Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Search for Muon-neutrino to Electron-neutrino and Muon-antineutrino to Electron-antineutrino Oscillations at NuTeV

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-ex/0203018 v2 pith:A56OWCQI submitted 2002-03-12 hep-ex

A Search for Muon-neutrino to Electron-neutrino and Muon-antineutrino to Electron-antineutrino Oscillations at NuTeV

classification hep-ex
keywords deltaoscillationsnutevalphalimitsparametersassumebeams
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Limits on $\nu_\mu \to \nu_e$ and $\bar\nu_\mu \to \bar\nu_e$ oscillations are extracted using the NuTeV detector with sign-selected $\nu_\mu$ and $\nub_\mu$ beams. In $\nub_\mu$ mode, for the case of $\sin^2 2\alpha = 1$, $\Delta m^2 > 2.6$ ${\rm eV^2}$ is excluded, and for $\Delta m^2 \gg 1000$ ${\rm eV^2}$, $\sin^2 2\alpha > 1.1 \times 10^{-3}$. The NuTeV data exclude the high $\Delta m^2$ end of $\bar\nu_\mu \to \bar\nu_e$ oscillations parameters favored by the LSND experiment without the need to assume that the oscillation parameters for $\nu$ and $\nub$ are the same. We present the most stringent experimental limits for $\nu_\mu (\bar{\nu}_\mu) \to \nu_e (\bar{\nu}_e)$ oscillations in the large $\Delta m^2$ region.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Electroweak right-handed neutrino portal dark matter

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0

    In neutrino-portal dark matter, ignoring internal dark-sector interactions during freeze-in can underestimate the final relic abundance by 30–95%.