Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 cited by

The SKA-Mid Galactic Plane survey at 10-15 GHz will deliver the first complete map of ionised gas and stellar feedback across the Milky Way.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-29 04:32 UTC pith:X7XJTVRS

load-bearing objection This is a clear science-case proposal for an SKA-Mid Galactic Plane survey at 10-15 GHz, but it states performance goals without the supporting calculations or simulations. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2606.26278 v2 pith:X7XJTVRS submitted 2026-06-24 astro-ph.GA

The 10-15 GHz radio continuum survey of the Galactic Plane with SKAO

A. Traficante , C. Mininni , F. Cavallaro , G. Umana , C. Trigilio , S. Molinari , L. D. Anderson , M. Audard
show 58 more authors
C. Bordiu C. S. Buemi C. Carrasco-Gonzalez L. Cerrigone E. J. Chung J. Dey A. Ingallinera I. Jimenez-Serra P. Klaassen S. Loru K. Mallick A. Nucara M. Padovani J. D. Pandian K. L. J. Rygl T. M. Rodr\'iguez G. Sabatini S. Reissl P. Suin M. A. Thompson T. L. Bourke J. S.Urquhart M. Valeille-Manet F. Xu A. Zavagno M. Benedettini E. Bianchi A. Bracco F. Bufano C. Codella N. Cunningham J. Dawson D. Galli M. G. Guarcello A. Karska W.-J. Kim P. Leto B. Liu B. Mookerjea F. Motte T. Nony R. Paladini A. Patel L. Podio A. J. T. Ramaila B. Riaz S. Riggi D. A. Roshi A. Ruggeri \'A. S\'anchez-Monge R. Sch\"odel O. M. Smirnov J. D. Soler S. Sottie R. Unnikrishnan A. Y. Yang K. Wang T. Wilson
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords radio continuum surveyGalactic Planeionised gasstellar feedbackHII regionsstar formationSKAsupernova remnants
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Previous infrared, sub-millimetre and molecular-line surveys have catalogued star-forming regions and gas kinematics, while lower-frequency radio data have traced some ionised structures. A uniform Galaxy-wide census of ionised gas at high resolution has remained out of reach. The paper argues that a sensitive 10-15 GHz continuum survey with SKA-Mid is required to resolve physical scales below 0.05 pc at distances up to 20 kpc and thereby supply the missing panoptic view of ionised structures and feedback.

Core claim

The SKA-Mid Galactic Plane survey at 10-15 GHz, with its unprecedented sensitivity, angular resolution and mapping speed, will provide the first panoptic view of ionised gas and stellar feedback across the Milky Way, tracing thermal radio jets, hypercompact and ultracompact HII regions, supernova remnants, planetary nebulae and evolved massive stars at scales smaller than 0.05 pc out to 20 kpc.

What carries the argument

The SKA-Mid Galactic Plane survey at 10-15 GHz, which resolves ionised structures at physical scales smaller than 0.05 pc at distances up to 20 kpc.

Load-bearing premise

The SKA-Mid instrument will achieve the required sensitivity, angular resolution below 0.05 pc at 20 kpc, and mapping speed once built and commissioned.

What would settle it

Commissioning data showing that SKA-Mid cannot reach the stated sensitivity or angular resolution at 10-15 GHz across the Galactic Plane would prevent the survey from delivering the claimed panoptic view.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • It will produce a uniform census of ionised gas structures associated with all phases of massive-star evolution across the entire Milky Way.
  • The data will complement existing far-infrared, sub-millimetre and molecular-line surveys by adding the missing ionised-gas component.
  • It will enable systematic studies of stellar feedback processes on Galactic scales that were previously limited to smaller regions.
  • The survey will resolve thermal radio jets, hypercompact HII regions, supernova remnants and planetary nebulae at sub-parsec scales throughout the disk.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining the new radio maps with existing multi-wavelength data sets could allow direct measurement of the energy budget of stellar feedback on Galaxy-wide scales.
  • The survey's resolution may reveal previously undetected faint or compact ionised regions that alter current estimates of the total ionising luminosity in the Milky Way.
  • If polarisation information is obtained, the data could constrain the role of magnetic fields in shaping ionised gas structures at the scales of individual HII regions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey proposal describing the scientific motivation for the SKA-Mid Galactic Plane survey at 10-15 GHz. It argues that existing multi-wavelength surveys leave a gap in uniform coverage of ionized gas and stellar feedback, and that the proposed survey will deliver the first panoptic view by achieving high sensitivity, angular resolution below 0.05 pc at distances up to 20 kpc, and efficient mapping speed.

Significance. If the stated instrumental performance is achieved, the survey would provide a valuable complement to existing far-infrared, sub-millimetre, molecular-line, and lower-frequency radio surveys, enabling systematic studies of ionized structures across the full Galactic Plane.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central performance claims (sensitivity, angular resolution <0.05 pc at 20 kpc, and mapping speed at 10-15 GHz) are asserted without any quantitative justification, error budgets, sensitivity calculations, or simulation results to support that SKA-Mid will deliver these capabilities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review of our survey proposal manuscript. The single major comment is addressed below, and we will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested justification.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central performance claims (sensitivity, angular resolution <0.05 pc at 20 kpc, and mapping speed at 10-15 GHz) are asserted without any quantitative justification, error budgets, sensitivity calculations, or simulation results to support that SKA-Mid will deliver these capabilities.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including brief quantitative support for these claims. The quoted figures are taken directly from the official SKA-Mid technical specifications (maximum baseline yielding ~0.5 arcsec resolution at 15 GHz, corresponding to <0.05 pc at 20 kpc, and the published sensitivity and survey-speed estimates from the SKA Observatory design documents). In the revised manuscript we will add one or two sentences in the abstract (or a footnote) that cite these specifications and the SKA sensitivity calculator, together with a short reference to the error budget implicit in the array configuration. We will also ensure the main text contains an explicit subsection summarising the adopted sensitivity, resolution, and mapping-speed calculations. No new simulations are required, as the values rest on the instrument design rather than on custom modelling. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The manuscript is a survey proposal whose text contains no derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claim is a prospective description of future SKA-Mid capabilities and science goals; it does not advance any empirical result or mathematical chain whose internal logic could reduce to its own inputs by construction. The load-bearing assumptions are external (instrument performance once built) rather than internal reductions, so the paper is self-contained with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The document is a survey proposal; no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or new physical entities are introduced or fitted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6198 in / 1071 out tokens · 44196 ms · 2026-06-29T04:32:59.679080+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Star formation emerges from the complex interplay between gravity, turbulence, magnetic fields, and stellar feedback, all of which vary across spatial scales and Galactic environments. Over the past decades, extensive multiwavelength surveys of the Galactic Plane have progressively unveiled this complexity. Far-infrared and sub-millimetre surveys have identified and characterized tens of thousands of star-forming regions, revealing their mass, temperature, and evolutionary stage. Complementary molecular-line surveys, spanning several CO transitions and isotopologues, have mapped the gas kinematics from giant molecular clouds down to sub-parsec structures. The advent of interferometers such as ALMA has revolutionized this field, enabling systematic studies of gas dynamics, fragmentation, and collapse in dense clumps at scales of a few thousand astronomical units. At the same time, mid-infrared and radio surveys at frequencies 0.8 <= nu <= 5 GHz have traced ionised gas associated with the earliest and latest phases of massive-star evolution, including thermal radio jets, hypercompact and ultracompact HII regions, supernova remnants, planetary nebulae, and evolved massive stars. Yet, a uniform, Galaxy-wide census of ionised structures and feedback processes remains elusive. A transformational leap forward requires a sensitive, high-resolution radio survey of the Galactic Plane at 10-15 GHz, capable of resolving physical scales smaller than 0.05 pc at distances up to 20 kpc. This is precisely the goal of the SKA-Mid Galactic Plane survey, which will, with its unprecedented sensitivity, angular resolution, and mapping speed, provide the first panoptic view of ionised gas and stellar feedback across the Milky Way.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26278 by A. Bracco, A. Ingallinera, A. J. T. Ramaila, A. Karska, A. Nucara, A. Patel, A. Ruggeri, \'A. S\'anchez-Monge, A. Traficante, A. Y. Yang, A. Zavagno, B. Liu, B. Mookerjea, B. Riaz, C. Bordiu, C. Carrasco-Gonzalez, C. Codella, C. Mininni, C. S. Buemi, C. Trigilio, D. A. Roshi, D. Galli, E. Bianchi, E. J. Chung, F. Bufano, F. Cavallaro, F. Motte, F. Xu, G. Sabatini, G. Umana, I. Jimenez-Serra, J. Dawson, J. Dey, J. D. Pandian, J. D. Soler, J. S.Urquhart, K. L. J. Rygl, K. Mallick, K. Wang, L. Cerrigone, L. D. Anderson, L. Podio, M. A. Thompson, M. Audard, M. Benedettini, M. G. Guarcello, M. Padovani, M. Valeille-Manet, N. Cunningham, O. M. Smirnov, P. Klaassen, P. Leto, P. Suin, R. Paladini, R. Sch\"odel, R. Unnikrishnan, S. Loru, S. Molinari, S. Reissl, S. Riggi, S. Sottie, T. L. Bourke, T. M. Rodr\'iguez, T. Nony, T. Wilson, W.-J. Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example of GP surveys at different wavelengths. Top panel: 13CO (3−2) emission image from CHIMPS (adapted from Rigby et al. 2015). Middle panel: 5 GHz image from GLOSTAR (adapted from Brunthaler et al. 2021). Bottom panel: Hi-GAL 250 𝜇m emission (adapted from Traficante et al. 2011 and Molinari et al. 2010). et al., 2013; Urquhart et al., 2014a). The CHaMP (Census of High- and Medium-mass Protostars) surve… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The concept of synergy between SKA-Mid and ALMA GP surveys. Left panel: the Spitzer 3.6 𝜇m and 8 𝜇m and MeerKAT 1.28 GHz composite image shows the overview of a massive star-forming region. Center panel: The ionized gas is traced by the MeerKAT 1.28 GHz and ALMA 3-mm images. Right panel: With the help of ALMA-QUARKS data, we can even trace the cold and dense gas which are the site of new generation of star… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Spatial coverage of the main GP radio surveys in the frequency range 0.8 ≲ 𝜈 ≲ 8 GHz. The RACS survey is not displayed, as it provides full-sky coverage. The detailed observational parameters of each survey are summarized in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sensitivity and frequency coverage of selected radio surveys, overlaid with the SEDs of H ii regions characterized by different average electron densities: 𝑛𝑒 ∼ 107 cm−3 (blue curve), 𝑛𝑒 ∼ 104 cm−3 (red curve), and 𝑛𝑒 ∼ 103 cm−3 (grey curve). The figure illustrates that the target sensitivity of the proposed GP survey at 10–15 GHz (20 𝜇Jy at 15 GHz; see Section 6) will enable the detection of even the fain… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: SED of the SNR G051.04+0.07 reported by Loru et al. (2024). This is a typical example of a SNR for which only a few measurements are available, and high-frequency observations, in particular in the 10-15 GHz will give strong constraints. 3.4 PNe PNe represent one of the final evolutionary stages of stars with (ZAMS) masses between 0.08 and 8𝑀⊙. After leaving the main sequence, these stars evolve first as r… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Rosetta Stone step-by-step production of SKA-Mid synthetic observations. Panel a: Simulated column density (𝑁𝐻 ) obtained with RAMSES for a collapsing 104 M⊙ cloud. Superimposed in magenta is the 15 GHz emission. Panel b: Simulated electron density (𝑛𝑒) obtained with RAMSES. Panel c: Radiative transfer at 15 GHz performed with POLARIS. Panel d: SKA-Mid-like post-processing obtained with a tailored CASA rou… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top panel: greyscale image of the Galaxy with overlaid the sky coverage of the SKA-Mid GP survey (orange box). Bottom left panel: zoom-in on the Galactic region 330◦ ≲ ℓ ≲ 334◦ observed at 1.3 GHz (Goedhart et al., 2024). This representative portion of the GP contains at least 3 confirmed supernova remnants, 4 additional SNR candidates, 5 PNe candidates, and ∼ 80 ALMAGAL sources. Bottom right panel: a deta… view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Should We Understand the Core Mass Function? A memo of the CMF2IMF conference at ESO Garching

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    High-mass CMF slopes depend strongly on minimum fitting mass; early-stage cores (ASHES) appear steeper, consistent with an evolving high-mass end.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

201 extracted references · 201 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/4. L. Anderson et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/4

  2. [2]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/706. L. D. Anderson et al.A&A, 537:A1,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/690/1/706

  3. [3]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117640. L. D. Anderson et al.ApJSS, 212(1):1,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117640

  4. [4]

    doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/1. L. D. Anderson et al.A&A, 605:A58,

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/1

  5. [5]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731019. L. D. Anderson et al.A&A, 693:A247,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731019

  6. [6]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451038. M. Anderson et al.MNRAS, 508(2):2964–2978,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451038

  7. [7]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2674. G. Anglada, L. F. Rodríguez, and C. Carrasco-González.A&ARv, 26(1):3,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2674

  8. [8]

    doi: 10.1007/s00159-018-0107-z. M. Armante et al.A&A, 686:A122,

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-018-0107-z

  9. [9]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347595. A. Avison et al.MNRAS, 526(2):2278–2300,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347595

  10. [10]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2824. P. J. Barnes et al.ApJSS, 196(1):12,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2824

  11. [11]

    doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/196/1/12. P. J. Barnes et al.ApJ, 812(1):6,

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/196/1/12

  12. [12]

    W.Batrla,H.E.Matthews,K.M.Menten,andC.M.Walmsley.Nature,326(6108):49–51,1987

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/6. W.Batrla,H.E.Matthews,K.M.Menten,andC.M.Walmsley.Nature,326(6108):49–51,1987. doi: 10.1038/326049a0. M. Benedettini et al.A&A, 633:A147,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/6 1987

  13. [13]

    31 The 10-15 GHz radio continuum survey of the GP with SKAO A

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936096. 31 The 10-15 GHz radio continuum survey of the GP with SKAO A. Traficante et al. M. Benedettini et al.A&A, 654:A144,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936096

  14. [14]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141433. R. A. Benjamin et al.PASP, 115(810):953–964,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141433

  15. [15]

    doi: 10.1086/376696. H. Beuther et al.A&A, 595:A32, 2016a. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629143. H. Beuther et al.A&A, 595:A32, 2016b. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629143. H. Beuther et al.A&A, 617:A100,

    work page doi:10.1086/376696

  16. [16]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833021. H. Beuther, R. Kuiper, and M. Tafalla.ARA&A, 63(1):1–44,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833021

  17. [17]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-013125-122023. M. Bonfand et al.A&A, 687:A163,

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-013125-122023

  18. [18]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347856. C. Bordiu et al.MNRAS, 2025a. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1667. C. Bordiu et al.A&A, 695:A144, 2025b. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450356. S.L.Breen,S.P.Ellingsen,J.L.Caswell,andB.E.Lewis.MNRAS,401(4):2219–2244,2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2009.15831.x. S. L. Breen et al.MNRAS, 435(1):524–530,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347856 2010

  19. [19]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1315. S. L. Breen et al.MNRAS, 450(4):4109–4136,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1315

  20. [20]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv847. C. L. Brogan et al.ApJL, 639(1):L25–L29,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv847

  21. [21]

    doi: 10.1086/501500. A. Brunthaler et al.A&A, 651:A85,

    work page doi:10.1086/501500

  22. [22]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039856. C. S. Buemi et al.MNRAS, 465(4):4147–4158,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039856

  23. [23]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3074. C. S. Buemi et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3074

  24. [24]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2013.22. S. J. Carey et al.PASP, 121(875):76,

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2013.22 2013

  25. [25]

    doi: 10.1086/596581. R. Cesaroni et al.A&A, 579:A71,

    work page doi:10.1086/596581

  26. [26]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525953. X. Chen et al.MNRAS, 466(4):4364–4369,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525953

  27. [27]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx011. Y. Chen et al.A&A, 678:A137,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx011

  28. [28]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346491. E. Churchwell et al.ApJ, 649(2):759–778,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346491

  29. [29]

    doi: 10.1086/507015. E. Churchwell et al.ApJ, 670(1):428–441,

    work page doi:10.1086/507015

  30. [30]

    doi: 10.1086/521646. E. Churchwell et al.PASP, 121(877):213,

    work page doi:10.1086/521646

  31. [31]

    doi: 10.1086/597811. A. Coletta et al.A&A, 696:A151,

    work page doi:10.1086/597811

  32. [32]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452706. D. Colombo et al.A&A, 655:L2,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452706

  33. [33]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142182. Y. Contreras et al.A&A, 549:A45,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142182

  34. [34]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220155. T. Csengeri et al.A&A, 565:A75,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220155

  35. [35]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322434. C. J. Cyganowski et al.AJ, 136(6):2391–2412,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322434

  36. [36]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2391. T. M. Dame, D. Hartmann, and P. Thaddeus.ApJ, 547(2):792,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2391

  37. [37]

    doi: 10.1086/318388. C. G. De Pree et al.ApJL, 781(2):L36, 2014a. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/781/2/L36. C. G. De Pree et al.ApJL, 781(2):L36, 2014b. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/781/2/L36. L. Deharveng et al.A&A, 523:A6,

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/318388 2041

  38. [38]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014422. J. T. Dempsey, H. S. Thomas, and M. J. Currie.ApJSS, 209(1):8,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014422

  39. [39]

    doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/8. J. Dey et al.A&A, 689:A254,

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/8

  40. [40]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039873. R. Dokara et al.A&A, 671:A145,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039873

  41. [41]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245339. A. Duarte-Cabral et al.A&A, 558:A125,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245339

  42. [42]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321393. A. Duarte-Cabral et al.A&A, 570:A1,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321393

  43. [43]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423677. A. Duarte-Cabral et al.MNRAS, 500:3027–3049,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423677

  44. [44]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2480. S. W. Duchesne et al.PASA, 40:e034,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2480

  45. [45]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2023.31. S. A. Dzib et al.A&A, 670:A9,

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2023.31 2023

  46. [46]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202143019. D. Elia et al.MNRAS, 504(2):2742–2766,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202143019

  47. [47]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1038. D. Elia et al.ApJ, 941(2):162,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1038

  48. [48]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca27d. I. N. Evans et al.ApJSS, 274(2):22,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca27d

  49. [49]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad6319. L. Eyer et al.A&A, 674:A13,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad6319

  50. [50]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244242. R. Franco-Hernández and L. F. Rodríguez.ApJL, 604(2):L105–L108,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244242

  51. [51]

    A.Frank etal

    doi: 10.1086/386282. A.Frank etal. InH.Beuther, R. S.Klessen, C.P. Dullemond, andT.Henning, editors,Protostars andPlanetsVI, pages 451–474,

    work page doi:10.1086/386282

  52. [52]

    doi: 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch020. S. Freund et al.A&A, 664:A105,

    work page doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch020

  53. [53]

    32 The 10-15 GHz radio continuum survey of the GP with SKAO A

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142573. 32 The 10-15 GHz radio continuum survey of the GP with SKAO A. Traficante et al. Gaia Collaboration et al.A&A, 674:A41, 2023a. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243232. Gaia Collaboration et al.A&A, 674:A1, 2023b. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940. R. Galván-Madrid, L. F. Rodríguez, P. T. P. Ho, and E. Keto.ApJL, 674(1):L33,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142573

  54. [54]

    doi: 10.1086/528957. R. Galván-Madrid et al.ApJSS, 274(1):15,

    work page doi:10.1086/528957

  55. [55]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad61e6. E. C. Gardiner et al.ApJ, 967(2):145,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad61e6

  56. [56]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad39e1. S. Geen, P. Hennebelle, P. Tremblin, and J. Rosdahl.MNRAS, 454(4):4484–4502, 2015a. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2272. S. Geen et al.MNRAS, 448(4):3248–3264, 2015b. doi: 1093/mnras/stv251. S. Goedhart et al.MNRAS, 531(1):649–681,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad39e1

  57. [57]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1166. P. F. Goldsmith, U. A. Yıldız, W. D. Langer, and J. L. Pineda.ApJ, 814(2):133,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1166

  58. [58]

    doi: 10.1086/590229. M. González-Avilés, S. Lizano, and A. C. Raga.ApJ, 621(1):359–371,

    work page doi:10.1086/590229

  59. [59]

    doi: 10.1086/427470. D. A. Green.Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 46(1):14,

    work page doi:10.1086/427470

  60. [60]

    doi: 10.1007/s12036-024-10038-4. J. A. Green et al.MNRAS, 392(2):783–794,

    work page doi:10.1007/s12036-024-10038-4

  61. [61]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14091.x. M. Y. Grudić et al.MNRAS, 512(1):216–232,

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14091.x 2008

  62. [62]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac526. A. Hacar et al. In S. Inutsuka et al., editors,Protostars and Planets VII, volume 534 ofAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, page 153,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac526

  63. [63]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09562. D. J. Helfand et al.AJ, 131(5):2525–2537,

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09562

  64. [64]

    doi: 10.1086/503253. P. Hennebelle and M. Y. Grudić.ARA&A, 62(1):63–111,

    work page doi:10.1086/503253

  65. [65]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052622-031748. M. G. Hoare et al. In B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, and K. Keil, editors,Protostars and Planets V, page 181,

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052622-031748

  66. [66]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0603560. M. G. Hoare et al.PASP, 124(919):939,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0603560

  67. [67]

    doi: 10.1086/668058. P. F. Hopkins et al.MNRAS, 491(3):3702–3729,

    work page doi:10.1086/668058

  68. [68]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3129. A. Ingallinera et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3129

  69. [69]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad005. K. Ishihara et al.ApJ, 974(1):95,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad005

  70. [70]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad630f. N. Izumi et al.ApJ, 963(2):163,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad630f

  71. [71]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad18c6. J. M. Jackson et al.ApJSS, 163(1):145,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad18c6

  72. [72]

    doi: 10.1086/500091. J. M. Jackson et al.PASA, 30:e057,

    work page doi:10.1086/500091

  73. [73]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2013.37. D. T. Jaffe and J. Martín-Pintado.ApJ, 520(1):162–172,

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2013.37 2013

  74. [74]

    doi: 10.1086/307440. A. Karska et al.A&A, 697:A186,

    work page doi:10.1086/307440

  75. [75]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453109. A. Karska et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453109

  76. [76]

    doi: 10.1086/379545. S. Khan et al.A&A, 689:A81,

    work page doi:10.1086/379545

  77. [77]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449390. K.-T. Kim and B.-C. Koo.ApJ, 549(2):979–996,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449390

  78. [78]

    Klassen, T

    M. Klassen, T. Peters, and R. E. Pudritz.ApJ, 758(2):137, 2012a. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/137. M. Klassen, R. E. Pudritz, and T. Peters.MNRAS, 421(4):2861–2871, 2012b. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20523.x. A. Koley et al.A&A, 702:A133,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/758/2/137 2012

  79. [79]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553830. M. S. N. Kumar, P. Palmeirim, D. Arzoumanian, and S. I. Inutsuka.A&A, 642:A87,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553830

  80. [80]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 202038232. S. Kurtz. In R. Cesaroni, M. Felli, E. Churchwell, and M. Walmsley, editors,Massive Star Birth: A Crossroads of Astrophysics, volume 227 ofIAU Symposium, pages 111–119,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/

Showing first 80 references.