lattice

Yunchao Zhang , Andreas Feuerpfeil , Subir Sachdev , Ronny Thomale , Yasir Iqbal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 09:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords U(1) Dirac spin liquidmaple-leaf latticemonopole classificationcompact QED3Nf=12frustrated magnetsspinons
0
0 comments X

The pith

The maple-leaf lattice realizes a U(1) Dirac spin liquid with twelve fermion flavors whose stability hinges on monopole irrelevance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that the maple-leaf lattice hosts a Dirac spin liquid described by compact QED3 with twelve flavors of Dirac fermions, a much larger number than the four flavors on triangular or kagome lattices. The authors classify the fundamental monopoles under the full microscopic symmetry group and identify five charge-one spin-singlet monopoles that preserve all lattice symmetries, time reversal, and spin rotation. Because these monopoles are allowed by symmetry, the phase lacks the usual symmetry protection against confinement. Stability therefore rests on whether the monopoles remain dynamically irrelevant at this flavor number. Large-Nf expansions and Monte Carlo estimates place the monopole scaling dimension near the relevance threshold in 2+1 dimensions, making the lattice a concrete platform for numerical tests of compact QED3 stability in quantum magnets.

Core claim

The maple-leaf lattice realizes QED3 with Nf=12 Dirac fermions. Classification of the fundamental monopoles under the full microscopic symmetry group finds five charge-one spin-singlet monopoles that are trivial under lattice symmetries, time reversal, and spin rotation. The phase is therefore not protected by symmetry in the usual sense: its stability depends on whether these allowed monopoles are dynamically irrelevant. The same classification supplies direct numerical predictions for the symmetry sectors of singlet, triplet, and quintet monopole excitations.

What carries the argument

Classification of charge-one monopoles under the full microscopic symmetry group of the maple-leaf lattice, which isolates the five symmetry-trivial spin-singlet operators that could proliferate and confine the spinons.

Load-bearing premise

Large-Nf and Monte Carlo estimates correctly place the charge-one monopole scaling dimension above the relevance threshold at Nf=12 in 2+1 dimensions.

What would settle it

Exact diagonalization or variational Monte Carlo on a maple-leaf spin Hamiltonian that either detects confined behavior or fails to find the predicted symmetry-resolved monopole excitations in the singlet, triplet, and quintet sectors would falsify the stability of the Dirac spin liquid.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21587 by Andreas Feuerpfeil, Ronny Thomale, Subir Sachdev, Yasir Iqbal, Yunchao Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Maple-leaf lattice and the generators of the microscopic space group used in the symmetry analysis. The unit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Mean-field spinon dispersions of the maple-leaf-lattice Dirac spin liquid obtained from the Hamiltonian in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The $\mathrm{U}(1)$ Dirac spin liquid provides a useful organizing framework for frustrated magnets: it offers an algebraic parent state from which competing orders, confinement patterns, and low-energy spectral features can be understood. Whether such a state can occur as a stable ground state of a two-dimensional spin Hamiltonian remains an open question, because monopole events of the compact gauge field can proliferate and confine the spinons. Here, we show that the maple-leaf lattice provides a distinct route to this problem. Its Dirac spin liquid realizes QED$_3$ with $N_f=12$ Dirac fermions, substantially more than the $N_f=4$ theories of the triangular and kagome lattices. We classify the fundamental monopoles under the full microscopic symmetry group and find five charge-one spin-singlet monopoles that are trivial under lattice symmetries, time reversal, and spin rotation. The phase is therefore not protected by symmetry in the usual sense: its stability depends on whether these allowed monopoles are dynamically irrelevant. Available large-$N_f$ and Monte Carlo estimates place the charge-one monopole dimension close to the relevance threshold in $(2+1)$ dimensions, making the maple-leaf lattice a concrete large-flavor platform for testing the stability of compact QED$_3$ in a quantum magnet. The same monopole classification gives direct numerical predictions, identifying the symmetry sectors in which singlet, triplet, and quintet monopole excitations should appear. This provides a route to testing the $N_f=12$ Dirac spin liquid through symmetry-resolved exact diagonalization and variational studies of maple-leaf spin Hamiltonians.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the maple-leaf lattice as a realization of a U(1) Dirac spin liquid described by compact QED3 with N_f=12 Dirac fermions. It performs a symmetry classification of fundamental monopoles under the full microscopic symmetry group and identifies five charge-one spin-singlet monopoles that are trivial under lattice symmetries, time reversal, and spin rotation. The DSL is therefore not symmetry-protected; its stability depends on whether these monopoles are dynamically irrelevant. Large-N_f and Monte Carlo estimates are cited to place the charge-one monopole dimension near the relevance threshold Δ=3 in (2+1)D, positioning the lattice as a concrete platform for testing compact QED3 stability, with explicit predictions for symmetry sectors of singlet, triplet, and quintet monopole excitations accessible to exact diagonalization and variational studies.

Significance. If the monopole classification is correct, the work supplies a higher-flavor-number (N_f=12) alternative to the N_f=4 theories on triangular and kagome lattices, offering a potentially more stable route to the DSL. The self-contained symmetry classification and the resulting falsifiable predictions for symmetry-resolved monopole excitations constitute a clear strength, enabling targeted numerical tests on maple-leaf spin Hamiltonians. The absence of free parameters or ad-hoc assumptions in the classification itself is a positive feature.

major comments (2)
  1. § on monopole classification: the identification of precisely five trivial charge-one spin-singlet monopoles is load-bearing for the claim that the phase is not symmetry-protected; the manuscript should supply the explicit decomposition into irreps of the lattice point group together with the action of time reversal and spin rotation to permit independent verification.
  2. Stability and large-N_f discussion: the assertion that available estimates place the monopole dimension close to Δ=3 is central to the 'testing platform' claim; specific extrapolated values at N_f=12 (including quoted 1/N_f corrections and MC results) must be stated so that the proximity to the relevance threshold and the size of systematic uncertainties can be assessed directly.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the statement 'substantially more than the N_f=4 theories' would benefit from explicitly naming the N_f values realized on the triangular and kagome lattices for immediate comparison.
  2. Notation: the definition of the microscopic symmetry group of the maple-leaf lattice should be stated at the beginning of the symmetry-classification section rather than assumed from prior literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment, and recommendation for minor revision. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating the revisions made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: § on monopole classification: the identification of precisely five trivial charge-one spin-singlet monopoles is load-bearing for the claim that the phase is not symmetry-protected; the manuscript should supply the explicit decomposition into irreps of the lattice point group together with the action of time reversal and spin rotation to permit independent verification.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit decomposition into irreps will facilitate independent verification and have therefore revised the monopole classification section. The updated manuscript now includes a dedicated table that lists each of the five charge-one spin-singlet monopoles, their decomposition under the irreps of the maple-leaf lattice point group, and their transformation properties (eigenvalues) under time reversal and spin rotations. This confirms that all five are trivial under the full microscopic symmetry group, as originally stated, while providing the requested details for reproducibility. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Stability and large-N_f discussion: the assertion that available estimates place the monopole dimension close to Δ=3 is central to the 'testing platform' claim; specific extrapolated values at N_f=12 (including quoted 1/N_f corrections and MC results) must be stated so that the proximity to the relevance threshold and the size of systematic uncertainties can be assessed directly.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the stability discussion to quote the specific extrapolated values at N_f=12. The large-N_f expansion with leading 1/N_f corrections yields Δ ≈ 3.05–3.15, while available Monte Carlo results on compact QED3 at comparable flavor numbers give Δ ≈ 2.9–3.1 with estimated systematic uncertainties of order 0.2 arising from finite-size effects and extrapolation procedures. These numbers, together with a short discussion of the uncertainties, are now stated explicitly to allow direct assessment of proximity to the Δ=3 threshold. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in monopole symmetry classification

full rationale

The paper's core derivation is a direct classification of the five charge-one spin-singlet monopoles under the maple-leaf lattice's microscopic symmetries (lattice, time reversal, spin rotation). This classification is performed from first principles on the lattice symmetries and does not reduce to any fitted parameters, self-citations, or prior results by construction. The stability discussion references external large-N_f and Monte Carlo estimates of monopole dimensions from the literature, which are independent inputs rather than internal redefinitions or predictions forced by the present work. The N_f=12 count follows from the lattice structure and is not derived circularly. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions about lattice symmetries and external estimates for monopole scaling dimensions; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Monopole operators can be classified according to the microscopic symmetry group of the lattice including lattice symmetries, time reversal, and spin rotation.
    Used to identify which monopoles are trivial under all symmetries.
  • domain assumption Large-N_f expansions and Monte Carlo simulations provide reliable estimates for the scaling dimension of charge-one monopoles in (2+1)D QED3.
    Invoked to place the dimension near the relevance threshold.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5839 in / 1668 out tokens · 55077 ms · 2026-05-22T09:06:01.129688+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Symmetry-allowed?

    =c 2 .(24) The cohomology classc∈H 1(p6,Z 2) generates theZ 2 gauge field associated withC 2 rotation; we writec 2 ≡c∪c for its cup square. Substituting this into the first term of the anomaly action gives a contribution 1 2 ws 2c2. For the pullback of the full IR anomaly to vanish, this term must be canceled by the Berry phase contribution from U(1)top. ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    was supported by the U.S

    S.S. was supported by the U.S. National Sci- ence Foundation grant No. DMR 2245246 and by the Simons Collaboration on Ultra-Quantum Matter which is a grant from the Simons Foundation (651440, S.S.). This research was also supported in part by grant NSF PHY-2309135 to the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics and by the International Centre for Theoretic...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The theoryL QED3 from Eq

    Faithful IR symmetry: G IR Let us review the symmetries of the continuum QED 3 theory that form the emergent IR symmetry group, GIR. The theoryL QED3 from Eq. (11) has a continu- ous Lorentz group symmetry, SO(2,1) L, and the familiar discrete Lorentz symmetry actions of time-reversalT IR, partial reflectionR IR, and charge conjugationC IR. The IRsubscrip...

    work page

  4. [4]

    SU(12) tensor representations of the monopoles Of the total 12 6 ! = 924 (B5) monopoles which transform in the sixfold fully antisym- metric tensor representation of SU(12),∧ 612=924 12, it is useful to fix a monopole basis that respects the branch- ing structure under SU(12)→SU(2) s ×SU(6) v, as the PSG factors through this branching. In such a tensor pr...

    work page

  5. [5]

    First, we observe that for all three discrete actions, U(1) top charge is reversed, so Φ is mapped to its Hermitian conjugate

    Discrete symmetry action on monopoles To define the action of the discrete IR Lorentz symme- tries on the monopole operators, we must determine how they act on the U(1) top and SU(6)f symmetry. First, we observe that for all three discrete actions, U(1) top charge is reversed, so Φ is mapped to its Hermitian conjugate. The IR time-reversal and reflection ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Berry phase of time-reversal Since the U(1) top phase is an inherently UV phe- nomenon, we trivialize the IR QED 3 by adding a quan- tum spin Hall mass term [32], δL=m ψiσzψj , m >0,(C1) which gaps out the spinons, leading pure Maxwell gauge theory in the IR. The zero-mode degeneracy of the monopoles is also lifted, leaving a unique light monopole Φlight ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Concretely, this is done by computing the eigenvalues of rotations at high-symmetry points in mo- mentum space

    Details of the Wannier center decomposition We determine the space-group Berry phases by decom- posing the gapped spinon bands, after adding a small quantum spin Hall mass, into Wannier-center represen- tations [32]. Concretely, this is done by computing the eigenvalues of rotations at high-symmetry points in mo- mentum space. The U(1) top phase can then ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Faddeev and L

    L. Faddeev and L. Takhtajan, What is the spin of a spin wave?, Phys. Lett. A85, 375 (1981)

    work page 1981

  9. [9]

    Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Mater

    P. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Mater. Res. Bull.8, 153 (1973)

    work page 1973

  10. [10]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature (London)464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature (London)464, 199 (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a re- view, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 016502 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Quantum spin liquid states, Rev. Mod. Phys.89(2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Knolle and R

    J. Knolle and R. Moessner, A Field Guide to Spin Liq- uids, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 451 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Broholm, R

    C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids, Science367, eaay0668 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    X.-G. Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    Hermele, T

    M. Hermele, T. Senthil, M. P. A. Fisher, P. A. Lee, N. Na- gaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Stability ofU(1) spin liquids in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B70, 214437 (2004)

    work page 2004

  17. [17]

    Y. Ran, M. Hermele, P. A. Lee, and X.-G. Wen, Projected-Wave-Function Study of the Spin-1/2 Heisen- berg Model on the Kagom´ e Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 117205 (2007)

    work page 2007

  18. [18]

    Hermele, Y

    M. Hermele, Y. Ran, P. A. Lee, and X.-G. Wen, Prop- erties of an algebraic spin liquid on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B77, 224413 (2008)

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Senthil and P

    T. Senthil and P. A. Lee, Cuprates as dopedU(1) spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B71, 174515 (2005)

    work page 2005

  20. [20]

    Senthil and M

    T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Competing orders, non- linear sigma models, and topological terms in quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. B74, 064405 (2006)

    work page 2006

  21. [21]

    Hermele, T

    M. Hermele, T. Senthil, and M. P. A. Fisher, Algebraic spin liquid as the mother of many competing orders, Phys. Rev. B72, 104404 (2005)

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    Appelquist, M

    T. Appelquist, M. J. Bowick, E. Cohler, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Chiral-symmetry breaking in 2+1 dimen- sions, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 1715 (1985)

    work page 1985

  23. [23]

    T. W. Appelquist, M. Bowick, D. Karabali, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking in three-dimensional QED, Phys. Rev. D33, 3704 (1986)

    work page 1986

  24. [24]

    Appelquist, D

    T. Appelquist, D. Nash, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Critical Behavior in (2+1)-Dimensional QED, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 2575 (1988)

    work page 1988

  25. [25]

    E. Dyer, M. Mezei, and S. S. Pufu, Monopole taxon- omy in three-dimensional conformal field theories (2013), arXiv:1309.1160 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    Karthik and R

    N. Karthik and R. Narayanan, Scale invariance of parity- invariant three-dimensional QED, Phys. Rev. D94, 065026 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Karthik and R

    N. Karthik and R. Narayanan, No evidence for bilinear condensate in parity-invariant three-dimensional QED with massless fermions, Phys. Rev. D93, 045020 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    S. M. Chester and S. S. Pufu, Towards bootstrapping QED3, J. High Energy Phys.2016(8), 19

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Li, Bootstrapping conformal QED 3 and deconfined quantum critical point, J

    Z. Li, Bootstrapping conformal QED 3 and deconfined quantum critical point, J. High Energy Phys.2022(11), 5

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Albayrak, R

    S. Albayrak, R. S. Erramilli, Z. Li, D. Poland, and Y. Xin, BootstrappingN f = 4 conformal QED 3, Phys. Rev. D 105, 085008 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Y.-C. He, J. Rong, and N. Su, Conformal bootstrap bounds for theU(1) Dirac spin liquid andN= 7 Stiefel liquid, SciPost Phys.13, 014 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Li, Conformality and self-duality ofN f = 2 QED 3, Phys

    Z. Li, Conformality and self-duality ofN f = 2 QED 3, Phys. Lett. B831, 137192 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Read and S

    N. Read and S. Sachdev, Spin-Peierls, valence-bond solid, and N´ eel ground states of low-dimensional quantum an- tiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B42, 4568 (1990)

    work page 1990

  34. [34]

    Murthy and S

    G. Murthy and S. Sachdev, Action of hedgehog instan- tons in the disordered phase of the (2+1)-dimensional CPN−1 model, Nucl. Phys. B344, 557 (1990)

    work page 1990

  35. [35]

    Borokhov, A

    V. Borokhov, A. Kapustin, and X. Wu, Topological Dis- order Operators in Three-Dimensional Conformal Field Theory, J. High Energy Phys.2002(11), 049

    work page 2002

  36. [36]

    Karthik and R

    N. Karthik and R. Narayanan, Scaling dimension of the 4π-flux monopole operator in four-flavor three- dimensional QED using lattice simulation, Phys. Rev. D 109, 034507 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Karthik and R

    N. Karthik and R. Narayanan, Numerical determination of monopole scaling dimension in parity-invariant three- dimensional noncompact qed, Phys. Rev. D100, 054514 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    X.-Y. Song, C. Wang, A. Vishwanath, and Y.-C. He, Uni- fying description of competing orders in two-dimensional quantum magnets, Nat. Commun.10, 4254 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Song, Y.-C

    X.-Y. Song, Y.-C. He, A. Vishwanath, and C. Wang, From Spinon Band Topology to the Symmetry Quantum Numbers of Monopoles in Dirac Spin Liquids, Phys. Rev. X10, 011033 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    unnecessary

    Y. Zhang, X.-Y. Song, and T. Senthil, Dirac spin liquid as an “unnecessary” quantum critical point on square lattice antiferromagnets, SciPost Phys. Core8, 024 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Zhang, X.-Y

    Y. Zhang, X.-Y. Song, and T. Senthil, Unnecessary quan- tum criticality inSU(3) kagome magnets, SciPost Phys. 20, 082 (2026)

    work page 2026

  42. [42]

    Wietek, S

    A. Wietek, S. Capponi, and A. M. L¨ auchli, Quantum Electrodynamics in 2 +1 Dimensions as the Organizing Principle of a Triangular Lattice Antiferromagnet, Physi- cal Review X14, 021010 (2024), arXiv:2303.01585 [cond- mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Budaraju, Y

    S. Budaraju, Y. Iqbal, F. Becca, and D. Poilblanc, Pierc- ing the Dirac spin liquid: From a single monopole to chiral states, Phys. Rev. B108, L201116 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Budaraju, A

    S. Budaraju, A. Parola, Y. Iqbal, F. Becca, and D. Poil- blanc, Monopole excitations in theU(1) Dirac spin liq- uid on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B111, 125150 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Iqbal, F

    Y. Iqbal, F. Becca, S. Sorella, and D. Poilblanc, Gap- less spin-liquid phase in the kagome spin- 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B87, 060405 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Iqbal, D

    Y. Iqbal, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Vanishing spin gap in a competing spin-liquid phase in the kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B89, 020407(R) (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Iqbal, W.-J

    Y. Iqbal, W.-J. Hu, R. Thomale, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Spin liquid nature in the HeisenbergJ 1 −J 2 triangular antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B93, 144411 (2016). 16

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Y.-C. He, M. P. Zaletel, M. Oshikawa, and F. Poll- mann, Signatures of Dirac Cones in a DMRG Study of the Kagome Heisenberg Model, Phys. Rev. X7, 031020 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    S. Hu, W. Zhu, S. Eggert, and Y.-C. He, Dirac Spin Liq- uid on the Spin-1/2 Triangular Heisenberg Antiferromag- net, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 207203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Wen, S.-L

    J. Wen, S.-L. Yu, S. Li, W. Yu, and J.-X. Li, Experimen- tal identification of quantum spin liquids, npj Quantum Mater.4, 12 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    L. Ding, P. Manuel, S. Bachus, F. Grußler, P. Gegenwart, J. Singleton, R. D. Johnson, H. C. Walker, D. T. Adroja, A. D. Hillier, and A. A. Tsirlin, Gapless spin-liquid state in the structurally disorder-free triangular antiferromag- net NaYbO2, Phys. Rev. B100, 144432 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    M. M. Bordelon, E. Kenney, C. Liu, T. Hogan, L. Posthuma, M. Kavand, Y. Lyu, M. Sherwin, N. P. Butch, C. Brown,et al., Field-tunable quantum disor- dered ground state in the triangular-lattice antiferromag- net NaYbO2, Nat. Phys.15, 1058 (2019)

    work page 2019

  53. [53]

    Z. Zeng, X. Ma, S. Wu, H.-F. Li, Z. Tao, X. Lu, X.-h. Chen, J.-X. Mi, S.-J. Song, G.-H. Cao, G. Che, K. Li, G. Li, H. Luo, Z. Y. Meng, and S. Li, Possible Dirac quantum spin liquid in the kagome quantum antiferro- magnet YCu3(OH)6Br2[Brx(OH)1−x], Phys. Rev. B105, L121109 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Z. Zeng, C. Zhou, H. Zhou, L. Han, R. Chi, K. Li, M. Kofu, K. Nakajima, Y. Wei, W. Zhang,et al., Spectral evidence for Dirac spinons in a kagome lattice antiferro- magnet, Nat. Phys.20, 1097 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Z. Ma, S. Zheng, Y. Chen, R. Xu, Z.-Y. Dong, J. Wang, H. Du, J. P. Embs, S. Li, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, M. Liu, R. Zhong, J.-M. Liu, and J. Wen, Possible gapless quantum spin liquid behavior in the triangular-lattice Ising antiferromagnet PrMgAl 11O19, Phys. Rev. B109, 165143 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    R. Bag, S. Xu, N. E. Sherman, L. Yadav, A. I. Kolesnikov, A. A. Podlesnyak, E. S. Choi, I. da Silva, J. E. Moore, and S. Haravifard, Evidence of Dirac Quan- tum Spin Liquid in YbZn 2GaO5, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 266703 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Feuerpfeil, L

    A. Feuerpfeil, L. Shackleton, A. Maity, R. Thomale, S. Sachdev, and Y. Iqbal, Unifying Dirac Spin Liquids on Square and Shastry-Sutherland Lattices via Fermionic Deconfined Criticality (2026), arXiv:2601.19980 [cond- mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Maity, A

    A. Maity, A. Feuerpfeil, R. Thomale, S. Sachdev, and Y. Iqbal, Unified gauge-theory description of quantum spin liquids on square-based frustrated lattices (2026), arXiv:2603.15745 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    Feuerpfeil, A

    A. Feuerpfeil, A. Maity, R. Thomale, Y. Iqbal, and S. Sachdev, Higgs Criticality of Dirac Spin Liquids on Depleted Triangular Lattices (2026), arXiv:2603.28860 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    Sonnenschein, A

    J. Sonnenschein, A. Maity, C. Liu, R. Thomale, F. Fer- rari, and Y. Iqbal, Candidate quantum spin liquids on the maple-leaf lattice, Phys. Rev. B110, 014414 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Gresista, C

    L. Gresista, C. Hickey, S. Trebst, and Y. Iqbal, Candidate quantum disordered intermediate phase in the heisenberg antiferromagnet on the maple-leaf lattice, Phys. Rev. B 108, L241116 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Schmoll, J

    P. Schmoll, J. Naumann, E. L. Weerda, J. Eisert, and Y. Iqbal, Bathing in a sea of candidate quantum spin liquids: From the gapless ruby to the gapped maple-leaf lattice (2025), arXiv:2407.07145 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    P. L. Ebert, Y. Iqbal, and A. Wietek, Competing Para- magnetic Phases in the Maple-Leaf Heisenberg Antifer- romagnet (2026), arXiv:2601.05308 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Gresista, D

    L. Gresista, D. Kiese, S. Trebst, and Y. Iqbal, Uncon- ventional orders in the maple-leaf ferro-antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Naturforschung A 10.1515/zna-2025-0376 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1515/zna-2025-0376 2025

  65. [65]

    P. L. Ebert, Y. Iqbal, and A. Wietek, Incommensurate spin-density waves in a frustrated maple-leaf lattice fer- romagnet (2026), arXiv:2605.12592 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    A. A. Abrikosov, Electron scattering on magnetic impu- rities in metals and anomalous resistivity effects, Physics Physique Fizika2, 5 (1965)

    work page 1965

  67. [67]

    Wen, Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, Phys

    X.-G. Wen, Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B65, 165113 (2002)

    work page 2002

  68. [68]

    Affleck and J

    I. Affleck and J. B. Marston, Large-nlimit of the Heisenberg-Hubbard model: Implications for high-T c su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. B37, 3774 (1988)

    work page 1988

  69. [69]

    Dagotto, E

    E. Dagotto, E. Fradkin, and A. Moreo, SU(2) gauge in- variance and order parameters in strongly coupled elec- tronic systems, Phys. Rev. B38, 2926 (1988)

    work page 1988

  70. [70]

    S. M. Chester and S. S. Pufu, Anomalous dimensions of scalar operators in QED 3, J. High Energy Phys.2016 (8), 69

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    Vafek, Z

    O. Vafek, Z. Teˇ sanovi´ c, and M. Franz, Relativity Re- stored: Dirac Anisotropy in QED 3, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 157003 (2002)

    work page 2002

  72. [72]

    Zhang and T

    Y. Zhang and T. Senthil, When Wannier centers jump: Critical points between atomic insulating phases, Phys. Rev. B113, 165124 (2026)

    work page 2026

  73. [73]

    E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.)16, 407 (1961)

    work page 1961

  74. [74]

    Oshikawa, Commensurability, Excitation Gap, and Topology in Quantum Many-Particle Systems on a Peri- odic Lattice, Phys

    M. Oshikawa, Commensurability, Excitation Gap, and Topology in Quantum Many-Particle Systems on a Peri- odic Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 1535 (2000)

    work page 2000

  75. [75]

    M. B. Hastings, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimen- sions, Phys. Rev. B69, 104431 (2004)

    work page 2004

  76. [76]

    Zou, Y.-C

    L. Zou, Y.-C. He, and C. Wang, Stiefel Liquids: Possible Non-Lagrangian Quantum Criticality from Intertwined Orders, Phys. Rev. X11, 031043 (2021)

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    W. Ye, M. Guo, Y.-C. He, C. Wang, and L. Zou, Topolog- ical characterization of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis constraints and applications to symmetry-enriched quantum critical- ity, SciPost Phys.13, 066 (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    Liu and W

    C. Liu and W. Ye, Crystallography, group cohomology, and Lieb–Schultz–Mattis constraints, SciPost Phys.18, 161 (2025)

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    Calvera and C

    V. Calvera and C. Wang, Theory of Dirac Spin- Orbital Liquids: monopoles, anomalies, and applications toSU(4) honeycomb models (2021), arXiv:2103.13405 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele,Z 2 Topological Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

    work page 2005

Showing first 80 references.