pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18659 · v1 · pith:DBQUKPY4new · submitted 2026-06-17 · 💻 cs.SD

Responsible ASR: Overcoming Challenges of Foundational Models in Narrow-Band and Low-Resource Settings

Tejas Godambe , Nutan Choudhary , Sanket Shah , Nagaraj Adiga , Sharath Adavanne This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 20:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SD
keywords automatic speech recognitionnarrow-bandlow-resource languagesfine-tuningfoundational modelsHindiIndian Englishtelephony
0
0 comments X

The pith

Foundational ASR models perform suboptimally on narrow-band Hindi and Indian-accented English telephony, with fine-tuning gains varying by pretraining exposure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests widely used open-source and commercial foundational ASR models on narrow-band spontaneous conversations in Hindi and Indian-accented English. Zero-shot results are poor for all models. Fine-tuning on a limited set of real annotated recordings produces some accuracy lifts, yet the size of those lifts tracks closely with how much of the target language or accent appeared in the original pretraining corpus. Readers would care because telephony remains a high-volume deployment setting where current models still fail for many languages and accents.

Core claim

Foundational ASR models exhibit suboptimal performance in zero-shot settings on narrow-band spontaneous conversations in Hindi and Indian-accented English. Fine-tuning with limited annotated recordings improves results to varying degrees, with greater benefits for languages and accents that had more exposure during pretraining.

What carries the argument

Zero-shot and fine-tuned evaluation of foundational ASR models on narrow-band low-resource language and accent telephony data.

If this is right

  • Languages and accents with less pretraining data receive smaller accuracy gains from the same fine-tuning procedure.
  • Even after fine-tuning, performance stays below usable thresholds for the most underrepresented cases.
  • Both open-source and commercial foundational models face comparable limitations in these narrow-band low-resource settings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the pattern holds, model selection for telephony ASR should favor checkpoints that already contain more narrow-band data from the target language or accent.
  • A direct test would be to retrain the same base models on increasing volumes of narrow-band Hindi or Indian English and measure whether fine-tuning gains scale linearly.
  • The finding implies that simply collecting more fine-tuning data may be less efficient than expanding the pretraining corpus for low-resource cases.

Load-bearing premise

The limited set of real-life annotated recordings used for fine-tuning is representative of the broader narrow-band spontaneous conversations the models will encounter in deployment.

What would settle it

Measuring fine-tuning improvement on a wider set of languages and finding no correlation with pretraining data volume for the target language or accent would falsify the main claim.

read the original abstract

Telephony conversations worldwide are conducted over narrow-band channels and are often spontaneous and colloquial in nature. This paper evaluates the performance of widely used foundational automatic speech recognition (ASR) models -- both open-source and commercial -- on narrow-band conversations in Hindi, a low-resource language, and Indian-accented English, a low-resource accent. We first assess these models in a zero-shot setting and find that their performance remains suboptimal across the board. Highlighting the challenges faced by ASR models in narrow-band and low-resource language scenarios, we further investigate the impact of fine-tuning open-source models using a limited set of real-life annotated recordings. Our findings indicate that while fine-tuning provides some improvements, its effectiveness varies across languages and accents, largely influenced by the amount of data encountered during pretraining

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper evaluates foundational ASR models (open-source and commercial) on narrow-band spontaneous conversations in Hindi and Indian-accented English. It reports suboptimal zero-shot performance across models and finds that fine-tuning open-source models on a limited set of real-life annotated recordings yields some improvements whose effectiveness varies by language/accent and is largely driven by the volume of relevant data seen during pretraining.

Significance. If substantiated with quantitative evidence, the work would usefully document practical limitations of current foundational ASR models in narrow-band, low-resource telephony settings and the uneven returns from limited fine-tuning, informing responsible deployment choices. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations are present.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims (suboptimal zero-shot performance; variable fine-tuning gains driven by pretraining exposure) are stated without any numerical WER/CER values, dataset sizes, model identifiers, or statistical tests. This absence is load-bearing because the manuscript is an empirical evaluation study whose soundness cannot be assessed from the given text.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and methods (implied): the interpretation that fine-tuning effectiveness varies 'largely influenced by the amount of data encountered during pretraining' requires that the 'limited set of real-life annotated recordings' is representative of the target narrow-band spontaneous distribution. No information is supplied on channel/acoustic matching, spontaneity/colloquial coverage, speaker diversity, or train/test distribution-shift statistics, leaving open the possibility that observed differences arise from mismatch rather than pretraining exposure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and substantiation of the empirical claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims (suboptimal zero-shot performance; variable fine-tuning gains driven by pretraining exposure) are stated without any numerical WER/CER values, dataset sizes, model identifiers, or statistical tests. This absence is load-bearing because the manuscript is an empirical evaluation study whose soundness cannot be assessed from the given text.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should contain concrete numerical results to support its claims. In the revised version we will insert the key zero-shot and fine-tuned WER/CER values, the size of the fine-tuning set, the specific model identifiers, and a brief note on any statistical comparisons performed. This change will make the central findings immediately verifiable from the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and methods (implied): the interpretation that fine-tuning effectiveness varies 'largely influenced by the amount of data encountered during pretraining' requires that the 'limited set of real-life annotated recordings' is representative of the target narrow-band spontaneous distribution. No information is supplied on channel/acoustic matching, spontaneity/colloquial coverage, speaker diversity, or train/test distribution-shift statistics, leaving open the possibility that observed differences arise from mismatch rather than pretraining exposure.

    Authors: This is a valid methodological concern. The fine-tuning recordings are drawn from the same narrow-band telephony domain as the evaluation set; however, the manuscript currently provides limited detail on acoustic matching, spontaneity, speaker coverage, and explicit distribution-shift metrics. We will expand the methods and dataset sections to supply these characteristics and any available shift statistics. While cross-model comparisons still point to pretraining exposure as the dominant factor, we will also discuss mismatch as a possible confounding influence and qualify the interpretation accordingly. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely empirical evaluation study

full rationale

The paper performs zero-shot evaluation of ASR models followed by fine-tuning experiments on a limited set of recordings, reporting observed performance differences across languages and accents. No derivation chain, equations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing premises exist. All claims are direct experimental observations rather than reductions to inputs by construction. The representativeness concern raised in the skeptic note is an external-validity issue, not a circularity issue.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No theoretical components; the work is an empirical evaluation of existing ASR models on specific audio conditions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5678 in / 1012 out tokens · 19666 ms · 2026-06-26T20:01:59.407897+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Customer support is a critical revenue-generating function for businesses, enabling after-sales service, promotions, and sales calls

    Introduction In this paper, we present our findings and insights from building a robust automatic speech recognition (ASR) system for a real- world call center application in Hindi, a low-resource language, and Indian-accented English, a low-resource accent. Customer support is a critical revenue-generating function for businesses, enabling after-sales se...

  2. [2]

    Fine-tune state-of-the-art ASR models: We utilize Nvidia’s NeMo [8], a production-grade ASR training and inference li- brary, and SpeechBrain [9], a research-grade ASR framework with advanced training and inference recipes

  3. [3]

    Open-source foundational embeddings from MMS [2]

    Investigate the use of foundational speech encoders: We eval- uate: a. Open-source foundational embeddings from MMS [2]. b. BEST-RQ [10] speech encoders trained from scratch on 100K hours of unlabeled narrow-band data using an open- source SpeechBrain recipe [11]

  4. [4]

    Develop and evaluate pseudo-labeling strategies: We explore various data augmentation, pseudo-labeling, and selection strategies to enhance ASR performance while minimizing re- liance on costly manual annotation

  5. [5]

    Quantify the performance gap for commercial deployment: We compare fine-tuned and trained models against baseline foundational models and an in-house ASR system trained en- tirely on domain-specific data, highlighting the gap in perfor- mance and the limitations of existing foundational models for real-world call center applications. Through these contrib...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Experimental Setup In this section, we describe the experimental setup used to train and evaluate ASR models for the call center use case. Our evaluation includes both state-of-the-art (SoTA) open-source foundational models and an in-house model trained specifically for narrow-band, conversational speech in Hindi and Indian- accented English. 2.1. SoTA Op...

    2048

  7. [7]

    As these interactions occur over a tele- phony channel, the audio is sampled at 8 kHz (narrow-band)

    Customer Support Datasets Customer support recordings consist of conversations between an agent and a customer. As these interactions occur over a tele- phony channel, the audio is sampled at 8 kHz (narrow-band). This section outlines the data preparation steps undertaken for training, fine-tuning, and evaluating both open-source foun- dational ASR models...

  8. [8]

    Results and Discussion Table 2 compares the performance of SoTA open source mod- els, commercial ASR models, scratch-trained models, fine- tuned models with Speech pre-trained embeddings, and existing ASR models. 4.1. SoTA open source models We evaluated open-source models, including Whisper, NeMo, and Data2Vec AQC. We used the Whisper-v3-large model [1] ...

  9. [9]

    Our findings reveal that while foundational models demonstrate rea- sonable generalization, their performance remains suboptimal in real-world telephony conversations

    Conclusion In this study, we systematically evaluated the performance of foundational ASR models in narrow-band, low-resource set- tings, focusing on Hindi and Indian-accented English. Our findings reveal that while foundational models demonstrate rea- sonable generalization, their performance remains suboptimal in real-world telephony conversations. By e...

  10. [10]

    Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, T. Xu, G. Brockman, C. McLeavey, and I. Sutskever, “Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 28 492–28 518

    2023

  11. [11]

    Scaling speech technology to 1,000+ languages,

    V . Pratap, A. Tjandra, B. Shi, P. Tomasello, A. Babu, S. Kundu, A. Elkahky, Z. Ni, A. Vyas, M. Fazel-Zarandiet al., “Scaling speech technology to 1,000+ languages,”Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 25, no. 97, pp. 1–52, 2024

    2024

  12. [12]

    XLS-R: Self-supervised Cross-lingual Speech Representation Learning at Scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09296,

    A. Babu, C. Wang, A. Tjandra, K. Lakhotia, Q. Xu, N. Goyal, K. Singh, P. V on Platen, Y . Saraf, J. Pinoet al., “Xls-r: Self- supervised cross-lingual speech representation learning at scale,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09296, 2021

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    All ears: Building self-supervised learning based asr models for indian lan- guages at scale,

    V . S. Lodagala, A. Biswas, S. Das, S. Umeshet al., “All ears: Building self-supervised learning based asr models for indian lan- guages at scale,” inProc. Interspeech 2024, 2024, pp. 3944–3948

    2024

  14. [14]

    Vistaar: Diverse benchmarks and training sets for indian language asr,

    K. S. Bhogale, S. Sundaresan, A. Raman, T. Javed, M. M. Khapra, and P. Kumar, “Vistaar: Diverse benchmarks and training sets for indian language asr,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15386, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    STT Hi Conformer-CTC Large,

    Nvidia, “STT Hi Conformer-CTC Large,” [Online; accessed 19-Feb-2025]. [Online]. Available: https://catalog.ngc.nvidia. com/orgs/nvidia/teams/nemo/models/stt hi conformer ctc large

    2025

  16. [16]

    STT En Fast Conformer-Transducer Large,

    ——, “STT En Fast Conformer-Transducer Large,” [Online; accessed 19-Feb-2025]. [Online]. Avail- able: https://catalog.ngc.nvidia.com/orgs/nvidia/teams/nemo/ models/stt en fastconformer transducer large

    2025

  17. [17]

    Nemo: a toolkit for con- versational ai and large language models,

    E. Harper, S. Majumdar, O. Kuchaiev, J. Li, Y . Zhang, E. Bakhturina, V . Noroozi, S. Subramanian, K. Nithin, J. Huang, F. Jia, J. Balam, X. Yang, M. Livne, Y . Dong, S. Naren, and B. Ginsburg, “Nemo: a toolkit for con- versational ai and large language models,” 2025, available athttps://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo. [Online]. Avail- able: https://nvidia.github...

    2025

  18. [18]

    Open-source conversational ai with SpeechBrain 1.0,

    M. Ravanelli, T. Parcollet, A. Moumen, S. de Langen, C. Subakan, P. Plantinga, Y . Wang, P. Mousavi, L. D. Libera, A. Ploujnikov, F. Paissan, D. Borra, S. Zaiem, Z. Zhao, S. Zhang, G. Karakasidis, S.-L. Yeh, P. Champion, A. Rouhe, R. Braun, F. Mai, J. Zuluaga- Gomez, S. M. Mousavi, A. Nautsch, X. Liu, S. Sagar, J. Duret, S. Mdhaffar, G. Laperriere, M. Rou...

  19. [19]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00463

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00463

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Self-supervised learning with random-projection quantizer for speech recogni- tion,

    C.-C. Chiu, J. Qin, Y . Zhang, J. Yu, and Y . Wu, “Self-supervised learning with random-projection quantizer for speech recogni- tion,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 3915–3924

    2022

  21. [21]

    Open im- plementation and study of best-rq for speech processing,

    R. Whetten, T. Parcollet, M. Dinarelli, and Y . Est `eve, “Open im- plementation and study of best-rq for speech processing,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04296, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Conformer: Convolution- augmented transformer for speech recognition,

    A. Gulati, J. Qin, C.-C. Chiu, N. Parmar, Y . Zhang, J. Yu, W. Han, S. Wang, Z. Zhang, Y . Wuet al., “Conformer: Convolution- augmented transformer for speech recognition,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.08100, 2020

    work page arXiv 2005

  23. [23]

    Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization

    I. Loshchilov, “Decoupled weight decay regularization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, “Attention is all you need,”Advances in Neural In- formation Processing Systems, 2017

    2017

  25. [25]

    Sequence Transduction with Recurrent Neural Networks

    A. Graves, “Sequence transduction with recurrent neural net- works,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.3711, 2012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    Long short-term memory,

    A. Graves and A. Graves, “Long short-term memory,”Supervised sequence labelling with recurrent neural networks, pp. 37–45, 2012

    2012

  27. [27]

    SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processing

    T. Kudo, “Sentencepiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for neural text processing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.06226, 2018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    Audio augmen- tation for speech recognition

    T. Ko, V . Peddinti, D. Povey, and S. Khudanpur, “Audio augmen- tation for speech recognition.” inInterspeech, vol. 2015, 2015, p. 3586

    2015

  29. [29]

    Specaugment: A simple data augmen- tation method for automatic speech recognition,

    D. S. Park, W. Chan, Y . Zhang, C.-C. Chiu, B. Zoph, E. D. Cubuk, and Q. V . Le, “Specaugment: A simple data augmen- tation method for automatic speech recognition,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08779, 2019

    work page arXiv 1904

  30. [30]

    wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech repre- sentations,

    A. Baevski, Y . Zhou, A. Mohamed, and M. Auli, “wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech repre- sentations,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 12 449–12 460, 2020

    2020

  31. [31]

    Improved noisy student training for automatic speech recognition,

    D. S. Park, Y . Zhang, Y . Jia, W. Han, C.-C. Chiu, B. Li, Y . Wu, and Q. V . Le, “Improved noisy student training for automatic speech recognition,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.09629, 2020

    work page arXiv 2005

  32. [32]

    Pushing the limits of semi-supervised learning for automatic speech recognition,

    Y . Zhang, J. Qin, D. S. Park, W. Han, C.-C. Chiu, R. Pang, Q. V . Le, and Y . Wu, “Pushing the limits of semi-supervised learning for automatic speech recognition,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.10504, 2020

    work page arXiv 2010