pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07232 · v1 · pith:YAY4JOL6new · submitted 2026-06-05 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Current and future constraints on heavy New Physics from τ weak dipole moments

Nejc Ko\v{s}nik , Zachary Polonsky , Aleks Smolkovi\v{c} This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 21:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords tau leptonweak dipole momentsnew physics constraintsprecision observablescollider projectionsDrell-Yan tailsZ decays
0
0 comments X

The pith

The tau lepton's weak dipole moments already provide leading constraints on heavy new physics and will become dominant at future colliders.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper updates the standard model prediction for the tau weak magnetic dipole moment with careful uncertainty assessment. It combines data from tau dipole moments, high-mass Drell-Yan processes, Z boson decays, and the electron electric dipole moment to set limits on new physics operators. The work projects that these tau observables will grow in importance for testing heavy new physics at upcoming facilities like the FCC-ee and the high-luminosity LHC.

Core claim

Working in the effective theory for heavy new physics, the tau weak magnetic and electric dipole moments rank among the strongest current probes of the associated operators and are expected to lead the sensitivity at future colliders.

What carries the argument

The weak magnetic and electric dipole moments of the tau lepton, used as precision observables to constrain new physics effects.

Load-bearing premise

New physics effects can be fully captured by dimension-six operators without contributions from lighter particles or higher-dimensional terms.

What would settle it

A measurement of the tau weak magnetic dipole moment that differs from the one-loop standard model prediction by more than the stated uncertainties, while other channels remain consistent with standard model expectations.

read the original abstract

We study the weak magnetic and electric dipole moments of the $\tau$ lepton as precision tests of the Standard Model (SM) and probes of heavy New Physics (NP). We present an updated SM prediction for the $\tau$ weak magnetic dipole moment at one loop, including a careful assessment of theoretical uncertainties from electroweak scheme dependence. Working within the SM Effective Field Theory, we derive comprehensive current constraints on the $\tau$ dipole operators from a combination of observables: the $\tau$ weak and electromagnetic dipole moments, high-mass Drell-Yan tails at the LHC, $Z$ partial decay widths, and the electron electric dipole moment. Finally, we assess the prospects of measuring the SM value of the $\tau$ weak magnetic moment at the FCC-$ee$ Tera-$Z$ run, and project the sensitivities of the leading observables to heavy NP at FCC-$ee$ and HL-LHC, paying particular attention to systematic uncertainties. We find that the $\tau$ weak dipole moments are already among the leading probes of the $\tau$ dipole operators, and will become increasingly dominant at future colliders.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper updates the one-loop SM prediction for the τ weak magnetic dipole moment including electroweak scheme dependence uncertainties, derives current constraints on the τ dipole operators in SMEFT from a combination of τ weak/electromagnetic dipole moments, LHC high-mass Drell-Yan tails, Z partial widths and the electron EDM, and projects future sensitivities at FCC-ee and HL-LHC, concluding that the τ weak dipole moments are already leading probes and will become dominant at future colliders.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work establishes the competitive and growing role of τ weak dipole moments as precision probes of heavy NP within SMEFT, with a multi-observable approach and uncertainty treatment that could usefully inform experimental priorities at HL-LHC and FCC-ee.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 (current constraints)] The claim that τ weak dipole moments are already among the leading probes (and will dominate at future colliders) requires that bounds from Drell-Yan tails, Z widths, eEDM and the dipole moments themselves can be compared inside the same dim-6 SMEFT basis. The manuscript states the analysis is performed “within the SM Effective Field Theory” but provides no explicit check or cutoff estimate showing that dim-8+ operators remain negligible in the high-mass Drell-Yan regime used for the LHC constraints; this assumption is load-bearing for the comparative ranking.
  2. [§5 (future prospects)] The future-projection section asserts that systematic uncertainties will not prevent the τ weak dipole moments from becoming dominant at FCC-ee, yet no quantitative assessment of how the projected sensitivities vary with plausible changes in those systematics is given; this directly affects the dominance claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The definition of the τ dipole operators (e.g., the precise normalization of the Wilson coefficients) should be stated explicitly in the introduction rather than only in a later section.
  2. Figure captions for the constraint plots would benefit from a short statement of the assumed cutoff scale or matching procedure used for the SMEFT bounds.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and the opportunity to address these points. We respond to each major comment below and will incorporate revisions as indicated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 (current constraints)] The claim that τ weak dipole moments are already among the leading probes (and will dominate at future colliders) requires that bounds from Drell-Yan tails, Z widths, eEDM and the dipole moments themselves can be compared inside the same dim-6 SMEFT basis. The manuscript states the analysis is performed “within the SM Effective Field Theory” but provides no explicit check or cutoff estimate showing that dim-8+ operators remain negligible in the high-mass Drell-Yan regime used for the LHC constraints; this assumption is load-bearing for the comparative ranking.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit cutoff estimate strengthens the dim-6 validity argument for the high-mass Drell-Yan constraints. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph estimating the momentum scale of the relevant Drell-Yan bins, comparing it to the assumed new-physics scale, and showing that dim-8 contributions remain sub-dominant under standard power-counting assumptions. This will support the direct comparison of all bounds within the dim-6 SMEFT framework. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5 (future prospects)] The future-projection section asserts that systematic uncertainties will not prevent the τ weak dipole moments from becoming dominant at FCC-ee, yet no quantitative assessment of how the projected sensitivities vary with plausible changes in those systematics is given; this directly affects the dominance claim.

    Authors: We concur that a quantitative robustness check is needed. The revised version will include a short sensitivity study in which the projected FCC-ee and HL-LHC bounds are recomputed after scaling the assumed systematic uncertainties by factors of 0.5 and 2. The results will demonstrate that the relative dominance of the τ weak dipole moments persists across this range, thereby reinforcing the claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; standard SMEFT analysis with external inputs

full rationale

The paper computes an updated one-loop SM prediction for the τ weak magnetic dipole moment, then derives constraints on dim-6 dipole operators by matching to external observables (τ dipole moments, Drell-Yan tails, Z widths, eEDM) and projecting future sensitivities. All load-bearing steps rely on standard loop calculations and measured data rather than fitting a parameter to a subset and renaming the fit as a prediction, or reducing via self-citation chains. The EFT assumption is an explicit modeling choice, not a definitional loop. No quoted reduction of the central claim to its own inputs exists.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the SMEFT framework for describing heavy new physics, the accuracy of one-loop electroweak calculations, and the assumption that the listed observables are sensitive primarily to the tau dipole operators without significant contamination from other effects.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Heavy new physics can be integrated out into dimension-six SMEFT operators without light degrees of freedom or higher-dimensional terms affecting the observables.
    Invoked when translating measurements into limits on tau dipole operators.
  • standard math One-loop electroweak calculations in the SM are sufficient for the tau weak magnetic dipole moment prediction with controlled scheme dependence.
    Basis for the updated SM prediction mentioned in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5735 in / 1396 out tokens · 23600 ms · 2026-06-27T21:48:54.803761+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bottom quark electroweak dipole moments at a high-energy $\mu-$collider

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A high-energy muon collider can set stronger limits on d=6 SMEFT operators for b-quark electroweak dipoles than existing EW precision data or B to Xs gamma measurements by studying bb and bbh final states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Hanneke, S

    D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell and G. Gabrielse,New measurement of the electron magnetic moment and the fine structure constant,Physical Review Letters100(Mar., 2008)

    2008

  2. [2]

    X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra and G. Gabrielse,Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 071801, [2209.13084]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Aliberti et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update,Phys

    R. Aliberti et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update,Phys. Rept.1143(2025) 1–158, [2505.21476]. [4]Muon g-2collaboration, D. P. Aguillard et al.,Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 127 ppb,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 101802, [2506.03069]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Bernabeu, G

    J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg and J. Vidal,Normal and transverse single tau polarization at the Z peak,Phys. Lett. B326(1994) 168–174

    1994

  5. [5]

    Bernabeu, G

    J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, M. Tung and J. Vidal,The Tau weak magnetic dipole moment,Nucl. Phys. B436(1995) 474–486, [hep-ph/9411289]. [7]ALEPHcollaboration, A. Heister et al.,Measurement of the tau polarization at LEP,Eur. Phys. J. C20(2001) 401–430, [hep-ex/0104038]. [8]ALEPHcollaboration, A. Heister et al.,Search for anomalous weak dipole mo...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  6. [6]

    Bernabeu, G

    J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, J. Papavassiliou and J. Vidal,Tau anomalous magnetic moment form-factor at super B/flavor factories,Nucl. Phys. B790(2008) 160–174, [0707.2496]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    Bernabeu, G

    J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg and J. Vidal,Tau spin correlations and the anomalous magnetic moment,JHEP01(2009) 062, [0807.2366]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    Gogniat, M

    J. Gogniat, M. Hoferichter and Y. Ulrich,Towards testing (g−2) τ in e +e− →τ +τ −: radiative corrections and projections for Belle II,JHEP07(2025) 172, [2505.09678]

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Crivellin, M

    A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and J. M. Roney,Toward testing the magnetic moment of the tau at one part per million,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 093007, [2111.10378]

    arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Hoferichter and G

    M. Hoferichter and G. Levati,Light New Physics and theτLepton Dipole Moments: Prospects at Belle II,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 181804, [2510.13966]. 12Although this ratio is equal toc 2 w, we find it slightly preferable to keep separate the mixing angles which arise in coupling constants from mass ratios coming from the propagating intermediate states and ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    Hoferichter and G

    M. Hoferichter and G. Levati,Light new physics and theτlepton dipole moments,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 095002, [2511.03786]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    Eidelman and M

    S. Eidelman and M. Passera,Theory of the tau lepton anomalous magnetic moment,Mod. Phys. Lett. A22(2007) 159–179, [hep-ph/0701260]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    Du, X.-G

    X.-Y. Du, X.-G. He, Z.-L. Huang, C.-W. Liu and Z.-Y. Zou,Probing the imaginary parts and theirq 2 dependences for the taug−2and EDM,2606.01178

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Pospelov and A

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz,CKM benchmarks for electron electric dipole moment experiments,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 056006, [1311.5537]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [15]

    G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, A. Santamaria and J. Vidal,Model independent bounds on the tau lepton electromagnetic and weak magnetic moments,Nucl. Phys. B582(2000) 3–18, [hep-ph/0002203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  16. [16]

    Huang, J.-M

    T. Huang, J.-M. Yang, B.-L. Young and X.-M. Zhang,Effective CP violating operators of the tau lepton and some of their phenomenologies,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 073007, [hep-ph/9803334]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  17. [17]

    Escribano and E

    R. Escribano and E. Masso,Improved bounds on the electromagnetic dipole moments of the τlepton,Phys. Lett. B395(1997) 369–372, [hep-ph/9609423]. [21]FCCcollaboration, A. Abada et al.,FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 474

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  18. [18]

    Buttazzo, G

    D. Buttazzo, G. Levati, Y. Ma, F. Maltoni, P. Paradisi and Z. Wang,Probingτlepton dipole moments at future Lepton Colliders,2604.14281

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Buchmuller and D

    W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler,Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation,Nucl. Phys. B268(1986) 621–653

    1986

  20. [20]

    Grzadkowski, M

    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek,Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian,JHEP10(2010) 085, [1008.4884]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    Brivio and M

    I. Brivio and M. Trott,The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory,Phys. Rept.793 (2019) 1–98, [1706.08945]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Isidori, F

    G. Isidori, F. Wilsch and D. Wyler,The standard model effective field theory at work,Rev. Mod. Phys.96(2024) 015006, [2303.16922]

    arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators I: Formalism and lambda Dependence,JHEP10 (2013) 087, [1308.2627]

    arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence,JHEP01(2014) 035, [1310.4838]

    arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Alonso, E

    R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott,Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology,JHEP04(2014) 159, [1312.2014]

    arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    de Blas, J

    J. de Blas, J. C. Criado, M. Perez-Victoria and J. Santiago,Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary,JHEP03(2018) 109, [1711.10391]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Carmona, A

    A. Carmona, A. Lazopoulos, P. Olgoso and J. Santiago,Matchmakereft: automated tree-level and one-loop matching,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 198, [2112.10787]. – 26 –

    arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M

    J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M. K¨ onig, J. Pag` es, A. E. Thomsen and F. Wilsch,A proof of concept for matchete: an automated tool for matching effective theories,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 662, [2212.04510]

    arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Denner,Techniques for calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one loop level and results for W physics at LEP-200,Fortsch

    A. Denner,Techniques for calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one loop level and results for W physics at LEP-200,Fortsch. Phys.41(1993) 307–420, [0709.1075]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  30. [30]

    Gogniat, M

    J. Gogniat, M. Hoferichter and G. Levati,Four-fermion operators,Z-boson exchange, andτ lepton dipole moments,2604.16598

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Biebel and T

    J. Biebel and T. Riemann,Predictions for anomalousτ +τ −γproduction at lep 1,Zeitschrift fur Physik C-Particles and Fields76(1997) 53 – 58

    1997

  32. [32]

    S. S. Gau, T. C. Paul, J. Swain and L. Taylor,Radiative tau lepton pair production as a probe of anomalous electromagnetic couplings of the tau,Nucl. Phys. B523(1998) 439–449, [hep-ph/9712360]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  33. [33]

    Eidelman, D

    S. Eidelman, D. Epifanov, M. Fael, L. Mercolli and M. Passera,τdipole moments via radiative leptonicτdecays,JHEP03(2016) 140, [1601.07987]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Cornet and J

    F. Cornet and J. I. Illana,Tau pair production via photon-photon collisions at LEP,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 1181–1184, [hep-ph/9503466]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  35. [35]

    Dyndal, M

    M. Dyndal, M. Klusek-Gawenda, M. Schott and A. Szczurek,Anomalous electromagnetic moments ofτlepton inγγ→τ +τ − reaction in Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B 809(2020) 135682, [2002.05503]

    arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Atag and A

    S. Atag and A. A. Billur,Possibility of DeterminingτLepton Electromagnetic Moments in γγ→τ +τ − Process at the CERN-LHC,JHEP11(2010) 060, [1005.2841]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    J. Brod, L. H¨ udepohl, E. Stamou and T. Steudtner,MaRTIn – Manual for the ”Massive Recursive Tensor Integration”,Comput. Phys. Commun.306(2025) 109372, [2401.04033]

    arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    J. A. M. Vermaseren,New features of FORM,math-ph/0010025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    H. H. Patel,Package-X 2.0: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals,Comput. Phys. Commun.218(2017) 66–70, [1612.00009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Biek¨ otter and B

    A. Biek¨ otter and B. D. Pecjak,Analytic results for electroweak precision observables at NLO in SMEFT,JHEP07(2025) 134, [2503.07724]

    arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    J. Brod, M. Gorbahn and E. Stamou,Two-Loop Electroweak Corrections for theK→πν¯ν Decays,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 034030, [1009.0947]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  42. [42]

    J. Brod, S. Kvedarait˙ e and Z. Polonsky,Two-loop electroweak corrections to the Top-Quark Contribution toϵ K,JHEP12(2021) 198, [2108.00017]

    arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Bobeth, M

    C. Bobeth, M. Gorbahn and E. Stamou,Electroweak Corrections toB s,d →ℓ +ℓ−,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 034023, [1311.1348]. [48]Particle Data Groupcollaboration, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  44. [44]

    Jegerlehner, M

    F. Jegerlehner, M. Y. Kalmykov and O. Veretin,MS versus pole masses of gauge bosons: Electroweak bosonic two loop corrections,Nucl. Phys. B641(2002) 285–326, [hep-ph/0105304]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  45. [45]

    Jegerlehner, M

    F. Jegerlehner, M. Y. Kalmykov and O. Veretin,MS-bar versus pole masses of gauge bosons. 2. Two loop electroweak fermion corrections,Nucl. Phys. B658(2003) 49–112, [hep-ph/0212319]. – 27 – [51]Tauola - a library of monte carlo programs to simulate decays of polarizedτleptons, Computer Physics Communications64(1991) 275–299

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  46. [46]

    Jadach, Z

    S. Jadach, Z. Was, R. Decker and J. K¨ uhn,Theτdecay library tauola, version 2.4, Computer Physics Communications76(1993) 361–380. [53]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Groupcollaboration, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on theZresonance,Phys. Rept.427(2006) 257–454, ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  47. [47]

    Aebischer, W

    J. Aebischer, W. Dekens, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, D. Sengupta and P. Stoffer, Effective field theory interpretation of lepton magnetic and electric dipole moments,JHEP 07(2021) 107, [2102.08954]. [59]Bellecollaboration, K. Inami et al.,An improved search for the electric dipole moment of theτlepton,JHEP04(2022) 110, [2108.11543]

    arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    J. Brod, J. M. Cornell, D. Skodras and E. Stamou,Global constraints on Yukawa operators in the standard model effective theory,JHEP08(2022) 294, [2203.03736]

    arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    T. S. Roussy et al.,An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment,Science 381(2023) adg4084, [2212.11841]

    arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Chupp, P

    T. Chupp, P. Fierlinger, M. Ramsey-Musolf and J. Singh,Electric dipole moments of atoms, molecules, nuclei, and particles,Rev. Mod. Phys.91(2019) 015001, [1710.02504]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Ardu and N

    M. Ardu and N. Valori,Equivalent electric dipole moment in SMEFT,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) 015035, [2503.21920]

    arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    D. A. Faroughy, A. Greljo and J. F. Kamenik,Confronting lepton flavor universality violation in B decays with high-p T tau lepton searches at LHC,Phys. Lett. B764(2017) 126–134, [1609.07138]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Greljo and D

    A. Greljo and D. Marzocca,High-p T dilepton tails and flavor physics,Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 548, [1704.09015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    Fuentes-Martin, A

    J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo, J. Martin Camalich and J. D. Ruiz-Alvarez,Charm physics confronts high-pT lepton tails,JHEP11(2020) 080, [2003.12421]

    arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Allwicher, D

    L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari and F. Wilsch,Drell-Yan tails beyond the Standard Model,JHEP03(2023) 064, [2207.10714]. – 28 –

    arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Greljo, J

    A. Greljo, J. Salko, A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,Rare b decays meet high-mass Drell-Yan, JHEP05(2023) 087, [2212.10497]

    arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Grunwald, G

    C. Grunwald, G. Hiller, K. Kr¨ oninger and L. Nollen,More synergies from beauty, top, Z and Drell-Yan measurements in SMEFT,JHEP11(2023) 110, [2304.12837]

    arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Greljo, J

    A. Greljo, J. Salko, A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,SMEFT restrictions on exclusive b→uℓν decays,JHEP11(2023) 023, [2306.09401]

    arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Allwicher, D

    L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari and F. Wilsch,HighPT: A tool for high-p T Drell-Yan tails beyond the standard model,Comput. Phys. Commun.289 (2023) 108749, [2207.10756]. [72]ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector usingppcollisions at √s= 13TeV,Phys. Rev....

    arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Dubovyk, A

    I. Dubovyk, A. Freitas, J. Gluza, T. Riemann and J. Usovitsch,Electroweak pseudo-observables and Z-boson form factors at two-loop accuracy,JHEP08(2019) 113, [1906.08815]. [75]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Electroweakcollaboration, S. Schael et al., Electroweak Measurements in Electron-Positron Collisions at W-Boson-Pair Energies at LEP,Phys. Rept.532(2013)...

    arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Altmannshofer, J

    W. Altmannshofer, J. Brod and M. Schmaltz,Experimental constraints on the coupling of the Higgs boson to electrons,JHEP05(2015) 125, [1503.04830]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  62. [62]

    Koˇ snik, A

    N. Koˇ snik, A. Palavri´ c and A. Smolkoviˇ c,UV origins of CP-violating leptonic Yukawa couplings,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 095046, [2509.04325]

    arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Smolkoviˇ c and P

    A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,Differentiable Multi-scale Effective Field Theory Likelihoods for Beyond the Standard Model Phenomenology,2603.15801

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Smolkoviˇ c and P

    A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,jelli,Zenodo(2026) doi:10.5281/zenodo.17175612

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17175612 2026

  65. [65]

    Brivio, K

    I. Brivio, K. Mimasu, P. Stangl, A. Biek¨ otter, A. R. C. G´ omez, C. Knight, L. Mantani, – 29 – E. Rossi, A. N. Rossia and A. Smolkoviˇ c,POPxf: An Exchange Format for Polynomial Observable Predictions,2511.17348

    arXiv

  66. [66]

    Aebischer et al.,WCxf: an exchange format for Wilson coefficients beyond the Standard Model,Comput

    J. Aebischer et al.,WCxf: an exchange format for Wilson coefficients beyond the Standard Model,Comput. Phys. Commun.232(2018) 71–83, [1712.05298]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    Smolkoviˇ c and P

    A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,rgevolve,Zenodo(2026) doi:10.5281/zenodo.20162429

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20162429 2026

  68. [68]

    Aebischer, J

    J. Aebischer, J. Kumar and D. M. Straub,Wilson: a Python package for the running and matching of Wilson coefficients above and below the electroweak scale,Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 1026, [1804.05033]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    D. M. Straub,flavio: a Python package for flavour and precision phenomenology in the Standard Model and beyond,1810.08132

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    Allwicher, C

    L. Allwicher, C. Cornella, G. Isidori and B. A. Stefanek,New physics in the third generation. A comprehensive SMEFT analysis and future prospects,JHEP03(2024) 049, [2311.00020]

    arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Maura, B

    V. Maura, B. A. Stefanek and T. You,Accuracy complements energy: electroweak precision tests at Tera-Z,JHEP10(2025) 022, [2412.14241]

    arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Dorˇ sner, S

    I. Dorˇ sner, S. Fajfer, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik and N. Koˇ snik,Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders,Phys. Rept.641(2016) 1–68, [1603.04993]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [73]

    Allwicher, D

    L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, M. Martines, O. Sumensari and F. Wilsch,On the EFT validity for Drell–Yan tails at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 463, [2412.14162]

    arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Cohen, J

    T. Cohen, J. Doss and X. Lu,Unitarity bounds on effective field theories at the LHC,JHEP 04(2022) 155, [2111.09895]

    arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Apollinari, O

    G. Apollinari, O. Br¨ uning, T. Nakamoto and L. Rossi,High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider HL-LHC,CERN Yellow Rep.(2015) 1–19, [1705.08830]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    Zurbano Fernandez et al.,High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Technical design report,

    I. Zurbano Fernandez et al.,High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Technical design report, . [96]OPALcollaboration, K. Ackerstaff et al.,An Upper limit on the anomalous magnetic moment of the tau lepton,Phys. Lett. B431(1998) 188–198, [hep-ex/9803020]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  77. [77]

    Roney,Status of Chiral Belle: The Beam Polarization Upgrade of SuperKEKB,PoS ICHEP2024(2025) 452

    M. Roney,Status of Chiral Belle: The Beam Polarization Upgrade of SuperKEKB,PoS ICHEP2024(2025) 452. [98]US Belle II Group, Belle II/SuperKEKB e- Polarization Upgrade Working Groupcollaboration, D. M. Asner et al.,Snowmass 2021 White Paper on Upgrading SuperKEKB with a Polarized Electron Beam: Discovery Potential and Proposed Implementation, inSnowmass 20...

    arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    K. B. Ng, Y. Zhou, L. Cheng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, Y. Shagam, A. J. Vigil, E. A. Cornell and J. Ye,Spectroscopy on the electron-electric-dipole-moment–sensitive states of ThF +,Physical Review A105(Feb.,

  79. [79]

    K. B. Ng, Y. Zhou, W. Cairncross, T. Roussy, Y. Shagam, K. Boyce, A. Vigil, M. Pettine, J. Ye and E. Cornell,The Upcoming JILA Gen. III eEDM Experiment, inAPS Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Meeting Abstracts, vol. 2019 ofAPS Meeting Abstracts, p. C02.003, May, 2019. – 30 –

    2019