Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Eccentric neutron star–black hole mergers sharpen spin, mass, and eccentricity measurements enough that a handful of detections can reveal their formation channel, neutron star mass structure, and birth metallicity.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 21:13 UTC pith:6OBLO6OX

load-bearing objection A clean, useful forecasting paper for eccentric NSBH populations whose headline numbers all hinge on one imported, un-swept PE improvement; worth refereeing with a required sensitivity analysis. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16136 v2 pith:6OBLO6OX submitted 2026-07-17 astro-ph.HE

Eccentricity as a Magnifying Glass: Precision Population Inference Enabled by Eccentric Neutron Star-Black Hole Mergers

Alberto Salvarese , Hsin-Yu Chen , Aaron Zimmerman , Snehal Tibrewal This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords neutron star-black hole mergersgravitational-wave eccentricitypopulation inferenceeffective spinneutron star mass distributionhierarchical Bayesian analysisO5 observing run
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the gravitational waves from eccentric neutron star–black hole (NSBH) mergers carry more precise information about component masses and spins than circular ones, because eccentricity excites higher harmonics and breaks parameter degeneracies. It simulates O5-like catalogs of eccentric NSBH detections and uses hierarchical Bayesian inference to show that this extra precision turns a small sample into a powerful population probe. Eccentric systems would: nearly double the rate at which spin–orbit misaligned (negative χ_eff) events are confidently identified (one per ~2.5 detections), reveal bimodal structure in the neutron star mass distribution that circular systems would hide, tighten constraints on the minimum and maximum neutron star mass, discriminate between black hole progenitor metallicity models, and test a proposed universal eccentricity distribution.

Core claim

The central discovery is that eccentricity is not just a formation tracer but an information amplifier. Adopting a factor-of-10 reduction in the uncertainties on the symmetric mass ratio and effective spin (as reported in a companion parameter-estimation study), the paper shows that ~43% of synthetic eccentric NSBH detections yield χ_eff < −2σ, versus ~22% for circular systems — so a confidently misaligned event appears roughly every 2.5 eccentric detections. With 30 detections, the Bayes factor favoring a double-peaked neutron star mass distribution over a uniform one grows by up to ~7.5 relative to the circular case, and the constraints on m_min and m_max tighten by factors of ~2 and ~2.5.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the eccentricity-induced improvement in single-event parameter estimation: eccentric orbits introduce higher harmonics and alter the time-frequency evolution of the waveform, breaking degeneracies and shrinking the posterior on the symmetric mass ratio η and effective spin χ_eff. The paper treats this as a simple factor-of-10 shrinkage of the measurement uncertainty relative to quasi-circular systems, then propagates the sharper event-level posteriors through a hierarchical Bayesian population analysis with detection-selection corrections.

Load-bearing premise

The headline rate and all Bayes-factor gains rest on the assumed factor-of-10 reduction in the uncertainties on the symmetric mass ratio and effective spin for eccentric systems; if real eccentric systems improve the measurements by a smaller factor (or only in part of the eccentricity range), the reported gains scale downward proportionally.

What would settle it

Measure the single-event posterior widths of the first handful of confidently eccentric NSBH detections in the fifth observing run and compare them with quasi-circular analogs at the same signal-to-noise ratio. If the widths on χ_eff and η do not shrink by close to an order of magnitude, the reported rates (one misaligned event per ~2.5 detections, and the Bayes-factor gains) will not be realised. More directly, a single eccentric NSBH event with a χ_eff posterior that straddles zero at low significance would not falsify the population claim by itself, but a systematic absence of negative-χ_ef

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A confidently identified spin–orbit misaligned NSBH merger (χ_eff < −2σ) should occur about once every 2.5 eccentric NSBH detections, providing a clear fingerprint of dynamical assembly.
  • The double-peaked neutron star mass distribution becomes distinguishable from a uniform distribution with growing Bayes factor as detections accumulate, reaching a ~7.5-fold advantage over the circular case at 30 detections.
  • Eccentricity-enhanced NS mass measurements tighten the inferred lower and upper bounds of the neutron star mass distribution by factors ~2 and ~2.5 at 30 detections, sharpening constraints on dense nuclear matter.
  • Black hole progenitor metallicity models become separable; the intermediate-metallicity model is favored over the high-metallicity model with Bayes-factor gains up to ~10^14 at 30 detections.
  • The population-level eccentricity distribution slope (a = −12/19) can be recovered and validated with the ~10 eccentric NSBH detections expected in the fifth observing run.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The headline rate of one misaligned event per ~2.5 detections is directly proportional to the assumed factor-of-10 uncertainty reduction; if real eccentric systems achieve a smaller or eccentricity-dependent improvement, the rate would drop toward the circular ~22% value, though still likely an enhancement.
  • The same 'eccentricity as magnifying glass' logic should apply to other astrophysical parameters the paper does not fully explore, such as the neutron star's tidal deformability: eccentric higher harmonics may help disentangle tidal effects from spin-induced quadrupole deformations, potentially enabling equation-of-state constraints from fewer events.
  • A testable prediction: if real O5 eccentric NSBH events show posterior widths that are indeed ~10 times narrower than circular analogs, the detected rate of negative-χ_eff systems should exceed the circular expectation; conversely, measuring broad χ_eff posteriors in the first few events would falsify the adopted precision gain.
  • The authors' neglect of SNR enhancement from eccentricity (acknowledged in Appendix A) might actually be conservative: if eccentric signals are also louder, the effective detection volume grows and the per-detection information content rises further.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper simulates eccentric neutron star–black hole (NSBH) populations detectable with A+ sensitivity, models the parameter-estimation improvement from eccentricity by reducing the η and χ_eff uncertainties by a uniform factor of 10 relative to quasi-circular systems, and then performs hierarchical Bayesian population inference. It compares Double-peaked vs Uniform NS mass models, infers NS mass bounds, distinguishes BH progenitor-metallicity models, and recovers the slope of a proposed eccentricity distribution. The headline claims are that one confidently misaligned (negative χ_eff) event occurs every ~2.5 eccentric NSBH detections, that NS mass structure and mass bounds are significantly better constrained, that metallicity models are more strongly distinguished, and that the eccentricity distribution can be tested by the end of O5.

Significance. The paper addresses a timely and important question: whether eccentric NSBH mergers are not only tracers of dynamical formation but also precision probes of compact-binary population properties. The analysis is carefully structured: it uses standard selection-corrected hierarchical likelihoods, explicit priors (Appendices B–C), a nested-sampling evidence calculation, and 30 catalog realizations to quantify sampling noise. If the adopted eccentricity-driven PE improvement is correct, the paper would establish an interesting new scientific payoff for eccentric NSBH detections. However, the quantitative conclusions are controlled by two assumptions that receive insufficient scrutiny: a uniform factor-10 uncertainty reduction imported from a companion paper, and the neglect of eccentricity dependence in the detection SNR. These assumptions affect the headline rates and all reported Bayes-factor gains, so the current manuscript cannot be accepted without sensitivity analysis or stronger justification.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, 'Eccentric' scenario; Figures 2–5] The factor-of-10 reduction in η and χ_eff uncertainties is applied uniformly to all eccentricities in [0.1, 0.9], but the cited Tibrewal et al. (2026) supports improvements of factors 5–13 only for e≈0.1–0.25. Because the injected p(log e)∝e^{-12/19} places many systems near low e but also populates e>0.25, this is an extrapolation that lacks direct support. The Section 3 fraction (43% vs 22%) and the 'one event per ~2.5 detections' claim, as well as the Bayes-factor gains in Figures 2, 4, and the hyperparameter-precision ratios in Figure 3, scale directly with this single input. No sensitivity analysis is provided for a factor-5 reduction, an e-dependent reduction, or an SNR-dependent uncertainty model. The manuscript should show how the headline results degrade under the lower end of the quoted range.
  2. [Appendix A and Section 6, Eq. (B11)] The detection model neglects any SNR dependence on eccentricity, and the paper argues this introduces no selection bias because eccentricity is drawn independently of the intrinsic source parameters entering the selection calculation. This argument is incomplete: if pdet depends on e, then even for independent e, the observed e distribution is weighted by pdet(e), so the selection factor ξ(Λ,M) must include an integral over e. Equation (B11) integrates only over θ={mNS, mBH, D_L}. The eccentricity-distribution slope inference in Section 6 omits pdet(e) by construction. If eccentricity affects detectability at all, the recovery of a in Figure 5 is biased. The authors should either include e in the injection-based selection estimate or quantify the regime in which neglecting e in pdet is safe.
  3. [Section 6, Eq. (6)] The exercise is described as testing the proposed universal eccentricity distribution, but it is a recovery test within the same power-law model family used to generate the injections. The analysis only infers the slope a, assuming the functional form p(e)∝e^{a-1} and fixed bounds. No comparison is made against alternative eccentricity distributions (e.g., circular population, different functional forms, or different bounds). The abstract's statement that the proposed distribution 'can be tested by the end of O5' overstates what is demonstrated. A model-comparison or goodness-of-fit test would be needed to support the claim of a test.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are typographical issues such as 'L VK' with irregular spacing, and some equations (e.g., Eq. B10) contain extraneous commas and formatting glitches. A careful proofread is needed.
  2. [References] Several DOIs appear to be placeholders or invalid, e.g., Chatziioannou et al. 2025 ('10.1103/ymsq-cfcw') and Kacanja et al. 2025 ('10.1103/jnsc-783p'). These should be corrected or replaced with proper journal identifiers.
  3. [Section 3] The notation χ_eff < −2σ_{χ_eff} should be clarified: is this a posterior credible interval excluding zero at 2σ, or a frequentist statement about the true value relative to the measurement uncertainty? The text says 'approximately the 2σ level' but the calculation method should be specified precisely.
  4. [Figure 3] The caption defines σ_circ/σ_ecc but does not state whether these are medians of per-event uncertainties or widths of population hyperparameter posteriors. Please define the ratio unambiguously.
  5. [Appendix C, Table 3] The prior for m_max^U is written as 'm_max^U ∼ U(10,14)' with inconsistent math formatting; make the notation uniform with the other hyperparameters.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Headline rate is controlled by a factor-of-10 PE-improvement input imported from an overlapping-author companion paper; the population-inference machinery itself is not circular.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2 (Simulations and Methods) uncertainty model; used in Section 3 (Negative Effective Spin)]
    "We model the effect of eccentricity by reducing the measurement uncertainties relative to the quasi-circular case. This choice is motivated by Tibrewal et al. (2026), who showed that orbital eccentricities in the range e∼0.1–0.25 can reduce the uncertainty in the component masses and χ_eff by factors of ∼5–13 for GW200105-like systems. We therefore adopt a reduction that represents an intermediate choice within that range. ... Eccentric: a factor of 10 reduction in the η and χ_eff uncertainties."

    The paper's headline quantitative result ('one event every ∼2.5 eccentric NSBH detections') is not derived from any PE computation performed in this paper; it is set by the adopted factor-of-10 reduction in δχ_eff. That reduction is justified only by citation to Tibrewal et al. (2026), whose author list includes three of the four authors of the present paper (Tibrewal, Zimmerman, Chen) and is not reproduced, benchmarked, or given a sensitivity analysis here. The Section 3 criterion χ_eff < −2σ_χeff uses the imported σ, so the 'clear evidence' fraction is a direct function of the imported input. If the true improvement were at the lower end of the cited 5–13 range, the headline rate would change proportionally; the paper's central claim is therefore load-bearing on an unverified self-citati

full rationale

The population-inference sections (3–5) use standard hierarchical Bayesian likelihoods, Monte Carlo selection functions, and injection-recovery checks; those analyses would be meaningful for any assumed per-event uncertainty and are not circular in themselves. The only load-bearing circularity concern is the imported factor-of-10 PE improvement: Section 2 adopts it from the overlapping-author companion paper (arXiv:2607.16135), and the abstract's flagship rate follows from applying the imported σ to the χ_eff<−2σ criterion. This is a fragility/sensitivity issue as much as a circularity, but because the self-citation supplies the exact number that controls the headline result and no independent support is given, it qualifies as load-bearing self-citation (score 4). Section 6's recovery of the injected slope a=−12/19 is an injection-recovery consistency test of the inference pipeline, not an independent confirmation of Rozner et al. (2026); it is not counted as a separate circularity because the paper only claims the distribution can be tested, not that it has been verified. Overall, the central claim has independent content in the population-inference methodology, so the score is 4 rather than higher.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 10 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are simulation inputs and the imported PE improvement; the axioms are standard population-modeling assumptions, with the most fragile being the factor-10 PE reduction and the eccentricity-independent detection model.

free parameters (5)
  • Eccentric PE uncertainty reduction factor = 10
    Hand-chosen as an intermediate value among factors 5–13 reported in Tibrewal et al. (2026); all downstream gains scale with this number.
  • Baseline circular uncertainties for η and χ_eff = 0.021 and 0.097 at SNR 20
    Adopted from Tibrewal et al. (2026); defines the 'Circular' scenario and anchors the eccentric scenario via the factor-10 reduction.
  • Fiducial NS mass distribution hyperparameters = μ1=1.3, σ1=0.03, μ2=1.8, σ2=0.07, mmin=1.2, mmax=2.5, α=0, f1=f2=1/3
    Chosen to represent a bimodal Galactic NS mass distribution; all NS-mass inference results depend on this injected shape.
  • Fiducial BH metallicity model hyperparameters (Z2) and alternatives Z1, Z3 = Z2: μ=8, σ=8, mmin=2.5, mmax=20 M_sun
    Representative population-synthesis mass distributions from Broekgaarden et al. (2021); the metallicity discrimination claims depend on these shapes.
  • Eccentricity distribution slope a = -12/19
    Injected from Rozner et al. (2026); Section 6 is an injection-recovery of this value rather than an independent test.
axioms (10)
  • standard math Isolated binary evolution circularizes orbits before they enter the detector band (Peters-Mathews)
    Used in the Introduction to motivate eccentricity as a tracer of non-isolated formation.
  • domain assumption Dynamical assembly produces residual eccentricity
    Standard assumption in the field, cited to multiple formation-channel studies.
  • domain assumption GW200105 has measurable eccentricity
    Relied on to motivate the population; multiple cited analyses support this, but it is not established beyond dispute.
  • domain assumption Eccentricity reduces PE uncertainties by factor ~10
    Adopted from Tibrewal et al. (2026), a companion paper with overlapping authorship; not independently validated in this work.
  • ad hoc to paper SNR does not depend on eccentricity in the detection calculation
    Explicitly assumed in Appendix A; if false, the eccentricity-distribution inference and event counts could be biased.
  • domain assumption NS spin is negligible and BH spin tilt is isotropically distributed
    Defines the dynamical-population model used for the χ_eff forecasts.
  • domain assumption No pairing function between NS and BH masses; no mass-χ_eff correlations
    Allows separable population priors in Appendix B; may not hold for real NSBH formation channels.
  • domain assumption Universal eccentricity distribution p(log e) ∝ e^{-12/19}
    Proposed by Rozner et al. (2026); injected and then recovered in Section 6.
  • standard math GWMockCat prescription generates realistic PE samples
    Standard mock-catalog method for luminosity distance and component masses, cited to Farah et al. (2023).
  • standard math Hierarchical likelihood conditioned on detection is unbiased
    Equations B10–B13; standard population-inference formalism with selection correction.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12811 in / 13246 out tokens · 106572 ms · 2026-08-01T21:13:55.646265+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The formation history of compact binary systems remains one of the key open questions in astrophysics. Theoretical studies generally favor isolated binary evolution for neutron star-black hole (NSBH) systems, which tends to produce nearly circular orbits. However, recent analyses of the gravitational-wave event GW200105 indicate that its source has measurable eccentricity, suggesting that alternative formation channels may also contribute. It has been shown that the intrinsic parameters of eccentric NSBH mergers, such as the component masses and spins, are much better measured than circular mergers with LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) observatories. We explore how such eccentricity-enhanced parameter measurements can affect the inference of NSBH formation channels. We find that sharper measurements of the effective spin parameter $\chi_{\rm eff}$ increase the fraction of systems for which negative values can be confidently identified, allowing for the clear measurement of a spin-orbit misaligned event every $\sim 2.5$ eccentric NSBH detections for an isotropically distributed population in the fifth LVK observing run (O5). Improved NS mass measurements provide better constraining power for NS mass distributions, potentially revealing structure and tightening the bounds that can be drawn on their upper and lower masses. Similarly, the recovery of a metallicity-dependent BH mass distribution is improved by eccentricity-enhanced measurements. Finally, we show that the proposed population-level eccentricity distribution for dynamical-formation channels can be tested by the end of O5.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16136 by Aaron Zimmerman, Alberto Salvarese, Hsin-Yu Chen, Snehal Tibrewal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top panel: Double-peaked NS mass distribution (blue solid line; injection) and Uniform NS mass distribution (orange dashed line; test model). Bottom panel: BH mass distributions for the three progenitor-metallicity models: Z1 (orange dashed line; test model), Z2 (blue solid line; injec￾tion), and Z3 (green dash-dotted line; test model). of Gaussian noise to the calculated optimal signal-to￾noise (SNR) rati… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows log10 BDP,U as a function of the number of detections, where we plot the median and symmetric 68% credible interval over 30 independent realizations. In the Circular scenario, the fiducial Double-peaked model is not significantly preferred over the simpler Uniform model even with 30 detections: the larger NS￾mass uncertainties obscure the structure of the under￾lying distribution, while the additiona… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Ratio between the precision of the inferred NS mass hyperparameters obtained under the Circular and Eccentric scenarios. We show the median and symmetric 68% credible interval of σcirc/σecc over 30 catalog realizations. Values greater than unity (black horizontal line) indicate tighter constraints in the Eccentric scenario. The left and right panels show the results for mmin NS and mmax NS , respectively … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: log10 Bayes factors comparing the fiducial intermediate-metallicity BH progenitor model, Z2, against the low- and high-metallicity models, Z1 and Z3. We show the median and symmetric 68% credible interval over 30 catalog realizations for log10 BZ2,Z1 (left panel) and log10 BZ2,Z3 (right panel), assuming Circular (blue) and Eccentric (orange). Values greater than zero indicate support for the fiducial inter… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Inferred posterior of the eccentricity-distribution slope a. The markers show the median across 30 independent catalog realizations of the posterior median; the error bars show the corresponding median lower and upper bounds of the central 68% credible intervals. The black horizontal line marks the injected value, a = −12/19. choice of Nobs and report the results in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Adopted eccentricity uncertainty δe as a function of eccentricity. This uncertainty model is used to generate the eccentricity PE samples adopted in the analysis. is the detection efficiency. In practice, the event-level integrals are evaluated via Monte Carlo integration over the Ns PE posterior samples ⃗θ (j) i for each event: Z d ⃗θ L(di | ⃗θ) p( ⃗θ |Λ⃗ , M) ≈ 1 Ns X Ns j=1 p  ⃗θ (j) i |Λ⃗ , M  π  ⃗θ… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Impact of eccentricity and higher-modes on neutron star-black hole parameter estimation

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Eccentric NSBH signals like GW200105 contain much more information about masses, mass ratio, and effective spin per unit SNR than circular signals, but not about sky position or distance.

  2. Impact of eccentricity and higher-modes on neutron star-black hole parameter estimation

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Eccentricity in neutron star–black hole mergers sharply tightens measurements of intrinsic parameters like mass ratio and effective spin, but gives almost no improvement in distance or sky localization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2026 , eprint=

    Impact of eccentricity and higher-modes on neutron star-black hole parameter estimation , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  2. [2]

    and Edelman, Bruce and Zevin, Michael and Fishbach, Maya and María Ezquiaga, Jose and Farr, Ben and Holz, Daniel E

    Farah, Amanda M. and Edelman, Bruce and Zevin, Michael and Fishbach, Maya and María Ezquiaga, Jose and Farr, Ben and Holz, Daniel E. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced02 , url =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced02 2023

  3. [3]

    and Taylor, Stephen R

    Vitale, Salvatore and Gerosa, Davide and Farr, Will M. and Taylor, Stephen R. Inferring the Properties of a Population of Compact Binaries in Presence of Selection Effects. Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy. 2020. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_45-1

    doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_45-1 2020

  4. [4]

    Bayesian analysis of neutrinos observed from supernova SN 1987A , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2002 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.063002 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.063002 2002

  5. [5]

    Finn, Lee Samuel and Chernoff, David F. , year=. Observing binary inspiral in gravitational radiation: One interferometer , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevd.47.2198 , number=

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.47.2198

  6. [6]

    Impact of massive binary star and cosmic evolution on gravitational wave observations I: black hole–neutron star mergers , volume=

    Broekgaarden, Floor S and Berger, Edo and Neijssel, Coenraad J and Vigna-Gómez, Alejandro and Chattopadhyay, Debatri and Stevenson, Simon and Chruslinska, Martyna and Justham, Stephen and de Mink, Selma E and Mandel, Ilya , year=. Impact of massive binary star and cosmic evolution on gravitational wave observations I: black hole–neutron star mergers , vol...

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2716

  7. [7]

    and Anderson, David R

    Burnham, Kenneth P. and Anderson, David R. , title =. 2002 , publisher =

    2002

  8. [8]

    and Millman, K

    Harris, Charles R. and Millman, K. Jarrod and van der Walt, Stéfan J and Gommers, Ralf and Virtanen, Pauli and Cournapeau, David and Wieser, Eric and Taylor, Julian and Berg, Sebastian and Smith, Nathaniel J. and Kern, Robert and Picus, Matti and Hoyer, Stephan and van Kerkwijk, Marten H. and Brett, Matthew and Haldane, Allan and Fernández del Río, Jaime ...

  9. [9]

    Hunter, J. D. , Title =. Computing in Science & Engineering , Volume =

  10. [10]

    AIP Conference Proceedings , volume =

    Skilling, John , title =. AIP Conference Proceedings , volume =. 2004 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.1835238 , url =

    doi:10.1063/1.1835238 2004

  11. [11]

    and Abbott, T

    Abbott, R. and Abbott, T. D. and Acernese, F. and Ackley, K. and Adams, C. and Adhikari, N. and Adhikari, R. X. and Adya, V. B. and Affeldt, C. and Agarwal, D. and Agathos, M. and Agatsuma, K. and others , year=. Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3 , volume=. Physical Review X , publisher=. doi:10.1103/...

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011048

  12. [12]

    2025 , eprint=

    GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  13. [13]

    dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences

    Speagle, Joshua S. dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2020. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa278. arXiv:1904.02180

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Farr, Will M. , year=. Accuracy Requirements for Empirically Measured Selection Functions , volume=. Research Notes of the AAS , publisher=. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ab1d5f , number=

    doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ab1d5f

  15. [15]

    Morey and Jan-Willem Romeijn and Jeffrey N

    Richard D. Morey and Jan-Willem Romeijn and Jeffrey N. Rouder , keywords =. The philosophy of Bayes factors and the quantification of statistical evidence , journal =. 2016 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.11.001 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2015.11.001 2016

  16. [16]

    Theory of Probability , year =

    Harold Jeffreys , editor =. Theory of Probability , year =

  17. [17]

    , title =

    Mukherjee, Pia and Parkinson, David and Liddle, Andrew R. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2006 , month =. doi:10.1086/501068 , url =

    doi:10.1086/501068 2006

  18. [18]

    Ezquiaga, Jose María and Holz, Daniel E. , year=. Jumping the Gap: Searching for LIGO’s Biggest Black Holes , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , publisher=. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe638 , number=

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe638 2041

  19. [19]

    and Berti, Emanuele and Bulik, Tomasz and Mandel, Ilya and O’Shaughnessy, Richard , year=

    Dominik, Michal and Belczynski, Krzysztof and Fryer, Christopher and Holz, Daniel E. and Berti, Emanuele and Bulik, Tomasz and Mandel, Ilya and O’Shaughnessy, Richard , year=. DOUBLE COMPACT OBJECTS. I. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE COMMON ENVELOPE ON MERGER RATES , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/1/52 , number=

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/1/52

  20. [20]

    and Bulik, Tomasz and O’Shaughnessy, Richard , year=

    Belczynski, Krzysztof and Holz, Daniel E. and Bulik, Tomasz and O’Shaughnessy, Richard , year=. The first gravitational-wave source from the isolated evolution of two stars in the 40–100 solar mass range , volume=. Nature , publisher=. doi:10.1038/nature18322 , number=

    doi:10.1038/nature18322

  21. [21]

    Mandel, Ilya and Broekgaarden, Floor S. , year=. Rates of compact object coalescences , volume=. Living Reviews in Relativity , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s41114-021-00034-3 , number=

    doi:10.1007/s41114-021-00034-3

  22. [22]

    Gravitational Radiation from Point Masses in a Keplerian Orbit , author =. Phys. Rev. , volume =. 1963 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.131.435 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrev.131.435 1963

  23. [23]

    Kulkarni, S. R. and Hut, Piet and McMillan, Steve J. , title =. Nature , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    1993

  24. [24]

    Nature , volume =

    Sigurdsson, Steinn and Hernquist, Lars , title =. Nature , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    1993

  25. [25]

    and McMillan, Stephen L

    Portegies Zwart, Simon F. and McMillan, Stephen L. W. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 1999 , month =. doi:10.1086/312422 , url =

    doi:10.1086/312422 1999

  26. [26]

    Hierarchical black hole mergers in young, globular and nuclear star clusters: the effect of metallicity, spin and cluster properties , volume=

    Mapelli, Michela and Dall’Amico, Marco and Bouffanais, Yann and Giacobbo, Nicola and Arca Sedda, Manuel and Artale, M Celeste and Ballone, Alessandro and Di Carlo, Ugo N and Iorio, Giuliano and Santoliquido, Filippo and Torniamenti, Stefano , year=. Hierarchical black hole mergers in young, globular and nuclear star clusters: the effect of metallicity, sp...

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1334

  27. [27]

    Eccentric black hole mergers via three-body interactions in young, globular, and nuclear star clusters , volume=

    Dall’Amico, Marco and Mapelli, Michela and Torniamenti, Stefano and Arca Sedda, Manuel , year=. Eccentric black hole mergers via three-body interactions in young, globular, and nuclear star clusters , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348745 , journal=

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348745

  28. [28]

    Orbital Eccentricity and Spin–Orbit Misalignment Are Evidence that Neutron Star–Black Hole Mergers Form through Triple Star Evolution , volume=

    Stegmann, Jakob and Klencki, Jakub , year=. Orbital Eccentricity and Spin–Orbit Misalignment Are Evidence that Neutron Star–Black Hole Mergers Form through Triple Star Evolution , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , publisher=. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae055b , number=

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae055b 2041

  29. [29]

    Dhurkunde, Rahul and Nitz, Alexander H. , year=. Search for eccentric NSBH and BNS mergers in the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Virgo , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.103018 , number=

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.103018

  30. [30]

    Eccentric black hole mergers forming in globular clusters , volume=

    Samsing, Johan , year=. Eccentric black hole mergers forming in globular clusters , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103014 , number=

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103014

  31. [31]

    and Abbott, T

    Abbott, R. and Abbott, T. D. and Abraham, S. and others , year=. Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star–Black Hole Coalescences , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , publisher=. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac082e , number=

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac082e 2041

  32. [32]

    2026 , eprint=

    GW200105: A detailed study of eccentricity in the neutron star-black hole binary , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  33. [33]

    Orbital eccentricity in a neutron star - black hole binary merger

    Morras, Gonzalo and Pratten, Geraint and Schmidt, Patricia. Orbital eccentricity in a neutron star - black hole binary merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2026. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae474c. arXiv:2503.15393

    arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Astrophysical implications of eccentricity in gravitational waves from neutron star-black hole binaries , volume=

    Romero-Shaw, Isobel and Stegmann, Jakob and Morras, Gonzalo and Dorozsmai, Andris and Zevin, Michael , year=. Astrophysical implications of eccentricity in gravitational waves from neutron star-black hole binaries , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stag323 , number=

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stag323

  35. [35]

    Kacanja, Keisi and Soni, Kanchan and Nitz, Alexander H. , year=. Eccentricity signatures in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s binary neutron star and neutron-star black holes , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/jnsc-783p , number=

    doi:10.1103/jnsc-783p

  36. [36]

    2026 , eprint=

    The Universal Eccentricity Distribution for Dynamical Gravitational-Wave Merger Channels , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  37. [37]

    and Zevin, Michael and Pankow, Chris and Kalogera, Vasilliki and Rasio, Frederic A

    Rodriguez, Carl L. and Zevin, Michael and Pankow, Chris and Kalogera, Vasilliki and Rasio, Frederic A. , year=. ILLUMINATING BLACK HOLE BINARY FORMATION CHANNELS WITH SPINS IN ADVANCED LIGO , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , publisher=. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/832/1/l2 , number=

    doi:10.3847/2041-8205/832/1/l2 2041

  38. [38]

    Stevenson, Simon and Berry, Christopher P. L. and Mandel, Ilya , year=. Hierarchical analysis of gravitational-wave measurements of binary black hole spin–orbit misalignments , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1764 , number=

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1764

  39. [39]

    and Stevenson, Simon and Miller, M

    Farr, Will M. and Stevenson, Simon and Miller, M. Coleman and Mandel, Ilya and Farr, Ben and Vecchio, Alberto , year=. Distinguishing spin-aligned and isotropic black hole populations with gravitational waves , volume=. Nature , publisher=. doi:10.1038/nature23453 , number=

    doi:10.1038/nature23453

  40. [40]

    Spin orientations of merging black holes formed from the evolution of stellar binaries , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.084036 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.084036 2018

  41. [41]

    Kiziltan, Bülent and Kottas, Athanasios and De Yoreo, Maria and Thorsett, Stephen E. , year=. THE NEUTRON STAR MASS DISTRIBUTION , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/778/1/66 , number=

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/778/1/66

  42. [42]

    ON THE MASS DISTRIBUTION AND BIRTH MASSES OF NEUTRON STARS , volume=

    Özel, Feryal and Psaltis, Dimitrios and Narayan, Ramesh and Santos Villarreal, Antonio , year=. ON THE MASS DISTRIBUTION AND BIRTH MASSES OF NEUTRON STARS , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/55 , number=

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/55

  43. [43]

    2016 , eprint=

    The millisecond pulsar mass distribution: Evidence for bimodality and constraints on the maximum neutron star mass , author=. 2016 , eprint=

    2016

  44. [44]

    Maximum mass cutoff in the neutron star mass distribution and the prospect of forming supramassive objects in the double neutron star mergers , volume=

    Shao, Dong-Sheng and Tang, Shao-Peng and Jiang, Jin-Liang and Fan, Yi-Zhong , year=. Maximum mass cutoff in the neutron star mass distribution and the prospect of forming supramassive objects in the double neutron star mergers , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.063006 , number=

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.063006

  45. [45]

    Ade, P. A. R. and Aghanim, N. and Arnaud, M. and others , year=. Planck2015 results: XIII. Cosmological parameters , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 , journal=

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830

  46. [46]

    Abbott, B. P. and Abbott, R. and Abbott, T. D. and Abraham, S. and Acernese, F. and others , year=. Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA , volume=. Living Reviews in Relativity , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9 , number=

    doi:10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9

  47. [47]

    Accuracy of Estimating Highly Eccentric Binary Black Hole Parameters with Gravitational-Wave Detections

    Gond \'a n, L \'a szl \'o and Kocsis, Bence and Raffai, P \'e ter and Frei, Zsolt. Accuracy of Estimating Highly Eccentric Binary Black Hole Parameters with Gravitational-Wave Detections. Astrophys. J. 2018. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaad0e. arXiv:1705.10781

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    Measurement Accuracy of Inspiraling Eccentric Neutron Star and Black Hole Binaries Using Gravitational Waves

    Gond \'a n, L \'a szl \'o and Kocsis, Bence. Measurement Accuracy of Inspiraling Eccentric Neutron Star and Black Hole Binaries Using Gravitational Waves. Astrophys. J. 2019. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf893. arXiv:1809.00672

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Parameter estimation for inspiraling eccentric compact binaries including pericenter precession

    Mikoczi, Balazs and Kocsis, Bence and Forgacs, Peter and Vasuth, Matyas. Parameter estimation for inspiraling eccentric compact binaries including pericenter precession. Phys. Rev. D. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.104027. arXiv:1206.5786

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  50. [50]

    2019 , eprint=

    Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyro , author=. 2019 , eprint=

    2019

  51. [51]

    James Bradbury and Roy Frostig and Peter Hawkins and Matthew James Johnson and Yash Katariya and Chris Leary and Dougal Maclaurin and George Necula and Adam Paszke and Jake Vander

  52. [52]

    Masses, Radii, and the Equation of State of Neutron Stars , volume=

    Özel, Feryal and Freire, Paulo , year=. Masses, Radii, and the Equation of State of Neutron Stars , volume=. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , publisher=. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023322 , number=

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023322

  53. [53]

    and Prakash, Madappa , year=

    Lattimer, James M. and Prakash, Madappa , year=. The equation of state of hot, dense matter and neutron stars , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.12.005 , journal=

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.12.005 2015

  54. [54]

    Thankful and Gandolfi, Stefano and Tews, Ingo and Radice, David and Steiner, Andrew W

    Chatziioannou, Katerina and Cromartie, H. Thankful and Gandolfi, Stefano and Tews, Ingo and Radice, David and Steiner, Andrew W. and Watts, Anna L. , year=. Neutron stars and the dense matter equation of state , volume=. Reviews of Modern Physics , publisher=. doi:10.1103/ymsq-cfcw , number=

    doi:10.1103/ymsq-cfcw

  55. [55]

    2026 , eprint=

    A universal framework to identify eccentric binary mergers: GW200105 case study , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  56. [56]

    THE FORMATION OF ECCENTRIC COMPACT BINARY INSPIRALS AND THE ROLE OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE EMISSION IN BINARY-SINGLE STELLAR ENCOUNTERS , volume=

    Samsing, Johan and MacLeod, Morgan and Ramirez-Ruiz, Enrico , year=. THE FORMATION OF ECCENTRIC COMPACT BINARY INSPIRALS AND THE ROLE OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE EMISSION IN BINARY-SINGLE STELLAR ENCOUNTERS , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/784/1/71 , number=

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/784/1/71

  57. [57]

    and Liu, Bin , title =

    Samsing, Johan and Hendriks, Kai and Zwick, Lorenz and D’Orazio, Daniel J. and Liu, Bin , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9f3d , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9f3d 2025

  58. [58]

    Antonini, Fabio and Toonen, Silvia and Hamers, Adrian S. , year=. Binary Black Hole Mergers from Field Triples: Properties, Rates, and the Impact of Stellar Evolution , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6f5e , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6f5e

  59. [59]

    On the Eccentricity Distribution of Coalescing Black Hole Binaries Driven by the Kozai Mechanism in Globular Clusters , volume=

    Wen, Linqing , year=. On the Eccentricity Distribution of Coalescing Black Hole Binaries Driven by the Kozai Mechanism in Globular Clusters , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1086/378794 , number=

    doi:10.1086/378794

  60. [60]

    and Kocsis, Bence and Loeb, Abraham , year=

    O’Leary, Ryan M. and Kocsis, Bence and Loeb, Abraham , year=. Gravitational waves from scattering of stellar-mass black holes in galactic nuclei , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14653.x , number=

    arXiv 2009

  61. [61]

    Antonini, Fabio and Perets, Hagai B. , year=. SECULAR EVOLUTION OF COMPACT BINARIES NEAR MASSIVE BLACK HOLES: GRAVITATIONAL WAVE SOURCES AND OTHER EXOTICA , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/27 , number=

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/27

  62. [62]

    Detection of GW200105 with a targeted eccentric search , volume=

    Phukon, Khun Sang and Schmidt, Patricia and Morras, Gonzalo and Pratten, Geraint , year=. Detection of GW200105 with a targeted eccentric search , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/cmtb-5q4b , number=

    work page doi:10.1103/cmtb-5q4b

  63. [63]

    2026 , eprint=

    GWTC-5.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  64. [64]

    2026 , eprint=

    Impact of eccentricity on the population properties of neutron star - black hole mergers , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  65. [65]

    Population properties and multimessenger prospects of neutron star–black hole mergers following GWTC-3 , volume=

    Biscoveanu, Sylvia and Landry, Philippe and Vitale, Salvatore , year=. Population properties and multimessenger prospects of neutron star–black hole mergers following GWTC-3 , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3052 , number=

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3052

  66. [66]

    Population Properties of Gravitational-wave Neutron Star–Black Hole Mergers , volume=

    Zhu, Jin-Ping and Wu, Shichao and Qin, Ying and Zhang, Bing and Gao, He and Cao, Zhoujian , year=. Population Properties of Gravitational-wave Neutron Star–Black Hole Mergers , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac540c , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac540c

  67. [67]

    Inferring the Neutron Star Maximum Mass and Lower Mass Gap in Neutron Star–Black Hole Systems with Spin , volume=

    Ye, Christine and Fishbach, Maya , year=. Inferring the Neutron Star Maximum Mass and Lower Mass Gap in Neutron Star–Black Hole Systems with Spin , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7f99 , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7f99

  68. [68]

    and Galaudage, Shanika , year=

    Farah, Amanda and Fishbach, Maya and Essick, Reed and Holz, Daniel E. and Galaudage, Shanika , year=. Bridging the Gap: Categorizing Gravitational-wave Events at the Transition between Neutron Stars and Black Holes , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f03 , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f03

  69. [69]

    Advanced LIGO , volume=

    Aasi, J and Abbott, B P and Abbott, R and Abbott, T and Abernathy, M R and Ackley, K and Adams, C and Adams, T and Addesso, P and Adhikari, R X and others , year=. Advanced LIGO , volume=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001 , number=

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001

  70. [70]

    Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , volume=

    Acernese, F and Agathos, M and Agatsuma, K and Aisa, D and Allemandou, N and Allocca, A and others , year=. Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , volume=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001 , number=

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001

  71. [71]

    2021 , eprint=

    Overview of KAGRA: Calibration, detector characterization, physical environmental monitors, and the geophysics interferometer , author=. 2021 , eprint=

    2021

  72. [72]

    and Shaikh, Md Arif and Kapadia, Shasvath J

    Tiwari, Avinash and Bhat, Sajad A. and Shaikh, Md Arif and Kapadia, Shasvath J. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d74 , url =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d74 2025