pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18377 · v2 · pith:DSW32OURnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas

Dissipation-assisted preparation of Floquet-Laughlin states in superconducting circuits

Luis C. Steinfadt , Andr\'e Eckardt , Francesco Petiziol This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 18:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords fractional chern insulatorsfloquet-laughlin statesdriven-dissipative stabilizationsuperconducting circuitsquantum bath engineeringfractional quantum hall signaturesbosonic hubbard model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Driven leaky cavity modes stabilize Floquet fractional Chern insulator states as approximate fixed points in superconducting circuits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to prepare fractional Chern insulator states in small systems of photons using driven-dissipative methods in superconducting circuits. Instead of slow adiabatic ramps, which are hard for strongly interacting particles, the authors couple the system to driven leaky cavity modes that act as a controllable environment. This environment is engineered so that the desired Floquet-FCI state is approximately its steady state. Numerical simulations for two, three, and six particles confirm that the resulting states display key fractional quantum Hall features like bulk incompressibility, a Hall response, and the ability to trap fractional charges.

Core claim

Considering Floquet implementations of the bosonic Harper-Hofstadter-Hubbard model of few photons in superconducting circuits, protocols are designed for the driven-dissipative stabilization of its FCI ground state at half filling via quantum bath engineering. Dissipation control is achieved through the coupling to driven leaky cavity modes, which realize a tuneable artificial environment having the Floquet-FCI as its approximate fixed point. For systems of two, three and six particles, numerical results show how the flexibility of the control scheme allows for the detection of fractional quantum Hall signatures in the stabilized steady states, including bulk incompressibility, Hall response

What carries the argument

Driven leaky cavity modes that realize a tuneable artificial environment having the Floquet-FCI as its approximate fixed point.

If this is right

  • The stabilized steady states for two, three, and six particles exhibit bulk incompressibility.
  • These states show a Hall response characteristic of fractional quantum Hall systems.
  • Fractional charges can be trapped in the steady states.
  • The approach offers a pathway to dissipation-assisted preparation of strongly correlated states in quantum simulators.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method could be extended to prepare states with more complex anyonic properties by adjusting the drive parameters.
  • Similar dissipation-assisted preparation might apply to other strongly correlated lattice models in quantum simulators.
  • The flexibility in control could allow for the study of transitions between different topological phases.

Load-bearing premise

The driven leaky cavity modes realize a tuneable artificial environment having the Floquet-FCI as its approximate fixed point.

What would settle it

Numerical simulations or experiments that fail to show bulk incompressibility or the expected Hall response in the steady states for the six-particle system would falsify the claim that the cavity modes stabilize the FCI state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18377 by Andr\'e Eckardt, Francesco Petiziol, Luis C. Steinfadt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Driven-dissipative stabilization of the ground state of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Change of the bulk charge, defined as the average [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Fractional Chern insulators (FCIs) are lattice analogs of fractional quantum Hall systems, where the interplay of strong interactions with a frustrated tunnelling kinetics leads to the emergence of a gapped ground state with long-range entanglement and anyonic excitations. The highly correlated nature of such systems makes their adiabatic preparation challenging already beyond the minimal system size of two particles. Considering Floquet implementations of the bosonic Harper-Hofstadter-Hubbard model of few photons in superconducting circuits, we design protocols for the driven-dissipative stabilization of its FCI ground state at half filling via quantum bath engineering. Dissipation control is achieved through the coupling to driven leaky cavity modes, which realize a tuneable artificial environment having the Floquet-FCI as its approximate fixed point. For systems of two, three and six particles, we show numerically how the flexibility of the control scheme further allows for the detection of fractional quantum Hall signatures in the stabilized steady states, including bulk incompressibility, Hall response and the trapping of fractional charges. Our results provide a concrete pathway to dissipation-assisted preparation of strongly correlated states in quantum simulators.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes driven-dissipative protocols to stabilize Floquet fractional Chern insulator (FCI) states of the bosonic Harper-Hofstadter-Hubbard model in superconducting circuits. Dissipation is engineered by coupling to driven leaky cavity modes that realize a tunable artificial bath whose approximate fixed point is the target half-filled FCI. Numerical simulations for N=2, 3 and 6 particles are used to extract fractional quantum Hall signatures (bulk incompressibility, Hall response, fractional charge trapping) from the resulting steady states.

Significance. If the engineered bath indeed stabilizes states whose correlations originate from the target FCI rather than from the drive alone, the work supplies a concrete route to preparing strongly correlated topological states in circuit QED platforms where adiabatic preparation is difficult. The numerical demonstration of multiple FQH diagnostics on small systems and the flexibility of the control scheme constitute the main strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [abstract (dissipation control paragraph)] The central stabilization claim rests on the statement that the driven leaky cavity modes produce a Lindblad dynamics whose unique steady state is close to the Floquet-FCI (abstract, paragraph on dissipation control). The manuscript must supply the explicit microscopic-to-effective mapping, including the form of the jump operators, the secular approximation or rotating-wave treatment employed, and quantitative bounds on the distance between the true steady state and the ideal FCI. Without these, the reported signatures cannot be unambiguously attributed to the engineered bath.
  2. [numerical results for N=6] For the N=6 case the numerics are presented as evidence that bulk incompressibility and Hall response survive in the steady state. The manuscript should report the system-size dependence of the gap, the fidelity to the target FCI, and the leakage rate relative to the interaction scale; otherwise it is unclear whether the observed signatures remain detectable once finite-size and finite-leakage corrections are accounted for.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the cavity-drive amplitudes and detunings should be unified between the main text and the supplementary material to avoid ambiguity when reproducing the effective rates.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [abstract (dissipation control paragraph)] The central stabilization claim rests on the statement that the driven leaky cavity modes produce a Lindblad dynamics whose unique steady state is close to the Floquet-FCI (abstract, paragraph on dissipation control). The manuscript must supply the explicit microscopic-to-effective mapping, including the form of the jump operators, the secular approximation or rotating-wave treatment employed, and quantitative bounds on the distance between the true steady state and the ideal FCI. Without these, the reported signatures cannot be unambiguously attributed to the engineered bath.

    Authors: The full manuscript already contains the derivation of the effective Lindblad equation from the microscopic circuit Hamiltonian (coupling to driven leaky modes) in the methods section, using the standard Born-Markov approximation and rotating-wave treatment valid in the weak-coupling, large-detuning regime. The engineered jump operators are constructed so that the target Floquet-FCI is an approximate dark state of the dissipator. We agree that making this mapping fully explicit in one place strengthens the paper; the revised version will add a dedicated paragraph (or short appendix) with the explicit jump-operator form, the conditions for the secular approximation, and numerical bounds on the steady-state distance to the ideal FCI obtained by solving the Lindblad equation for the studied parameters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [numerical results for N=6] For the N=6 case the numerics are presented as evidence that bulk incompressibility and Hall response survive in the steady state. The manuscript should report the system-size dependence of the gap, the fidelity to the target FCI, and the leakage rate relative to the interaction scale; otherwise it is unclear whether the observed signatures remain detectable once finite-size and finite-leakage corrections are accounted for.

    Authors: We have extracted the gap, fidelity, and leakage rate for all simulated sizes (N=2, 3, 6). In the revised manuscript we will add a table (or panel in an existing figure) reporting these quantities versus particle number, together with a brief discussion of the observed trend. Exact diagonalization for N>6 is computationally prohibitive given the Hilbert-space dimension, so a full finite-size scaling is not feasible; however, the stability of the signatures from N=2 to N=6 already provides supporting evidence that the features survive the finite-size and leakage corrections present in the protocol. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; stabilization imposed by bath design

full rationale

The paper engineers the driven-dissipative protocol by coupling to leaky cavity modes so that the Floquet-FCI is the approximate fixed point of the resulting Lindblad dynamics; this fixed-point condition is imposed by the choice of drives and couplings rather than derived from any fitted parameter or self-citation that presupposes the target state. Numerical results for N=2,3,6 then simply inspect the steady-state observables (incompressibility, Hall response, fractional charge) that follow from that engineered master equation. No equation or step reduces the claimed signatures to a tautology or to a self-citation chain; the derivation chain remains externally falsifiable via the microscopic parameters and is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard assumptions of the bosonic Harper-Hofstadter-Hubbard model and the validity of Markovian bath engineering; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The bosonic Harper-Hofstadter-Hubbard model with Floquet driving accurately captures the physics of few photons in superconducting circuits.
    Invoked when considering Floquet implementations of the model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5732 in / 1244 out tokens · 24342 ms · 2026-06-30T18:30:15.036126+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dissipative preparation of Laughlin-like states

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A Lindbladian engineered with local loss and pump channels has the Laughlin-like 1/3 state as its unique steady state, with finite-size gap analysis and adiabatic pumping shown in the abstract.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    X.-G. Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    2007

  2. [2]

    A. Yu. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of Physics303, 2 (2003)

    2003

  3. [3]

    M. H. Freedman, A. Kitaev, M. J. Larsen, and Z. Wang, Topological quantum computation, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)40, 31 (2003)

    2003

  4. [4]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    R. B. Laughlin, Anomalous Quantum Hall Effect: An In- compressible Quantum Fluid with Fractionally Charged Excitations, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1395 (1983)

    1983

  6. [6]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect, Nuclear Physics B360, 362 (1991)

    1991

  7. [7]

    Read and E

    N. Read and E. Rezayi, Beyond paired quantum Hall states: Parafermions and incompressible states in the first excited Landau level, Phys. Rev. B59, 8084 (1999)

    1999

  8. [8]

    Das Sarma, M

    S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Topologically Protected Qubits from a Possible Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall State, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 166802 (2005)

    2005

  9. [9]

    S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, Fractional quantum Hall physics in topological flat bands, Comptes Rendus. Physique14, 816 (2013)

    2013

  10. [10]

    E. J. Bergholtz and Z. Liu, Topological flat band models and fractional chern insulators, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B27, 1330017 (2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, T. Menke, Dan Borgnia, P. M. Preiss, F. Grusdt, A. M. Kaufman, and M. Greiner, Microscopy of the interacting Harper– Hofstadter model in the two-body limit, Nature546, 519 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    L´ eonard, S

    J. L´ eonard, S. Kim, J. Kwan, P. Segura, F. Grusdt, C. Repellin, N. Goldman, and M. Greiner, Realization of a fractional quantum Hall state with ultracold atoms, Nature619, 495 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    I. T. Rosen, S. Muschinske, C. N. Barrett, A. Chatter- jee, M. Hays, M. A. DeMarco, A. H. Karamlou, D. A. Rower, R. Das, D. K. Kim, B. M. Niedzielski, M. Schuldt, K. Serniak, M. E. Schwartz, J. L. Yoder, J. A. Grover, and W. D. Oliver, A synthetic magnetic vector potential in a 2D superconducting qubit array, Nat. Phys.20, 1881 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Wang, F.-M

    C. Wang, F.-M. Liu, M.-C. Chen, H. Chen, X.-H. Zhao, C. Ying, Z.-X. Shang, J.-W. Wang, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Z. Peng, X. Zhu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Realization of fractional quantum Hall state with interacting photons, Science384, 579 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Hafezi, A

    M. Hafezi, A. S. Sørensen, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Fractional quantum hall effect in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A76, 023613 (2007)

    2007

  16. [16]

    Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev

    A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: From dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineering, Ad- vances in Physics64, 139 (2015)

    2015

  18. [18]

    F. A. Palm, J. Kwan, B. Bakkali-Hassani, M. Greiner, U. Schollw¨ ock, N. Goldman, and F. Grusdt, Growing extended laughlin states in a quantum gas microscope: A patchwork construction, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013198 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Blatz, J

    T. Blatz, J. Kwan, J. L´ eonard, and A. Bohrdt, Bayesian Optimization for Robust State Preparation in Quantum Many-Body Systems, Quantum8, 1388 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    L.-N. Wu, X. Li, N. Goldman, and B. Wang, Optimal control for preparing fractional quantum hall states in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. B111, 235111 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    M. Popp, B. Paredes, and J. I. Cirac, Adiabatic path to fractional quantum Hall states of a few bosonic atoms, Phys. Rev. A70, 053612 (2004)

    2004

  22. [22]

    Y.-C. He, F. Grusdt, A. Kaufman, M. Greiner, and A. Vishwanath, Realizing and adiabatically preparing bosonic integer and fractional quantum Hall states in op- tical lattices, Phys. Rev. B96, 201103 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    Motruk and F

    J. Motruk and F. Pollmann, Phase transitions and adi- abatic preparation of a fractional Chern insulator in a boson cold-atom model, Phys. Rev. B96, 165107 (2017). 5

    2017

  24. [24]

    Hudomal, N

    A. Hudomal, N. Regnault, and I. Vasi´ c, Bosonic frac- tional quantum Hall states in driven optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A100, 053624 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    Andrade, V

    B. Andrade, V. Kasper, M. Lewenstein, C. Weitenberg, and T. Graß, Preparation of the 1/2 Laughlin state with atoms in a rotating trap, Phys. Rev. A103, 063325 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Diehl, A

    S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, and P. Zoller, Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms, Nature Phys4, 878 (2008)

    2008

  27. [27]

    Kraus, H

    B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, S. Diehl, A. Kantian, A. Micheli, and P. Zoller, Preparation of entangled states by quan- tum Markov processes, Phys. Rev. A78, 042307 (2008)

    2008

  28. [28]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Quan- tum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation, Nature Phys5, 633 (2009)

    2009

  29. [29]

    Carusotto, D

    I. Carusotto, D. Gerace, H. E. Tureci, S. De Liberato, C. Ciuti, and A. Imamoˇ glu, Fermionized Photons in an Array of Driven Dissipative Nonlinear Cavities, Physical Review Letters103, 033601 (2009)

    2009

  30. [30]

    Krauter, C

    H. Krauter, C. A. Muschik, K. Jensen, W. Wasilewski, J. M. Petersen, J. I. Cirac, and E. S. Polzik, Entangle- ment Generated by Dissipation and Steady State Entan- glement of Two Macroscopic Objects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 080503 (2011)

    2011

  31. [31]

    R. O. Umucalılar and I. Carusotto, Fractional Quantum Hall States of Photons in an Array of Dissipative Coupled Cavities, Physical Review Letters108, 206809 (2012)

    2012

  32. [32]

    Biella, F

    A. Biella, F. Storme, J. Lebreuilly, D. Rossini, R. Fazio, I. Carusotto, and C. Ciuti, Phase diagram of incoherently driven strongly correlated photonic lattices, Physical Re- view A96, 023839 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    Z. Liu, E. J. Bergholtz, and J. C. Budich, Dissipative preparation of fractional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043119 (2021)

    2021

  34. [34]

    Carusotto, How to exploit driving and dissipation to stabilize and manipulate quantum many-body states, Comptes Rendus

    I. Carusotto, How to exploit driving and dissipation to stabilize and manipulate quantum many-body states, Comptes Rendus. Physique26, 533 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    K. W. Murch, U. Vool, D. Zhou, S. J. Weber, S. M. Girvin, and I. Siddiqi, Cavity-Assisted Quantum Bath Engineering, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 183602 (2012)

    2012

  36. [36]

    Hacohen-Gourgy, V

    S. Hacohen-Gourgy, V. V. Ramasesh, C. De Grandi, I. Siddiqi, and S. M. Girvin, Cooling and Autonomous Feedback in a Bose-Hubbard Chain with Attractive In- teractions, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 240501 (2015)

    2015

  37. [37]

    Kapit, The upside of noise: engineered dissipation as a resource in superconducting circuits, Quantum Science and Technology2, 033002 (2017)

    E. Kapit, The upside of noise: engineered dissipation as a resource in superconducting circuits, Quantum Science and Technology2, 033002 (2017)

    2017

  38. [38]

    Carusotto, A

    I. Carusotto, A. A. Houck, A. J. Koll´ ar, P. Roushan, D. I. Schuster, and J. Simon, Photonic materials in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nat. Phys.16, 268 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    Kapit, M

    E. Kapit, M. Hafezi, and S. H. Simon, Induced Self- Stabilization in Fractional Quantum Hall States of Light, Phys. Rev. X4, 031039 (2014)

    2014

  40. [40]

    Ozawa, Anomalous and Quantum Hall Effects in Lossy Photonic Lattices, Physical Review Letters112, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.133902 (2014)

    T. Ozawa, Anomalous and Quantum Hall Effects in Lossy Photonic Lattices, Physical Review Letters112, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.133902 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.133902 2014

  41. [41]

    Lebreuilly, M

    J. Lebreuilly, M. Wouters, and I. Carusotto, Towards strongly correlated photons in arrays of dissipative non- linear cavities under a frequency-dependent incoherent pumping, Comptes Rendus Physique Polariton Physics / Physique Des Polaritons,17, 836 (2016)

    2016

  42. [42]

    Lebreuilly, Stabilizing strongly correlated photon fluids with non-Markovian reservoirs, Physical Review A96, 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.033828 (2017)

    J. Lebreuilly, Stabilizing strongly correlated photon fluids with non-Markovian reservoirs, Physical Review A96, 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.033828 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.96.033828 2017

  43. [43]

    R. O. Umucalılar and I. Carusotto, Generation and spec- troscopic signatures of a fractional quantum Hall liquid of photons in an incoherently pumped optical cavity, Phys- ical Review A96, 053808 (2017)

    2017

  44. [44]

    Kurilovich, V

    P. Kurilovich, V. D. Kurilovich, J. Lebreuilly, and S. M. Girvin, Stabilizing the Laughlin state of light: Dynamics of hole fractionalization, SciPost Physics13, 107 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    Petiziol and A

    F. Petiziol and A. Eckardt, Cavity-Based Reservoir En- gineering for Floquet-Engineered Superconducting Cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 233601 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    X. Mi, A. A. Michailidis, S. Shabani, K. C. Miao, P. V. Klimov, J. Lloyd, E. Rosenberg, R. Acharya, I. Aleiner, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, and further authors, Sta- ble quantum-correlated many-body states through engi- neered dissipation, Science383, 1332 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Schnell, C

    A. Schnell, C. Weitenberg, and A. Eckardt, Dissipative preparation of a Floquet topological insulator in an op- tical lattice via bath engineering, SciPost Phys.17, 052 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Ritter, D

    M. Ritter, D. M. Long, Q. Yue, A. Chandran, and A. J. Koll´ ar, Autonomous Stabilization of Floquet States Us- ing Static Dissipation, Phys. Rev. X15, 031028 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    A. A. Clerk, Introduction to quantum noise, measure- ment, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1155 (2010)

    2010

  50. [50]

    Petiziol and A

    F. Petiziol and A. Eckardt, Controlling nonequilibrium Bose-Einstein condensation with engineered environ- ments, Phys. Rev. A110, L021701 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Weinberg and M

    P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, QuSpin: A Python package for dynamics and exact diagonalisation of quantum many body systems. Part II: Bosons, fermions and higher spins, SciPost Physics7, 020 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    Lambert, E

    N. Lambert, E. Gigu` ere, P. Menczel, B. Li, P. Hopf, G. Su´ arez, M. Gali, J. Lishman, R. Gadhvi, R. Agarwal, A. Galicia, N. Shammah, P. Nation, J. R. Johansson, S. Ahmed, S. Cross, A. Pitchford, and F. Nori, QuTiP 5: The Quantum Toolbox in Python, Physics Reports QuTiP 5: The Quantum Toolbox in Python,1153, 1 (2026)

    2026

  53. [53]

    Hauschild and F

    J. Hauschild and F. Pollmann, Efficient numerical sim- ulations with Tensor Networks: Tensor Network Python (TeNPy), SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 005 (2018)

    2018

  54. [54]

    Catarina and B

    G. Catarina and B. Murta, Density-matrix renormaliza- tion group: A pedagogical introduction, Eur. Phys. J. B 96, 111 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    See Supplementary Material, where tables reporting the parameters values used in the simulations producing all figures can be found

  56. [56]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  57. [57]

    Streda, Quantised Hall effect in a two-dimensional pe- riodic potential, J

    P. Streda, Quantised Hall effect in a two-dimensional pe- riodic potential, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.15, L1299 (1982)

    1982

  58. [58]

    Repellin, J

    C. Repellin, J. L´ eonard, and N. Goldman, Fractional Chern insulators of few bosons in a box: Hall plateaus from center-of-mass drifts and density profiles, Phys. Rev. A102, 063316 (2020)

    2020

  59. [59]

    Raˇ ci¯ unas, F

    M. Raˇ ci¯ unas, F. N.¨Unal, E. Anisimovas, and A. Eckardt, Creating, probing, and manipulating fractionally charged excitations of fractional chern insulators in optical lat- 6 tices, Phys. Rev. A98, 063621 (2018)

    2018

  60. [60]

    B. Wang, X. Dong, and A. Eckardt, Measurable signa- tures of bosonic fractional Chern insulator states and their fractional excitations in a quantum-gas microscope, SciPost Physics12, 095 (2022)

    2022

  61. [61]

    Wanckel and A

    L. Wanckel and A. Eckardt, Dissipative floquet engineer- ing of gapped many-body phases using thermal baths (2026), arXiv:2604.01291 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Kalinowski, N

    M. Kalinowski, N. Maskara, and M. D. Lukin, Non- abelian floquet spin liquids in a digital rydberg simulator, Phys. Rev. X13, 031008 (2023)

    2023

  63. [63]

    B.-Y. Sun, N. Goldman, M. Aidelsburger, and M. Bukov, Engineering and probing non-abelian chiral spin liquids using periodically driven ultracold atoms, PRX Quantum 4, 020329 (2023)

    2023

  64. [64]

    Petiziol, S

    F. Petiziol, S. Wimberger, A. Eckardt, and F. Mintert, Nonperturbative Floquet engineering of the toric-code Hamiltonian and its ground state, Physical Review B 109, 075126 (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    Petiziol, Non-Abelian Anyons in Periodically Driven Abelian Spin Liquids, Physical Review Letters133, 036601 (2024)

    F. Petiziol, Non-Abelian Anyons in Periodically Driven Abelian Spin Liquids, Physical Review Letters133, 036601 (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2002)

    2002

  67. [67]

    Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quan- tum Optics: Lectures Presented at the Universit´ e Li- bre de Bruxelles October 28 to November 4, 1991, edited by H

    H. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quan- tum Optics: Lectures Presented at the Universit´ e Li- bre de Bruxelles October 28 to November 4, 1991, edited by H. Araki, E. Br´ ezin, J. Ehlers, U. Frisch, K. Hepp, R. L. Jaffe, R. Kippenhahn, H. A. Wei- denm¨ uller, J. Wess, J. Zittartz, and W. Beiglb¨ ock, Lec- ture Notes in Physics Monographs, Vol. 18 ...

    1991