pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20418 · v1 · pith:WD3CQZTMnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 💻 cs.SD

MixProLAP: Mixture-Induced Uncertainty Modeling for Probabilistic Language-Audio Pretraining

Yu Nakagome , Jaesong Lee , Soo-Whan Chung This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SD
keywords audio-language pretrainingprobabilistic modelingmixture-induced uncertaintyaudio-text retrievaloverlapping soundssemantic inclusionmany-to-many alignmentuncertainty-aware embeddings
0
0 comments X

The pith

Representing audio and text as distributions via mixture-induced overlaps models many-to-many alignment ambiguity more effectively than deterministic point embeddings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that audio-language pretraining can better handle the inherent ambiguity of overlapping sounds and varied descriptions by learning probabilistic distributions for each modality instead of fixed embeddings. It achieves this by mixing audio-text pairs to simulate real mixtures and adding a multi-level inclusion loss to respect semantic relations. A reader would care because this could lead to more robust systems for audio retrieval and understanding in complex acoustic environments where one-to-one mappings do not hold. The experiments indicate improved performance on standard benchmarks over deterministic approaches.

Core claim

By mixing audio-text pairs to induce uncertainty from overlapping sounds and introducing a multi-level inclusion loss, the framework learns distribution representations that capture the many-to-many correspondences in audio-language data, outperforming deterministic contrastive methods on retrieval tasks.

What carries the argument

Mixture-induced uncertainty modeling, which creates overlapping audio from mixed pairs to simulate real scenes and semantic inclusions, combined with probabilistic cross-modal alignment.

If this is right

  • Outperforms deterministic baselines on audio-text retrieval benchmarks.
  • Captures semantic inclusion relations among sound events through the inclusion loss.
  • Models many-to-many correspondence ambiguity in audio-text alignment.
  • Provides uncertainty-aware representations for each modality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach might generalize to other multimodal pretraining where ambiguity arises from real-world mixtures.
  • Testing on datasets with explicitly labeled overlapping events could further validate the mixture simulation.
  • The method suggests potential improvements in downstream tasks like audio captioning or event detection in noisy settings.

Load-bearing premise

Mixing audio-text pairs creates overlapping sounds that accurately reflect real acoustic mixtures and capture semantic inclusion relations among sound events.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment where models using masking-based simulation achieve comparable or better retrieval performance on real-world overlapping audio datasets would challenge the superiority of the mixture approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20418 by Jaesong Lee, Soo-Whan Chung, Yu Nakagome.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of MixProLAP architecture. Audio and text en￾coders output probabilistic embeddings through mean and variance projection heads. PPCL aligns the distributions across modalities. 3. Proposed Method: MixProLAP In this section, we introduce MixProLAP, a probabilistic frame￾work that models uncertainty through audio mixing. Our key contribution is replacing masking-based uncertainty with addi￾tive unce… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of intra-modal inclusion loss. (a) Audio mixing creates a semantic superset where each source distribution is included within the mixture. (b) Text concatenation constructs a textual superset encompassing both captions. tent of the mixed audio signal. We enforce the inclusion relationship between sources and their mixtures as illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Relationship between input length and estimated uncertainty on AudioCaps test set. contributes to the observed improvements. 4.5. Masking vs. Mixing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Acoustic environments often contain multiple overlapping sound events, and the same acoustic scene can be described using diverse textual expressions, making audio-text alignment inherently ambiguous. This paper proposes a probabilistic audio-language pretraining framework to model many-to-many correspondence ambiguity in audio-text alignment. Unlike conventional contrastive methods that learn deterministic point embeddings, our approach represents each modality as a distribution and learns uncertainty-aware cross-modal alignment. Rather than relying on masking-based uncertainty simulation, we mix audio-text pairs to create overlapping sounds that better reflect real acoustic mixtures and capture semantic inclusion relations among sound events. We further introduce a multi-level inclusion loss to enforce representations consistent with these relations. Experiments on audio-text retrieval benchmarks show that the proposed method outperforms deterministic baselines.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MixProLAP, a probabilistic audio-language pretraining framework to model many-to-many correspondence ambiguity in audio-text alignment. Unlike deterministic contrastive methods that learn point embeddings, it represents each modality as a distribution and learns uncertainty-aware cross-modal alignment. It uses mixing of audio-text pairs (rather than masking) to create overlapping sounds that reflect real acoustic mixtures and capture semantic inclusion relations, and introduces a multi-level inclusion loss to enforce consistency with these relations. The central claim is that this outperforms deterministic baselines on audio-text retrieval benchmarks.

Significance. If the results hold and are reproducible, the work could advance multimodal pretraining by offering a modeling choice (mixing-induced uncertainty) that more closely approximates real-world acoustic overlap and semantic inclusion than standard masking simulations. This has potential implications for applications requiring robust handling of ambiguous audio-text correspondences.

major comments (1)
  1. The manuscript consists solely of the abstract; no method derivations, loss function definitions, experimental setups, benchmark details, quantitative results, tables, figures, or error bars are provided. This prevents any assessment of whether the reported outperformance supports the central claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and the opportunity to respond. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The manuscript consists solely of the abstract; no method derivations, loss function definitions, experimental setups, benchmark details, quantitative results, tables, figures, or error bars are provided. This prevents any assessment of whether the reported outperformance supports the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript text provided consists solely of the abstract and lacks method derivations, loss function definitions (such as the multi-level inclusion loss), experimental setups, benchmark details, quantitative results, tables, figures, or error bars. This observation is accurate and prevents a full assessment of the claims. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate all of these elements in detail. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Specific definitions and derivations of the mixture-induced uncertainty modeling and multi-level inclusion loss, as well as the exact experimental setups, benchmarks, results, tables, figures, and error bars, since these are not present in the provided manuscript text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The provided abstract and description outline a probabilistic pretraining method with mixture-based uncertainty modeling and a multi-level inclusion loss. The central claim is empirical outperformance on audio-text retrieval benchmarks versus deterministic baselines. No equations, derivations, or self-citations are shown that reduce predictions to fitted inputs by construction, import uniqueness from prior self-work, or smuggle ansatzes. The mixing-vs-masking choice is presented as an explicit modeling decision whose validity is tested externally via benchmarks, making the framework self-contained against independent evaluation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review limited to abstract; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms beyond the stated domain premise are detailed.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Acoustic environments often contain multiple overlapping sound events, and the same acoustic scene can be described using diverse textual expressions, making audio-text alignment inherently ambiguous.
    Opening premise of the abstract that motivates the entire framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5653 in / 1090 out tokens · 32816 ms · 2026-06-26T15:40:11.906191+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    heavy rain

    Introduction Humans naturally describe complex acoustic environments us- ing language. Learning to align audio signals with textual de- scriptions has therefore become an important problem in multi- modal representation learning. Recent progress in cross-modal learning has been driven by contrastive pretraining approaches that learn joint embeddings from ...

  2. [2]

    ) 𝜎(𝑎!,𝑎

    Probabilistic Representation Learning Most contrastive multi-modal learning frameworks represent each modality using deterministic point embeddings, which do not explicitly model uncertainty in cross-modal relationships. To address this limitation, probabilistic representations have been proposed. PCME [11] and PCME++ [12] model each in- put as a Gaussian...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    A, and B

    Proposed Method: MixProLAP In this section, we introduce MixProLAP, a probabilistic frame- work that models uncertainty through audio mixing. Our key contribution is replacing masking-based uncertainty with addi- tive uncertainty through waveform mixing, enabling more ap- propriate hierarchical structure learning for audio signals. An overview of the arch...

  4. [4]

    Experimental Settings Dataset and metrics.We used AudioCaps [20] and ClothoV2 [21] datasets for both training and evaluation

    Experiments 4.1. Experimental Settings Dataset and metrics.We used AudioCaps [20] and ClothoV2 [21] datasets for both training and evaluation. Au- dioCaps consists of approximately 51k audio clips from Au- dioSet [22] with human written captions, while ClothoV2 con- tains nearly 6k audio samples with five captions each. All au- dio samples were processed ...

    arXiv 1915

  5. [5]

    Conclusion We propose MixProLAP, a probabilistic audio-language pre- training framework that replaces masking-based uncertainty with additive uncertainty through audio mixing. Unlike mask- ing, which destroys semantic content for transient sounds or fails to create hierarchy for ambient sounds, mixing constructs a semantic superset that naturally satisfie...

  6. [6]

    The authors are solely re- sponsible for all scientific content, including the methodology, experiments, analysis, and conclusions

    Generative AI Use Disclosure The use of generative AI in this paper was limited strictly to text refinement and clarity improvements. The authors are solely re- sponsible for all scientific content, including the methodology, experiments, analysis, and conclusions

  7. [7]

    Seeing voices and hearing faces: Cross-modal biometric matching,

    A. Nagrani, S. Albanie, and A. Zisserman, “Seeing voices and hearing faces: Cross-modal biometric matching,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018

    2018

  8. [8]

    Perfect match: Improved cross-modal embeddings for audio-visual synchronisa- tion,

    S.-W. Chung, J. S. Chung, and H.-G. Kang, “Perfect match: Improved cross-modal embeddings for audio-visual synchronisa- tion,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2019

    2019

  9. [9]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agar- wal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clarket al., “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learn- ing, 2021

    2021

  10. [10]

    CLAP: learning audio concepts from natural language supervision,

    B. Elizalde, S. Deshmukh, M. Al Ismail, and H. Wang, “CLAP: learning audio concepts from natural language supervision,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2023

    2023

  11. [11]

    Siglip 2: Multilingual vision-language encoders with im- proved semantic understanding, localization, and dense features,

    M. Tschannen, A. Gritsenko, X. Wang, M. F. Naeem, I. Alabdul- mohsin, N. Parthasarathy, T. Evans, L. Beyer, Y . Xia, B. Mustafa et al., “Siglip 2: Multilingual vision-language encoders with im- proved semantic understanding, localization, and dense features,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14786, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    AudioCLIP: Ex- tending CLIP to image, text and audio,

    A. Guzhov, F. Raue, J. Hees, and A. Dengel, “AudioCLIP: Ex- tending CLIP to image, text and audio,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2022

    2022

  13. [13]

    Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,

    Y . Wu, K. Chen, T. Zhang, Y . Hui, T. Berg-Kirkpatrick, and S. Dubnov, “Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2023

    2023

  14. [14]

    Natural language super- vision for general-purpose audio representations,

    B. Elizalde, S. Deshmukh, and H. Wang, “Natural language super- vision for general-purpose audio representations,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2024

    2024

  15. [15]

    ProbVLM: Probabilistic adapter for frozen vison-language models,

    U. Upadhyay, S. Karthik, M. Mancini, and Z. Akata, “ProbVLM: Probabilistic adapter for frozen vison-language models,” inPro- ceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023

    2023

  16. [16]

    Probabilistic language- image pre-training,

    S. Chun, W. Kim, S. Park, and S. Yun, “Probabilistic language- image pre-training,” inProceedings of the International Confer- ence on Learning Representations, 2025

    2025

  17. [17]

    Probabilistic embeddings for cross-modal retrieval,

    S. Chun, S. J. Oh, R. S. De Rezende, Y . Kalantidis, and D. Lar- lus, “Probabilistic embeddings for cross-modal retrieval,” inPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021

    2021

  18. [18]

    Improved probabilistic image-text representations,

    S. Chun, “Improved probabilistic image-text representations,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Repre- sentations, 2024

    2024

  19. [19]

    LongProLIP: A probabilistic vision- language model with long context text,

    S. Chun and S. Yun, “LongProLIP: A probabilistic vision- language model with long context text,” inICLR Workshop on Quantify Uncertainty and Hallucination in Foundation Models, 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Position: Multiplicity is an in- evitable and inherent challenge in multimodal learning,

    S. Chun and O. Russakovsky, “Position: Multiplicity is an in- evitable and inherent challenge in multimodal learning,” inPro- ceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 2026

    2026

  21. [21]

    Pro- LAP: Probabilistic language-audio pre-training,

    T. Manabe, Y . Ishikawa, H. Munakata, and T. Komatsu, “Pro- LAP: Probabilistic language-audio pre-training,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.18423, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    HTS-AT: A hierarchical token-semantic audio transformer for sound classification and detection,

    K. Chen, X. Du, B. Zhu, Z. Ma, T. Berg-Kirkpatrick, and S. Dub- nov, “HTS-AT: A hierarchical token-semantic audio transformer for sound classification and detection,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Pro- cessing, 2022

    2022

  23. [23]

    Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows,

    Z. Liu, Y . Lin, Y . Cao, H. Hu, Y . Wei, Z. Zhang, S. Lin, and B. Guo, “Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows,” inProceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021

    2021

  24. [24]

    Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,

    A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, I. Sutskever et al., “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” OpenAI blog, vol. 1, no. 8, p. 9, 2019

    2019

  25. [25]

    Deep varia- tional information bottleneck,

    A. A. Alemi, I. Fischer, J. V . Dillon, and K. Murphy, “Deep varia- tional information bottleneck,” inProceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017

    2017

  26. [26]

    AudioCaps: Generat- ing captions for audios in the wild,

    C. D. Kim, B. Kim, H. Lee, and G. Kim, “AudioCaps: Generat- ing captions for audios in the wild,” inProceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics: Human Language Technologies, 2019

    2019

  27. [27]

    Clotho: An audio cap- tioning dataset,

    K. Drossos, S. Lipping, and T. Virtanen, “Clotho: An audio cap- tioning dataset,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Con- ference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2020

    2020

  28. [28]

    Audio Set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events,

    J. F. Gemmeke, D. P. W. Ellis, D. Freedman, A. Jansen, W. Lawrence, R. C. Moore, M. Plakal, and M. Ritter, “Audio Set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2017

    2017

  29. [29]

    Estimated audio–caption correspondences improve language-based audio retrieval,

    P. Primus, F. Schmid, and G. Widmer, “Estimated audio–caption correspondences improve language-based audio retrieval,” inPro- ceedings of the Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events 2024 Workshop (DCASE2024), 2024

    2024

  30. [30]

    Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding,

    A. v. d. Oord, Y . Li, and O. Vinyals, “Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748, 2018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Decoupled weight decay regulariza- tion,

    I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, “Decoupled weight decay regulariza- tion,” inProceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019

    2019

  32. [32]

    SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognition,

    D. S. Park, W. Chan, Y . Zhang, C.-C. Chiu, B. Zoph, E. D. Cubuk, and Q. V . Le, “SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognition,” inINTERSPEECH, 2019

    2019