REVIEW 1 cited by
Observation of K^*(892)⁰bar K^*(892)⁰ in chi_(cJ) Decays
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Observation of K^*(892)⁰bar K^*(892)⁰ in chi_(cJ) Decays
read the original abstract
$K^*(892)^0\bar K^*(892)^0$ signals from $\chi_{cJ} (J=0,1,2)$ decays are observed for the first time using a data sample of 14 million $\psi(2S)$ events accumulated at the BES II detector. The branching fractions ${\cal B}(\chi_{cJ}\to K^*(892)^0\bar K^*(892)^0)$ $(J = 0,1,2)$ are determined to be $(1.55 \pm 0.35 \pm 0.30)\times 10^{-3}$, $(1.58 \pm 0.32 \pm 0.29)\times 10^{-3}$, and $(4.67 \pm 0.55 \pm 0.85)\times 10^{-3}$ for the $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$ and $\chi_{c2}$ decays, respectively, where the first errors are statistical and the second are systematic. The significances of these signals are about 4.2$\sigma$, 4.3$\sigma$, and 7.5$\sigma$, respectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Unquenched Charmonium and Beyond
This Lanzhou-group review argues that coupled-channel (unquenched) effects, not exotic constituents, are the common thread explaining charmonium anomalies from the rho-pi puzzle to the Y-problem states.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.