pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.29609 · v1 · pith:OJE534FYnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Engineering recoil heating in coherent-scattering levitated optomechanics

Maksim Lednev , Uro\v{s} Deli\'c , Johannes Feist , Carlos Gonzalez-Ballestero This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 07:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords recoil heatingcoherent scatteringlevitated optomechanicsPurcell effectmacroscopic quantum electrodynamicsfew-mode quantizationdecoherence
0
0 comments X

The pith

The electromagnetic environment in microcavities can strongly suppress recoil heating rates for levitated particles, contrary to free-space assumptions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Recoil heating from scattered photons is a key source of decoherence that limits nonclassical motional states in optical traps. In coherent-scattering cavity setups, existing work assumes the heating rate matches its free-space value. The paper shows this assumption fails because the cavity environment modifies the rate through the Purcell effect. A new framework predicts significant suppression is possible in state-of-the-art microcavities for both center-of-mass and librational motion. The approach works for particles near arbitrary electromagnetic structures and opens a path to reducing motional decoherence through structure design.

Core claim

In cavity setups using coherent scattering, the recoil heating rate is not equal to its free-space value; the electromagnetic environment can strongly modify it by the Purcell effect. A general theoretical framework based on macroscopic quantum electrodynamics and few-mode quantization shows that this rate can be significantly suppressed in state-of-the-art microcavities for both center-of-mass and librational motion. The method applies to particles trapped in the presence of arbitrary electromagnetic structures.

What carries the argument

A theoretical framework based on macroscopic quantum electrodynamics combined with the few-mode quantization approach, which captures modifications to recoil heating due to sharp optical resonances where perturbative methods fail.

If this is right

  • Recoil heating rate in coherent-scattering cavities differs from the free-space value.
  • Significant suppression of heating is possible in microcavities for both center-of-mass and librational degrees of freedom.
  • Motional decoherence can be engineered by designing the surrounding photonic structure.
  • The framework applies to any particle trapped near arbitrary electromagnetic structures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Cavity designs could be optimized to reach lower decoherence thresholds needed for preparing quantum motional states.
  • The same approach might apply to other scattering-induced decoherence channels beyond recoil heating.
  • Experiments could test the framework by varying cavity geometry and measuring changes in heating rates.

Load-bearing premise

That usual perturbative approaches cannot accurately predict recoil heating in the presence of sharp optical resonances, so a new framework is required to capture the modification.

What would settle it

A direct experimental comparison of the measured recoil heating rate for a levitated particle inside a state-of-the-art microcavity versus the same particle in free space, checking whether the cavity rate shows the predicted suppression.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.29609 by Carlos Gonzalez-Ballestero, Johannes Feist, Maksim Lednev, Uro\v{s} Deli\'c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A sub-wavelength nanoparticle (green) is trapped by an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Cavity geometry and radial electric field profile at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Numerically obtained optomechanical coupling rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spectral density perceived by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recoil heating from photon scattering is a fundamental source of decoherence in optical trapping, severely limiting the preparation of nonclassical motional states. In cavity setups in the coherent scattering configuration, a predictive theory of recoil heating rate is missing, as usual perturbative approaches fail in the presence of sharp optical resonances. Hence, current works assume that the recoil heating rate is approximately equal to its free-space value. Here we show that this is not the case, as the electromagnetic environment can strongly modify recoil heating rate by the Purcell effect. Specifically, we predict that this rate can be significantly suppressed in state-of-the-art microcavities, for both center-of-mass and librational motion. To establish these results, we develop a general theoretical framework based on macroscopic quantum electrodynamics and on the few-mode quantization approach developed in nanophotonics. Our method applies to particles trapped in the presence of arbitrary electromagnetic structures, thus providing a route to engineering motional decoherence in levitated optomechanics by photonic structure design.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical framework based on macroscopic quantum electrodynamics combined with the few-mode quantization approach from nanophotonics. It argues that usual perturbative methods fail near sharp optical resonances, so the recoil heating rate in coherent-scattering levitated optomechanics cannot be assumed equal to its free-space value. Instead, the electromagnetic environment modifies the rate via the Purcell effect, and the authors predict significant suppression of this rate (for both center-of-mass and librational motion) in state-of-the-art microcavities. The framework is presented as general for particles in arbitrary electromagnetic structures.

Significance. If the central prediction holds, the work supplies a concrete route to engineering a key decoherence channel in levitated optomechanics through photonic design. This would be relevant for preparing nonclassical motional states. The generality of the macroscopic-QED plus few-mode method is a positive feature, though its quantitative accuracy for total recoil heating remains to be verified.

major comments (1)
  1. [Framework section (derivation of the modified scattering rate)] The suppression claim is load-bearing on the assertion that the few-mode quantization framework correctly computes the total recoil heating rate (momentum transfer integrated over the full radiation pattern). The skeptic concern is valid here: it is not demonstrated that non-resonant continuum modes, which dominate free-space recoil, are properly included or renormalized rather than left at their unmodified background value. Without an explicit check that the net integrated rate (cavity-modified plus continuum) is reduced, the predicted suppression does not necessarily follow. This issue must be addressed with a concrete calculation or comparison to the free-space limit.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the rate 'can be significantly suppressed' but does not quote the numerical factor or the specific cavity parameters used; these should appear in the main text or a table for reproducibility.
  2. Notation for the recoil heating rate (free-space versus cavity-modified) should be introduced once and used consistently to avoid ambiguity when comparing to prior literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for raising this substantive point about the treatment of continuum modes. We address it directly below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Framework section (derivation of the modified scattering rate)] The suppression claim is load-bearing on the assertion that the few-mode quantization framework correctly computes the total recoil heating rate (momentum transfer integrated over the full radiation pattern). The skeptic concern is valid here: it is not demonstrated that non-resonant continuum modes, which dominate free-space recoil, are properly included or renormalized rather than left at their unmodified background value. Without an explicit check that the net integrated rate (cavity-modified plus continuum) is reduced, the predicted suppression does not necessarily follow. This issue must be addressed with a concrete calculation or comparison to the free-space limit.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the total integrated recoil rate is necessary to substantiate the suppression prediction. Our framework employs macroscopic QED to capture the full electromagnetic environment (including non-resonant contributions via the dyadic Green's function) while using few-mode quantization only for the resonant cavity modes. To directly resolve the concern, the revised manuscript will include a new calculation (or appendix) that decomposes the momentum transfer into resonant and continuum parts, demonstrates recovery of the free-space rate in the limit of vanishing cavity finesse, and confirms that the net integrated rate is reduced relative to free space. This will show that continuum modes are renormalized rather than held at their unmodified background value. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; framework applies established methods to new geometry

full rationale

The paper introduces a framework combining macroscopic QED with few-mode quantization to compute recoil heating rates in structured electromagnetic environments. The central claim—that Purcell modification can suppress the rate relative to free space—follows from applying the scattering calculation to the cavity-modified density of states, without any quoted step that reduces the output to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a redefinition of the input. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work in a way that forces the result. The derivation therefore remains self-contained and externally falsifiable via independent nanophotonic calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; ledger populated from stated methodological choices. No free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics applies to the particle-cavity system
    Invoked to develop the general theoretical framework for arbitrary electromagnetic structures.
  • domain assumption Few-mode quantization approach from nanophotonics is valid for recoil heating calculation
    Used to handle sharp optical resonances where perturbative methods fail.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5715 in / 1190 out tokens · 15130 ms · 2026-06-29T07:04:50.312611+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Scattering theory for cavity-assisted spin-motion-photon interactions

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Extends scattering theory to derive a compact operator-based input-output relation for spin-motion-photon interactions in cavity QED applicable across geometries and potentials.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Millen, T

    J. Millen, T. S. Monteiro, R. Pettit, and A. N. Vamivakas, Optomechanics with levitated particles, Reports on Progress in Physics83, 026401 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, M

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, M. Aspelmeyer, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, and O. Romero-Isart, Levitodynamics: Levi- tation and control of microscopic objects in vacuum, Science 374, eabg3027 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    B. A. Stickler, K. Hornberger, and M. S. Kim, Quantum rotations of nanoparticles, Nature Reviews Physics3, 589 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Deli ´c, M

    U. Deli ´c, M. Reisenbauer, K. Dare, D. Grass, V . Vuleti ´c, N. Kiesel, and M. Aspelmeyer, Cooling of a levitated nanoparticle to the motional quantum ground state, Science 367, 892 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Magrini, P

    L. Magrini, P. Rosenzweig, C. Bach, A. Deutschmann-Olek, S. G. Hofer, S. Hong, N. Kiesel, A. Kugi, and M. Aspelmeyer, Real-time optimal quantum control of mechanical motion at room temperature, Nature595, 373 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Tebbenjohanns, M

    F. Tebbenjohanns, M. L. Mattana, M. Rossi, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space, Nature595, 378 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Kamba, R

    M. Kamba, R. Shimizu, and K. Aikawa, Optical cold damp- ing of neutral nanoparticles near the ground state in an optical lattice, Opt. Express30, 26716 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Militaru, M

    A. Militaru, M. Rossi, F. Tebbenjohanns, O. Romero-Isart, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, Ponderomotive squeezing of light by a levitated nanoparticle in free space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 053602 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    Magrini, V

    L. Magrini, V . A. Camarena-Ch´avez, C. Bach, A. Johnson, and M. Aspelmeyer, Squeezed light from a levitated nanopar- ticle at room temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 053601 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    Piotrowski, D

    J. Piotrowski, D. Windey, J. Vijayan, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, A. de los R´ıos Sommer, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, O. Romero- Isart, R. Reimann, and L. Novotny, Simultaneous ground- state cooling of two mechanical modes of a levitated nanopar- ticle, Nature Physics19, 1009 (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    Rossi, A

    M. Rossi, A. Militaru, N. Carlon Zambon, A. Riera- Campeny, O. Romero-Isart, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, Quantum delocalization of a levitated nanoparticle, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 083601 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    Troyer, F

    S. Troyer, F. Fechtel, L. Hummer, H. Rudolph, B. A. Stickler, U. Deli´c, and M. Arndt, Quantum ground-state cooling of two librational modes of a nanorotor, Nature Physics22, 584 (2026)

    2026

  13. [13]

    Kamba, N

    M. Kamba, N. Hara, and K. Aikawa, Quantum squeezing of a levitated nanomechanical oscillator, Science389, 1225 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Skrabulis, M

    M. Skrabulis, M. C. Sosa, N. C. Zambon, A. Militaru, M. Rossi, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, Nanomechanical sensor resolving impulsive forces below its zero-point fluctu- ations (2026), arXiv:2601.19392 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Romero-Isart, M

    O. Romero-Isart, M. L. Juan, R. Quidant, and J. I. Cirac, Toward quantum superposition of living organisms, New Journal of Physics12, 033015 (2010)

    2010

  16. [16]

    D. E. Chang, C. A. Regal, S. B. Papp, D. J. Wilson, J. Ye, O. Painter, H. J. Kimble, and P. Zoller, Cavity opto- mechanics using an optically levitated nanosphere, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 1005 (2010)

    2010

  17. [17]

    Romero-Isart, A

    O. Romero-Isart, A. C. Pflanzer, F. Blaser, R. Kaltenbaek, N. Kiesel, M. Aspelmeyer, and J. I. Cirac, Large quantum superpositions and interference of massive nanometer-sized objects, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 020405 (2011)

    2011

  18. [18]

    Romero-Isart, Quantum superposition of massive objects and collapse models, Phys

    O. Romero-Isart, Quantum superposition of massive objects and collapse models, Phys. Rev. A84, 052121 (2011)

    2011

  19. [19]

    Roda-Llordes, A

    M. Roda-Llordes, A. Riera-Campeny, D. Candoli, P. T. Gro- chowski, and O. Romero-Isart, Macroscopic quantum super- positions via dynamics in a wide double-well potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 023601 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Neumeier, M

    L. Neumeier, M. A. Ciampini, O. Romero-Isart, M. As- 6 pelmeyer, and N. Kiesel, Fast quantum interference of a nanoparticle via optical potential control, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2306953121 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Bemani, A

    F. Bemani, A. A. Rakhubovsky, and R. Filip, Heralded quan- tum non-gaussian states in pulsed levitating optomechanics, npj Quantum Information11, 160 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Deli´c, M

    U. Deli´c, M. Reisenbauer, D. Grass, N. Kiesel, V . Vuleti´c, and M. Aspelmeyer, Cavity cooling of a levitated nanosphere by coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 123602 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    Windey, C

    D. Windey, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, P. Maurer, L. Novotny, O. Romero-Isart, and R. Reimann, Cavity-based 3d cooling of a levitated nanoparticle via coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 123601 (2019)

    2019

  24. [24]

    Dania, O

    L. Dania, O. S. Kremer, J. Piotrowski, D. Candoli, J. Vijayan, O. Romero-Isart, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, L. Novotny, and M. Frimmer, High-purity quantum optomechanics at room temperature, Nature Physics21, 1603 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    V . Jain, J. Gieseler, C. Moritz, C. Dellago, R. Quidant, and L. Novotny, Direct measurement of photon recoil from a levitated nanoparticle, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 243601 (2016)

    2016

  26. [26]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, P

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, P. Maurer, D. Windey, L. Novotny, R. Reimann, and O. Romero-Isart, Theory for cavity cooling of levitated nanoparticles via coherent scattering: Master equation approach, Phys. Rev. A100, 013805 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Maurer, C

    P. Maurer, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, and O. Romero-Isart, Quantum theory of light interaction with a lorenz-mie par- ticle: Optical detection and three-dimensional ground-state cooling, Phys. Rev. A108, 033714 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Rudolph, K

    H. Rudolph, K. Hornberger, and B. A. Stickler, Entangling levitated nanoparticles by coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. A 101, 011804 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    Rudolph, J

    H. Rudolph, J. Sch ¨afer, B. A. Stickler, and K. Hornberger, Theory of nanoparticle cooling by elliptic coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. A103, 043514 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    Sch¨afer, H

    J. Sch¨afer, H. Rudolph, K. Hornberger, and B. A. Stickler, Cooling nanorotors by elliptic coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 163603 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    Vijayan, J

    J. Vijayan, J. Piotrowski, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, K. Weber, O. Romero-Isart, and L. Novotny, Cavity-mediated long- range interactions in levitated optomechanics, Nature Physics 20, 859 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Novotny and B

    L. Novotny and B. Hecht,Principles of Nano-Optics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

    2012

  33. [33]

    Tebbenjohanns, M

    F. Tebbenjohanns, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, Optimal position detection of a dipolar scatterer in a focused field, Phys. Rev. A100, 043821 (2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    Scheel and S

    S. Scheel and S. Y . Buhmann, Macroscopic quantum electro- dynamics - Concepts and applications, Acta Phys. Slovaca 58(2008)

    2008

  35. [35]

    S. Y . Buhmann,Dispersion Forces I: Macroscopic Quan- tum Electrodynamics and Ground-State Casimir, Casimir- Polder and van der Waals Forces(Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 2012)

    2012

  36. [36]

    S. Y . Buhmann,Dispersion Forces II: Many-Body Effects, Excited Atoms, Finite Temperature and Quantum Friction (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)

    2012

  37. [37]

    Medina, F

    I. Medina, F. J. Garc´ıa-Vidal, A. I. Fern´andez-Dom´ınguez, and J. Feist, Few-Mode Field Quantization of Arbitrary Elec- tromagnetic Spectral Densities, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 093601 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    S´anchez-Barquilla, F

    M. S´anchez-Barquilla, F. J. Garc´ıa-Vidal, A. I. J. Fern´andez- Dom´ınguez, and J. Feist, Few-mode field quantization for multiple emitters, Nanophotonics11, 4363 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    Lednev, F

    M. Lednev, F. J. Garc´ıa-Vidal, and J. Feist, Lindblad master equation capable of describing hybrid quantum systems in the ultrastrong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 106902 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Lednev, D

    M. Lednev, D. Fern´andez de la Pradilla, F. Lindel, E. Moreno, F. J. Garc´ıa-Vidal, and J. Feist, Spatially resolved photon statistics of general nanophotonic systems, PRX Quantum6, 020361 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, I

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, I. Coroli, and U. Deli´c, Optical po- tential shaping and photon recoil suppression through coher- ent scattering, arXiv, In Preparation (2026)

    2026

  42. [42]

    A. C. Pflanzer, O. Romero-Isart, and J. I. Cirac, Master- equation approach to optomechanics with arbitrary di- electrics, Phys. Rev. A86, 013802 (2012)

    2012

  43. [43]

    H ¨ummer, F

    T. H ¨ummer, F. J. Garc ´ıa-Vidal, L. Mart ´ın-Moreno, and D. Zueco, Weak and strong coupling regimes in plasmonic qed, Phys. Rev. B87, 115419 (2013)

    2013

  44. [44]

    Rousseaux, D

    B. Rousseaux, D. Dzsotjan, G. Colas des Francs, H. R. Jauslin, C. Couteau, and S. Gu´erin, Adiabatic passage medi- ated by plasmons: A route towards a decoherence-free quan- tum plasmonic platform, Phys. Rev. B93, 045422 (2016)

    2016

  45. [45]

    Dzsotjan, B

    D. Dzsotjan, B. Rousseaux, H. R. Jauslin, G. C. des Francs, C. Couteau, and S. Gu´erin, Mode-selective quantization and multimodal effective models for spherically layered systems, Phys. Rev. A94, 023818 (2016)

    2016

  46. [46]

    Castellini, H

    A. Castellini, H. R. Jauslin, B. Rousseaux, D. Dzsotjan, G. Colas des Francs, A. Messina, and S. Gu´erin, Quantum plasmonics with multi-emitters: application to stimulated raman adiabatic passage, The European Physical Journal D 72, 223 (2018)

    2018

  47. [47]

    Varguet, B

    H. Varguet, B. Rousseaux, D. Dzsotjan, H. R. Jauslin, S. Gu ´erin, and G. C. d. Francs, Non-hermitian hamilto- nian description for quantum plasmonics: from dissipative dressed atom picture to fano states, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics52, 055404 (2019)

    2019

  48. [48]

    Feist, A

    J. Feist, A. I. Fern´andez-Dom´ınguez, and F. J. Garc´ıa-Vidal, Macroscopic QED for quantum nanophotonics: emitter- centered modes as a minimal basis for multiemitter problems, Nanophotonics10, 477 (2021)

    2021

  49. [49]

    (5) but with the substitution r2 i0(∂2/∂ri∂r ′ i)→ ri0rj0 (∂2/∂ri∂r ′ j )

    For a non-inversion-symmetric structure, these modes are not orthogonal to each other and commute as [ˆai(ω),ˆa† j (ω′)] = δ(ω−ω ′)Jij (ω)/ p Ji(ω)Jj (ω) [48], with Jij (ω) defined as in Eq. (5) but with the substitution r2 i0(∂2/∂ri∂r ′ i)→ ri0rj0 (∂2/∂ri∂r ′ j )

  50. [50]

    Inc., Comsol multiphysics® v

    C. Inc., Comsol multiphysics® v. 6.4 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Toroˇs and T

    M. Toroˇs and T. S. Monteiro, Quantum sensing and cooling in three-dimensional levitated cavity optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023228 (2020)

    2020

  52. [52]

    Toroˇs, U

    M. Toroˇs, U. Deli´c, F. Hales, and T. S. Monteiro, Coherent- scattering two-dimensional cooling in levitated cavity op- tomechanics, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023071 (2021)

    2021

  53. [53]

    Brand ˜ao, D

    I. Brand ˜ao, D. Tandeitnik, and T. Guerreiro, Coher- ent scattering-mediated correlations between levitated nanospheres, Quantum Science and Technology6, 045013 (2021)

    2021

  54. [54]

    H. T. Dung, L. Kn ¨oll, and D.-G. Welsch, Intermolecular energy transfer in the presence of dispersing and absorbing media, Phys. Rev. A65, 043813 (2002). 7

    2002

  55. [55]

    Seberson and F

    T. Seberson and F. Robicheaux, Distribution of laser shot- noise energy delivered to a levitated nanoparticle, Phys. Rev. A102, 033505 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    Cerchiari, L

    G. Cerchiari, L. Dania, D. S. Bykov, R. Blatt, and T. E. Northup, Position measurement of a dipolar scatterer via self-homodyne detection, Phys. Rev. A104, 053523 (2021)

    2021

  57. [57]

    Jakubec, C

    C. Jakubec, C. Jarzynski, and K. Sinha, Decoherence and brownian motion of a polarizable particle near a medium, Phys. Rev. A112, 042225 (2025)

    2025

  58. [58]

    Gajewski and J

    R. Gajewski and J. Bateman, Backaction suppression in levi- tated optomechanics using reflective boundaries, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023041 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    Brion, L

    E. Brion, L. H. Pedersen, and K. Mølmer, Adiabatic elimina- tion in a lambda system, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40, 1033 (2007)

    2007

  60. [60]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, Tutorial: projector approach to mas- ter equations for open quantum systems, Quantum8, 1454 (2024)

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, Tutorial: projector approach to mas- ter equations for open quantum systems, Quantum8, 1454 (2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    Ben-Asher, A

    A. Ben-Asher, A. I. Fern ´andez-Dom´ınguez, and J. Feist, Interference-induced cavity resonances and imaginary rabi splitting, Nanophotonics15, e70087 (2026)

    2026

  62. [62]

    Our model fully captures this effect, as opposed to previous models that neglect it by necessity [26]

    These terms arise from the finite overlap between the field modes responsible for cavity loss and for Stokes/antiStokes scattering, which in arbitrary structures can be very large. Our model fully captures this effect, as opposed to previous models that neglect it by necessity [26]

  63. [63]

    Magrini, R

    L. Magrini, R. A. Norte, R. Riedinger, I. Marinkovi ´c, D. Grass, U. Deli ´c, S. Gr ¨oblacher, S. Hong, and M. As- pelmeyer, Near-field coupling of a levitated nanoparticle to a photonic crystal cavity, Optica5, 1597 (2018)

    2018

  64. [64]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, J

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, J. Zieli´nska, M. Rossi, A. Militaru, M. Frimmer, L. Novotny, P. Maurer, and O. Romero-Isart, Suppressing recoil heating in levitated optomechanics using squeezed light, PRX Quantum4, 030331 (2023)

    2023

  65. [65]

    H ¨upfl, F

    J. H ¨upfl, F. Russo, L. M. Rachbauer, D. Bouchet, J. Lu, U. Kuhl, and S. Rotter, Continuity equation for the flow of fisher information in wave scattering, Nature Physics20, 1294 (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    Agrenius, J

    T. Agrenius, J. Garcia de Abajo, and O. Romero-Isart, In preparation, arXiv (2025)

    2025

  67. [67]

    Neumeier, R

    L. Neumeier, R. Quidant, and D. E. Chang, Self-induced back-action optical trapping in nanophotonic systems, New Journal of Physics17, 123008 (2015)

    2015

  68. [68]

    Mestres, J

    P. Mestres, J. Berthelot, S. S. A ´cimovi´c, and R. Quidant, Unraveling the optomechanical nature of plasmonic trapping, Light: Science & Applications5, e16092 (2016)

    2016

  69. [69]

    Monterrosas-Romero, S

    M. Monterrosas-Romero, S. K. Alavi, E. M. Koistinen, and S. Hong, Optomechanically induced optical trapping system based on photonic crystal cavities, Opt. Express31, 20398 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    S. K. Alavi, Z. Sheng, H. Lee, H. Lee, and S. Hong, En- hanced optomechanical coupling between an optically lev- itated particle and an ultrahigh-q optical microcavity, ACS Photonics12, 34 (2025)

    2025

  71. [71]

    Modifications, however, can easily be included by substi- tuting the Gaussian field profile by the field profile in the presence of the structure, which can be obtained by solving the corresponding classical scattering problem

  72. [72]

    D. A. Steck,Classical and Modern Optics(University of Oregon, 2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    C. C. Rusconi, M. Perdriat, G. H´etet, O. Romero-Isart, and B. A. Stickler, Spin-controlled quantum interference of levi- tated nanorotors, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 093605 (2022). 8 END MATTER Tweezer with a Gaussian profile In accordance with most experiments, for the case study shown in Figs. 2-3 we assume that the tweezer mode profile is given by the free-...

    2022