REVIEW 3 cited by
Verb Semantics and Lexical Selection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper will focus on the semantic representation of verbs in computer systems and its impact on lexical selection problems in machine translation (MT). Two groups of English and Chinese verbs are examined to show that lexical selection must be based on interpretation of the sentence as well as selection restrictions placed on the verb arguments. A novel representation scheme is suggested, and is compared to representations with selection restrictions used in transfer-based MT. We see our approach as closely aligned with knowledge-based MT approaches (KBMT), and as a separate component that could be incorporated into existing systems. Examples and experimental results will show that, using this scheme, inexact matches can achieve correct lexical selection.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Semantically Guided Adversarial Testing of Vision Models Using Language Models
Pretrained language models can select adversarial target labels more effectively than static lexical databases, particularly for semantically distant classes.
-
A Modular Unsupervised Framework for Attribute Recognition from Unstructured Text
POSID combines regex, Word2Vec, WordNet, and SBERT zero-shot classification with POS-tag heuristics to extract person attributes from incident reports, reaching 0.90 F1 for clothes attribute-value pairs on the new Inc...
-
Multimodal Information Retrieval for Open World with Edit Distance Weak Supervision
FemmIR uses graph-edit-distance weak supervision over extracted object properties to rank multimodal retrieval results without any similarity labels or fine-tuning.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.