pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21702 · v1 · pith:4BDY3KCAnew · submitted 2026-06-19 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Analytic results for heavy-quark contributions to charged-current DIS at NNLO

Fabrizio Caola , Giulio Gambuti , Martin Link This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 13:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords heavy quarkscharged-current DISNNLO QCD correctionscoefficient functionsGoncharov polylogarithmscharm mass dependencedeep inelastic scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

NNLO QCD corrections to heavy-quark production in charged-current DIS are computed analytically with exact charm mass dependence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the complete partonic coefficient functions at next-to-next-to-leading order for the structure functions F2, FL, and F3 in charged-current deep-inelastic scattering, keeping the exact dependence on the charm quark mass. This includes contributions from up to three heavy quarks in the final state, expressed in terms of Goncharov polylogarithms for cases with at most two heavy quarks and Chen iterated integrals or series expansions for the three-heavy-quark case. A sympathetic reader would care because these results allow for precise and efficient numerical evaluations in the relevant energy range, improving predictions for experiments involving charm quarks without relying on mass approximations or massless limits.

Core claim

We present analytic results for the NNLO QCD corrections to heavy-quark production in charged-current deep-inelastic scattering, retaining the exact dependence on the charm quark mass. We compute the complete partonic coefficient functions for the structure functions F2, FL, and F3 in the quark and gluon channels, including contributions with up to three heavy quarks in the final state. Contributions with at most two final-state heavy quarks are expressed in terms of manifestly real Goncharov polylogarithms, while the three-heavy-quark contribution involves elliptic structures represented via Chen iterated integrals and rapidly convergent expansions valid for Q greater than or equal to 5 GeV

What carries the argument

The reverse-unitarity framework combined with integration-by-parts reduction and canonical differential equations, which reduces the integrals to Goncharov polylogarithms or Chen iterated integrals.

If this is right

  • The analytic expressions enable robust numerical evaluation without encountering numerical instabilities from elliptic sectors in most cases.
  • Results agree with known exact results at lower perturbative orders and in the massless limit.
  • The expansions provide flexible and fast evaluation in the perturbative region Q ≳ 5 GeV.
  • These coefficient functions can be used directly in phenomenological studies of heavy-quark contributions to DIS.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such analytic control over mass dependence may allow similar techniques to be applied to other processes like neutral-current DIS or hadron collider observables involving heavy quarks.
  • The separation into polylog and elliptic parts highlights where higher transcendental functions become necessary in QCD calculations.
  • The provided expansions could be implemented in public codes for fast convolution with parton distributions.

Load-bearing premise

All two-heavy-quark contributions can be reduced to manifestly real Goncharov polylogarithms without irreducible elliptic sectors.

What would settle it

A numerical comparison showing disagreement between the computed coefficient functions and existing leading-power expansions in the high-Q limit, or with known NNLO massless results, would indicate an error in the analytic expressions.

read the original abstract

We present analytic results for the next-to-next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to heavy-quark production in charged-current deep-inelastic scattering, retaining the exact dependence on the charm quark mass. We compute the complete partonic coefficient functions for the structure functions $F_2$, $F_L$, and $F_3$ in the quark and gluon channels, including contributions with up to three heavy quarks in the final state. Working within the reverse-unitarity framework, we use integration-by-parts and canonical differential-equations techniques to express all contributions with at most two final-state heavy quarks in terms of manifestly real Goncharov polylogarithms which allow for a robust and efficient numerical evaluation. The three-heavy-quark contribution involves elliptic structures for which we give a general representation in terms of Chen iterated integrals, as well as expressions in terms of rapidly convergent expansions that are valid in the perturbative $Q\gtrsim 5~{\rm GeV}$ region and also allow for a flexible and fast numerical evaluation. We validate our results against known exact results at lower orders, massless NNLO coefficient functions, and existing leading-power expansions in the asymptotic limit where the virtuality $Q$ is much larger than the charm mass.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes analytic next-to-next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to heavy-quark production in charged-current deep-inelastic scattering, retaining exact charm-quark mass dependence. It derives the complete partonic coefficient functions for F2, FL, and F3 in the quark and gluon channels, including final states with up to three heavy quarks. Using reverse unitarity, integration-by-parts, and canonical differential equations, contributions with at most two heavy quarks are reduced to manifestly real Goncharov polylogarithms, while the three-heavy-quark sector is expressed via Chen iterated integrals and rapidly convergent series valid for Q ≳ 5 GeV. Results are validated against exact lower-order expressions, massless NNLO limits, and high-Q asymptotic expansions.

Significance. If the results hold, this delivers the first complete analytic NNLO coefficient functions for massive charm in CC DIS structure functions. The explicit separation of polylogarithmic and elliptic sectors, together with the provision of both polylog and convergent-series representations, enables robust numerical evaluation for phenomenology. The validation against known lower-order exact results, massless NNLO coefficient functions, and leading-power expansions constitutes a concrete strength of the work.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the two-heavy-quark contributions reduce to 'manifestly real Goncharov polylogarithms'; a short paragraph in §3 or §4 clarifying the branch-cut handling that guarantees reality would aid readers implementing the expressions.
  2. Table or figure captions for the numerical comparisons (e.g., against massless NNLO limits) could explicitly list the kinematic ranges and the number of terms retained in the asymptotic expansions to facilitate direct reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the positive assessment, including the recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper computes explicit analytic NNLO coefficient functions for massive charm in charged-current DIS using reverse-unitarity + IBP + canonical DEs, expressing results in Goncharov polylogarithms (≤2 heavy quarks) or Chen integrals/expansions (3 heavy quarks). Validation is performed against independent lower-order exact results, massless NNLO limits, and high-Q expansions. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no load-bearing self-citation chain is invoked to justify uniqueness or ansatz, and no renaming of known results occurs. The central claim is the new explicit expressions themselves, which remain falsifiable against external data and prior calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard perturbative QCD and established integral-reduction techniques; no free parameters are fitted to data, no new axioms beyond domain-standard assumptions, and no invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Reverse-unitarity framework applies to the relevant Feynman integrals in charged-current DIS
    Invoked to reduce the integrals to polylogarithms and Chen integrals.
  • domain assumption Canonical differential equations exist and can be solved for the two-heavy-quark sectors
    Central to expressing results in Goncharov polylogarithms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5748 in / 1381 out tokens · 21057 ms · 2026-06-26T13:30:29.683705+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Implementation of DIS at N$^3$LO for PDF determination

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    N³LO DIS implementation in VFNS with improved massive neutral-current coefficient approximation for PDF fits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. Huss, J. Huston, S. Jones, M. Pellen and R. R¨ ontsch,Les Houches 2023 – Physics at TeV Colliders: Report on the Standard Model Precision Wishlist,2504.06689

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Chiefa, M.N

    A. Chiefa, M.N. Costantini, J. Cruz-Martinez, E.R. Nocera, T.R. Rabemananjara, J. Rojo et al.,Parton distributions confront LHC Run II data: a quantitative appraisal,JHEP07 (2025) 067 [2501.10359]

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Ubiali,Parton Distribution Functions and Their Impact on Precision of the Current Theory Calculations, 4, 2024 [2404.08508]

    M. Ubiali,Parton Distribution Functions and Their Impact on Precision of the Current Theory Calculations, 4, 2024 [2404.08508]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Azzi et al.,Report from Working Group 1: Standard Model Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC,CERN Yellow Rep

    P. Azzi et al.,Report from Working Group 1: Standard Model Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC,CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.7(2019) 1 [1902.04070]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Cepeda et al.,Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC,CERN Yellow Rep

    M. Cepeda et al.,Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC,CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.7(2019) 221 [1902.00134]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Cooper-Sarkar,Parton Distribution Functions for Discovery Physics at the LHC,Acta Phys

    A.M. Cooper-Sarkar,Parton Distribution Functions for Discovery Physics at the LHC,Acta Phys. Polon. Supp.16(2023) 7 [2302.11788]

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Barontini, N

    A. Barontini, N. Laurenti and J. Rojo,NNPDF progress and the path to proton structure at N3LO accuracy,PoSDIS2024(2025) 039

    2025

  8. [8]

    Nadolsky et al.,The upcoming CTEQ-TEA parton distributions in a nutshell,PoS DIS2024(2025) 057 [2408.11131]

    P. Nadolsky et al.,The upcoming CTEQ-TEA parton distributions in a nutshell,PoS DIS2024(2025) 057 [2408.11131]

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Cridge, L.A

    T. Cridge, L.A. Harland-Lang and R.S. Thorne,MSHT Approximate N3LO PDFs: Updates and Consequences for Phenomenology, in32nd International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects, 10, 2025 [2510.09321]

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Alekhin, M.V

    S. Alekhin, M.V. Garzelli, S.O. Moch and O. Zenaiev,NNLO PDFs driven by top-quark data,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 162 [2407.00545]

    arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Forte and G

    S. Forte and G. Watt,Progress in the Determination of the Partonic Structure of the Proton,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.63(2013) 291 [1301.6754]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    J. Gao, L. Harland-Lang and J. Rojo,The Structure of the Proton in the LHC Precision Era,Phys. Rept.742(2018) 1 [1709.04922]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Bagnaschi and A

    E. Bagnaschi and A. Vicini,Parton Density Uncertainties and the Determination of Electroweak Parameters at Hadron Colliders,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 041801 [1910.04726]. [14]CCFRcollaboration,Determination of the strange quark content of the nucleon from a next-to-leading order QCD analysis of neutrino charm production,Z. Phys. C65(1995) 189 [hep-ex/9406...

    arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Acampora, C

    G. Acampora, C. Ahdida, R. Albanese, C. Albrecht, A. Alexandrov, M. Andreini et al., Snd@lhc: the scattering and neutrino detector at the lhc,Journal of Instrumentation19 (2024) P05067

    2024

  15. [15]

    Alekhin et al.,A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case,Rept

    S. Alekhin et al.,A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case,Rept. Prog. Phys.79(2016) 124201 [1504.04855]. [22]SHiPcollaboration,A facility to Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) at the CERN SPS, 1504.04956. [23]F ASERcollaboration,The FASER detector,JINST19(2024) P05066 [2207.11427]. [24]F ASERcollaboration,First Dir...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Feng et al.,The Forward Physics Facility at the High-Luminosity LHC,J

    J.L. Feng et al.,The Forward Physics Facility at the High-Luminosity LHC,J. Phys. G50 (2023) 030501 [2203.05090]

    arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Abdul Khalek, A

    R. Abdul Khalek, A. Accardi, J. Adam, D. Adamiak, W. Akers, M. Albaladejo et al., Science requirements and detector concepts for the electron-ion collider,Nuclear Physics A 1026(2022) 122447. [27]ATLAScollaboration,Measurement of the production of aWboson in association with a charm quark inppcollisions at √s=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector,JHEP05(2014) 068...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Faura, S

    F. Faura, S. Iranipour, E.R. Nocera, J. Rojo and M. Ubiali,The Strangest Proton?,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1168 [2009.00014]

    arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Cruz-Martinez, M

    J.M. Cruz-Martinez, M. Fieg, T. Giani, P. Krack, T. M¨ akel¨ a, T.R. Rabemananjara et al., The LHC as a Neutrino-Ion Collider,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 369 [2309.09581]

    arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    M. Buza, Y. Matiounine, J. Smith and W.L. van Neerven,Charm electroproduction viewed in the variable flavor number scheme versus fixed order perturbation theory,Eur. Phys. J. C 1(1998) 301 [hep-ph/9612398]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  21. [21]

    Bierenbaum, J

    I. Bierenbaum, J. Blumlein and S. Klein,Mellin Moments of theO(α 3 s)Heavy Flavor Contributions to unpolarized Deep-Inelastic Scattering atQ 2 ≫m 2 and Anomalous Dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B820(2009) 417 [0904.3563]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    Ablinger, J

    J. Ablinger, J. Blumlein, S. Klein, C. Schneider and F. Wissbrock,TheO(α 3 s)Massive – 58 – Operator Matrix Elements ofO(n f)for the Structure FunctionF 2(x, Q2)and Transversity, Nucl. Phys. B844(2011) 26 [1008.3347]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [23]

    Ablinger, J

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. Hasselhuhn, A. von Manteuffel, M. Round et al., The Transition Matrix ElementA gq(N)of the Variable Flavor Number Scheme atO(α 3 s), Nucl. Phys. B882(2014) 263 [1402.0359]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Ablinger, A

    J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel and C. Schneider, The 3-loop pure singlet heavy flavor contributions to the structure functionF 2(x, Q2)and the anomalous dimension,Nucl. Phys. B890(2014) 48 [1409.1135]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Ablinger, A

    J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. Hasselhuhn, A. von Manteuffel et al., The 3-Loop Non-Singlet Heavy Flavor Contributions and Anomalous Dimensions for the Structure FunctionF 2(x, Q2)and Transversity,Nucl. Phys. B886(2014) 733 [1406.4654]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Behring, I

    A. Behring, I. Bierenbaum, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, S. Klein and F. Wißbrock,The logarithmic contributions to theO(α 3 s)asymptotic massive Wilson coefficients and operator matrix elements in deeply inelastic scattering,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 3033 [1403.6356]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Behring, J

    A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. Hasselhuhn, A. von Manteuffel and C. Schneider, O(α3 s) heavy flavor contributions to the charged current structure functionxF 3(x, Q2)at large momentum transfer,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 114005 [1508.01449]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    Behring, J

    A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel and C. Schneider,The 3-Loop Non-Singlet Heavy Flavor Contributions to the Structure Functiong 1(x, Q2)at Large Momentum Transfer,Nucl. Phys. B897(2015) 612 [1504.08217]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Behring, J

    A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, G. Falcioni, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel and C. Schneider, Asymptotic 3-loop heavy flavor corrections to the charged current structure functions F W +−W − L (x, Q2)andF W +−W − 2 (x, Q2),Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 114006 [1609.06255]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Bl¨ umlein, G

    J. Bl¨ umlein, G. Falcioni and A. De Freitas,The CompleteO(α 2 s)Non-Singlet Heavy Flavor Corrections to the Structure Functionsg ep 1,2(x, Q2),F ep 1,2,L(x, Q2),F ν(¯ν) 1,2,3(x, Q2)and the Associated Sum Rules,Nucl. Phys. B910(2016) 568 [1605.05541]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Ablinger, J

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, C. Schneider and K. Sch¨ onwald,The two-mass contribution to the three-loop pure singlet operator matrix element,Nucl. Phys. B927 (2018) 339 [1711.06717]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Ablinger, J

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. Goedicke, C. Schneider and K. Sch¨ onwald,The Two-mass Contribution to the Three-Loop Gluonic Operator Matrix ElementA (3) gg,Q,Nucl. Phys. B932(2018) 129 [1804.02226]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Ablinger, A

    J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, C. Schneider et al., The three-loop single mass polarized pure singlet operator matrix element,Nucl. Phys. B 953(2020) 114945 [1912.02536]

    arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Ablinger, J

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, M. Saragnese, C. Schneider and K. Sch¨ onwald,The three-loop polarized pure singlet operator matrix element with two different masses,Nucl. Phys. B952(2020) 114916 [1911.11630]

    arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Ablinger, J

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. Goedicke, M. Saragnese, C. Schneider et al.,The two-mass contribution to the three-loop polarized gluonic operator matrix elementA (3) gg,Q, Nucl. Phys. B955(2020) 115059 [2004.08916]

    arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Behring, J

    A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, K. Sch¨ onwald and C. Schneider, – 59 – The polarized transition matrix elementA gq(N)of the variable flavor number scheme at O(α3 s),Nucl. Phys. B964(2021) 115331 [2101.05733]

    arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Bl¨ umlein, A

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, M. Saragnese, C. Schneider and K. Sch¨ onwald,Logarithmic contributions to the polarized O(αs3) asymptotic massive Wilson coefficients and operator matrix elements in deeply inelastic scattering,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 034030 [2105.09572]

    arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Ablinger, A

    J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. Goedicke, A. von Manteuffel et al., The unpolarized and polarized single-mass three-loop heavy flavor operator matrix elements Agg,Q and∆A gg,Q,JHEP12(2022) 134 [2211.05462]

    arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Ablinger, A

    J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, C. Schneider et al., The first–order factorizable contributions to the three–loop massive operator matrix elements AQg(3) and∆AQg(3),Nucl. Phys. B999(2024) 116427 [2311.00644]

    arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Ablinger, A

    J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, C. Schneider et al., The non-first-order-factorizable contributions to the three-loop single-mass operator matrix elements AQg(3) and∆AQg(3),Phys. Lett. B854(2024) 138713 [2403.00513]

    arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Ablinger, J

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, C. Schneider and K. Sch¨ onwald, The two-mass contributions to the three-loop massive operator matrix elements ˜A(3) Qg and ∆ ˜A(3) Qg,2510.09403

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    Ablinger, A

    J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, C. Schneider et al., The three-loop single-mass heavy-flavor corrections to the structure functionsF 2(x, Q2)and g1(x, Q2),2509.16124

    arXiv

  43. [43]

    Ablinger, A

    J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, C. Schneider et al., The single-mass variable flavor number scheme at three-loop order,JHEP03(2026) 248 [2510.02175]

    arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    Ablinger, A

    J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, C. Schneider et al., The three-loop single-mass heavy flavor corrections to deep-inelastic scattering,PoS LL2024(2024) 047 [2407.02006]

    arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Gottschalk,Chromodynamic Corrections to Neutrino Production of Heavy Quarks,Phys

    T. Gottschalk,Chromodynamic Corrections to Neutrino Production of Heavy Quarks,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 56

    1981

  46. [46]

    Gluck, S

    M. Gluck, S. Kretzer and E. Reya,The Strange sea density and charm production in deep inelastic charged current processes,Phys. Lett. B380(1996) 171 [hep-ph/9603304]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  47. [47]

    Blumlein, A

    J. Blumlein, A. Hasselhuhn, P. Kovacikova and S. Moch,O(α s)Heavy Flavor Corrections to Charged Current Deep-Inelastic Scattering in Mellin Space,Phys. Lett. B700(2011) 294 [1104.3449]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  48. [48]

    Buonocore, G

    L. Buonocore, G. Limatola, P. Nason and F. Tramontano,An event generator for Lepton-Hadron deep inelastic scattering at NLO+PS with POWHEG including mass effects, JHEP08(2024) 083 [2406.05115]

    arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Meinzinger, D

    P. Meinzinger, D. Reichelt and F. Silvetti,Event generation at MEPS@NLO accuracy in neutral and charged current DIS at the EIC,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 074039 [2506.08994]

    arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Berger, J

    E.L. Berger, J. Gao, C.S. Li, Z.L. Liu and H.X. Zhu,Charm-Quark Production in Deep-Inelastic Neutrino Scattering at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 212002 [1601.05430]. – 60 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    Gao,Massive charged-current coefficient functions in deep-inelastic scattering at NNLO and impact on strange-quark distributions,JHEP02(2018) 026 [1710.04258]

    J. Gao,Massive charged-current coefficient functions in deep-inelastic scattering at NNLO and impact on strange-quark distributions,JHEP02(2018) 026 [1710.04258]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Bl¨ umlein, A

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, C.G. Raab and K. Sch¨ onwald,The unpolarized two-loop massive pure singlet Wilson coefficients for deep-inelastic scattering,Nucl. Phys. B945(2019) 114659 [1903.06155]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Risse, V

    P. Risse, V. Bertone, T. Jeˇ zo, K. Kovaˇ r´ ık, A. Kusina, F. Olness et al.,Heavy quark mass effects in charged-current deep-inelastic scattering at approximate NNLO in the Aivazis-Collins-Olness-Tung scheme,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 114004 [2504.13317]

    arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Travaglini et al.,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes,J

    G. Travaglini et al.,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443001 [2203.13011]

    arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Ellis, W.J

    R.K. Ellis, W.J. Stirling and B.R. Webber,QCD and collider physics, vol. 8, Cambridge University Press (2, 2011), 10.1017/CBO9780511628788

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628788 2011

  56. [56]

    Larin,The renormalization of the axial anomaly in dimensional regularization,Physics Letters B303(1993) 113–118

    S. Larin,The renormalization of the axial anomaly in dimensional regularization,Physics Letters B303(1993) 113–118

    1993

  57. [57]

    Anastasiou and K

    C. Anastasiou and K. Melnikov,Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD, Nucl. Phys. B646(2002) 220 [hep-ph/0207004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  58. [58]

    Tkachov,A Theorem on Analytical Calculability of Four Loop Renormalization Group Functions,Phys.Lett.B100(1981) 65

    F. Tkachov,A Theorem on Analytical Calculability of Four Loop Renormalization Group Functions,Phys.Lett.B100(1981) 65

    1981

  59. [59]

    Chetyrkin and F

    K. Chetyrkin and F. Tkachov,Integration by Parts: The Algorithm to Calculate beta Functions in 4 Loops,Nucl.Phys.B192(1981) 159

    1981

  60. [60]

    Laporta,High precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int.J.Mod.Phys.A15(2000) 5087 [hep-ph/0102033]

    S. Laporta,High precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int.J.Mod.Phys.A15(2000) 5087 [hep-ph/0102033]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  61. [61]

    Goncharov,Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes, 2011

    A.B. Goncharov,Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes, 2011

    2011

  62. [62]

    Nogueira,Automatic Feynman Graph Generation,J

    P. Nogueira,Automatic Feynman Graph Generation,J. Comput. Phys.105(1993) 279

    1993

  63. [63]

    Studerus,Reduze – Feynman integral reduction in C++,Comput

    C. Studerus,Reduze – Feynman integral reduction in C++,Comput. Phys. Commun.181 (2010) 1293 [0912.2546]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  64. [64]

    von Manteuffel and C

    A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus,Reduze 2 - distributed feynman integral reduction, 2012

    2012

  65. [65]

    Ruijl, T

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda and J. Vermaseren,Form version 4.2, 2017

    2017

  66. [66]

    Klappert, F

    J. Klappert, F. Lange, P. Maierh¨ ofer and J. Usovitsch,Integral reduction with kira 2.0 and finite field methods,Computer Physics Communications266(2021) 108024 [2008.06494]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Lange, J

    F. Lange, J. Usovitsch and Z. Wu,Kira 3: integral reduction with efficient seeding and optimized equation selection,Comput. Phys. Commun.322(2026) 109999 [2505.20197]

    arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Moch, J.A.M

    S. Moch, J.A.M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt,Third-order QCD corrections to the charged-current structure function F(3),Nucl. Phys. B813(2009) 220 [0812.4168]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  69. [69]

    Vermaseren, A

    J.A.M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt and S. Moch,The Third-order QCD corrections to deep-inelastic scattering by photon exchange,Nucl. Phys. B724(2005) 3 [hep-ph/0504242]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  70. [70]

    Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys

    A.V. Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys. Lett. B254(1991) 158

    1991

  71. [71]

    Remiddi,Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,Nuovo Cim

    E. Remiddi,Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,Nuovo Cim. A110 (1997) 1435 [hep-th/9711188]. – 61 –

    arXiv 1997

  72. [72]

    Gehrmann and E

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi,Differential equations for two-loop four-point functions, Nucl. Phys. B580(2000) 485 [hep-ph/9912329]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  73. [73]

    Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys

    J.M. Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(2013) 251601 [1304.1806]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  74. [74]

    Chen,Iterated path integrals,Bull

    K.-T. Chen,Iterated path integrals,Bull. Am. Math. Soc.83(1977) 831

    1977

  75. [75]

    Cachazo,Sharpening The Leading Singularity,0803.1988

    F. Cachazo,Sharpening The Leading Singularity,0803.1988

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  76. [76]

    Baikov,Explicit solutions of the multiloop integral recurrence relations and its application,Nucl

    P.A. Baikov,Explicit solutions of the multiloop integral recurrence relations and its application,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A389(1997) 347 [hep-ph/9611449]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  77. [77]

    Baikov,Explicit solutions of the three loop vacuum integral recurrence relations,Phys

    P.A. Baikov,Explicit solutions of the three loop vacuum integral recurrence relations,Phys. Lett. B385(1996) 404 [hep-ph/9603267]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  78. [78]

    Frellesvig and C.G

    H. Frellesvig and C.G. Papadopoulos,Cuts of Feynman Integrals in Baikov representation, JHEP04(2017) 083 [1701.07356]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  79. [79]

    Frellesvig,The loop-by-loop Baikov representation — Strategies and implementation, JHEP04(2025) 111 [2412.01804]

    H. Frellesvig,The loop-by-loop Baikov representation — Strategies and implementation, JHEP04(2025) 111 [2412.01804]

    arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Tarasov,Connection between Feynman integrals having different values of the space-time dimension,Phys

    O.V. Tarasov,Connection between Feynman integrals having different values of the space-time dimension,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 6479 [hep-th/9606018]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

Showing first 80 references.