REVIEW 1 cited by
A First Comparison of the SBF Survey Distances with the Galaxy Density Field: Implications for H₀ and Omega
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A First Comparison of the SBF Survey Distances with the Galaxy Density Field: Implications for H₀ and Omega
read the original abstract
We compare the peculiar velocities measured in the SBF Survey of Galaxy Distances with the predictions from the density fields of the IRAS 1.2 Jy flux-limited redshift survey and the Optical Redshift Survey (ORS) to derive simultaneous constraints on the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the density parameter $\beta = \Omega^{0.6}/b$, where $b$ is the linear bias. We find $\beta_I=0.42^{+0.10}_{-0.06}$ and $\beta_O=0.26\pm0.08$ for the IRAS and ORS comparisons, respectively, and $H_0=74\pm4$ \kmsMpc (with an additional 9% uncertainty due to the Cepheids themselves). The match between predicted and observed peculiar velocities is good for these values of $H_0$ and $\beta$, and although there is covariance between the two parameters, our results clearly point toward low-density cosmologies. Thus, the unresolved discrepancy between the ``velocity-velocity'' and ``density-density'' measurements of $\beta$ continues.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Simulation Based Inference Approach to Modelling of Type Ia Supernova Populations
A simulation-based inference pipeline (Stjörnumál) fits SN Ia dust and intrinsic scatter models to DES 5-year data, enabling fast Bayesian model comparison across seven SN Ia population models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.