pith. sign in

arxiv: gr-qc/0105096 · v1 · submitted 2001-05-26 · 🌀 gr-qc

Gravitoelectromagnetism: Just a Big Word?

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords approachesapproachbettergravitationalgravitoelectromagnetismparticularproblemssplitting
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Arguments are made in favor of broadening the scope of the various approaches to splitting spacetime into a single common framework in which measured quantities, derivative operations, and adapted coordinate systems are clearly understood in terms of associated test observer families. This ``relativity of splitting formalisms" for fully nonlinear gravitational theory has been tagged with the name "gravitoelectromagnetism" because of the well known analogy between its linearization and electromagnetism, and it allows relationships between the various approaches to be better understood and makes it easier to extrapolate familiarity with one approach to the others. This is important since particular problems or particular features of those problems in gravitational theory are better suited to different approaches, and the present barriers between the proponents of each individual approach sometimes prevent the best match from occurring.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Physics is simple only when analyzed locally

    physics.gen-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Splitting techniques on timelike congruences in GR yield local Minkowski descriptions, with Newtonian gravity arising as an effect of non-geodesic reference frame paths.