Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Luminosity-Weighted or `Marked' Correlation Function

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0512463 v1 pith:YCFJHRMB submitted 2005-12-17 astro-ph

The Luminosity-Weighted or `Marked' Correlation Function

classification astro-ph
keywords functioncorrelationluminositygalaxyhaloclusteringenvironmentluminosity-weighted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present measurements of the redshift-space luminosity-weighted or `marked' correlation function in the SDSS. These are compared with a model in which the luminosity function and luminosity dependence of clustering are the same as that observed, and in which the form of the luminosity-weighted correlation function is entirely a consequence of the fact that massive halos populate dense regions. We do this by using mock catalogs which are constrained to reproduce the observed luminosity function and the luminosity dependence of clustering, as well as by using the language of the redshift-space halo-model. These analyses show that marked correlations may show a signal on large scales even if there are no large-scale physical effects--the statistical correlation between halos and their environment will produce a measureable signal. Our model is in good agreement with the measurements, indicating that the halo mass function in dense regions is top-heavy; the correlation between halo mass and large scale environment is the primary driver for correlations between galaxy properties and environment; and the luminosity of the central galaxy in a halo is different from (in general, brighter than) that of the other objects in the halo. Thus our measurement provides strong evidence for the accuracy of these three standard assumptions of galaxy formation models. These assumptions also form the basis of current halo-model based interpretations of galaxy clustering.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tomographic Alcock-Paczynski Test with Marked Correlation Functions

    astro-ph.CO 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First integration of tomographic AP tests with MCFs and PCA compression yields 48% and 45% tighter errors on Ω_m and w versus standard two-point functions.

  2. Weighted Webs: Morphology-Informed Marked Fields

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Morphology-based marks (tidal shear and local fractal dimension) add a modest but complementary ~10% Fisher-information gain over density-only marked power spectra for cosmological parameters.