REVIEW 2 cited by
Asymmetric Systematic Errors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Asymmetric systematic errors arise when there is a non-linear dependence of a result on a nuisance parameter. Their combination is traditionally done by adding positive and negative deviations separately in quadrature. There is no sound justification for this, and it is shown that indeed it is sometimes clearly inappropriate. Consistent techniques are given for this combination of errors, and also for evaluating $\chi^2$, and for forming weighted sums.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Asymmetric Errors
Asymmetric errors are given a consistent treatment by distinguishing pdf-based from likelihood-based uncertainties, and by providing a family of three-parameter models with validated combination rules and open-source ...
-
KAN-LSTM-Transformer Neural Networks, MFV and Cosmological Parameters
KLT-Net reconstructs the SN Ia distance modulus non-parametrically; with MFV M_B and flat-ΛCDM Bayesian/Hessian inference it yields H0 ≈ 69.6 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹ and Ωm ≈ 0.30.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.