Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 1 cited by

Two Doppler-free multiphoton schemes drive the strontium clock transition in microseconds on free-space thermal clouds and suppress Doppler dephasing a thousandfold.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 21:16 UTC pith:RJTBUQ2C

load-bearing objection Clean experimental demo of two practical Doppler-free multiphoton drives that give microsecond clock control and ~1000 imes Doppler suppression on free-space thermal 88Sr; residual alignment is the real limit and they quantify it.

arxiv 2607.06789 v1 pith:RJTBUQ2C submitted 2026-07-07 physics.atom-ph

Microsecond-Scale Coherent Control of a Forbidden Clock Transition with Doppler-Free Multiphoton Excitations

Guglielmo Panelli , Erik J. Porter , V. Rose Knight , Shaun C. Burd , Mark Kasevich This is my paper
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords optical clock transitionDoppler-free multiphoton excitationstrontiumRamsey spectroscopythermal ensemblesthree-photon Rabisequential Raman excitation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the forbidden optical clock transition in strontium can be driven coherently in a few microseconds on large free-space thermal clouds, without lattices or ultra-cold temperatures. Two laser geometries cancel the first-order Doppler shift: a simultaneous three-photon drive and a sequential single-photon-plus-Raman protocol. Both produce high-contrast population transfer (76–91 percent) and keep Ramsey contrast alive for milliseconds instead of microseconds. The practical result is that millions of atoms can participate in clock-state manipulations that previously required tight confinement, opening a route to faster sensors, larger ensembles, and simpler hardware for clocks, interferometers, and quantum metrology.

Core claim

Two Doppler-free multiphoton excitation schemes achieve microsecond-scale coherent control of the 1S0–3P0 clock transition in free-space thermal ensembles of 3 million 88Sr atoms, with 190 kHz three-photon Rabi frequency (76 percent π-pulse efficiency) and 820 kHz sequential effective Rabi frequency (over 90 percent efficiency), suppressing Doppler dephasing by three orders of magnitude relative to single-photon excitation.

What carries the argument

Doppler-free multiphoton geometry: three coplanar lasers oriented so that k1 + k2 − k3 = 0 (or k1 = −kR for the sequential case), canceling the first-order Doppler shift while still coupling ground and clock states through intermediate 3P1 and 3S1 levels.

Load-bearing premise

The lasers must stay aligned well enough that residual net wave-vector is only about one-thousandth of a single laser’s wave-vector; if alignment is worse, residual Doppler dephasing erases the thousandfold coherence gain.

What would settle it

Measure Ramsey contrast decay time while deliberately increasing angular misalignment beyond ~0.5 mrad; if the claimed 4-ms coherence time collapses back toward the single-photon 4.5 µs limit, the geometric cancellation is not holding.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript demonstrates two Doppler-free multiphoton schemes for coherent control of the strongly forbidden 1S0–3P0 clock transition in free-space thermal ensembles of 3 imes10^6 88Sr atoms. Method 1 is a simultaneous three-photon drive (Eq. 1) that yields a measured 192(3) kHz Rabi frequency and 76(2)% π-pulse efficiency; Method 2 is a sequential single-photon + Raman protocol that reaches an effective 820 kHz Rabi frequency and >90% π-pulse efficiency in <1 µs. Both schemes are realized with a coplanar wave-vector geometry that nulls the first-order Doppler shift (k1+k2-k3=0). High-contrast Ramsey spectroscopy is performed, showing a 1000-fold extension of the 1/e contrast decay time from 4.5 µs (single-photon control) to 4.1–4.5 ms. Supporting material includes full Lindblad simulations (App. C), an analytic phase-propagation treatment of the sequential protocol (App. D), and quantitative infidelity and residual-Doppler budgets (Table II, App. B).

Significance. If the results hold, the work removes a long-standing technical barrier to the use of optical clock transitions: the requirement for Lamb-Dicke confinement or sub-Doppler temperatures. Microsecond-scale, high-contrast, recoil-free excitation of a forbidden transition on large free-space ensembles is directly relevant to optical clocks, large-momentum-transfer atom interferometers, cavity-based spin squeezing, and Rydberg-mediated quantum information protocols. The experimental evidence is concrete (Rabi oscillations, Fourier-limited sub-Doppler linewidths, and multi-millisecond Ramsey fringes) and is backed by transparent error budgets and open data. The techniques are species- and isotope-agnostic and therefore constitute a broadly useful addition to the atomic-physics toolkit.

minor comments (4)
  1. In Sec. II C the AC-Stark contributions of lasers 1–3 are quoted as -40 kHz/mW, 5 Hz/mW and 80 kHz/mW; a short table or explicit conversion from the measured powers used for the 290 Hz resonance would make the residual-shift claim easier to verify.
  2. Fig. 5(b) attributes the shortened fringe period at large τ to uncompensated ULE drift. A one-sentence quantification of the expected drift rate (already given in App. A 2 as 6 Hz/min) would remove any residual ambiguity.
  3. Table II footnote b notes that a fraction of scattered population returns to |e⟩; a parenthetical estimate of that incoherent contribution (already stated as small) would complete the fidelity accounting.
  4. The geometric DF angles θopt31=59.64° and θopt32=59.44° appear only in App. B 4; placing them once in the main-text caption of Fig. 1 would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: central claims rest on direct population and contrast measurements, with analytic expressions derived from standard rotating-frame Hamiltonians rather than fitted inputs or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The paper's strongest results (190 kHz three-photon Rabi frequency with 76 % π-pulse efficiency, 820 kHz sequential effective Rabi with >90 % efficiency, and 1000-fold extension of Ramsey contrast decay from 4.5 µs to >4 ms) are extracted from measured state populations versus pulse duration or dark time (Figs. 2–5). Rabi frequencies Ω1 and ΩR are obtained independently from single-photon and Raman oscillations; residual |Δk| is inferred a posteriori from observed contrast decay and shown to be consistent with ≤1 mrad alignment (App. B4), not inserted as an input that forces the claimed suppression. Analytic phase expressions (Eqs. 3, 4, 7, 8 and App. D) follow by composing standard free-evolution, single-photon, and Raman propagators under the geometric DF condition k1 + kR = 0; they contain no free parameters fitted to the Ramsey data they later describe. Simulations (App. C) use measured intensities, detunings, and beam sizes and reproduce the observed dynamics without circular adjustment. Self-citations ([23], [25]) supply prior technical context but are not load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes that define the present results. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no self-definitional, fitted-prediction, or self-citation circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is an experimental demonstration resting on standard atomic physics (electric-dipole interaction, rotating-wave approximation, Lindblad spontaneous emission, Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distributions) plus the geometric DF condition k1+k2−k3=0. No new particles or forces are postulated. Free parameters are ordinary experimental knobs (laser powers, detunings, residual alignment) that are either measured independently or bounded by the data themselves.

free parameters (3)
  • residual net wave-vector |Δk|/|k1| = ~10^{-3}
    Inferred from Ramsey contrast decay to be ~10^{-3}; sets the residual Doppler dephasing rate that limits the claimed coherence time.
  • three-photon and Raman Rabi frequencies (Ω3ν, ΩR) = 192 kHz (method 1), 1.12 MHz Raman (method 2)
    Set by chosen laser intensities and detunings; measured from independent Rabi oscillations and used to predict π-pulse times.
  • intermediate-state detunings Δ1, Δ2 = 2π×5 MHz, 2π×400 MHz
    Chosen by hand (5 MHz, 400 MHz) to balance Rabi rate against scattering and velocity-dependent coupling; enter the effective three-photon Rabi formula.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption First-order Doppler shift vanishes when the vector sum of the three laser wave-vectors is identically zero (k1+k2−k3=0).
    Stated in Sec. I and Fig. 1; underpins both the simultaneous and sequential DF claims.
  • standard math Rotating-wave and adiabatic-elimination approximations remain valid for the chosen detunings and Rabi frequencies, allowing reduction to an effective two- or three-level system.
    Used throughout App. C and D to derive effective Rabi frequencies and phase propagators.
  • domain assumption Spontaneous emission and off-resonant scattering rates are given by the standard Lindblad operators with known branching ratios and linewidths of 88Sr.
    App. B2 and C; used to budget the observed π-pulse infidelity.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 33017 in / 2736 out tokens · 37484 ms · 2026-07-10T21:16:35.455523+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Microsecond-Scale Coherent Control of a Forbidden Clock Transition with Doppler-Free Multiphoton Excitations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RJTBUQ2C

@misc{pith2026260706789,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Microsecond-Scale Coherent Control of a Forbidden Clock Transition with Doppler-Free Multiphoton Excitations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RJTBUQ2C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06789}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We demonstrate two Doppler-free (DF) excitation schemes for coherent manipulation of the ${}^1\!S_0 - {}^3\!P_0$ clock transition in $^{88}$Sr that achieve microsecond-scale excitation times. The first approach uses three-photon excitation with distinct phase-coherent spectral components to couple the ground and clock states while canceling the first-order Doppler shift. The second approach is a sequential protocol that combines a single-photon excitation with a two-photon Raman excitation, reducing coherent clock transition manipulation times to below a microsecond. With both methods, we perform high-contrast Ramsey spectroscopy on thermal ensembles of $3 \times 10^{6}$ atoms in free space. We observe three orders of magnitude suppression of Doppler dephasing compared to single-photon excitation, relaxing the need for tight confinement or ultra-low temperatures. These broadly applicable techniques enable fast, coherent manipulation of narrow-line transitions, with implications for optical atomic clocks, matter-wave interferometers, quantum-enhanced metrology, and quantum information processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06789 by Erik J. Porter, Guglielmo Panelli, Mark Kasevich, Shaun C. Burd, V. Rose Knight.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of Doppler-free (DF) multiphoton exci [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Three-photon Rabi oscillations on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Three-photon suppression of Doppler broadening. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Sequential DF excitation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Ramsey fringes and coherence time comparisons between single-photon and Doppler-free methods 1 and 2. (a) Pulse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Simulated population dynamics for a single stationary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dissipation Enables Strongly Detuning-Dependent Interference in Pulsed Dynamical Decoupling

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Relaxation during pulsed dynamical decoupling makes interference visibility grow linearly with detuning and flips the interference phase by π at resonance, as shown in strontium atoms and a transmon.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The MOT is overlapped with an 813 nm optical lattice oriented along the direc- tion of gravity (ˆzin Fig

    Sample preparation We prepare the atomic samples of 88Sr atoms in the ground state 1S0 at 7–9µK with a dual-stage magneto- optical trap (MOT) [49, 50]. The MOT is overlapped with an 813 nm optical lattice oriented along the direc- tion of gravity (ˆzin Fig. 1) with a depth of 40µK. Upon termination of the MOT, the atoms remain confined in the lattice whil...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Excitation lasers All excitation lasers are injection-locked diode lasers seeded by external cavity diode lasers (ECDLs) to am- plify the optical power delivered to the atomic sam- ple. The 689 nm ECDL is stabilized using an ultra- low-expansion (ULE) reference cavity with a finesse of 3×10 5 and 5 kHz linewidth (Stable Laser Systems) using the Pound-Drev...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Each readout method uses a combination of push and repump pulses

    State readout After atomic state manipulation with the excitation lasers, we employ three types of state-selective imaging schemes for atomic state readout. Each readout method uses a combination of push and repump pulses. Push pulses consist of 1µs pulses of light resonant with the 461 nm 1S0 − 1P1 transition with natural linewidth of 32 MHz that rapidly...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Ramsey contrast decay analysis Here we describe the procedures for the fits used to quantify Ramsey contrast 1/e decay time for the DF and single-photon excitation methods shown in Fig. 5(c). We parameterize the Ramsey contrast as a function of the Ramsey dark timeτusing the fit function f(τ;A, t I , tH) =Aexp " − τ tI 2 − τ tH # ,(A1) where theAis the fr...

    work page

  5. [5]

    For fermions this shift is strongly suppressed, as the Pauli exclusion principle for- bidss-wave collisions

    Density shifts Interatomic collisions produce a frequency shift dur- ing interrogation that scales with the atomic density and s-wave scattering lengtha. For fermions this shift is strongly suppressed, as the Pauli exclusion principle for- bidss-wave collisions. Typically, bosons in high-density optical lattice sites are limited by this density shift [2]....

    work page

  6. [6]

    A state|j⟩cou- pled to|v⟩with coupling strength Ω jv and detuning ∆jv scatters at a rateR sc,j = ΓvΩ2 jv /4∆2 jv

    Off-resonant scattering In both methods, off-resonant scattering via the short- lived|v⟩state, which has a decay rate Γ v = 72×10 6 s−1, poses limits on clock state excitation. A state|j⟩cou- pled to|v⟩with coupling strength Ω jv and detuning ∆jv scatters at a rateR sc,j = ΓvΩ2 jv /4∆2 jv. For the simulta- neous method, lasers 1 and 2 additionally contrib...

    work page

  7. [7]

    We approximate the scattered population after timeTas the sum of the individual con- tributions from each statej Psc(T)≈ X j Z T 0 Rsc,jPj(t)dt ,(B1) which is valid when all scattered populations remain small. For method 1, population outside of|g⟩and|e⟩is only virtually populated, so our scattering during a pulse of durationTwill be dominated byR sc,g an...

    work page

  8. [8]

    We assume perfect DF alignment of the excitation lasers

    Velocity-dependent coupling strength Here we quantify the limit of excitation fraction achiev- able for the two methods demonstrated due to finite de- tunings and finite Rabi frequencies. We assume perfect DF alignment of the excitation lasers. Method 1:The detuning of the excitation lasers is a function of atomic velocityvand, as a result, so is the thre...

    work page

  9. [9]

    1(a) areθ opt 31 = 59.64 ◦ and θopt 32 = 59.44 ◦

    Angular misalignment For the excitation wavelengths in this work, the an- gles between the excitation lasers that satisfy the DF condition as shown in Fig. 1(a) areθ opt 31 = 59.64 ◦ and θopt 32 = 59.44 ◦. Any deviations from these optimal an- gles result in a residual uncanceled wavevector ∆k= k1 +k 2 −k 3 that in turn leads to velocity sensitivity in a ...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Ensemble free-fall and free-space expansion As indicated in Fig. 5(c) in the main text, Ramsey contrast can be limited in these demonstrations due to atomic ensemble free-fall out of the finite excitation beam waists along with thermal expansion during the dark time. In our demonstration the 1/e 2 intensity radiiw i for the three excitation lasers range f...

    work page

  11. [11]

    However, for Gaussian beams the local wavevector is determined by a combination of propagation angle, wavefront curvature, and Gouy phase

    Gaussian beam effects The DF condition is perfectly satisfied for plane waves propagating at the optimal beam angles. However, for Gaussian beams the local wavevector is determined by a combination of propagation angle, wavefront curvature, and Gouy phase. These latter two contributions lead to deviations from the DF condition. To determine the impact of ...

    work page

  12. [12]

    Peak excitation infidelity budget Here we summarize the dominant contributions to the peak excitation fraction infidelity in our system. We in- 13 clude the effects detailed in the preceding sections along with effects modeled in Appendix C below such as fi- nite laser size, ensemble temperature, and transient state population. Table II shows these contri...

    work page

  13. [13]

    The Hamiltonian transforms as ˜H=U HU † + iℏ(∂tU)U †. After discarding fast, counter-rotating terms (the rotating-wave approximation), we have a time- independent atomic Hamiltonian, which can be written as ˜Ha/ℏ=−(∆ 1 + 2δB)|s −⟩ ⟨s−| −∆ 1 |s+⟩ ⟨s+| −∆ 2 |v⟩ ⟨v| −∆ 3 |e⟩ ⟨e|. (C3) For an atom moving at velocityvin the lab frame, the detunings transform a...

    work page

  14. [14]

    1 contains four primary states relevant to the sequential excitation

    Effective three-level system The full level structure of Fig. 1 contains four primary states relevant to the sequential excitation. The Raman virtual state|v⟩is far-detuned from any single-photon resonance, with ∆2 = 2π×400 MHz much larger than the Raman drive amplitudes and the Doppler spread. The off-resonant scattering and accumulated population via th...

    work page

  15. [15]

    Time-evolution operators In the rotating frame defined by Eq. (D1) with ba- sis{|g⟩,|s +⟩,|e⟩}, the Hamiltonians for free evolution, single-photon driving, and Raman driving are ˜Hf /ℏ=   0 0 0 0−δ 1 0 0 0−(δ 1 +δ R)   ,(D2) ˜H1/ℏ=   0 Ω 1/2 0 Ω1/2−δ 1 0 0 0−(δ 1 +δ R)   ,(D3) and ˜HR/ℏ=   0 0 0 0−δ 1 ΩR/2 0 Ω R/2−(δ 1 +δ R)   ,(D4) respective...

    work page

  16. [16]

    For aπ/2-pulse,T π/2 1 =π/(2Ω 1) and we obtain Ugs+(T π/2 1 )≈ eiδ1T π/2 1 /2 √ 2 1−iδ 1/Ω1 −i −i1 +iδ 1/Ω1

    We consider the special cases ofπ/2- andπ- pulses, and computeU gs+ to leading order inδ 1/Ω1. For aπ/2-pulse,T π/2 1 =π/(2Ω 1) and we obtain Ugs+(T π/2 1 )≈ eiδ1T π/2 1 /2 √ 2 1−iδ 1/Ω1 −i −i1 +iδ 1/Ω1 . (D8) The±iδ 1/Ω1 corrections on the diagonal elements encode the Bloch-vector tilt error produced by a detunedπ/2 rotation. The off-diagonal couplings a...

    work page

  17. [17]

    Phase dynamics Using the propagators above, we can extract the rel- ative phase between two states at any point in a pulse sequence. The phaseϕ ab between two states|a⟩and|b⟩ after a pulse sequence is computed with the argument of the ratio of the state coefficients arg (c a/cb) after apply- ing the corresponding unitaries. a. Phase imprint of a sequentia...

    work page

  18. [18]

    Hollberg, C

    L. Hollberg, C. W. Oates, G. Wilpers, C. W. Hoyt, Z. W. Barber, S. A. Diddams, W. H. Oskay, and J. C. Bergquist, Optical frequency/wavelength refer- ences, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Op- tical Physics38, S469 (2005)

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 637 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. F. J. Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Search for new physics with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025008 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2313 (2010)

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    Takamoto, F.-L

    M. Takamoto, F.-L. Hong, R. Higashi, and H. Katori, An optical lattice clock, Nature435, 321 (2005)

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    M. A. Norcia, A. W. Young, W. J. Eckner, E. Oelker, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, Seconds-scale coherence on an optical clock transition in a tweezer array, Science 366, 93 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    T. Ido, T. H. Loftus, M. M. Boyd, A. D. Ludlow, K. W. Holman, and J. Ye, Precision spectroscopy and density- dependent frequency shifts in ultracold sr, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 153001 (2005)

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    P. O. Schmidt, T. Rosenband, C. Langer, W. M. Itano, J. C. Bergquist, and D. J. Wineland, Spectroscopy using quantum logic, Science309, 749 (2005)

    work page 2005

  26. [26]

    Bothwell, D

    T. Bothwell, D. Kedar, E. Oelker, J. M. Robinson, S. L. Bromley, W. L. Tew, J. Ye, and C. J. Kennedy, JILA SrI optical lattice clock with uncertainty of 2.0×10 −18, Metrologia56, 065004 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    W. F. McGrew, X. Zhang, R. J. Fasano, S. A. Sch¨ affer, K. Beloy, D. Nicolodi, R. C. Brown, N. Hinkley, G. Mi- lani, M. Schioppo, T. H. Yoon, and A. D. Ludlow, Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level, Nature564, 87 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    S. M. Brewer, J.-S. Chen, A. M. Hankin, E. R. Clements, C. W. Chou, D. J. Wineland, D. B. Hume, and D. R. Leibrandt, 27Al+ quantum-logic clock with a systematic uncertainty below 10 −18, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 033201 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Finkelstein, R

    R. Finkelstein, R. B.-S. Tsai, X. Sun, P. Scholl, S. Di- rekci, T. Gefen, J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, and M. Endres, Universal quantum operations and ancilla-based read-out for tweezer clocks, Nature634, 321 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    A. Cao, W. J. Eckner, T. Lukin Yelin, A. W. Young, S. Jandura, L. Yan, K. Kim, G. Pupillo, J. Ye, N. Dark- wah Oppong, and A. M. Kaufman, Multi-qubit gates and schr¨ odinger cat states in an optical clock, Nature634, 315 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    J. A. Munizet al., High-fidelity universal gates in the 171Yb ground-state nuclear-spin qubit, PRX Quantum 6, 020334 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    L. Hu, N. Poli, L. Salvi, and G. M. Tino, Atom interfer- ometry with the sr optical clock transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 263601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Rudolph, T

    J. Rudolph, T. Wilkason, M. Nantel, H. Swan, C. M. Hol- land, Y. Jiang, B. E. Garber, S. P. Carman, and J. M. Hogan, Large momentum transfer clock atom interferom- etry on the 689 nm intercombination line of strontium, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 083604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    C. F. A. Baynham and Others, A prototype differen- tial atom interferometer for fundamental physics, Nature 654, 622 (2026)

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    A. V. Taichenachev, V. I. Yudin, C. W. Oates, C. W. Hoyt, Z. W. Barber, and L. Hollberg, Magnetic field- induced spectroscopy of forbidden optical transitions with application to lattice-based optical atomic clocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 083001 (2006)

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    T. Hong, C. Cramer, W. Nagourney, and E. N. Fort- son, Optical clocks based on ultranarrow three-photon resonances in alkaline earth atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 050801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    Santra, E

    R. Santra, E. Arimondo, T. Ido, C. H. Greene, and J. Ye, High-accuracy optical clock via three-level coherence in neutral bosonic 88Sr, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 173002 (2005)

    work page 2005

  38. [38]

    D. S. Barker, N. C. Pisenti, B. J. Reschovsky, and G. K. Campbell, Three-photon process for producing a degen- erate gas of metastable alkaline-earth-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. A93, 053417 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    E. A. Alden, K. R. Moore, and A. E. Leanhardt, Two- photon E1 - M1 optical clock, Phys. Rev. A90, 012523 (2014)

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    S. P. Carman, J. Rudolph, B. E. Garber, M. J. Van de Graaff, H. Swan, Y. Jiang, M. Nantel, M. Abe, R. L. Barcklay, and J. M. Hogan, Collinear three-photon ex- citation of a strongly forbidden optical clock transition, Phys. Rev. X15, 031051 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    J. He, B. Pasquiou, R. G. Escudero, S. Zhou, M. Borkowski, and F. Schreck, Coherent three-photon excitation of the strontium clock transition, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L012050 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Panelli, S

    G. Panelli, S. C. Burd, E. J. Porter, and M. Kasevich, Doppler-free three-photon spectroscopy on narrow-line optical transitions, Phys. Rev. A111, 033112 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Grynberg, F

    G. Grynberg, F. Biraben, M. Bassini, and B. Cagnac, Three-photon Doppler-free spectroscopy: Experimental evidence, Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 283 (1976)

    work page 1976

  44. [44]

    Glick, B

    J. Glick, B. E. Anderson, T. N. Nunley, J. Bingaman, 19 J. J. Liu, D. H. Meyer, and P. Kunz, Doppler-free rydberg spectroscopy in a warm vapor, Phys. Rev. A112, 063726 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    S. A. Diddams, K. Vahala, and T. Udem, Optical fre- quency combs: Coherently uniting the electromagnetic spectrum, Science369, eaay3676 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    N. F. Ramsey, Molecular-beam magnetic resonance methods, inMolecular Beams(Oxford University Press, 1986)

    work page 1986

  47. [47]

    Santarelli, P

    G. Santarelli, P. Laurent, P. Lemonde, A. Clairon, A. G. Mann, S. Chang, A. N. Luiten, and C. Salomon, Quan- tum projection noise in an atomic fountain: A high sta- bility cesium frequency standard, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 4619 (1999)

    work page 1999

  48. [48]

    Katori, M

    H. Katori, M. Takamoto, V. G. Pal’chikov, and V. D. Ovsiannikov, Ultrastable optical clock with neutral atoms in an engineered light shift trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 173005 (2003)

    work page 2003

  49. [49]

    Kiruga, C

    A. Kiruga, C. Cheung, D. Filin, P. Barakhshan, A. Bhos- ale, V. Badhan, B. Arora, R. Eigenmann, and M. S. Safronova, Portal for high-precision atomic data and computation, Computer Physics Communications319, 109951 (2026)

    work page 2026

  50. [50]

    Bergmann, H

    K. Bergmann, H. Theuer, and B. W. Shore, Coherent population transfer among quantum states of atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 1003 (1998)

    work page 1998

  51. [51]

    Godfrin, R

    C. Godfrin, R. Ballou, E. Bonet, M. Ruben, S. Kly- atskaya, W. Wernsdorfer, and F. Balestro, Generalized ramsey interferometry explored with a single nuclear spin qudit, NPJ Quantum Information4, 53 (2018)

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Neeley, M

    M. Neeley, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, E. Lucero, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, H. Wang, J. Wen- ner, A. N. Cleland, M. R. Geller, and J. M. Martinis, Emulation of a quantum spin with a superconducting phase qudit, Science325, 722 (2009)

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    D. A. Steck, Quantum and atom optics, Available online athttp://steck.us/teaching(2007), revision 0.13.16, 24 May 2024

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    Kitagawa and M

    M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Squeezed spin states, Phys. Rev. A47, 5138 (1993)

    work page 1993

  55. [55]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Heinzen, Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A50, 67 (1994)

    work page 1994

  56. [56]

    Pezz` e, A

    L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum- enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit, Science306, 1330 (2004)

    work page 2004

  58. [58]

    Hosten, N

    O. Hosten, N. J. Engelsen, R. Krishnakumar, and M. A. Kasevich, Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms, Nature 529, 505 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    G. P. Greve, C. Luo, B. Wu, and J. K. Thompson, Entanglement-enhanced matter-wave interferometry in a high-finesse cavity, Nature610, 472 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Y. A. Yang, M. Miklos, Y. M. Tso, S. Kraus, J. Hur, and J. Ye, Clock precision beyond the standard quantum limit at 10−18 level, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 193202 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Dimopoulos, P

    S. Dimopoulos, P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Ka- sevich, and S. Rajendran, Atomic gravitational wave in- terferometric sensor, Phys. Rev. D78, 122002 (2008)

    work page 2008

  62. [62]

    Abeet al., Matter-wave atomic gradiometer inter- ferometric sensor (MAGIS-100), Quantum Science and Technology6, 044003 (2021)

    M. Abeet al., Matter-wave atomic gradiometer inter- ferometric sensor (MAGIS-100), Quantum Science and Technology6, 044003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    I. S. Madjarov, J. P. Covey, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, A. Kale, A. Cooper, H. Pichler, V. Schkolnik, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres, High-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth rydberg atoms, Nature Physics16, 857 (2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Schine, A

    N. Schine, A. W. Young, W. J. Eckner, M. J. Martin, and A. M. Kaufman, Long-lived bell states in an array of optical clock qubits, Nature Physics18, 1067 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    Porter, Zenodo: open access data (2026)

    E. Porter, Zenodo: open access data (2026)

    work page 2026

  66. [66]

    Katori, T

    H. Katori, T. Ido, Y. Isoya, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami, Magneto-optical trapping and cooling of strontium atoms down to the photon recoil temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1116 (1999)

    work page 1999

  67. [67]

    A. D. Ludlow,The Strontium Optical Lattice Clock: Op- tical Spectroscopy with Sub-Hertz Accuracy, Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder (2008)

    work page 2008

  68. [68]

    R. W. P. Drever, J. L. Hall, F. V. Kowalski, J. Hough, G. M. Ford, A. J. Munley, and H. Ward, Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator, Applied Physics B31, 97 (1983)

    work page 1983

  69. [69]

    S. A. Diddams, D. J. Jones, J. Ye, S. T. Cundiff, J. L. Hall, J. K. Ranka, R. S. Windeler, R. Holzwarth, T. Udem, and T. W. H¨ ansch, Direct link between mi- crowave and optical frequencies with a 300 THz femtosec- ond laser comb, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 5102 (2000)

    work page 2000

  70. [70]

    Bourdeauducqet al., Artiq (2016)

    S. Bourdeauducqet al., Artiq (2016)

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    Lisdat, J

    C. Lisdat, J. S. R. Vellore Winfred, T. Middelmann, F. Riehle, and U. Sterr, Collisional losses, decoherence, and frequency shifts in optical lattice clocks with bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 090801 (2009)

    work page 2009

  72. [72]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip 2: A python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comp. Phys. Comm.184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013