Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Mutation matrices from Poisson CGL extensions

T0 review · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Explicit matrix product formulas for Poisson CGL mutation matrices

desk verdict Solid explicit formulas for GY mutation matrices; clean identification with BFZ matrices read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07028 v1 pith:2TY5PVKX submitted 2026-07-08 math.RA math.SG

Zihang Liu , Jiang-Hua Lu , Yipeng Mi This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RAmath.SG MSC 17B6313F6053D17
keywords PoissonCGLextensionsclusteralgebrasmutationmatricesGSVequationssymmetricstructuresgeneralizedCartanBFZsignedwords
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper solves a concrete computational problem inside the Goodearl-Yakimov theory of cluster structures on polynomial Poisson algebras. In that theory, a symmetric T-Poisson CGL extension — a polynomial ring with a Poisson bracket and torus action satisfying certain compatibility axioms — is shown to carry a family of cluster algebra seeds indexed by permutations τ in a subset Ξ_n of the symmetric group. Each seed comes with a mutation matrix M_τ that was previously known to exist and be unique only through an involved induction argument; its entries were not given by any closed formula. This paper provides those formulas. The key idea is to observe that the equations characterizing M_τ (the GSV Equations, relating the Poisson coefficient matrix of the cluster variables to their torus weights) can be solved directly by elementary linear algebra, yielding an explicit matrix product M = E^t ν^{-1} E Λ involving the predecessor/successor structure of the CGL extension, the Poisson bracket data, and a diagonal matrix of scalars. For the symmetric case, this simplifies to M = E^t Q E, where Q = ν^{-1} Λ encodes the Cartan integers of the log-canonical part of the Poisson bracket. For each re-ordering τ, the formula becomes M_τ = E^t_{τ•} Q τ^t_• E, a conjugation of the base matrix M by the change-of-basis matrix E^{-1}_{τ^{-1}_•} E. The paper then shows that when the symmetric Poisson CGL extension arises from a symmetrizable generalized Cartan matrix A and a word i in the index set, these mutation matrices coincide (up to re-indexing) with the Berenstein-Fomin-Zelevinsky mutation matrices associated to signed words, unifying two previously separate families of matrices in cluster algebra and Lie theory.

What carries the argument

The GSV Equations — a system of linear equations qM = -Λ and χ_y M = 0 relating the Poisson coefficient matrix q of the log-canonical cluster variables y, the torus character matrix χ_y, and a diagonal scalar matrix Λ — are the central object. The paper shows these equations have a unique solution given by the matrix product M = E^t ν^{-1} E Λ, where E is built from the successor map s and ν is the upper-triangular matrix of Poisson bracket constants. The existence of an integer solution is proved by expanding certain elements of the Poisson algebra as Laurent polynomials in the homogeneous Poisson prime elements y and reading off the exponents, which directly give the columns of M.

What would settle it

If the GSV Equations qM = -Λ, χ_y M = 0 admitted multiple solutions in Mat_{n×ex}(k) for some Poisson CGL extension, or if the matrix product E^t ν^{-1} E Λ failed to have integer entries for some valid CGL extension, the main formulas would break down. Concretely, one could test this on a specific symmetric Poisson CGL extension of small length and verify whether the Laurent monomial b_{s(j)} / y_{s(j)} predicted by the formula actually has the exponent vector given by the j-th column of M.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The mutation matrices M_τ in the Goodearl-Yakimov cluster structure on a symmetric Poisson CGL extension are given explicitly by the matrix product M_τ = (E^{-1}_{τ^{-1}_•} E)^t M (E^{-1}_{τ^{-1}_•} E)_{ex×ex}, where M = E^t Q E is the base mutation matrix, E encodes the predecessor/successor maps, and Q = ν^{-1} Λ is determined by the Poisson bracket and torus weights. For CGL extensions from generalized Cartan matrices, these matrices are exactly the BFZ mutation matrices associated to signed words, via an explicit bijection between signed words and admissible triples (i, τ, ε_1).

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation of the explicit formulas as genuine cluster mutation matrices relies on the Goodearl-Yakimov theory, which requires a normality condition (certain scalars ι_{s(j)} equal 1) and a rationality condition on the ratio of Poisson scalars. The algebraic identities and matrix product formulas themselves hold without these assumptions, but their role as mutation matrices in a mutation-equivalent family of seeds depends on them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The matrix product formula eB(i†) = E(i†)^t Q(i†) E(i†) for BFZ mutation matrices can be proved directly without Poisson CGL theory, providing a new algebraic tool for studying cluster structures on double Bruhat cells and Bott-Samelson cells.
  • The non-zero entries of every M_τ are constrained to be ±1 or ±a where a is a negative Cartan integer, giving strong structural constraints on cluster algebras arising from Poisson CGL extensions.
  • The identification of M_τ with BFZ matrices bridges the Goodearl-Yakimov Poisson-theoretic approach to cluster algebras with the Kashiwara-Kim exchange matrices from monoidal categorification, potentially allowing techniques to transfer between the two settings.
  • The nondegenerate cluster ensemble matrix bB(i†) is shown to equal the full square matrix cM(i†) = E(i†)^t Q(i†) E(i†), giving a matrix product decomposition for both its skew-symmetrizable and symmetrizable parts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The matrix product formula M = E^t ν^{-1} E Λ suggests that mutation matrices in broader classes of cluster algebras with Poisson structures might admit similar factorizations through the combinatorics of predecessor/successor maps.
  • The connection between Poisson cohomology classes (via the vectors θ_{(j,s(j))} in the second T-invariant Poisson cohomology) and mutation matrix entries hints at a deeper cohomological interpretation of cluster exchange relations that could extend beyond the CGL setting.
  • The bijection between signed words and admissible triples (i, τ, ε_1) may serve as a dictionary for translating problems between the representation-theoretic side (quantum affine algebras, canonical bases) and the Poisson-geometric side (CGL extensions, Poisson brackets).
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. This paper derives explicit formulas for the mutation matrices M_tau arising in the Goodearl-Yakimov cluster structure theory for symmetric Poisson CGL extensions. For an arbitrary (not necessarily symmetric) T-Poisson CGL extension R of length n, the authors show that the unique solution to the GSV Equations (1.9) is given by the matrix product M = E^t nu^{-1} E Lambda (Theorem 3.4.5, Corollary 3.3.2), and they verify existence by showing that the element b_{s(j)}/y_{s(j)} is a Laurent monomial whose exponent vector gives the j-th column of M (Proposition 3.4.3). For symmetric extensions, they obtain the more symmetric formula M = E^t Q E_{n x ex} (Theorem 4.3.3) and, for each tau in Xi_n, the formula M_tau = E^t_{tau bullet} Q tau^t_bullet E_{n x ex} (Theorem 4.7.5), together with an entry-wise description in terms of Cartan integers (Theorem 4.7.10). As an application, for symmetric CGL extensions R_{(A,i)} constructed from a symmetrizable generalized Cartan matrix A and a word i, they establish a bijection between signed words and admissible triples (Section 5.3) and prove that the BFZ mutation matrix eB(i dagger) equals a permutation of M_tau (Theorem 5.4.8), also yielding a matrix product formula for the nondegenerate cluster ensemble matrix bB(i dagger) (Theorem 5.5.1).

Significance. The paper solves a concrete and well-motivated problem: the mutation matrices M_tau in the Goodearl-Yakimov theory were previously characterized only as unique solutions to a linear system (via an involved induction in [GY23, Theorem 11.1]), and this paper replaces that characterization with explicit closed-form expressions. The matrix product formula M = E^t nu^{-1} E Lambda is derived by elementary linear algebra (Lemma 3.3.1, Corollary 3.3.2), and the existence proof via the monomial property of b_{s(j)} (Proposition 3.4.3, Lemma 3.4.2) is self-contained. The connection to BFZ mutation matrices (Theorem 5.4.8) and cluster ensemble matrices (Theorem 5.5.1) provides a bridge between the Poisson CGL framework and the combinatorial theory of signed words, and the matrix product formula (5.15) for eB(i dagger) appears to be new. The entry-wise description of M_tau in terms of Cartan integers (Theorem 4.7.10) is a useful concrete output. The results are applicable to Poisson structures on Bott-Samelson cells.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; algebraic formulas independently derived, cluster interpretation relies on [GY23]

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The GSV Equations (1.9) are stated independently as qM = -Λ and χ_y M = 0. The uniqueness of the solution M = E^t ν^{-1} EΛ is proved by elementary linear algebra (Corollary 3.3.2, via Lemma 3.3.1), and existence is proved by showing b_{s(j)} is a nonzero monomial using Lemma 3.4.2 and Lemma 3.3.3 (Proposition 3.4.3, Theorem 3.4.5). The formula M_τ = E^t_{τ•} Q τ^t_• E_{n×ex} (Theorem 4.7.5) is derived by applying Theorem 3.4.5 to the re-ordered CGL extension R_τ, using the conjugation identities in Lemma 4.7.2. The BFZ identification (Theorem 5.4.8) is verified by entry-wise comparison with [BZ05, (8.7)], and the matrix product formula (5.15) is independently derived from the Poisson CGL theory. The reliance on [GY23] (Goodearl-Yakimov) for the mutation equivalence of seeds (Theorem 4.6.2) is a dependency on external prior work for the cluster-theoretic interpretation, but the explicit formulas for M_τ and their algebraic properties (integrality, entry-wise description via Cartan integers) are established independently. The normality condition (ι_{s(j)}=1) is needed only for Theorem 3.6.1 (R = U(y, M^ε)), not for the formulas themselves, and Corollary 3.5.4 shows it is achievable by rescaling. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by construction, and no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the algebraic results. The score of 2 reflects the minor dependency on [GY23] for the cluster interpretation, which the paper itself acknowledges (§1.1: 'we make use of many results from [GY23]').

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new mathematical objects or postulated entities. All objects (mutation matrices, CGL extensions, Poisson prime elements, Cartan integers, BFZ matrices) are defined in prior literature. The contribution consists of new formulas and identifications among existing objects. There are no free parameters: the matrices E, ν, Λ, Q are all determined by the Poisson structure and torus action data.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of the sequence of homogeneous Poisson prime elements y = (y_1,...,y_n) for a T-Poisson CGL extension (Theorem 3.1.1, from [GY23])
    The entire construction of the GSV equations and the matrix M depends on the existence of this sequence. Invoked at the start of §3.1.
  • domain assumption Log-canonicality of the sequence y with Poisson coefficient matrix q = FλF^t (Lemma 3.1.5, from [GY23])
    The GSV equations qM = -Λ require q to be the Poisson coefficient matrix of a log-canonical sequence. Invoked in §3.3.
  • domain assumption For symmetric CGL extensions, the proper re-orderings R_τ for τ ∈ Ξ_n are T-Poisson CGL extensions (Proposition 6.4 of [GY23])
    The construction of M_τ in §4.7 depends on R_τ being a valid CGL extension. Invoked in §4.5.
  • domain assumption The classification of symmetric Poisson CGL extensions via Cartan integers and Poisson cohomology from [ML25]
    The entry-wise description of M in terms of Cartan integers (§4.4, Theorem 4.7.10) uses the structure theorem from [ML25] that the vectors θ_{(j,s(j))} have entries expressible as Cartan integers.
  • domain assumption Normality condition: ι_{s(j)} = 1 for all j ∈ ex, and rationality condition: λ_{L(j)}/λ_{L(k)} ∈ Q_{>0} for all j,k ∈ ex
    These conditions are needed for M to be skew-symmetrizable and for the upper cluster algebra equality R = U(y, M^ε) to hold. Stated in Theorem 4.6.2 and Theorem 3.6.1.
  • standard math Standard properties of Poisson-Ore extensions, locally nilpotent derivations, and the reverse lexicographic order on Z^n
    Used throughout for degree computations and leading term analysis in §3.2 and §4.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mutation matrices from Poisson CGL extensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2TY5PVKX

@misc{pith2026260707028,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mutation matrices from Poisson CGL extensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2TY5PVKX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07028}
}
read the original abstract

Symmetric Poisson CGL extensions form a particular class of polynomial Poisson algebras that are shown by K. Goodearl and M. Yakimov to admit compatible cluster structures. In this paper, we give explicit formulas for a family of mutation matrices in the Goodearl-Yakimov theory via matrix products as well as by entry-wise description.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Poisson derivations and cohomology of Poisson nilpotent algebras

    math.RA 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5 of 10

    Under N_P(R)=Z_P(R), every Poisson derivation of a uniparameter PNA is uniquely Hamiltonian plus a weight-homogeneous central derivation, so PH^1(R) is free of rank equal to the PNA rank.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Matviichuk and J.-H

    M. Matviichuk and J.-H. Lu , title =. 2025 , note =

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Kashiwara and M

    M. Kashiwara and M. Kim and S.-J. Oh and E. Park , title =. Invent. Math. , volume =

    work page

  3. [3]

    Exchange matrices of

    Masaki Kashiwara and Myungho Kim , keywords =. Exchange matrices of. Advances in Mathematics , volume =. 2026 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2025.110711 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aim.2025.110711 2026

  4. [4]

    Contu and F

    A. Contu and F. Qin and Q. Wei , title =. Pacific Journal of Mathematics , volume =

    work page

  5. [5]

    Brown and K

    K. Brown and K. Goodearl , title =

    work page

  6. [6]

    A. B. Buan and R. Marsh and M. Reineke and I. Reiten and G. Todorov , title =. Advances in Mathematics , volume =

    work page

  7. [7]

    A. B. Buan and B. R. Marsh and I. Reiten , title =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , volume =

    work page

  8. [8]

    Cao and B

    P. Cao and B. Keller and F. Qin , title =. J. Reine Angew. Math. , volume =

    work page

Show all 97 references
  1. [9]

    V. V. Fock and A. B. Goncharov , title =. Ann. Sci. de l’ENS , volume =

  2. [10]

    Goodearl and S

    K. Goodearl and S. Launois , title =. Bull. Soc. Math. France , volume =

  3. [11]

    Fujiwara and Y

    S. Fujiwara and Y. Gyoda , title =. SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. , volume =

  4. [12]

    Fomin and L

    S. Fomin and L. Willaims and A. Zelevinsky , title =. 2019 , note =

    2019

  5. [13]

    Galashin and T

    P. Galashin and T. Lam , title =. 2019 , note =

    2019

  6. [14]

    Scott , title =

    J. Scott , title =. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society , volume =

  7. [15]

    Berensteina and A

    A. Berensteina and A. Zelevinsky , title=. Adv. in Math. , publisher=. 2005 , pages=. doi:, number=

    2005

  8. [16]

    Casals and E

    R. Casals and E. Gorsky and M. Gorsky and I. Le and L. Shen and J. Simental , title =. 2022 , note =

    2022

  9. [17]

    Galashin and T

    P. Galashin and T. Lam and M. Sherman-Bennett , title =

  10. [18]

    Drinfeld , title=

    V.G. Drinfeld , title=. Doklady Mathematics , publisher=. 1982 , pages=. doi:, number=

    1982

  11. [19]

    Drinfeld , TITLE =

    V. Drinfeld , TITLE =. Proceedings of ICM 1986 , SERIES =. 1986 , ISBN =

    1986

  12. [20]

    Elek and J.-H

    B. Elek and J.-H. Lu , title=. Int. Math. Res. Not. , publisher=. 2021 , pages=. doi:, number=

    2021

  13. [21]

    Cluster ensembles and

    Harold Williams , journal =. Cluster ensembles and

  14. [22]

    Geiss and B

    C. Geiss and B. Leclerc and J. Schroer , journal =

  15. [23]

    Geiss and B

    C. Geiss and B. Leclerc and J. Schroer , journal =. Factorial cluster algebras , volume =

  16. [24]

    Gekhtman and M

    M. Gekhtman and M. Shapiro and A. Vainshtein , title =

  17. [25]

    Gekhtman and M

    M. Gekhtman and M. Shapiro and A. Vainshtein , title =. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. , number =

  18. [26]

    Fomin and A

    S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky , journal =. Double

  19. [27]

    K. R. Goodearl and M. T. Yakimov , title=. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , publisher=. 2014 , pages=. doi:, number=

    2014

  20. [28]

    K. R. Goodearl and M. T. Yakimov , title=. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , publisher=. 2020 , pages=. doi:10.4171/JEMS/969 , number=

    2020 doi

  21. [29]

    K. R. Goodearl and M. T. Yakimov , title=. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , publisher=. 2009 , pages=. doi:, number=

    2009

  22. [30]

    K. R. Goodearl and M. T. Yakimov , title=. 2023 , pages=. doi:, journal=

    2023

  23. [31]

    K. R. Goodearl and M. T. Yakimov , title=. 2017 , pages=. doi:, journal=

    2017

  24. [32]

    K. R. Goodearl and M. T. Yakimov , title=. Duke Math. J. , publisher=. 2021 , pages=. doi:10.1215/00127094-2020-0061 , number=

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    Kogan and A

    M. Kogan and A. Zelevinsky , title=. Int. Math. Res. Not. , publisher=. 2002 , pages=. doi:, number=

    2002

  26. [34]

    Propp , title =

    J. Propp , title =. Integers , volume =

  27. [35]

    Kimura and F

    Y. Kimura and F. Qin and Q. Wei , title =. SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. , volume =

  28. [36]

    Brenner , TITLE =

    S. Brenner , TITLE =. Proceedings of the Antwerp Conference , SERIES =. 1979 , ISBN =

    1979

  29. [37]

    Brenner , TITLE =

    S. Brenner , TITLE =. Representation Theory I: Finite Dimensional Algebras , SERIES =

  30. [38]

    M. C. R. Butler , TITLE =. Integral representations and applications (. 1981 , ISBN =

    1981

  31. [39]

    Morier-Genoud , journal =

    S. Morier-Genoud , journal =

  32. [40]

    Assem and C

    I. Assem and C. Reutenauer and D. Smith , journal =. Friezes , volume =

  33. [41]

    M. W. Cheung and T. Magee and T. Mandel and G. Muller , title =

  34. [42]

    Fei , title =

    J. Fei , title =. J. London Math. Soc. , number =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  35. [43]

    Cao and F

    P. Cao and F. Li , title=. Compos. Math. , publisher=. 2020 , pages=. doi:10.1112/S0010437X20007113 , number=

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    Rietsch and L

    K. Rietsch and L. Williams , journal =

  37. [45]

    Shen and D

    L. Shen and D. Weng , title =. SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. , number =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  38. [46]

    Shen and D

    L. Shen and D. Weng , title =. Forum of Math. SIGMA , number =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  39. [47]

    Oh , title =

    S.Q. Oh , title =. Comm. Algebra , volume =

  40. [48]

    Dupont , title =

    G. Dupont , title =. J. Pure Appl. Algebra , volume =

  41. [49]

    Cheung and M

    M.-W. Cheung and M. Gross and G. Muller and G. Musiker and D. Rupel and S. Stella and H. Williams , title =. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A , volume =

  42. [50]

    Reading and D

    N. Reading and D. E. Speyer , title =. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , volume =

  43. [51]

    Rupel and S

    D. Rupel and S. Stella and H. Williams , =. Compos. Math. , volume =

  44. [52]

    Duke Math J

    F.Qin , title =. Duke Math J. , volume =

  45. [53]

    , title =

    Qin, F. , title =. 2022 , note=

    2022

  46. [54]

    Fu and Y

    C. Fu and Y. Gyoda. Compatibility degree of cluster complexes. 2023

    2023

  47. [55]

    , title =

    Muller, G. , title =. SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. , volume =. 2014 , PAGES =

    2014

  48. [56]

    Selecta Math

    Greedy elements in rank 2 cluster algebras , volume=. Selecta Math. , author=. 2014 , pages=

    2014

  49. [57]

    Contemporary Mathematics , author=

    On tropical dualities in cluster algebras , volume=. Contemporary Mathematics , author=. 2012 , pages=. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/conm/565 , number=

    2012 doi

  50. [58]

    , TITLE =

    Nakanishi, T. , TITLE =. Representations of algebras and related topics , SERIES =. 2011 , ISBN =. doi:10.4171/101-1/9 , URL =

    2011 doi

  51. [59]

    Reading and S

    N. Reading and S. Stella , title =. Pacific J. Math. , volume =

  52. [60]

    Hohlweg and V

    C. Hohlweg and V. Pilaud and S. Stella , title =. Adv. Math. , volume =. 2018 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2018.01.019 , url =

    2018 doi

  53. [61]

    Reading and S

    N. Reading and S. Stella , title =. J. Comb. Algebra , volume =

  54. [62]

    Assem and G

    I. Assem and G. Dupont , title =. J. Pure Appl. Algebra , volume =

  55. [63]

    Bobiński , title =

    G. Bobiński , title =. Colloq. Math. , volume =

  56. [64]

    F. Qin. Analogs of the dual canonical bases for cluster algebras from Lie theorey. 2024

    2024

  57. [65]

    P. Cao. F -invariant in cluster algebras. 2023

    2023

  58. [66]

    Cao and Y

    P. Cao and Y. Gyoda and T. Yurikusa , title =. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , volume =

  59. [67]

    Lu and V

    J.-H. Lu and V. Mouquin , title=. Adv. Math. , publisher=. 2017 , pages=. doi:, number=

    2017

  60. [68]

    Lu and V

    J.-H. Lu and V. Mouquin , title=. Int. Math. Res. Not. , publisher=. 2017 , pages=. doi:, number=

    2017

  61. [69]

    Cao and F

    P. Cao and F. Li , title =. Math. Ann. , volume =

  62. [70]

    Ceballos and V

    C. Ceballos and V. Pilaud , title =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , volume =

  63. [71]

    Dlab and P

    V. Dlab and P. Gabriel , title =. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Present Trends in Representation Theory held at Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont., August 13–18, 1979 , pages =. 1980 , volume=

    1979

  64. [72]

    Felikson and P

    A. Felikson and P. Tumarkin , title =. Adv. Math. , year =

  65. [73]

    Gao and L

    H. Gao and L. Shen and D. Weng , journal =. Augmentations, Fillings, and Clusters , pages =

  66. [74]

    and Demonet, L

    Keller, B. and Demonet, L. , title =. Contemp. Math. , number =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  67. [75]

    Happel and U

    D. Happel and U. Preiser and C. M. Ringel , title =. Representation theory, II (Proc. Second Internat. Conf., Carleton Univ., Ottawa, Ont., 1979) , pages =. 1980 , volume=

    1979

  68. [76]

    and Fomin, S

    Berenstein, A. and Fomin, S. and Zelevinsky, A. , TITLE =. Duke Math. J. , FJOURNAL =. 2005 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-04-12611-9 , URL =

    2005 doi

  69. [77]

    and Zelevinsky, A

    Fomin, S. and Zelevinsky, A. , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 2003 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4007/annals.2003.158.977 , URL =

    2003 doi

  70. [78]

    Melo and A

    C. Melo and A. N. The cluster complex for cluster

  71. [79]

    Fomin and A

    S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky , title =. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , number =. 2002 , doi =

    2002

  72. [80]

    Fomin and A

    S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky , journal =. Cluster algebras

  73. [81]

    Fomin and A

    S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky , title =. Compos. Math. , volume =

  74. [82]

    Gross and P

    M. Gross and P. Hacking and S. Keel , title =. Algebraic geometry , volume =

  75. [83]

    Gross and P

    M. Gross and P. Hacking and S. Keel and M. Kontsevich , title =. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , volume =

  76. [84]

    Guo , title =

    L. Guo , title =. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , volume =

  77. [85]

    Keller , title =

    B. Keller , title =. Triangulated categories , pages =. 2010 , volume=

    2010

  78. [86]

    Keller and S

    B. Keller and S. Scherotzke , title =. Adv. Math. , volume =

  79. [87]

    Keller , title =

    B. Keller , title =. Derived categories in algebraic geometry , pages =. 2012 , volume=

    2012

  80. [88]

    Keller , title =

    B. Keller , title =. Ann. of Math. (2) , volume =

  81. [89]

    Reading , title =

    N. Reading , title =. Math. Z. , volume =

  82. [90]

    C. M. Ringel , title =. J. Algebraic Combin. , volume =

  83. [91]

    Rupel and S

    D. Rupel and S. Stella , title =. SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. , volume =

  84. [92]

    Rupel and S

    D. Rupel and S. Stella and H. Williams , title =. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , volume =

  85. [93]

    Yang and A

    S.-W. Yang and A. Zelevinsky , title =. Transform. Groups , volume =

  86. [94]

    A. de St. Germain , title =

  87. [95]

    A. de St. Germain , title =. 2023 , note =

    2023

  88. [96]

    A. de St. Germain and M. Huang and J.H. Lu , title =. 2023 , note =

    2023

  89. [97]

    Zamolodchikov , abstract =

    Al.B. Zamolodchikov , abstract =. On the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz equations for reflectionless ADE scattering theories , journal =. 1991 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(91)91737-G , url =

    1991 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.