REVIEW 1 cited by
Why Magnetic Fields Cannot be the Main Agent Shaping Planetary Nebulae
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Why Magnetic Fields Cannot be the Main Agent Shaping Planetary Nebulae
read the original abstract
An increasing amount of literature reports the detection of magnetic fields in asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars and in central stars of planetary nebulae (PNs). These detections lead to claims that the magnetic fields are the main agent shaping the PNs. In this paper, I examine the energy and angular momentum carried by magnetic fields expelled from AGB stars, as well as other physical phenomena that accompany the presence of large scale fields, such as those claimed in the literature. I show that a single star cannot supply the energy and angular momentum if the magnetic fields have the large coherent structure required to shape the circumstellar wind. Therefore, the structure of non-spherical planetary nebulae cannot be attributed to dynamically important large scale magnetic fields. I conclude that the observed magnetic fields around evolved stars can be understood by locally enhanced magnetic loops which can have a secondary role in the shaping of the PN. The primary role, I argue, rests with the presence of a companion.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A catalogue of high angular resolution and contrast polarimetric maps of 45 nearby AGB stars with SPHERE/ZIMPOL
Uniformly reduced SPHERE/ZIMPOL polarization maps of 45 AGB stars reveal 16 resolved dust envelopes, three new, but the proposed target-selection criteria are partially circular and in-sample.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.