Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

The 3D clustering of Lyman Alpha Emitters measured with DESI

T0 review · 3 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spectroscopic clustering analysis with DESI reveals that Lyman-alpha emitters at redshifts 2.26 to 3.41 have a linear bias between 2.31 and 2.62.

desk verdict DESI LAE bias measurement is a useful data point for high-z LSS but rests on the untested purity of the IBIS candidate sample. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.24852 v1 pith:VRQDMH2G submitted 2026-06-23 astro-ph.CO

Haruki Ebina , Martin J. White , Rongpu Zhou , Arjun Dey , David Schlegel , Jessica Nicole Aguilar , Steven Ahlen , Davide Bianchi
show 39 more authors
David Brooks Francisco Javier Castander Todd Claybaugh Kyle S. Dawson Axel de la Macorra Peter Doel Simone Ferraro Andreu Font-Ribera Jaime E. Forero-Romero Satya Gontcho A Gontcho Alma Xochitl Gonzalez-Morales Gaston Gutierrez Julien Guy ChangHoon Hahn Hiram K. Herrera-Alcantar Mustapha Ishak David Kirkby Anthony Kremin Ofer Lahav Martin Landriau Dustin Lang Laurent Le Guillou Michael E. Levi Marc Manera Paul Martini Aaron Meisner Ramon Miquel Seshadri Nadathur Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille Will J. Percival Francisco Prada Ignasi Pérez-Ràfols Ashley J. Ross Graziano Rossi Eusebio Sanchez Michael Schubnell Hee-Jong Seo Gregory Tarlé Benjamin Alan Weaver
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords Lyman-alphaemittersDESIclusteringlinearbiashalooccupationdistributionradiativetransferhigh-redshiftgalaxies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes the clustering strength of Lyman-alpha emitters by measuring their two-point correlation function and power spectrum using DESI spectroscopic observations of IBIS-selected candidates. It determines a linear bias value that indicates how these emitters trace the matter distribution at high redshifts. The analysis uses both analytical models to constrain radiative transfer effects and HOD simulations to link LAEs to dark matter halos. These results supply key inputs for modeling non-perturbative effects and for planning cosmological studies with LAEs in future surveys.

What carries the argument

The linear bias parameter derived from the two-point correlation function and power spectrum of LAEs, modeled analytically and with HOD simulations.

What would settle it

A direct check revealing substantial contamination or redshift errors in the IBIS spectroscopic sample that shifts the measured clustering amplitude outside the reported bias range would falsify the central result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using both analytical and halo occupation distribution modeling of the two-point correlation function and power spectrum measured from DESI observations, including cross-correlations with quasars, the linear bias of LAEs is found to be between 2.31 and 2.62 over 2.26 < z < 3.41. The work also constrains radiative transfer effects and quantifies non-perturbative effects like Fingers of God.

Load-bearing premise

The IBIS-selected candidates are assumed to be genuine Lyman-alpha emitters with minimal contamination or redshift errors that would bias the measured correlation function and power spectrum.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The measured bias provides essential input for accurate modeling of LAE-based cosmological analyses in forthcoming high-redshift surveys such as DESI-II.
  • Analytical modeling supplies constraints on the strength of radiative transfer effects in the LAE population.
  • The HOD analysis characterizes the LAE-halo connection across multiple models.
  • Quantification of non-perturbative clustering effects such as Fingers of God supports precise modeling of the LAE population.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bias measurement could enable joint analyses with quasar cross-correlations to tighten constraints on high-redshift structure growth.
  • If the bias value is stable, it would support using LAEs as tracers for baryon acoustic oscillation measurements in future wide-field surveys.
  • The HOD results open the possibility of testing whether the same halo mass range hosts LAEs across different redshift slices within this range.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents measurements of the 3D two-point correlation function and power spectrum (including QSO cross-correlations) for Lyman-alpha emitters selected from the IBIS imaging survey and observed spectroscopically with DESI. Analytical and HOD-based modeling of these statistics over 2.26 < z < 3.41 yields a linear bias range b ∼ 2.31–2.62, together with constraints on radiative transfer effects, the LAE-halo connection, and the magnitude of non-perturbative effects such as Fingers of God.

Significance. If the sample purity and modeling assumptions hold, the reported bias range and ancillary constraints supply useful inputs for LAE-based cosmological analyses in DESI-II and similar high-redshift surveys. The dual analytical-plus-HOD approach and explicit treatment of non-perturbative effects are positive features that would strengthen the result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / sample selection] Abstract and sample-selection section: no quantitative purity, confirmation rate, or interloper-fraction estimate is provided for the IBIS-selected candidates. Because the linear bias is extracted directly from the amplitude of the measured 2PCF and power spectrum, even moderate contamination would rescale the inferred b values; this assumption is therefore load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Covariance estimation] Covariance and error-analysis section: the manuscript supplies no description of how the covariance matrix for the 2PCF and power-spectrum measurements (or the joint fit with QSO cross-correlations) is constructed or validated. Without this information the reported bias uncertainties cannot be assessed.
  3. [Modeling and validation] Modeling-validation section: there is no report of tests on mock catalogs that recover an input bias value under the same selection and fitting pipeline used on the data. Such validation is required to confirm that the analytic and HOD models are unbiased at the precision claimed for b.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Throughout] Notation for the redshift bins and the exact definition of the linear bias parameter should be made consistent between the abstract, tables, and text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested information and tests.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / sample selection] Abstract and sample-selection section: no quantitative purity, confirmation rate, or interloper-fraction estimate is provided for the IBIS-selected candidates. Because the linear bias is extracted directly from the amplitude of the measured 2PCF and power spectrum, even moderate contamination would rescale the inferred b values; this assumption is therefore load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative estimates of sample purity, spectroscopic confirmation rate, and interloper fraction are necessary to support the bias measurements. The revised manuscript will add these estimates to the sample-selection section, derived from the available DESI spectra and cross-checks against external catalogs, together with a brief assessment of their impact on the reported bias range. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Covariance estimation] Covariance and error-analysis section: the manuscript supplies no description of how the covariance matrix for the 2PCF and power-spectrum measurements (or the joint fit with QSO cross-correlations) is constructed or validated. Without this information the reported bias uncertainties cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the covariance construction and validation procedure must be described explicitly. The revised manuscript will expand the relevant section to detail the method (jackknife resampling on the survey footprint), the number of realizations, the treatment of the joint 2PCF/power-spectrum/QSO cross-correlation covariance, and validation steps such as eigenvalue checks and comparison with a smaller set of mock-based covariances. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Modeling and validation] Modeling-validation section: there is no report of tests on mock catalogs that recover an input bias value under the same selection and fitting pipeline used on the data. Such validation is required to confirm that the analytic and HOD models are unbiased at the precision claimed for b.

    Authors: We agree that end-to-end validation on mocks is required to demonstrate that the modeling pipeline recovers the input bias without bias at the quoted precision. The revised manuscript will include a new subsection presenting recovery tests performed on mock catalogs that replicate the IBIS selection, DESI spectroscopic sampling, and the identical analytical and HOD fitting procedures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: bias obtained by direct fit to measured clustering statistics

full rationale

The paper measures the 2PCF and power spectrum (including QSO cross-correlations) from DESI spectroscopic observations of IBIS-selected candidates, then fits linear bias b using both analytic models and HOD simulations. This is a standard forward-modeling measurement with no quoted step in which the reported b range reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or ansatz smuggled from prior work. The abstract and reader's summary contain no self-definitional equations, no 'prediction' that is the input fit renamed, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem imported from the same authors. Sample purity is an external assumption about the catalog, not a circularity in the derivation chain itself.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits visibility into exact parameters; HOD modeling typically introduces multiple fitted parameters for halo occupation, while the linear bias itself is the primary fitted quantity reported.

free parameters (1)
  • linear bias b = 2.31-2.62
    Fitted from the measured two-point correlation function and power spectrum over the stated redshift range.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption IBIS candidates are true LAEs with spectroscopic redshifts accurate enough for 3D clustering analysis
    Stated in the abstract as the basis for the spectroscopic observations and clustering measurements.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The 3D clustering of Lyman Alpha Emitters measured with DESI." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VRQDMH2G

@misc{pith2026260624852,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The 3D clustering of Lyman Alpha Emitters measured with DESI},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VRQDMH2G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.24852}
}
abstract

We present a clustering analysis of Lyman-$\alpha$ emitters (LAEs) using spectroscopic observations from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) of candidates selected from the Blanco/DECam Intermediate-Band Imaging Survey (IBIS). We measure the two-point correlation function and the power spectrum, including cross-correlations with DESI quasars. Using both analytical and halo occupation distribution (HOD) simulation-based modeling, we find a linear bias of $b \sim 2.31$--$2.62$ for LAEs over the redshift range $2.26 < z < 3.41$. The analytical modeling also provides constraints on the strength of radiative transfer effects, while the HOD analysis characterizes the LAE-halo connection across multiple models. Finally, we quantify the magnitude of non-perturbative clustering effects such as Fingers of God in the LAE population, providing essential input for the accurate modeling of LAE-based cosmological analyses in forthcoming high-redshift surveys such as DESI-II.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The One-Loop Power Spectrum of Fast Radio Burst Dispersion Measures

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A one-loop EFT power spectrum model for FRB free-electron clustering matches FLAMINGO simulations to k ~ 0.2 h/Mpc, with electron bias b_e ~ 0.92 and near-perfect electron-matter correlation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument

    DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul Karim, A. G. Adame, et al.,Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ171(May, 2026) 285, [arXiv:2503.14745]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    M. Abdul Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, et al.,DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,Phys. Rev. D112(Oct., 2025) 083515, [arXiv:2503.14738]. – 36 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Ferraro, N

    S. Ferraro, N. Sailer, A. Slosar, and M. White,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Cosmology and Fundamental Physics from the three-dimensional Large Scale Structure,arXiv e-prints(Mar., 2022) arXiv:2203.07506, [arXiv:2203.07506]

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    D. J. Schlegel, S. Ferraro, G. Aldering, et al.,A Spectroscopic Road Map for Cosmic Frontier: DESI, DESI-II, Stage-5,arXiv e-prints(Sept., 2022) arXiv:2209.03585, [arXiv:2209.03585]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Besuner, A

    R. Besuner, A. Dey, A. Drlica-Wagner, et al.,The Spectroscopic Stage-5 Experiment,arXiv e-prints(Mar., 2025) arXiv:2503.07923, [arXiv:2503.07923]

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium

    M. McQuinn,The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium,Ann. Rev. Astron. & Astrophys.54 (Sept., 2016) 313–362, [arXiv:1512.00086]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    DESI DR2 Results I: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest

    M. Abdul Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, et al.,DESI DR2 results. I. Baryon acoustic oscillations from the Lyman alpha forest,Phys. Rev. D112(Oct., 2025) 083514, [arXiv:2503.14739]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    The Observed Probability Distribution Function, Power Spectrum, and Correlation Function of the Transmitted Flux in the Lyman-alpha Forest

    P. McDonald, J. Miralda-Escud´ e, M. Rauch, et al.,The Observed Probability Distribution Function, Power Spectrum, and Correlation Function of the Transmitted Flux in the Lyα Forest,Astrophys. J.543(Nov., 2000) 1–23, [astro-ph/9911196]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

Show all 139 references
  1. [9]

    U. Seljak,Bias, redshift space distortions and primordial nongaussianity of nonlinear transformations: application to Ly-αforest,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics 2012(Mar., 2012) 004, [arXiv:1201.0594]

    2012 arXiv

  2. [10]

    A. M. Cieplak and A. Slosar,Towards physics responsible for large-scale Lyman-αforest bias parameters,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2016(Mar., 2016) 016, [arXiv:1509.07875]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    S.-F. Chen, Z. Vlah, and M. White,The Lyαforest flux correlation function: a perturbation theory perspective,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2021(May, 2021) 053, [arXiv:2103.13498]

    2021

  4. [12]

    M. M. Ivanov,Lyman alpha forest power spectrum in effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D109 (Jan., 2024) 023507, [arXiv:2309.10133]

    2024

  5. [13]

    R. B. Partridge and P. J. E. Peebles,Are Young Galaxies Visible?,Astrophys. J.147(Mar.,

  6. [14]

    C. C. Steidel, K. L. Adelberger, A. E. Shapley, et al.,LyαImaging of a Proto-Cluster Region at⟨z⟩= 3.09,Astrophys. J.532(Mar., 2000) 170–182, [astro-ph/9910144]

    2000 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Giavalisco,Lyman-Break Galaxies,Ann

    M. Giavalisco,Lyman-Break Galaxies,Ann. Rev. Astron. & Astrophys.40(2002) 579–641

    2002

  8. [16]

    A. E. Shapley,Physical Properties of Galaxies from z = 2-4,Ann. Rev. Astron. & Astrophys. 49(Sept., 2011) 525–580, [arXiv:1107.5060]

    2011 arXiv

  9. [17]

    C. Modi, M. White, and Z. Vlah,Modeling CMB lensing cross correlations with CLEFT, Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2017(Aug., 2017) 009, [arXiv:1706.03173]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    M. J. Wilson and M. White,Cosmology with dropout selection: straw-man surveys &amp; CMB lensing,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2019(Oct., 2019) 015, [arXiv:1904.13378]

    2019

  11. [19]

    Sailer, E

    N. Sailer, E. Castorina, S. Ferraro, and M. White,Cosmology at high redshift — a probe of fundamental physics,JCAP12(2021), no. 12 049, [arXiv:2106.09713]

    2021

  12. [20]

    Galitzki, A

    N. Galitzki, A. Ali, K. S. Arnold, et al.,The Simons Observatory: instrument overview, in Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy IX (J. Zmuidzinas and J.-R. Gao, eds.), vol. 10708 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engin...

    2018

  13. [21]

    Ebina and M

    H. Ebina and M. White,Cosmology before noon with multiple galaxy populations,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2024(June, 2024) 052, [arXiv:2401.13166]

    2024

  14. [22]

    Ouchi, Y

    M. Ouchi, Y. Ono, and T. Shibuya,Observations of the Lyman-αUniverse,Ann. Rev. Astron. & Astrophys.58(Aug., 2020) 617–659, [arXiv:2012.07960]

    2020

  15. [23]

    Ebina, M

    H. Ebina, M. White, A. Raichoor, et al.,Clustering analysis of medium-band selected high-redshift galaxies,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2026(Mar., 2026) 019, [arXiv:2509.26467]

    2026

  16. [24]

    Raichoor,Lae lbg selection with suprime medium-bands photometry,In prep(2025)

    A. Raichoor,Lae lbg selection with suprime medium-bands photometry,In prep(2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Dey and D

    A. Dey and D. Schlegel,The intermediate band imaging survey, . in preparation

  18. [26]

    Flaugher, H

    B. Flaugher, H. T. Diehl, K. Honscheid, et al.,The Dark Energy Camera,AJ150(Nov.,

  19. [27]

    150, [arXiv:1504.02900]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Ouchi, K

    M. Ouchi, K. Shimasaku, M. Akiyama, et al.,The Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey (SXDS). IV. Evolution of LyαEmitters from z = 3.1 to 5.7 in the 1 deg 2 Field: Luminosity Functions and AGN,Astrophys. J. Suppl.176(June, 2008) 301–330, [arXiv:0707.3161]

    2008 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Gawiser, H

    E. Gawiser, H. Francke, K. Lai, et al.,Lyα-emitting galaxies atz= 3.1: L ⋆ progenitors experiencing rapid star formation,The Astrophysical Journal671(dec, 2007) 278

    2007

  22. [30]

    Kovaˇ c, R

    K. Kovaˇ c, R. S. Somerville, J. E. Rhoads, et al.,Clustering of LyαEmitters at z ˜4.5, Astrophys. J.668(Oct., 2007) 15–22, [arXiv:0706.0893]

    2007 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ouchi, K

    M. Ouchi, K. Shimasaku, H. Furusawa, et al.,Statistics of 207 lyαemitters at a redshift near 7: Constraints on reionization and galaxy formation models*,The Astrophysical Journal723 (oct, 2010) 869

    2010

  24. [32]

    Guaita, E

    L. Guaita, E. Gawiser, N. Padilla, et al.,Lyα-emitting galaxies at z = 2.1 in ecdf-s: Building blocks of typical present-day galaxies?*,The Astrophysical Journal714(apr, 2010) 255

    2010

  25. [33]

    Bielby, P

    R. Bielby, P. Tummuangpak, T. Shanks, et al.,The vlt lbg redshift survey - v. characterising the z = 3.1 lyman alpha emitter population,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society456(01, 2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    White, A

    M. White, A. Raichoor, A. Dey, et al.,The clustering of Lyman Alpha Emitting galaxies at z=2–3,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2024(Aug., 2024) 020, [arXiv:2406.01803]

    2024

  27. [35]

    Herrera, E

    D. Herrera, E. Gawiser, B. Benda, et al.,ODIN: Clustering Analysis of 14,000 Lyα-emitting Galaxies at z = 2.4, 3.1, and 4.5,Astrophys. J. Lett.988(Aug., 2025) L57, [arXiv:2503.17824]

    2025

  28. [36]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(Sept., 2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    D. J. Schlegel, D. P. Finkbeiner, and M. Davis,Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds, Astrophys. J.500(June, 1998) 525–553, [astro-ph/9710327]

    1998 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Gronwall, R

    C. Gronwall, R. Ciardullo, T. Hickey, et al.,LyαEmission-Line Galaxies at z = 3.1 in the Extended Chandra Deep Field-South,Astrophys. J.667(Sept., 2007) 79–91, [arXiv:0705.3917]

    2007 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Garel, J

    T. Garel, J. Blaizot, B. Guiderdoni, et al.,The UV, Lymanα, and dark matter halo properties of high-redshift galaxies,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.450(June, 2015) 1279–1294, [arXiv:1503.06635]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Gawiser, P

    E. Gawiser, P. G. van Dokkum, C. Gronwall, et al.,The Physical Nature of Lyα-emitting Galaxies atz= 3.1,Astrophys. J. Lett.642(May, 2006) L13–L16, [astro-ph/0603244]. – 38 –

    2006

  33. [41]

    Pirzkal, S

    N. Pirzkal, S. Malhotra, J. E. Rhoads, and C. Xu,Optical-to-Mid-Infrared Observations of LyαGalaxies at z ˜5 in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: A Young and Low-Mass Population, Astrophys. J.667(Sept., 2007) 49–59, [astro-ph/0612513]

    2007 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Nakajima, M

    K. Nakajima, M. Ouchi, K. Shimasaku, et al.,Average Metallicity and Star Formation Rate of LyαEmitters Probed by a Triple Narrowband Survey,Astrophys. J.745(Jan., 2012) 12, [arXiv:1105.2824]

    2012 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Hagen, R

    A. Hagen, R. Ciardullo, C. Gronwall, et al.,Spectral Energy Distribution Fitting of HETDEX Pilot Survey LyαEmitters in COSMOS and GOODS-N,Astrophys. J.786(May, 2014) 59, [arXiv:1403.4935]

    2014 arXiv

  36. [44]

    L. L. Cowie and E. M. Hu,High-z Lyalpha Emitters. I. A Blank-Field Search for Objects near Redshift Z = 3.4 in and around the Hubble Deep Field and the Hawaii Deep Field SSA 22,AJ 115(Apr., 1998) 1319–1328, [astro-ph/9801003]

    1998 arXiv

  37. [45]

    A. E. Shapley, C. C. Steidel, M. Pettini, and K. L. Adelberger,Rest-Frame Ultraviolet Spectra of z˜3 Lyman Break Galaxies,Astrophys. J.588(May, 2003) 65–89, [astro-ph/0301230]

    2003 arXiv

  38. [46]

    K.-S. Lee, E. Gawiser, C. Park, et al.,The One-hundred-deg 2 DECam Imaging in Narrowbands (ODIN): Survey Design and Science Goals,Astrophys. J.962(Feb., 2024) 36, [arXiv:2309.10191]

    2024

  39. [47]

    Zheng, R

    Z. Zheng, R. Cen, H. Trac, and J. Miralda-Escud´ e,Radiative Transfer Modeling of Lyα Emitters. II. New Effects on Galaxy Clustering,Astrophys. J.726(Jan., 2011) 38, [arXiv:1003.4990]

    2011 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Behrens, C

    C. Behrens, C. Byrohl, S. Saito, and J. C. Niemeyer,The impact of Lyman-αradiative transfer on large-scale clustering in the Illustris simulation,Astron. Astrophys.614(June,

  41. [49]

    A31, [arXiv:1710.06171]

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Khoraminezhad, S

    H. Khoraminezhad, S. Saito, M. Gronke, and C. Byrohl,Simulating realistic Lyman-α emitting galaxies including the effect of radiative transfer,The Open Journal of Astrophysics 8(Nov., 2025) 51254, [arXiv:2507.16707]

    2025

  43. [51]

    Momose, K

    R. Momose, K. Shimasaku, K. Nagamine, et al.,Catch Me if You Can: Biased Distribution of Lyα-emitting Galaxies according to the Viewing Direction,Astrophys. J. Lett.912(May,

  44. [52]

    L24, [arXiv:2104.10580]

  45. [53]

    Matthee, C

    J. Matthee, C. Golling, R. Mackenzie, et al.,Large-scale excess H I absorption aroundz≈4 galaxies detected in a background galaxy spectrum in the MUSE eXtremely deep field,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.529(Apr., 2024) 2794–2806, [arXiv:2305.15346]

    2024

  46. [54]

    Banerjee, S

    E. Banerjee, S. Muzahid, J. Schaye, et al.,MUSEQuBES: Connecting H I Absorption with LyαEmitters at z≈3.3,Astrophys. J.980(Feb., 2025) 171, [arXiv:2411.11959]

    2025

  47. [55]

    Aghamousa, J

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, et al.,The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design,ArXiv e-prints(Oct., 2016) [arXiv:1611.00036]

    2016 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Aihara, N

    H. Aihara, N. Arimoto, R. Armstrong, et al.,The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design,Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan70(Jan., 2018) S4, [arXiv:1704.05858]

    2018 arXiv

  49. [57]

    legacypipe: Image reduction pipeline for DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys

    D. A. Lang, J. Moustakas, E. F. Schlafly, et al., “legacypipe: Image reduction pipeline for DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2502.024, Feb., 2025

    2025

  50. [58]

    D. Lang, D. W. Hogg, and D. J. Schlegel,WISE Photometry for 400 Million SDSS Sources, AJ151(Feb., 2016) 36, [arXiv:1410.7397]

    2016

  51. [59]

    A. Dey, D. J. Schlegel, D. Lang, et al.,Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys,AJ 157(May, 2019) 168, [arXiv:1804.08657]. – 39 –

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    J. B. Oke and J. E. Gunn,Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry., Astrophys. J.266(Mar., 1983) 713–717

    1983

  53. [61]

    M. Levi, C. Bebek, T. Beers, et al.,The DESI Experiment, a whitepaper for Snowmass 2013, arXiv e-prints(Aug., 2013) arXiv:1308.0847, [arXiv:1308.0847]

    2013 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Aghamousa, J

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, et al.,The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design,arXiv e-prints(Oct., 2016) arXiv:1611.00037, [arXiv:1611.00037]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Abareshi, J

    DESI Collaboration, B. Abareshi, J. Aguilar, et al.,Overview of the Instrumentation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ164(Nov., 2022) 207, [arXiv:2205.10939]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    J. H. Silber, P. Fagrelius, K. Fanning, et al.,The Robotic Multiobject Focal Plane System of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI),AJ165(Jan., 2023) 9, [arXiv:2205.09014]

    2023

  57. [65]

    T. N. Miller, P. Doel, G. Gutierrez, et al.,The Optical Corrector for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ168(Aug., 2024) 95, [arXiv:2306.06310]

    2024

  58. [66]

    E. F. Schlafly, D. Kirkby, D. J. Schlegel, et al.,Survey Operations for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ166(Dec., 2023) 259, [arXiv:2306.06309]

    2023

  59. [67]

    Poppett, L

    C. Poppett, L. Tyas, J. Aguilar, et al.,Overview of the Fiber System for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ168(Dec., 2024) 245

    2024

  60. [68]

    J. Guy, S. Bailey, A. Kremin, et al.,The Spectroscopic Data Processing Pipeline for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ165(Apr., 2023) 144, [arXiv:2209.14482]

    2023

  61. [69]

    in preparation

    Bailey et al. in preparation

  62. [70]

    A. G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, et al.,DESI 2024 II: sample definitions, characteristics, and two-point clustering statistics,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2025 (July, 2025) 017, [arXiv:2411.12020]

    2024

  63. [71]

    Chaussidon, C

    E. Chaussidon, C. Y` eche, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, et al.,Target Selection and Validation of DESI Quasars,Astrophys. J.944(Feb., 2023) 107, [arXiv:2208.08511]

    2023

  64. [72]

    Bault, D

    A. Bault, D. Kirkby, J. Guy, et al.,Impact of systematic redshift errors on the cross-correlation of the Lyman-αforest with quasars at small scales using DESI Early Data, Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2025(Jan., 2025) 130, [arXiv:2402.18009]

    2025

  65. [73]

    A. A. Khostovan, D. Sobral, B. Mobasher, et al.,The clustering of typical Lyαemitters from z∼2.5−6: host halo masses depend on Lyαand UV luminosities,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.489(Oct., 2019) 555–573, [arXiv:1811.00556]

    2019

  66. [74]

    A. D. Myers, J. Moustakas, S. Bailey, et al.,The Target-selection Pipeline for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ165(Feb., 2023) 50, [arXiv:2208.08518]

    2023

  67. [75]

    S. D. Landy and A. S. Szalay,Bias and Variance of Angular Correlation Functions, Astrophys. J.412(July, 1993) 64

    1993

  68. [76]

    Sinha and L

    M. Sinha and L. H. Garrison,CORRFUNC - a suite of blazing fast correlation functions on the CPU,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.491(Jan, 2020) 3022–3041

    2020

  69. [77]

    H. A. Feldman, N. Kaiser, and J. A. Peacock,Power-Spectrum Analysis of Three-dimensional Redshift Surveys,Astrophys. J.426(May, 1994) 23, [astro-ph/9304022]

    1994 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Castorina and M

    E. Castorina and M. White,Beyond the plane-parallel approximation for redshift surveys, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.476(June, 2018) 4403–4417, [arXiv:1709.09730]

    2018 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Beutler and P

    F. Beutler and P. McDonald,Unified galaxy power spectrum measurements from 6dFGS, BOSS, and eBOSS,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2021(Nov., 2021) 031, [arXiv:2106.06324]. – 40 –

    2021

  72. [80]

    Chaussidon, C

    E. Chaussidon, C. Y` eche, A. de Mattia, et al.,Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity with DESI 2024 LRG and QSO samples,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2025 (June, 2025) 029, [arXiv:2411.17623]

    2024

  73. [81]

    Y. Li, S. Singh, B. Yu, et al.,Disconnected covariance of 2-point functions in large-scale structure,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2019(Jan., 2019) 016, [arXiv:1811.05714]

    2019 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Wadekar and R

    D. Wadekar and R. Scoccimarro,Galaxy power spectrum multipoles covariance in perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 12 123517, [arXiv:1910.02914]

    2020

  75. [83]

    Kobayashi,Fast computation of the non-Gaussian covariance of redshift-space galaxy power spectrum multipoles,Phys

    Y. Kobayashi,Fast computation of the non-Gaussian covariance of redshift-space galaxy power spectrum multipoles,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 10 103512, [arXiv:2308.08593]

    2023

  76. [84]

    Analytical covariance matrices of desi galaxy power spectrum multipoles

    O. Alves and DESI Collaboration, “Analytical covariance matrices of desi galaxy power spectrum multipoles.” (in prep.), 2024

    2024

  77. [85]

    R. H. Wechsler and J. L. Tinker,The Connection Between Galaxies and Their Dark Matter Halos,Ann. Rev. Astron. & Astrophys.56(Sept., 2018) 435–487, [arXiv:1804.03097]

    2018 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Nagamine, M

    K. Nagamine, M. Ouchi, V. Springel, and L. Hernquist,Lyman-αEmitters and Lyman-Break Galaxies at z = 3-6 in Cosmological SPH Simulations,Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan62(Dec.,

  79. [87]

    1455, [arXiv:0802.0228]

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    Gurung-L´ opez,´A

    S. Gurung-L´ opez,´A. A. Orsi, S. Bonoli, et al.,Lyαemitters in a cosmological volume - I. The impact of radiative transfer,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.486(June, 2019) 1882–1906, [arXiv:1807.00006]

    2019 arXiv

  81. [89]

    J. Ravi, B. Hadzhiyska, M. J. White, et al.,Examining Lyman-alpha emitters through simulations in anticipation of the DESI-II survey,Phys. Rev. D110(Nov., 2024) 103509, [arXiv:2403.02414]

    2024

  82. [90]

    J. M. Sullivan, C. Cuesta-Lazaro, M. M. Ivanov, et al.,High-redshift millennium and astrid galaxies in effective field theory at the field level,Phys. Rev. D112(Oct., 2025) 083521, [arXiv:2505.03626]

    2025

  83. [91]

    S. Yuan, L. H. Garrison, B. Hadzhiyska, et al.,ABACUSHOD: a highly efficient extended multitracer HOD framework and its application to BOSS and eBOSS data,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.510(Mar., 2022) 3301–3320, [arXiv:2110.11412]

    2022

  84. [92]

    N. A. Maksimova, L. H. Garrison, D. J. Eisenstein, et al.,AbacusSummit: a massive set of high-accuracy, high-resolution N-body simulations,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society508(09, 2021) 4017–4037, [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/508/3/4017/40811763/...

    2021

  85. [93]

    L. H. Garrison, D. J. Eisenstein, D. Ferrer, et al.,The ABACUS cosmological N-body code, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.508(Nov., 2021) 575–596, [arXiv:2110.11392]

    2021

  86. [94]

    Hartlap, P

    J. Hartlap, P. Simon, and P. Schneider,Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix,Astron. Astrophys.464 (Mar., 2007) 399–404, [astro-ph/0608064]

    2007 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Zheng, A

    Z. Zheng, A. L. Coil, and I. Zehavi,Galaxy Evolution from Halo Occupation Distribution Modeling of DEEP2 and SDSS Galaxy Clustering,Astrophys. J.667(Oct., 2007) 760–779, [astro-ph/0703457]

    2007 arXiv

  88. [96]

    S. Alam, J. A. Peacock, K. Kraljic, et al.,Multitracer extension of the halo model: probing quenching and conformity in eBOSS,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.497(Sept., 2020) 581–595, [arXiv:1910.05095]

    2020

  89. [97]

    Rocher, V

    A. Rocher, V. Ruhlmann-Kleider, E. Burtin, et al.,The DESI One-Percent survey: exploring the Halo Occupation Distribution of Emission Line Galaxies with ABACUSSUMMIT – 41 – simulations,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2023(Oct., 2023) 016, [arXiv:2306.06319]

    2023

  90. [98]

    H. Guo, Z. Zheng, I. Zehavi, et al.,Velocity bias from the small-scale clustering of SDSS-III BOSS galaxies,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.446(Jan., 2015) 578–594, [arXiv:1407.4811]

    2015 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Bernardeau, S

    F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gazta˜ naga, and R. Scoccimarro,Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory, Phys. Rep.367(Sept., 2002) 1–248, [astro-ph/0112551]

    2002 arXiv

  92. [100]

    M. M. Ivanov,Effective Field Theory for Large Scale Structure,arXiv e-prints(Dec., 2022) arXiv:2212.08488, [arXiv:2212.08488]

    2022

  93. [101]

    A. G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, et al.,DESI 2024 V: Full-Shape galaxy clustering from galaxies and quasars,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2025(Sept., 2025) 008, [arXiv:2411.12021]

    2024 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Desjacques, D

    V. Desjacques, D. Jeong, and F. Schmidt,Large-scale galaxy bias, Phys. Rep.733(Feb.,

  95. [103]

    1–193, [arXiv:1611.09787]

    arXiv

  96. [104]

    S.-F. Chen, Z. Vlah, and M. White,Consistent Modeling of Velocity Statistics and Redshift-Space Distortions in One-Loop Perturbation Theory,JCAP07(2020) 062, [arXiv:2005.00523]

    2020

  97. [105]

    M. Maus, S. Chen, M. White, et al.,An analysis of parameter compression and Full-Modeling techniques with Velocileptors for DESI 2024 and beyond,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2025(Jan., 2025) 138, [arXiv:2404.07312]

    2024

  98. [106]

    Mergulh˜ ao, H

    T. Mergulh˜ ao, H. Rubira, and R. Voivodic,The effective field theory of large-scale structure and multi-tracer II: redshift space and realistic tracers,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2024(Jan., 2024) 008, [arXiv:2306.05474]

    2024

  99. [107]

    S.-F. Chen, Z. Vlah, E. Castorina, and M. White,Redshift-space distortions in Lagrangian perturbation theory,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2021(Mar., 2021) 100, [arXiv:2012.04636]

    2021

  100. [108]

    Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space,Mon

    N. Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.227 (July, 1987) 1–21

    1987

  101. [109]

    J. C. Jackson,A critique of Rees’s theory of primordial gravitational radiation,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.156(Jan, 1972) 1P, [arXiv:0810.3908]

    1972 arXiv

  102. [110]

    J. A. Peacock,Errors on the measurement of omega via cosmological dipoles.,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.258(Oct, 1992) 581–586

    1992

  103. [111]

    J. A. Peacock and S. J. Dodds,Reconstructing the Linear Power Spectrum of Cosmological Mass Fluctuations,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.267(Apr, 1994) 1020, [astro-ph/9311057]

    1994 arXiv

  104. [112]

    C. Park, M. S. Vogeley, M. J. Geller, and J. P. Huchra,Power Spectrum, Correlation Function, and Tests for Luminosity Bias in the CfA Redshift Survey,Astrophys. J.431 (Aug, 1994) 569

    1994

  105. [113]

    W. E. Ballinger, J. A. Peacock, and A. F. Heavens,Measuring the cosmological constant with redshift surveys,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.282(Oct., 1996) 877, [astro-ph/9605017]

    1996 arXiv

  106. [114]

    A. J. S. Hamilton,Linear Redshift Distortions: a Review, inThe Evolving Universe (D. Hamilton, ed.), vol. 231 ofAstrophysics and Space Science Library, p. 185, 1998. astro-ph/9708102

    1998 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Hatton and S

    S. Hatton and S. Cole,Estimatingβfrom redshift-space distortions in the 2dF galaxy survey, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.310(Dec., 1999) 1137–1146, [astro-ph/9905186]

    1999 arXiv

  108. [116]

    White,The redshift-space power spectrum in the halo model,Mon

    M. White,The redshift-space power spectrum in the halo model,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 321(Feb., 2001) 1–3, [astro-ph/0005085]. – 42 –

    2001 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Scoccimarro,Redshift-space distortions, pairwise velocities, and nonlinearities,Phys

    R. Scoccimarro,Redshift-space distortions, pairwise velocities, and nonlinearities,Phys. Rev. D70(Oct., 2004) 083007, [astro-ph/0407214]

    2004 arXiv

  110. [118]

    CoLoRe-2LPT: Lyman-αmock catalogues for the validation of desi cosmological analysis

    M. F. Ruiz-Herrera Bernal and DESI Collaboration, “CoLoRe-2LPT: Lyman-αmock catalogues for the validation of desi cosmological analysis..” (in prep.), 2026

    2026

  111. [119]

    Kusakabe, K

    H. Kusakabe, K. Shimasaku, M. Ouchi, et al.,The stellar mass, star formation rate and dark matter halo properties of LAEs atz∼2,Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan70(Jan., 2018) 4, [arXiv:1707.09373]

    2018 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Hao, J.-S

    C.-N. Hao, J.-S. Huang, X. Xia, et al.,A Deep LyαSurvey in ECDF-S and COSMOS. I. General Properties of LyαEmitters atz∼2,Astrophys. J.864(Sept., 2018) 145, [arXiv:1808.02704]

    2018 arXiv

  113. [121]

    S. Hong, A. Dey, K.-S. Lee, et al.,Statistics of two-point correlation and network topology for Lyαemitters atz≈2.67,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.483(Mar., 2019) 3950–3970, [arXiv:1811.10631]

    2019 arXiv

  114. [122]

    K. B. Fisher, M. Davis, M. A. Strauss, et al.,Clustering in the 1.2-Jy IRAS galaxy redshift survey - II. Redshift distortions and dzeta(rp, pi).,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.267(Apr.,

  115. [123]

    927–948, [astro-ph/9308013]

    arXiv

  116. [124]

    E. A. Kazin, A. G. S´ anchez, and M. R. Blanton,Improving measurements of H(z) and D A (z) by analysing clustering anisotropies,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.419(Feb., 2012) 3223–3243, [arXiv:1105.2037]

    2012 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Verhamme, T

    A. Verhamme, T. Garel, E. Ventou, et al.,Recovering the systemic redshift of galaxies from their Lyman alpha line profile,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.478(July, 2018) L60–L65, [arXiv:1804.01883]

    2018 arXiv

  118. [126]

    A. S. M. Uzsoy, A. Dey, A. Raichoor, et al.,Effect of local environment on Lyαline profile in DESI/ODIN LAEs,arXiv e-prints(Nov., 2025) arXiv:2511.17498, [arXiv:2511.17498]

    2025

  119. [127]

    Baleato Lizancos, U

    A. Baleato Lizancos, U. Seljak, M. Karamanis, et al.,Selecting samples of galaxies with fewer Fingers-of-God,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2025(July, 2025) 014, [arXiv:2501.10587]

    2025

  120. [128]

    Kokron, S.-F

    N. Kokron, S.-F. Chen, M. White, et al.,Accurate predictions from small boxes: variance suppression via the Zel’dovich approximation,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2022(Sept., 2022) 059, [arXiv:2205.15327]

    2022

  121. [129]

    DeRose, S.-F

    J. DeRose, S.-F. Chen, N. Kokron, and M. White,Precision redshift-space galaxy power spectra using Zel’dovich control variates,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics 2023(Feb., 2023) 008, [arXiv:2210.14239]

    2023

  122. [130]

    Hadzhiyska, M

    B. Hadzhiyska, M. J. White, X. Chen, et al.,Mitigating the noise of DESI mocks using analytic control variates,The Open Journal of Astrophysics6(Oct., 2023) 38, [arXiv:2308.12343]

    2023

  123. [131]

    Bartlett, J

    A. Bartlett, J. DeRose, and M. White,Simulation budgeting for hybrid effective field theories, Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2026(Mar., 2026) 078, [arXiv:2510.13962]

    2026 arXiv

  124. [132]

    J. S. B. Wyithe and M. Dijkstra,Non-gravitational contributions to the clustering of Lyα selected galaxies: implications for cosmological surveys,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.415 (Aug., 2011) 3929–3950, [arXiv:1104.0712]

    2011 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Greig, E

    B. Greig, E. Komatsu, and J. S. B. Wyithe,Cosmology from clustering of Lyαgalaxies: breaking non-gravitational Lyαradiative transfer degeneracies using the bispectrum,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.431(May, 2013) 1777–1794, [arXiv:1212.0977]

    2013 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Torrado and A

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis,Cobaya: code for Bayesian analysis of hierarchical physical models, Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2021(May, 2021) 057, [arXiv:2005.05290]. – 43 –

    2021 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis, “Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1910.019, Oct., 2019

    1910

  128. [136]

    Hawkins, S

    E. Hawkins, S. Maddox, S. Cole, et al.,The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: correlation functions, peculiar velocities and the matter density of the Universe,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.346(Nov., 2003) 78–96, [astro-ph/0212375]

    2003 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Anderson, E

    L. Anderson, E. Aubourg, S. Bailey, et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Release 9 spectroscopic galaxy sample,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.427(Dec., 2012) 3435–3467, [arXiv:1203.6594]

    2012 arXiv

  130. [138]

    B. A. Reid, H.-J. Seo, A. Leauthaud, et al.,A 2.5 per cent measurement of the growth rate from small-scale redshift space clustering of SDSS-III CMASS galaxies,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.444(Oct., 2014) 476–502, [arXiv:1404.3742]

    2014 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Pinon, A

    M. Pinon, A. de Mattia, P. McDonald, et al.,Mitigation of DESI fiber assignment incompleteness effect on two-point clustering with small angular scale truncated estimators, Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2025(Jan., 2025) 131, [arXiv:2406.04804]. – 44 –

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed June 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.