Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Luminosity- and morphology-dependent clustering of galaxies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0003358 v2 pith:MHWXOVSI submitted 2000-03-23 astro-ph

Luminosity- and morphology-dependent clustering of galaxies

classification astro-ph
keywords luminositysegregationgalaxiesmorphologicalclusteringcorrelationdependearly-type
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

How does the clustering of galaxies depend on their inner properties like morphological type and luminosity? We address this question in the mathematical framework of marked point processes and clarify the notion of luminosity and morphological segregation. A number of test quantities such as conditional mark-weighted two-point correlation functions are introduced. These descriptors allow for a scale-dependent analysis of luminosity and morphology segregation. Moreover, they break the degeneracy between an inhomogeneous fractal point set and actual present luminosity segregation. Using the Southern Sky Redshift Survey~2 (da Costa et al. 1998, SSRS2) we find both luminosity and morphological segregation at a high level of significance, confirming claims by previous works using these data (Benoist et al. 1996, Willmer et al. 1998). Specifically, the average luminosity and the fluctuations in the luminosity of pairs of galaxies are enhanced out to separations of 15Mpc/h. On scales smaller than 3Mpc/h the luminosities on galaxy pairs show a tight correlation. A comparison with the random-field model indicates that galaxy luminosities depend on the spatial distribution and galaxy-galaxy interactions. Early-type galaxies are also more strongly correlated, indicating morphological segregation. The galaxies in the PSCz catalog (Saunders et al. 2000) do not show significant luminosity segregation. This again illustrates that mainly early-type galaxies contribute to luminosity segregation. However, based on several independent investigations we show that the observed luminosity segregation can not be explained by the morphology-density relation alone.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tomographic Alcock-Paczynski Test with Marked Correlation Functions

    astro-ph.CO 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First integration of tomographic AP tests with MCFs and PCA compression yields 48% and 45% tighter errors on Ω_m and w versus standard two-point functions.

  2. Weighted Webs: Morphology-Informed Marked Fields

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Morphology-based marks (tidal shear and local fractal dimension) add a modest but complementary ~10% Fisher-information gain over density-only marked power spectra for cosmological parameters.

  3. Cosmological constraints from neighbor-density-weighted marked correlation functions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Neighbor-density-weighted marked correlation functions improve FoM for Ωm–σ8 by 1.7–2.5× over standard 2PCF using Gaussian-process emulators on 129 w0waCDM+∑mν simulations.

  4. Cosmological constraints from neighbor-density-weighted marked correlation functions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Neighbor-density-weighted marked correlation functions improve FoM for Ω_m–σ_8 by 1.7–2.5× over standard 2PCF using emulators from 129 w0waCDM+∑m_ν simulations.