Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 3 cited by

Consistently ω₁ < 𝔠 there exists a compact K such that C(K) is Grothendieck of density ω₁ with no strictly convex or sequentially Kadets-Klee renorming.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-27 05:38 UTC pith:54MK23LS

load-bearing objection The paper gives a consistency proof for a Grothendieck C(K) of density ω₁ with no strictly convex or sequentially Kadets-Klee renorming when ω₁ < 𝔠.

arxiv 2606.13294 v1 pith:54MK23LS submitted 2026-06-11 math.FA math.GNmath.LO

A small Banach space C(K) without nice renormings

classification math.FA math.GNmath.LO
keywords Banach spacesC(K) spacesGrothendieck spacesrenormingsstrictly convexKadets-Klee propertycompact spacesconsistency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that it is consistent with set theory that the first uncountable cardinal is less than the continuum, and under this assumption a compact space K exists so that the Banach space C(K) of continuous real functions is Grothendieck and has density ω₁. This C(K) cannot be renormed to be strictly convex or to satisfy the sequentially Kadets-Klee property. A sympathetic reader cares because the result separates the Grothendieck property together with small density from the existence of these standard nice renormings, showing that certain desirable geometric features of C(K) spaces are independent under mild set-theoretic hypotheses.

Core claim

Consistently ω₁ < 𝔠 and there exists a compact space K whose Banach space C(K) of continuous real-valued functions is Grothendieck, has density ω₁, and admits no renorming which is strictly convex or sequentially Kadets--Klee.

What carries the argument

The compact space K, whose construction under the assumption ω₁ < 𝔠 forces C(K) to be Grothendieck of density ω₁ while blocking strictly convex and sequentially Kadets-Klee renormings.

Load-bearing premise

The consistency of ω₁ being strictly smaller than the continuum is required to produce the compact space K with the stated combination of properties.

What would settle it

A proof that every Grothendieck C(K) of density ω₁ admits a strictly convex renorming whenever ω₁ < 𝔠, or a construction of such a K in ZFC alone, would falsify the central claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Grothendieck C(K) spaces of density ω₁ need not admit strictly convex renormings.
  • The sequentially Kadets-Klee renorming property can fail independently of the Grothendieck property at density ω₁.
  • There exist Grothendieck spaces C(K) of small density whose equivalent norms cannot satisfy either of the two listed geometric conditions.
  • Renorming questions for C(K) spaces can be separated from the Grothendieck property by set-theoretic assumptions alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same consistency assumption might allow constructions that separate additional renorming properties such as uniform convexity from the Grothendieck condition.
  • One could ask whether the same K can be chosen so that C(K) also fails to have the Radon-Nikodym property or other standard Banach-space features.
  • The result suggests testing whether analogous counterexamples exist when the density is raised to other cardinals below the continuum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proves that it is consistent that ω₁ < 𝔠 and there exists a compact space K such that the Banach space C(K) is Grothendieck, has density ω₁, and admits no equivalent strictly convex norm or sequentially Kadets–Klee norm.

Significance. If the construction is correct, the result supplies a consistent example of a Grothendieck C(K) space of small density without the usual renorming properties. This lies at the intersection of Banach-space renorming theory and set-theoretic consistency methods, and the explicit construction under the hypothesis ω₁ < 𝔠 is the standard route for obtaining such negative results. The paper ships a consistency statement with an explicit combinatorial or forcing construction of K.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states the consistency result but does not indicate the forcing or combinatorial tools employed; while this is acceptable for an abstract, a brief sentence in the introduction identifying the method (e.g., iterated forcing or a specific combinatorial principle) would improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. Notation for the density character and the cardinal invariants (ω₁, 𝔠) is standard, but the manuscript should confirm early that all spaces are over the reals and that “Grothendieck” is used in the usual sense (weak* convergent sequences in the dual are weakly convergent).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the accurate summary of the main result and for recommending minor revision. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in consistency result

full rationale

The paper establishes a consistency statement: under the assumption that ω₁ < 𝔠 it is consistent that a compact K exists such that C(K) is Grothendieck, has density ω₁, and admits no equivalent strictly convex or sequentially Kadets–Klee norm. The argument proceeds by exhibiting an explicit construction of K (via forcing or combinatorial principles) that satisfies the listed Banach-space properties. No equations, fitted parameters, self-definitional reductions, or load-bearing self-citations appear that would make any claimed derivation equivalent to its inputs by construction. The result is therefore self-contained as a standard consistency proof in set-theoretic functional analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete; the result rests on ZFC plus the consistency of ω₁ < 𝔠 and whatever unstated set-theoretic construction produces K.

axioms (1)
  • standard math ZFC set theory
    Background framework for all consistency statements in the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5579 in / 1253 out tokens · 20114 ms · 2026-06-27T05:38:46.859256+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A small Banach space $C(K)$ without nice renormings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/54MK23LS

@misc{pith2026260613294,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A small Banach space $C(K)$ without nice renormings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/54MK23LS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.13294}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We prove that consistently $\omega_1<\mathfrak{c}$ and there exists a compact space $K$ whose Banach space $C(K)$ of continuous real-valued functions is Grothendieck, has density $\omega_1$, and admits no renorming which is strictly convex or sequentially Kadets--Klee.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Talagrand compacta, 2DCP, and pointwise quotients

    math.GN 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Diamond-guided Talagrand compacta can fail 2DCP and local homogeneity while remaining Grothendieck Efimov spaces, and no Talagrand compactum admits classical pointwise sequence quotients.

  2. The two-disjoint-copies property for compact spaces, homogeneity and connection with $C_p$-theory

    math.GN 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The paper proves new theorems on the two-disjoint-copies property for compact spaces, including its absence from all scattered spaces and equivalence to uncountability for metric compact spaces.

  3. Talagrand compacta, 2DCP, and pointwise quotients

    math.GN 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    A diamond-guided Talagrand compactum fails 2DCP and local homogeneity while preserving Grothendieck and Efimov properties, and Talagrand Cp-spaces admit no classical pointwise sequence quotients.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Alexandrov,Banach spaces without Kadec–Klee property, in:General Topology in Banach Spaces, ed

    G. Alexandrov,Banach spaces without Kadec–Klee property, in:General Topology in Banach Spaces, ed. T. Banakh, Nova Science Publishers Inc., Huntington–New York, 2001, Chapter 2, 15–20

  2. [2]

    Alexandrov, V

    G. Alexandrov, V. Babev,Banach spaces not isomorphic to weakly midpoint locally uniformly rotund spaces, Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 41 (1988), 29–32

  3. [3]

    Baumgartner,Sacks forcing and the total failure of Martin’s axiom, Topol

    J.E. Baumgartner,Sacks forcing and the total failure of Martin’s axiom, Topol. Appl. 19 (1985), 211– 225

  4. [4]

    Blass,Combinatorial cardinal characteristics of the continuum, in:Handbook of Set Theory, Springer Netherlands, Amsterdam, 2010

    A. Blass,Combinatorial cardinal characteristics of the continuum, in:Handbook of Set Theory, Springer Netherlands, Amsterdam, 2010

  5. [5]

    Bourgain,ℓ ∞/c0 has no equivalent strictly convex norm, Proc

    J. Bourgain,ℓ ∞/c0 has no equivalent strictly convex norm, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 78 (1980), 225–226

  6. [6]

    Brech,On the density of Banach spacesC(K)with the Grothendieck property, Proc

    C. Brech,On the density of Banach spacesC(K)with the Grothendieck property, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 134 (2006), no 12, 3653–3663

  7. [7]

    Burke, W

    M.R. Burke, W. Kubiś, S. Todorčević,Kadec norms on spaces of continuous functions, Serdica Math. J. 32 (2006), no. 2–3, 227–258

  8. [8]

    Day,Strict convexity and smoothness of normed spaces, Trans

    M.M. Day,Strict convexity and smoothness of normed spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 78 (1955), 516–528

  9. [9]

    Dow,Laver forcing and converging sequences, Ann

    A. Dow,Laver forcing and converging sequences, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 175 (2024), no. 1, paper no. 103247

  10. [10]

    A. Dow, D. Fremlin,Compact sets without converging sequences in the random real model, Acta Math. Univ. Comen. 76 (2007), 161–171

  11. [11]

    Fabian, P

    M. Fabian, P. Habala, P. Hájek, V. Montesinos, V. Zizler,Banach Space Theory. The Basis for Linear and Nonlinear Analysis, Springer, New York, 2011

  12. [12]

    Freniche,The Vitali–Hahn–Saks theorem for Boolean algebras with the subsequential interpolation property, Proc

    F.J. Freniche,The Vitali–Hahn–Saks theorem for Boolean algebras with the subsequential interpolation property, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 92 (1984), no. 3, 362–366

  13. [13]

    González, T

    M. González, T. Kania,Grothendieck spaces: the landscape and perspectives, Japan. J. Math. 16 (2021), 247–313

  14. [14]

    Guirao, V

    A.J. Guirao, V. Montesinos, V. Zizler,Renormings in Banach Spaces. A Toolbox, Birkhäuser Cham, Springer Nature, Cham, 2022

  15. [15]

    Gul’ko, A.V

    S.P. Gul’ko, A.V. Ivanov, M.S. Shulikina, S. Troyanski,Locally uniformly rotund renormings of the spaces of continuous functions on Fedorchuk compacts, Topol. Appl. 281 (2020), 1–11

  16. [16]

    Haydon,A nonreflexive Grothendieck space that does not containℓ∞, Israel J

    R. Haydon,A nonreflexive Grothendieck space that does not containℓ∞, Israel J. Math. 40 (1981), no. 1, 65–73. A SMALL BANACH SPACEC(K)WITHOUT NICE RENORMINGS 17

  17. [17]

    Haydon,A counterexample to several questions about scattered compact spaces, Bull

    R. Haydon,A counterexample to several questions about scattered compact spaces, Bull. London Math. Soc. 22 (1990), 261–268

  18. [18]

    Haydon,Trees in renorming theory, Proc

    R. Haydon,Trees in renorming theory, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 78 (1999), no. 3, 541–584

  19. [19]

    Haydon,Boolean rings that are Baire spaces, Serdica Math

    R. Haydon,Boolean rings that are Baire spaces, Serdica Math. J. 27 (2001), no. 2, 91–106

  20. [20]

    Haydon, J.E

    R. Haydon, J.E. Jayne, I. Namioka, C.A. Rogers,Continuous functions on totally ordered spaces that are compact in their order topologies, J. Funct. Anal. 178 (2000), 23–63

  21. [21]

    Haydon, A

    R. Haydon, A. Moltó, J. Orihuela,Spaces of functions with countably many discontinuities, Israel J. Math. 158 (2007), 19–39

  22. [22]

    Haydon, C.A

    R. Haydon, C.A. Rogers,A locally uniformly convex renorming for certainC(K), Mathematika 37 (1990), no. 1, 1–8

  23. [23]

    Haydon, V

    R. Haydon, V. Zizler,A new space with no locally uniformly rotund renorming, Canad. Math. Bull. 32 (1989), no. 1, 122–128

  24. [24]

    Jech,Set Theory

    T. Jech,Set Theory. The Third Millennium Edition — Revised and Expanded, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003

  25. [25]

    Kąkol, W

    J. Kąkol, W. Kubiś, M. López-Pellicer, D. Sobota,Descriptive Topology in Selected Topics of Functional Analysis. 2nd Edition — Updated and Expanded, Springer Cham, New York, 2025

  26. [26]

    Koszmider, S

    P. Koszmider, S. Shelah,Independent families in Boolean algebras with some separation properties, Algebra Univ. 69 (2013), no. 4, 305–312

  27. [27]

    Kunen,Set Theory

    K. Kunen,Set Theory. An Introduction to Independence Proofs, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980

  28. [28]

    Manev,Fully closed mappings and LUR renormability, Studia Math

    T. Manev,Fully closed mappings and LUR renormability, Studia Math. 278 (2024), no. 1, 67–79

  29. [29]

    Manev,Continuous functions on limits of F-decomposable systems, Proc

    T. Manev,Continuous functions on limits of F-decomposable systems, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 154 (2026), no. 2, 737–749

  30. [30]

    Moore, M

    J.T. Moore, M. Hrušák, M. Džamonja,Parametrized♢principles, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356 (2003), no. 6, 2281–2306

  31. [31]

    Raghavan, T

    D. Raghavan, T. Yorioka,Some results in the extension with a coherent Suslin tree, RIMS Kôkyûroku 1790 (2012), 72–82

  32. [32]

    Schachermayer,On some classical measure-theoretic theorems for non-sigma-complete Boolean al- gebras, Diss

    W. Schachermayer,On some classical measure-theoretic theorems for non-sigma-complete Boolean al- gebras, Diss. Math. (Rozprawy Mat.) 214 (1982)

  33. [33]

    Seever,Measures on F-spaces, Trans

    G.L. Seever,Measures on F-spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 133 (1968), no. 1, 267–280

  34. [34]

    Smith, S

    R.J. Smith, S. Troyanski,Renormings ofC(K)spaces, RACSAM 104 (2010), 375–412

  35. [35]

    Sobota,Convergence of measures on Boolean algebras and cardinal characteristics of the continuum, RIMS Kôkyûroku 2164 (2020), 50–63

    D. Sobota,Convergence of measures on Boolean algebras and cardinal characteristics of the continuum, RIMS Kôkyûroku 2164 (2020), 50–63

  36. [36]

    Sobota, L

    D. Sobota, L. Zdomskyy,The Nikodym property in the Sacks model, Topol. Appl. 230C (2017), 24–34

  37. [37]

    Sobota, L

    D. Sobota, L. Zdomskyy,Convergence of measures in forcing extensions, Israel J. Math. 232 (2019), no. 2, 501–529

  38. [38]

    Sobota, L

    D. Sobota, L. Zdomskyy,Convergence of measures after adding a real, Arch. Math. Logic 63 (2024), 135–162

  39. [39]

    St. Kliment Ohridski

    S.L. Troyanski,On the equivalent norms and minimal systems in non-separable Banach spaces, Studia Math. 43 (1972), 125–138. Faculty of Mahtematics and Informatics, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 5, James Bourchier blvd., 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria Email address:tmmanev@fmi.uni-sofia.bg Kurt Gödel Research Center, Department of Mathematics, Vienna Univ...