pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13656 · v1 · pith:2TRXTL4Enew · submitted 2026-05-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Nodal Topological Superconductivity Driven by Crystalline Antiunitary Symmetry in Altermagnets

Xiao Xiao , Arun Bansil This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords altermagnetstopological superconductivityantiunitary symmetryMajorana flat bandsnodal phaseschiral symmetriesBogoliubov-de Gennesnodal loops
0
0 comments X

The pith

Crystalline antiunitary symmetry in fourfold altermagnets forbids pure spin-singlet pairing and selects structures yielding emergent chiral symmetries that produce nodal topological superconductivity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In fourfold collinear altermagnets the native antiunitary symmetry combining time reversal and C4z rotation rules out pure spin-singlet superconducting pairing. It instead selects pairing structures whose Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonians acquire emergent chiral symmetries. These symmetries stabilize nodal topological phases over wide parameter ranges, including a nodal-point phase with Majorana flat bands and nodal-loop phases that support chiral Majorana edge states. The nodal character survives even when the antiunitary symmetry breaks spontaneously, showing that the topology is rooted in the pairing constraint itself. This route offers an intrinsic material platform for topological superconductivity without engineered interfaces.

Core claim

The native crystalline antiunitary symmetry T C4z in fourfold rotational collinear altermagnets generically forbids pure spin-singlet pairing and selects pairing structures that admit Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonians with emergent chiral symmetries, giving rise to robust nodal topological phases including a nodal-point phase hosting Majorana flat bands and two distinct nodal-loop phases with chiral Majorana edge states; the nodal structure persists after spontaneous breaking of the antiunitary symmetry.

What carries the argument

The crystalline antiunitary symmetry T C4z, which constrains superconducting pairing to channels that induce emergent chiral symmetries in the BdG Hamiltonian.

If this is right

  • Robust nodal topological phases exist over broad parameter regimes in altermagnets.
  • A nodal-point phase hosts Majorana flat bands.
  • Nodal-loop phases exhibit chiral Majorana edge states.
  • Nodal features remain after spontaneous symmetry breaking.
  • Tunneling spectroscopy can distinguish the phases and detect symmetry breaking.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar symmetry-driven pairing selection may occur in altermagnets with other rotational symmetries.
  • The mechanism could enable Majorana modes in bulk materials without proximity effects.
  • This approach might generalize to other classes of magnetic superconductors.
  • Competing pairing channels might be suppressed in real materials exhibiting this symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The dominant pairing interaction belongs to the symmetry-allowed channels that produce the emergent chiral symmetries rather than being dominated by competing pairing symmetries or orders.

What would settle it

Detection of dominant pure spin-singlet pairing without nodal features in the superconducting spectrum of a fourfold altermagnet would disprove the generic selection of the topological channels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13656 by Arun Bansil, Xiao Xiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Normal-state properties: (a) lattice structure; (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Topological nodal-point superconducting phase: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Tunneling spectra of planar junctions between an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Topological superconductivity hosts protected quasiparticles and is central to topological quantum computation, yet its realization in intrinsic materials remains challenging and often relies on engineered platforms. Here we uncover a symmetry-constrained mechanism for nodal topological superconductivity in altermagnets. Focusing on fourfold rotational collinear altermagnets, we show that the native crystalline antiunitary symmetry $\mathcal{T}C_{4z}$ generically forbids pure spin-singlet pairing and selects pairing structures that admit Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) Hamiltonians with emergent chiral symmetries. These symmetries further give rise to robust nodal topological phases over broad parameter regimes, including a nodal-point phase hosting Majorana flat bands (MFBs) and two distinct nodal-loop phases with chiral Majorana edge states. Notably, the nodal structure persists even after spontaneous breaking of the antiunitary symmetry, indicating that the topology originates from symmetry-constrained pairing rather than direct symmetry protection. Finally, we propose tunneling signatures that can distinguish these nodal phases and probe symmetry breaking experimentally.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that in fourfold collinear altermagnets the native crystalline antiunitary symmetry T C_{4z} generically forbids pure spin-singlet pairing, selects pairing structures that admit BdG Hamiltonians with emergent chiral symmetries, and thereby produces robust nodal topological superconducting phases (a nodal-point phase with Majorana flat bands and two nodal-loop phases with chiral Majorana edge states). These nodal features are asserted to survive spontaneous breaking of the antiunitary symmetry, with tunneling signatures proposed to distinguish the phases experimentally.

Significance. If the symmetry selection and dominance of the allowed pairing channels hold, the work identifies an intrinsic mechanism for nodal topological superconductivity in altermagnets that does not rely on engineered heterostructures. The persistence of topology after symmetry breaking and the concrete tunneling diagnostics would be useful additions to the literature on altermagnetic superconductors.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (BdG Hamiltonian construction): the claim that T C_{4z} 'generically forbids pure spin-singlet pairing' is presented via representation theory, but the subsequent step that the selected channels dominate over competing singlet or triplet components is not supported by any microscopic interaction (Hubbard, electron-phonon, or otherwise) projected onto the altermagnetic bands; without this, the mapping from symmetry to physical pairing remains an assumption.
  2. [§4.1–4.3] §4.1–4.3 (phase diagrams): the statements of 'broad parameter regimes' and 'robust nodal phases' are illustrated with numerical BdG spectra for a few representative values of the pairing amplitudes, yet no systematic scan or analytic bound is given on the size of the region where the emergent chiral symmetry and nodal structure survive; the persistence after spontaneous symmetry breaking is shown only for one specific breaking pattern.
  3. [§5] §5 (tunneling signatures): the proposed differential-conductance features assume the nodal phases realized by the symmetry-selected pairing; if other pairing channels or competing orders (e.g., charge-density-wave) are present at comparable strength, the signatures would be modified or absent, but no estimate of relative pairing strengths is provided.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The notation T C_{4z} is introduced without an explicit definition of the antiunitary operator in the first paragraph of the introduction; a short footnote or sentence clarifying its action on spin and orbital degrees of freedom would improve readability.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (nodal-loop dispersions) uses the same color scale for both loop phases; adding a second panel or distinct markers would make the distinction between the two loop phases clearer.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, clarifying the symmetry-based nature of our results while incorporating revisions where they strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (BdG Hamiltonian construction): the claim that T C_{4z} 'generically forbids pure spin-singlet pairing' is presented via representation theory, but the subsequent step that the selected channels dominate over competing singlet or triplet components is not supported by any microscopic interaction (Hubbard, electron-phonon, or otherwise) projected onto the altermagnetic bands; without this, the mapping from symmetry to physical pairing remains an assumption.

    Authors: We agree that the dominance of symmetry-allowed channels over competing ones ultimately requires microscopic input. Our analysis relies on representation theory to show that pure spin-singlet pairing is forbidden by the antiunitary symmetry, so any physical pairing must involve the selected mixed or triplet structures. We have revised §3 to explicitly distinguish the symmetry selection rule from a claim of microscopic dominance and added a brief paragraph noting that the leading instability in realistic models (e.g., Hubbard or electron-phonon) would need to be checked separately; this remains an assumption of the present work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: §4.1–4.3 (phase diagrams): the statements of 'broad parameter regimes' and 'robust nodal phases' are illustrated with numerical BdG spectra for a few representative values of the pairing amplitudes, yet no systematic scan or analytic bound is given on the size of the region where the emergent chiral symmetry and nodal structure survive; the persistence after spontaneous symmetry breaking is shown only for one specific breaking pattern.

    Authors: We accept that the original presentation of robustness was limited. In the revised manuscript we have added a systematic parameter scan (now shown in the supplementary material) that maps the extent of the nodal phases over a wide range of pairing amplitudes. We also include an analytic argument based on the protection by emergent chiral symmetry that bounds the stability region. For spontaneous symmetry breaking we have extended the analysis to two additional breaking patterns, confirming that the nodal structure and Majorana features persist in each case. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §5 (tunneling signatures): the proposed differential-conductance features assume the nodal phases realized by the symmetry-selected pairing; if other pairing channels or competing orders (e.g., charge-density-wave) are present at comparable strength, the signatures would be modified or absent, but no estimate of relative pairing strengths is provided.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the tunneling diagnostics are conditional on the symmetry-selected pairing being dominant. We have revised §5 to state this assumption clearly, to discuss how competing orders such as charge-density waves could modify or suppress the signatures, and to note that quantitative estimates of relative pairing strengths would require material-specific microscopic calculations beyond the scope of the present symmetry-focused study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Symmetry-constrained derivation of nodal phases is self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives the forbidden pure spin-singlet pairing and the emergence of chiral symmetries in the BdG Hamiltonian directly from the action of the native crystalline antiunitary symmetry T C4z on fourfold altermagnets. These steps follow from standard group-theoretic constraints on the pairing matrix and the resulting topological invariants; they do not reduce to fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The persistence of nodal structure after spontaneous symmetry breaking is shown by explicit construction of the Hamiltonian under the remaining symmetries, independent of microscopic interaction details. The assumption that symmetry-allowed channels dominate in real materials is an external physical premise, not a circular step within the derivation chain. No equations or claims in the manuscript equate a prediction to its own input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Bogoliubov-de Gennes formalism for superconductors and the domain assumption that the materials possess the stated crystalline antiunitary symmetry.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The Bogoliubov-de Gennes formalism accurately describes the superconducting state in these materials.
    Used throughout to analyze pairing structures and emergent symmetries.
  • domain assumption Fourfold rotational collinear altermagnets possess the native crystalline antiunitary symmetry T C4z.
    This symmetry is the load-bearing element that constrains pairing and generates the nodal phases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5484 in / 1340 out tokens · 49933 ms · 2026-05-14T18:09:55.440212+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Direction-selective triplet pairing and spin-edge locking in altermagnetic metals

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Altermagnetic spin splitting selects direction-selective triplet pairing in 2D d-wave metals and generates spin-locked Majorana edge states in both spin-conserving and Rashba-mixed regimes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Sigrist and K

    M. Sigrist and K. Ueda, Phenomenological theory of un- conventional superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.63, 239 (1991)

    work page 1991

  2. [2]

    V. P. Mineev and K. V. Samokhin,Introduction to Un- conventional Superconductivity(Gordon and Breach Sci- ence Publishers, Amsterdam, 1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y. Ando, Topological superconductors: a re- view, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 076501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems, Reports on Progress in Physics75, 076501 (2012)

    J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems, Reports on Progress in Physics75, 076501 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Pientka, A

    F. Pientka, A. Keselman, E. Berg, A. Yacoby, A. Stern, and B. I. Halperin, Topological superconductivity in a planar josephson junction, Phys. Rev. X7, 021032 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    H. Ren, F. Pientka, S. Hart, A. T. Pierce, M. Kosowsky, L. Lunczer, R. Schlereth, B. Scharf, E. M. Hankiewicz, L. W. Molenkamp, B. I. Halperin, and A. Yacoby, Topo- logical superconductivity in a phase-controlled josephson junction, Nature569, 93–98 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    R. M. Lutchyn, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, L. P. Kouwen- hoven, P. Krogstrup, C. M. Marcus, and Y. Oreg, Majo- rana zero modes in superconductor–semiconductor het- erostructures, Nature Reviews Materials3, 52–68 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Ma- jorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 077001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Y. Oreg, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Helical liquids and majorana bound states in quantum wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 177002 (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. L. Hughes, and J. Cano, Altermag- netic routes to majorana modes in zero net magnetiza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Pientka, L

    F. Pientka, L. I. Glazman, and F. von Oppen, Topological superconducting phase in helical shiba chains, Phys. Rev. B88, 155420 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Nadj-Perge, I

    S. Nadj-Perge, I. K. Drozdov, J. Li, H. Chen, S. Jeon, J. Seo, A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yaz- dani, Observation of majorana fermions in ferromagnetic atomic chains on a superconductor, Science346, 602–607 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Smejkal, R

    L. Smejkal, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. c. v. ˇSipr, J. Sinova, and T. c. v. Jungwirth, Chiral magnons in altermagnetic ruo 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 256703 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically ordered mag- netic octupoles ind-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X14, 011019 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau theory of alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 176702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    V. Leeb, A. Mook, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Knolle, Sponta- neous formation of altermagnetism from orbital ordering, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236701 (2024). 6

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Y. Yu, H. G. Suh, M. Roig, and D. F. Agterberg, Alter- magnetism from coincident Van Hove singularities: ap- plication toκ-Cl, Nat. Commun.16, 2950 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Li and C.-C

    Y.-X. Li and C.-C. Liu, Majorana corner modes and tun- able patterns in an altermagnet heterostructure, Phys. Rev. B108, 205410 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Y.-X. Li, Y. Liu, and C.-C. Liu, Creation and manipu- lation of higher-order topological states by altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, L201109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    R. M. Fernandes, V. S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, and R. G. Pereira, Topological transition from nodal to nodeless zeeman splitting in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, 024404 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. F. Vender- bos, Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 096703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Parshukov, R

    K. Parshukov, R. Wiedmann, and A. P. Schnyder, Topo- logical crossings in two-dimensional altermagnets: Sym- metry classification and topological responses, Phys. Rev. B111, 224406 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Q. Cui, Y. Zhu, X. Yao, P. Cui, and H. Yang, Giant spin- hall and tunneling magnetoresistance effects based on a two-dimensional nonrelativistic antiferromagnetic metal, Phys. Rev. B108, 024410 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    X. Chen, D. Wang, L. Li, and B. Sanyal, Giant spin- splitting and tunable spin-momentum locked transport in room temperature collinear antiferromagnetic semimetal- lic CrO monolayer, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 022402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Guo, Z.-X

    P.-J. Guo, Z.-X. Liu, and Z.-Y. Lu, Quantum anomalous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnetism, npj Comput. Mater.9, 70 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Q. Cui, B. Zeng, P. Cui, T. Yu, and H. Yang, Efficient spin seebeck and spin nernst effects of magnons in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. B108, L180401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Y. Fang, J. Cano, and S. A. A. Ghorashi, Quantum geom- etry induced nonlinear transport in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Attias, A

    L. Attias, A. Levchenko, and M. Khodas, Intrinsic anomalous hall effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 094425 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Crystal thermal transport in altermagnetic ruo2, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Sylju˚ asen, A

    E. Sylju˚ asen, A. Qaiumzadeh, and A. Sudbø, Quantum geometry and magnon hall transport in an altermagnet, Phys. Rev. B112, 064429 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Zhang, L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite- momentum cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets, Nature Communications15, 1801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    C. Sun, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Andreev reflection in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B108, 054511 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Papaj, Andreev reflection at the altermagnet- superconductor interface, Phys

    M. Papaj, Andreev reflection at the altermagnet- superconductor interface, Phys. Rev. B108, L060508 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    C. W. J. Beenakker and T. Vakhtel, Phase-shifted an- dreev levels in an altermagnet josephson junction, Phys. Rev. B108, 075425 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    J. A. Ouassou, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, dc joseph- son effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 076003 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    B. Lu, K. Maeda, H. Ito, K. Yada, and Y. Tanaka, φjosephson junction induced by altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 226002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Cheng and Q.-F

    Q. Cheng and Q.-F. Sun, Orientation- dependent josephson effect in spin-singlet superconductor/altermagnet/spin-triplet supercon- ductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B109, 024517 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    M. Wei, L. Xiang, F. Xu, L. Zhang, G. Tang, and J. Wang, Gapless superconducting state and mirage gap in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, L201404 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Altermagnetic supercon- ducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B110, 024503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Cheng, Y

    Q. Cheng, Y. Mao, and Q.-F. Sun, Field-free josephson diode effect in altermagnet/normal metal/altermagnet junctions, Phys. Rev. B110, 014518 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Chakraborty and A

    D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Perfect super- conducting diode effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 026001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Sim and J

    G. Sim and J. Knolle, Pair density waves and super- current diode effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B112, L020502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    I. d. M. Froldi and H. Freire, Efficiency of the super- conducting diode effect of pair-density-wave states in two-dimensional d-wave altermagnets, Ann. Phys.483, 170273 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    I. de M. Froldi and H. Freire, Highly efficient supercon- ducting diode effect in unconventionalp-wave magnets, (2026), arXiv:2601.09783 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    A. A. Zyuzin, Magnetoelectric effect in superconductors withd-wave magnetization, Phys. Rev. B109, L220505 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    J.-X. Hu, O. Matsyshyn, and J. C. W. Song, Nonlinear superconducting magnetoelectric effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 026001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling mag- netoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromag- nets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    H. Bai, Y. C. Zhang, Y. J. Zhou, P. Chen, C. H. Wan, L. Han, W. X. Zhu, S. X. Liang, Y. C. Su, X. F. Han, F. Pan, and C. Song, Efficient spin-to-charge conversion via altermagnetic spin splitting effect in antiferromagnet ruo2, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Sun and J

    C. Sun and J. Linder, Spin pumping from a ferromagnetic insulator into an altermagnet, Phys. Rev. B108, L140408 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Predictable gate-field control of spin in alter- magnets with spin-layer coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 056401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    E. W. Hodt and J. Linder, Spin pumping in an altermagnet/normal-metal bilayer, Phys. Rev. B109, 174438 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    B. Chi, L. Jiang, Y. Zhu, G. Yu, C. Wan, J. Zhang, and X. Han, Crystal-facet-oriented altermagnets for detecting ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic states by giant tun- neling magnetoresistance, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 034038 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representa- 7 tion theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    I. I. Mazin, Notes on altermagnetism and superconduc- tivity, AAPPS Bull.35, 18 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Zhu, Z.-Y

    D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic met- als, Phys. Rev. B108, 184505 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Brekke, A

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Two-dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal micro- scopic model, Phys. Rev. B108, 224421 (2023)

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    V. S. de Carvalho and H. Freire, Unconventional super- conductivity in altermagnets with spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B110, L220503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Chakraborty and A

    D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Constraints on superconducting pairing in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B112, 014516 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Feng and Z

    X. Feng and Z. Zhang, Superconducting order parame- ters in spin space groups: Methodology and application, Phys. Rev. B111, 054520 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Exotic superconduct- ing states in altermagnets

    K. Parshukov and A. P. Schnyder, Exotic superconduct- ing states in altermagnets, (2025), arXiv:2507.10700 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    T. F. Heung and M. Franz, Probing topological degener- acy on a torus using superconducting altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 205145 (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    Y.-M. Wu, Y. Wang, and R. M. Fernandes, Intra-unit-cell singlet pairing mediated by altermagnetic fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 156001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    Fukaya, B

    Y. Fukaya, B. Lu, K. Yada, Y. Tanaka, and J. Cayao, Crossed surface flat bands in three-dimensional super- conducting altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2026)

    work page 2026

  70. [70]

    X. Zou, R. M. Fernandes, and E. Fradkin, Superconduct- ing states and intertwined orders in metallic altermag- nets, (2026), arXiv:2603.04503 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2026

  71. [71]

    Luo, Z.-T

    X.-J. Luo, Z.-T. Sun, X. Feng, M. Tian, and K. T. Law, Hidden zeeman field in odd-parity magnets: An ideal platform for topological superconductivity, (2026), arXiv:2603.15147 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2026

  72. [72]

    C. L. M. Wong, J. Liu, K. T. Law, and P. A. Lee, Majo- rana flat bands and unidirectional majorana edge states in gapless topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B88, 060504(R) (2013)

    work page 2013

  73. [73]

    Daido and Y

    A. Daido and Y. Yanase, Majorana flat bands, chiral majorana edge states, and unidirectional majorana edge states in noncentrosymmetric superconductors, Phys. Rev. B95, 134507 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group Theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter (Springer, 2008)

    work page 2008

  75. [75]

    See Supplemental Material for additional details

    work page

  76. [76]

    Goryo, M

    J. Goryo, M. H. Fischer, and M. Sigrist, Possible pairing symmetries in srptas with a local lack of inversion center, Phys. Rev. B86, 100507(R) (2012)

    work page 2012

  77. [77]

    N. F. Q. Yuan, K. F. Mak, and K. T. Law, Possible topo- logical superconducting phases of mos2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 097001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  78. [78]

    R. S. Keizer, S. T. B. Goennenwein, T. M. Klapwijk, G. Miao, G. Xiao, and A. Gupta, A spin triplet supercur- rent through the half-metallic ferromagnet cro 2, Nature 439, 825 (2006)

    work page 2006

  79. [79]

    J. J. He, T. K. Ng, P. A. Lee, and K. T. Law, Selec- tive equal-spin andreev reflections induced by majorana fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 037001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  80. [80]

    M. Roig, Y. Yu, R. C. Ekman, A. Kreisel, B. M. Ander- sen, and D. F. Agterberg, Quasisymmetry-constrained spin ferromagnetism in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 016703 (2025)

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.