Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

This paper argues that the binary black-hole mergers in the fifth LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA catalog split into four distinct subpopulations—differing in mass, mass ratio, and spin—and that the four-component model beats a single smooth population mo

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 06:03 UTC pith:XYVZLUH4

load-bearing objection A careful but methodologically circular four-component decomposition of GWTC-5.0; the Bayes factor is overstated, but the analysis is worth engaging seriously. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22011 v2 pith:XYVZLUH4 submitted 2026-07-24 astro-ph.HE

Revealing Four Subpopulations of Binary Black-Hole Mergers with the Fifth Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

Nir Guttman , Paul D. Lasky , Eric Thrane This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords gravitational wavesbinary black holespopulation inferencemass spectrumspin distributionsubpopulationshierarchical mergersGWTC-5.0
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that the merging black holes seen by gravitational-wave observatories do not form one smooth population but four distinct subpopulations. The authors first run a non-parametric reconstruction that places probability where the data prefer it, see four clusters in the two-dimensional component-mass plane, and then build a four-component parametric mixture around those clusters. The dominant component is a low-mass, low-spin population near 10 solar masses that contributes about 70% of the merger rate and is separated from heavier systems by a depletion near 14 solar masses. Two intermediate-mass components differ in mass ratio—one pairs a ~10 solar-mass black hole with a heavier primary, the other merges nearly equal masses near 30–35 solar masses—and a rare percent-level high-mass component has broad mass ratios and large spins. If correct, the decomposition maps onto distinct formation channels: failed supernovae, isolated-binary mass transfer, dense stellar environments, and hierarchical mergers, which is why a sympathetic reader would care.

Core claim

The central claim is that the GWTC-5.0 binary black-hole population is naturally described by four subpopulations with distinct mass, mass-ratio, and spin properties, and the four-component model is preferred over the standard LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA population model by a log Bayes factor of 19.2. The low-mass component centres at 10.1 solar masses in primary mass, favours near-equal mass ratio (mean 0.85), has low spins and aligned tilts, and contributes ~70% of the merger rate. The horizontal component contributes ~13%, pairs a secondary concentrated near 9.2 solar masses with a power-law primary extending to ~37 solar masses, and shows mixed spin properties. The diagonal component contributes ~1

What carries the argument

The method is a two-stage hybrid. First, a non-parametric maximum-likelihood population reconstruction ('pi-stroke') represents the population as a weighted collection of delta functions and is used only to identify where the data want support in the (m1, m2) plane. Second, guided by the four clusters seen there, the authors construct a parametric mixture: each subpopulation gets its own mass distribution (truncated normals, power laws, and Planck tapers) and its own spin model, either in effective spin (a truncated normal plus uniform mixture for chi_eff) or in physical spins (spin magnitudes and tilt alignments). The comparison model is the standard LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA default population mode

Load-bearing premise

The four-component structure and the evidence for it are both derived from the same data: the mixture was designed after seeing clusters in the non-parametric reconstruction of these 259 events, and the Bayes factor does not correct for that look-elsewhere effect; if the clusters are artifacts of the maximum-likelihood delta-function solution, the four-component claim collapses.

What would settle it

Feed the same two-stage pipeline mock gravitational-wave catalogs drawn from a single smooth population (or apply it to the next independent catalog), and check how often a four-component model is preferred by ln BF > 10. If such false positives are common, the claimed evidence is a selection artifact; if a future catalog also yields four stable components with similar mixture fractions, the claim is supported.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the four-component model is correct, the majority of binary black-hole mergers come from a low-mass, low-spin channel near 10 solar masses, and the depletion near 14 solar masses is real structure, with the merger rate there about 26 times lower than the default model predicts.
  • The population cannot be summarized by the primary-mass distribution alone: the horizontal and diagonal components overlap in primary mass but have very different mass-ratio and spin behaviour, so mass ratio and spin are needed to separate channels.
  • Distinct spin properties across components support formation-channel interpretations: low-mass and diagonal are low-spin, horizontal is mixed, high-mass is broad and misaligned, consistent with hierarchical mergers.
  • Current data do not require separate redshift evolution for the four components: allowing component-specific redshift laws changes the log Bayes factor by less than about 0.5.
  • The paper reports independent agreement from another non-parametric analysis of similar subpopulation structure, suggesting the findings are not unique to this particular method.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported ln BF = 19.2 likely overstates the evidence because the four-component model was chosen after inspecting the same events' non-parametric reconstruction; a principled correction for this in-sample model selection, or a comparison with 3- and 5-component alternatives, would give a fairer evidence figure.
  • If the 14 solar-mass depletion is astrophysical, stellar-evolution models can be tested by predicting the gap's location and width as functions of progenitor metallicity and redshift; future events inside the gap would challenge it.
  • The horizontal component's mixed spins imply a testable distinction: stable mass transfer with tidal spin-up predicts systematically positive chi_eff and aligned tilts for this component, whereas a dynamical origin predicts isotropic tilts.
  • The diagonal component's low chi_eff with possibly broad tilts is near the edge of current sensitivity; a larger catalog can determine whether its tilt distribution is truly isotropic, which would strongly favour formation in dense stellar environments over field binaries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes 259 binary black-hole mergers from GWTC-5.0 and argues that the population is naturally decomposed into four subpopulations in the (m1, m2) plane: a dominant low-mass component near 10–12 Msun, an unequal-mass 'horizontal' branch with secondary near 10 Msun, a near-equal-mass 'diagonal' branch peaking near 30–35 Msun, and a rare high-mass component with broad spins interpreted as hierarchical mergers. The method is two-stage: a non-parametric maximum-likelihood reconstruction (pi-stroke) is used as a discovery step, and the four parametric components are then 'motivated by these clusters' (Sec. 2). The four-component model is compared with the LVK default population model, reporting ln BF = 19.2 (physical spin) and ln BF = 16.5 (effective spin) in Sec. 4. The paper includes posterior predictive checks, selection effects following LVK prescriptions, and robustness to spin parameterization. The main claim is that these four components are distinct physical populations with distinct spin and mass-ratio properties.

Significance. If the four-component decomposition is robust, the paper would strengthen the emerging picture of multiple BBH formation channels, and the hybrid data-driven-plus-parametric approach is a useful methodological contribution. The analysis is generally careful: it uses standard LVK event selection and selection effects, includes posterior predictive intervals, does not impose the pair-instability gap, and checks both effective-spin and physical-spin parameterizations. However, the central evidence—the ln BF = 19.2 preference over the LVK baseline—is computed in-sample: the four components were chosen after inspecting the pi-stroke reconstruction of the same 259 events. The manuscript provides no 3- or 5-component comparison and no correction for the model-selection loop. Unless this is addressed, the 'overwhelmingly preferred' claim (Abstract) is not supported by the presented analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2 / Sec. 4]
  2. [Sec. 2, Eq. (1)]
  3. [Sec. 1 / Sec. 4]
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title]
  2. [Sec. 2]
  3. [Sec. 6]
  4. [Fig. 1]
  5. [Appendix B]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity found: the four-component model is fitted to the same data it is compared against, which is a statistical selection-effect concern, but no step reduces by construction to its own input.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: single-event posterior samples are used (1) to run a pi-stroke maximum-likelihood reconstruction, (2) to motivate a four-component parametric mixture, and (3) to compute a Bayes factor against the LVK default model on the same 259 events. This is an in-sample model-selection procedure, and the paper candidly states in Sec. 1: 'This procedure reverses the usual order of inference: rather than beginning with a theoretically motivated model and searching for its imprint in the data, we first identify and characterize the dominant structures preferred by the observations and only then interpret them astrophysically.' That is a real methodological caveat about look-elsewhere/selection effects, but it is not circularity in the sense required here: no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no equation is defined in terms of the quantity it claims to prove, and the reported ln BF = 19.2 is an actual computed evidence ratio, not an identity. The pi-stroke citations (Payne & Thrane 2023; Guttman et al. 2026) are method citations rather than imported conclusions, and the paper explicitly warns that pi-stroke 'should not be interpreted as the true astrophysical population distribution, nor as a smooth density estimate.' The absence of 3- or 5-component benchmarks and the lack of a null-hypothesis correction are correctness/statistical concerns, not circular reductions. No self-citation chain forces the central claim, and the astrophysical interpretations are presented as non-unique. Thus no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

10 free parameters · 5 axioms · 4 invented entities

The central claim rests on many fitted hyperparameters (40–45) plus a fixed spin-uniform interval chosen from a specific remnant-spin model. Most mass/spin structure is fitted, not predicted; independent support exists only for some components.

free parameters (10)
  • Mixture fractions f1, f2, f3 = f_low=0.709+0.069/-0.099, f_horiz=0.130+0.082/-0.059, f_diag=0.141+0.079/-0.047
    Fitted to GWTC-5.0; determine relative merger rates of the four components.
  • Low-mass component mass parameters (7) = mu_m1=10.1+1.5/-0.8 Msun, mu_q=0.85+0.12/-0.10; boundaries/taper widths in repo
    Truncated-normal shape parameters fitted to data; define the 10 Msun component.
  • Horizontal component parameters (6) = alpha=5.2+4.0/-5.7, mu_m2=9.2+2.3/-2.4 Msun, sigma_m2=3.8+1.8/-1.7 Msun
    Power law in m1 and normal in m2, fitted to data; defines the unequal-mass branch.
  • Diagonal component parameters (9) = lambda_pk=0.78+0.20/-0.34, mu_pk=31.0+2.7/-4.2 Msun
    Mixture of power law and truncated normal in m1, normal in q, fitted to data.
  • High-mass component parameters (6) = alpha_U and boundaries in repo; q-peak ~0.58+0.19/-0.25
    Power law in m1 and normal in q, fitted to data; defines the high-mass tail.
  • Redshift evolution index kappa = not reported in text
    Power-law redshift evolution shared across components, fitted to data.
  • Effective-spin parameters (8) = xi_chi: low=0.04, horiz=0.67, diag=0.11, high=0.77; other mu/sigma in repo
    Mixture of truncated normal and uniform in chi_eff; fitted separately per component.
  • Physical-spin parameters (13) = mu_chi high=0.58+0.36/-0.45, sigma_chi high=0.70+0.27/-0.36; others in repo
    Per-component spin magnitude and tilt mixture parameters, fitted to data.
  • Fixed chi_eff uniform interval (-0.47, 0.47) = -0.47, 0.47 (fixed by hand)
    Chosen from a 1G+2G remnant-spin model (Antonini et al. 2025) rather than fitted; affects high-mass spin support.
  • Aligned tilt component center mu_tilt = 1 = 1 (fixed)
    Aligned tilt component mean fixed at cos(theta)=1; not fitted.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The 259 selected GWTC-5.0 events and their posterior samples are reliable and independent.
    The analysis inherits LVK's event selection and posterior sampling; any catalog systematics propagate.
  • domain assumption The injection-based selection function is a valid estimate of detection efficiency.
    Standard LVK prescription; if injections are incomplete, mixture fractions and rates are biased.
  • domain assumption The pi-stroke maximum-likelihood reconstruction is a valid exploratory tool and its delta-function clusters correspond to real population support.
    Core discovery step; method from Payne & Thrane (2023) and Guttman et al. (2026).
  • ad hoc to paper The fixed spin-uniform interval (-0.47, 0.47) brackets the true chi_eff support of hierarchical-merger populations.
    Footnote 2; based on a specific remnant-spin assumption ã~0.69 and m1~2m2.
  • domain assumption Mass-spin model adequacy: four truncated-normal/power-law components can represent the true population without misspecification.
    Underlying parametric model; if wrong, the Bayes factor could be inflated.
invented entities (4)
  • low-mass subpopulation independent evidence
    purpose: Explain the dominant ~10 Msun, nearly equal-mass, low-spin mergers.
    Prior independent evidence exists (Legred et al. 2026; LVK catalogs).
  • horizontal subpopulation no independent evidence
    purpose: Explain unequal-mass mergers pairing a ~10 Msun secondary with a 20–38 Msun primary.
    This is the newly claimed branch; no independent confirmation yet.
  • diagonal subpopulation independent evidence
    purpose: Explain near-equal-mass 30–35 Msun low-spin mergers.
    The 35 Msun excess is known (Talbot & Thrane 2018), but separating it as a component is new.
  • high-mass subpopulation independent evidence
    purpose: Explain >47 Msun, broad-q, high-spin hierarchical mergers.
    Prior predictions/evidence for a hierarchical component (Antonini et al. 2025).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 17060 in / 15881 out tokens · 147582 ms · 2026-08-01T06:03:38.606847+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Gravitational-wave data are beginning to reveal a structured landscape of black-hole masses and spins, suggesting multiple formation processes are now being resolved observationally. We analyze data from LIGO--Virgo--KAGRA's (LVK's) fifth Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog and find that the population is naturally described by four distinct subpopulations. The dominant component, contributing $\simeq70\%$ of the astrophysical merger rate, is characterised by a low-mass population centred near $10M_\odot$ and is separated from heavier systems by a depletion near $14M_\odot$. This component may be associated with black holes formed from failed supernovae. Above this depletion, we find two intermediate-mass components: an unequal-mass branch pairing the lower-mass, $\simeq10M_\odot$ black hole with a heavier black hole, perhaps associated with isolated-binary/stable-mass-transfer formation, and a nearly equal-mass branch peaking near $30$--$35M_\odot$ whose low spins and mass distribution favour first-generation systems possibly born in dense stellar environments. A fourth, percent-level component extends to higher masses and is characterized by a broad mass-ratio distribution and large spin magnitudes, consistent with a hierarchical-merger population. Our four-component model is overwhelmingly preferred over a standard LVK population model by a natural-log Bayes factor of $\ln(\mathrm{BF}) = 19.2$. Our work observationally unveils a new subpopulation of black-hole mergers utilising a new hybrid data-driven and parametric-model discovery method, bringing us one step closer to understanding stellar-mass black-hole archaeology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22011 by Eric Thrane, Nir Guttman, Paul D. Lasky.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The distribution of black hole component masses. The central panel shows the reconstructed population density in the (m1, m2) plane, with grey shading denoting the total distribution. Darker shading indicates higher probability density. The coloured contours show 25% peak-density levels of different sub-populations identified in this study. The top and right panels show the corresponding marginal distribut… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Inferred mass-ratio and effective-spin properties of the four reconstructed subpopulations. Top: posterior predictive distributions for the mass ratio q, with shaded bands showing the corresponding 90% posterior predictive intervals. The low-mass component and diagonal com￾ponent favour nearly equal masses, while horizontal and high-mass prefer broader and more unequal-mass distribu￾tions. Bottom: posterio… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Inferred physical-spin properties of the four reconstructed subpopulations. Left: posterior predictive distributions for the spin magnitude χ, assumed to be identical for the primary and secondary black holes within each subpopulation. Shaded bands show the corresponding 90% posterior predictive intervals. Right: posterior distributions for the tilt-alignment mixing fractions ξ (k) tilt defined in Eq. (2).… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Low-mass depletion relative to the LVK default population model. Left: posterior predictive distributions for the primary mass m1 from the χeff and physical-spin four-subpopulation models, compared with the LVK default model. Right: moving-window probability ratios, R(m1) = Pours(Wm1 )/PLVK(Wm1 ), shown in terms of log10 R for the χeff and physical-spin models. Values below zero indicate mass windows where… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mass distributions of the four inferred binary-black-hole subpopulations in the (m1, m2) plane. The coloured shading shows the median posterior-predictive density of each subpopulation, weighted by its inferred population fraction, so that the relative intensities indicate the components’ contributions to the total population. For clarity, the shading is restricted to the highest-density region containing … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Four-dimensional Model-agnostic Probe into the Astrophysical Origins of Binary Black Hole Subpopulations

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A GPU-accelerated binned Gaussian process yields the first model-agnostic 4D BBH population in (m1, q, χeff, χp), revealing four mass-based subpopulations and new spin-mass-ratio correlations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A&A , volume =

    Failed supernovae as a natural explanation for the binary black hole mass distribution , author =. A&A , volume =. 2023 , publisher =

    2023

  2. [2]

    Low-mass failed supernovae and the 10\,M_

    Isaac Legred and Jacob Golomb and Katerina Chatziioannou , year=. Low-mass failed supernovae and the 10\,M_. 2604.01420 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    Model exploration in gravitational-wave astronomy with the maximum population likelihood , author =. Phys. Rev. Res. , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023013 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.023013 2023

  4. [4]

    and Thrane, Eric , title =

    Guttman, Nir and Payne, Ethan and Lasky, Paul D. and Thrane, Eric , title =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae17af , url =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae17af 2026

  5. [5]

    Journal of Open Source Software , doi =

    Colm Talbot and Amanda Farah and Shanika Galaudage and Jacob Golomb and Hui Tong , title =. Journal of Open Source Software , doi =. 2025 , publisher =

    2025

  6. [6]

    2026 , eprint=

    Evidence for additional structure in the effective spin distribution hints at multiple formation pathways in GWTC-5.0 , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  7. [7]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Antonini, Fabio and Gieles, Mark and Dosopoulou, Fani and Chattopadhyay, Debatri , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad972 , url =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad972 2023

  8. [8]

    Oey, M. S. , title =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/739/2/L46 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/739/2/l46 2011

  9. [9]

    2026 , eprint=

    Reversible-jump MCMC reveals binary black hole subpopulations with distinct redshift evolution , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  10. [10]

    and Vijaykumar, Aditya and Fishbach, Maya , title =

    Farah, Amanda M. and Vijaykumar, Aditya and Fishbach, Maya , title =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae4e19 , url =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae4e19 2026

  11. [11]

    2025 , month =

    Ray, Anarya and Hernandez, Ignacio Magaña and Breivik, Katelyn and Creighton, Jolien , title =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf22a , url =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf22a 2025

  12. [12]

    and Farah, Amanda M

    Tong, Hui and Fishbach, Maya and Thrane, Eric and Mould, Matthew and Callister, Thomas A. and Farah, Amanda M. and Guttman, Nir and Banagiri, Sharan and Beltran-Martinez, Daniel and Farr, Ben and Galaudage, Shanika and Godfrey, Jaxen and Heinzel, Jack and Kalomenopoulos, Marios and Miller, Simona J. and Vijaykumar, Aditya , date =. Evidence of the pair-in...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10359-0 2026

  13. [14]

    Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3 , author=. Phys. Rev. X , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011048 2023

  14. [15]

    2026 , eprint=

    Compactness Peaks and Subpopulations: Probing Stellar Physics and Formation Channels of Merging Binary Black Holes , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  15. [16]

    Compactness peaks: An astrophysical interpretation of the mass distribution of merging binary black holes , volume=

    Galaudage, Shanika and Lamberts, Astrid , year=. Compactness peaks: An astrophysical interpretation of the mass distribution of merging binary black holes , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451654 , journal=

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451654

  16. [17]

    2025 , eprint=

    GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  17. [18]

    Banagiri, Sharan and Thrane, Eric and Lasky, Paul D. , year=. Evidence for Three Subpopulations of Merging Binary Black Holes at Different Primary Masses , volume=. Physical Review Letters , publisher=. doi:10.1103/blyb-lqv6 , number=

    work page doi:10.1103/blyb-lqv6

  18. [19]

    , title =

    Mandel, Ilya and de Mink, Selma E. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw379 , url =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw379 2016

  19. [20]

    2025 , month =

    Kishore Roy, Soumendra and van Son, Lieke A C and Farr, Will M , title =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae1921 , url =

    doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae1921 2025

  20. [21]

    2021 , eprint=

    A Thesaurus for Common Priors in Gravitational-Wave Astronomy , author=. 2021 , eprint=

    2021

  21. [23]

    Schneider, Fabian R. N. and Podsiadlowski, Philipp and Laplace, Eva , title =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd77a , url =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd77a 2023

  22. [24]

    and Yungelson, Lev R

    Postnov, Konstantin A. and Yungelson, Lev R. , date =. The Evolution of Compact Binary Star Systems , url =. Living Reviews in Relativity , number =. 2014 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-3 , id =

    doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-3 2014

  23. [25]

    Star Cluster Population of High Mass Black Hole Mergers in Gravitational Wave Data , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.011401 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.011401 2025

  24. [26]

    and Adamcewicz, Christian and Doctor, Zoheyr and Kalogera, Vicky , title =

    Banagiri, Sharan and Callister, Thomas A. and Adamcewicz, Christian and Doctor, Zoheyr and Kalogera, Vicky , title =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf4c6 , url =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf4c6 2025

  25. [27]

    2025 , eprint=

    A subpopulation of low-mass, spinning black holes: signatures of dynamical assembly , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  26. [28]

    2026 , eprint=

    GWTC-5.0: An Introduction to Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  27. [29]

    2026 , eprint=

    GWTC-5.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  28. [30]

    and Thrane, Eric , year=

    Adamcewicz, Christian and Guttman, Nir and Lasky, Paul D. and Thrane, Eric , year=. Do Both Black Holes Spin in Merging Binaries? Evidence from GWTC-4 and Astrophysical Implications , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1370 , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1370

  29. [31]

    2018 , month =

    Talbot, Colm and Thrane, Eric , title =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab34c , url =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab34c 2018

  30. [32]

    B. P. Abbott and others. GW170608: Observation of a 19 Solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence

  31. [33]

    GW190412: Observation of a Binary-Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses

    R Abbott and others. GW190412: Observation of a Binary-Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses

  32. [34]

    Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914

    B P Abbott and others. Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914

  33. [35]

    On the properties of the massive binary black hole merger GW170729

    Katerina Chatziioannou and others. On the properties of the massive binary black hole merger GW170729

  34. [36]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R Abbott and others. GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

  35. [37]

    Talbot and E Thrane

    C. Talbot and E Thrane. Determining the population properties of spinning black holes

  36. [38]

    High resolution nonparametric inference of gravitational-wave populations in multiple dimensions , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063043 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.063043 2025

  37. [39]

    Nonparametric analysis of correlations in the binary black hole population with LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data , volume=

    Heinzel, Jack and Mould, Matthew and Vitale, Salvatore , year=. Nonparametric analysis of correlations in the binary black hole population with LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.l061305 , number=

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.l061305

  38. [40]

    2026 , eprint=

    Black hole mergers from dense star clusters with realistic binary populations , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  39. [41]

    , title =

    Zevin, Michael and Bavera, Simone S. , title =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6f5d , url =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6f5d 2022

  40. [42]

    Most Black Holes Are Born Very Slowly Rotating , volume=

    Fuller, Jim and Ma, Linhao , year=. Most Black Holes Are Born Very Slowly Rotating , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , publisher=. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab339b , number=

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab339b 2041

  41. [43]

    Unequal-mass highly spinning binary black hole mergers in the stable mass transfer formation channel , volume=

    Olejak, Aleksandra and Klencki, Jakub and Xu, Xiao-Tian and Wang, Chen and Belczynski, Krzysztof and Lasota, Jean-Pierre , year=. Unequal-mass highly spinning binary black hole mergers in the stable mass transfer formation channel , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450480 , journal=

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450480

  42. [44]

    Hierarchical mergers of stellar-mass black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures , volume=

    Gerosa, Davide and Fishbach, Maya , year=. Hierarchical mergers of stellar-mass black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures , volume=. Nature Astronomy , publisher=. doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01398-w , number=

    doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01398-w

  43. [45]

    Marchant, Pablo and Pappas, Kaliroë M. W. and Gallegos-Garcia, Monica and Berry, Christopher P. L. and Taam, Ronald E. and Kalogera, Vicky and Podsiadlowski, Philipp , year=. The role of mass transfer and common envelope evolution in the formation of merging binary black holes , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039992 , journal=

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039992

  44. [46]

    Applications to X-ray binaries and to the binarypulsars

    The effects of sudden mass loss and a random kick velocity produced in a supernova explosion on the dynamics of a binary star of arbitrary orbital eccentricity. Applications to X-ray binaries and to the binarypulsars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/160871 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/160871

  45. [47]

    M.\ and Takens, \ R

    Tauris, \ T. M.\ and Takens, \ R. J.\. Runaway velocities of stellar components originating from disrupted binaries via asymmetric supernova explosions. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 1998

    1998

  46. [48]

    Gravitational waves from supernova mass loss and natal kicks in close binaries , volume=

    Holgado, A Miguel and Ricker, Paul M , year=. Gravitational waves from supernova mass loss and natal kicks in close binaries , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2925 , number=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2925

  47. [49]

    Modelling precession effects with a single effective precession parameter , author =

    Towards models of gravitational waveforms from generic binaries: II. Modelling precession effects with a single effective precession parameter , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.024043 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.024043 2015

  48. [50]

    Coalescence of two spinning black holes: An effective one-body approach , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2001 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.124013 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.124013 2001

  49. [51]

    and Klencki, J

    Belczynski, K. and Klencki, J. and Fields, C. E. and Olejak, A. and Berti, E. and Meynet, G. and Fryer, C. L. and Holz, D. E. and O’Shaughnessy, R. and Brown, D. A. and Bulik, T. and Leung, S. C. and Nomoto, K. and Madau, P. and Hirschi, R. and Kaiser, E. and Jones, S. and Mondal, S. and Chruslinska, M. and Drozda, P. and Gerosa, D. and Doctor, Z. and Gie...

  50. [52]

    Resolving the Stellar-Collapse and Hierarchical-Merger Origins of the Coalescing Black Holes , volume=

    Li, Yin-Jie and Wang, Yuan-Zhu and Tang, Shao-Peng and Fan, Yi-Zhong , year=. Resolving the Stellar-Collapse and Hierarchical-Merger Origins of the Coalescing Black Holes , volume=. Physical Review Letters , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.051401 , number=

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.051401

  51. [53]

    2026 , eprint=

    Transitions in the Mass-ratio and Spin Properties of Binary Black Holes in GWTC-5 , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  52. [54]

    2026 , eprint=

    Distinct spin properties and astrophysical origin of low mass binary black holes in gravitational wave data , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  53. [55]

    2021 , month =

    Tiwari, Vaibhav and Fairhurst, Stephen , title =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abfbe7 , url =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abfbe7 2021

  54. [56]

    Examining the Gap in the Chirp Mass Distribution of Binary Black Holes , volume=

    Tiwari, Vaibhav , year=. Examining the Gap in the Chirp Mass Distribution of Binary Black Holes , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2260 , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2260

  55. [57]

    2026 , eprint=

    The Chirp-Mass Ladder: A New Rung Emerges , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  56. [58]

    2026 , eprint=

    No model-independent evidence for a peak in binary black hole spin (mis)alignments , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  57. [59]

    Mould, Matthew and Gerosa, Davide and Taylor, Stephen R. , year=. Deep learning and Bayesian inference of gravitational-wave populations: Hierarchical black-hole mergers , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.103013 , number=

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.103013

  58. [60]

    Reexamining Evidence of a Pair-instability Mass Gap in the Binary Black Hole Population , volume=

    Ray, Anarya and Kalogera, Vicky , year=. Reexamining Evidence of a Pair-instability Mass Gap in the Binary Black Hole Population , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , publisher=. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae374d , number=

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae374d 2041

  59. [61]

    and Vitale, Salvatore , year=

    Mould, Matthew and Heinzel, Jack and Álvarez-López, Sofía and Plunkett, Cailin and Wolfe, Noah E. and Vitale, Salvatore , year=. Measurement prospects for the pair-instability mass cutoff with gravitational waves , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/sqy9-nnqq , number=

    doi:10.1103/sqy9-nnqq

  60. [62]

    Is there an excess of black holes around 20 M⊙? Optimizing the complexity of population models with the use of reversible jump MCMC

    Toubiana, A and Katz, Michael L and Gair, Jonathan R , year=. Is there an excess of black holes around 20 M⊙? Optimizing the complexity of population models with the use of reversible jump MCMC. , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2215 , number=

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2215

  61. [63]

    2026 , eprint=

    Emergent structure in the binary black hole mass distribution and implications for population-based cosmology , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  62. [64]

    2026 , eprint=

    When the black holes align: a subpopulation of aligned massive binary black holes observed via gravitational waves , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  63. [65]

    Aligned Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in Active-Galactic-Nuclei Disks Revealed by GWTC-4 , volume=

    Li, Yin-Jie and Wang, Yuan-Zhu and Tang, Shao-Peng and Fan, Yi-Zhong , year=. Aligned Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in Active-Galactic-Nuclei Disks Revealed by GWTC-4 , volume=. Physical Review Letters , publisher=. doi:10.1103/qyfv-wkv1 , number=

    doi:10.1103/qyfv-wkv1

  64. [66]

    2025 , month =

    Li, Yin-Jie and Wang, Yuan-Zhu and Tang, Shao-Peng and Chen, Tong and Fan, Yi-Zhong , title =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add535 , url =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add535 2025

  65. [67]

    Cover Your Basis: Comprehensive Data-driven Characterization of the Binary Black Hole Population , volume=

    Edelman, Bruce and Farr, Ben and Doctor, Zoheyr , year=. Cover Your Basis: Comprehensive Data-driven Characterization of the Binary Black Hole Population , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb5ed , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb5ed

  66. [68]

    2025 , eprint=

    Population of Binary Black Holes Inferred from One Hundred and Fifty Gravitational Wave Signals , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  67. [69]

    2026 , eprint=

    Joint population and strong-lensing inference for resolved gravitational-wave events probes the black-hole merger rate beyond the peak of star formation , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  68. [70]

    2023 , month =

    Sadiq, Jam and Dent, Thomas and Gieles, Mark , title =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0ce6 , url =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0ce6 2023

  69. [71]

    On the Astrophysical Origin of Binary Black Hole Subpopulations: A Tale of Three Channels? , volume=

    Ray, Anarya and Mukherjee, Shirsha and Zevin, Michael and Kalogera, Vicky , year=. On the Astrophysical Origin of Binary Black Hole Subpopulations: A Tale of Three Channels? , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , publisher=. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae80cb , number=

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae80cb 2041

  70. [72]

    Characterizing Binary Black Hole Subpopulations in GWTC-4 with Binned Gaussian Processes: On the Origins of the 35 M _ ⊙ Peak

    Sridhar, Omkar and Ray, Anarya and Kalogera, Vicky. Characterizing Binary Black Hole Subpopulations in GWTC-4 with Binned Gaussian Processes: On the Origins of the 35 M _ ⊙ Peak. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2026. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae8011. arXiv:2511.22093

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  71. [73]

    Inferring black hole formation channels in GWTC-4.0 via parametric mass-spin correlations derived from first principles , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1103/3mb7-vnft , url =

    doi:10.1103/3mb7-vnft 2026

  72. [74]

    Schneider, F. R. N. and Podsiadlowski, Ph. and Müller, B. , title =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039219

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039219

  73. [75]

    2025 , eprint=

    Good things always come in 3s: trimodality in the binary black-hole chirp-mass distribution supports bimodal black-hole formation , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  74. [76]

    Mandel, Ilya and Riley, Jeff and Boesky, Adam and Brček, Adam and Hirai, Ryosuke and Kapil, Veome and Lau, Mike Y. M. and Merritt, JD and Rodríguez-Segovia, Nicolás and Romero-Shaw, Isobel and Song, Yuzhe and Stevenson, Simon and Vajpeyi, Avi and van Son, L. A. C. and Vigna-Gómez, Alejandro and Willcox, Reinhold , title =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538...

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adf8d0 2025

  75. [77]

    and Boyett, Kristian N

    Riley, Jeff and Agrawal, Poojan and Barrett, Jim W. and Boyett, Kristian N. k. and Broekgaarden, Floor S. and Chattopadhyay, Debatri and Gaebel, Sebastian M. and Gittins, Fabian and Hirai, Ryosuke and Howitt, George and Justham, Stephen and Khandelwal, Lokesh and Kummer, Floris and Lau, Mike Y. m. and Mandel, Ilya and de Mink, Selma E. and Neijssel, Coenr...

    2022