REVIEW 2 cited by
Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Recently a great deal of attention has focused on quantum computation following a sequence of results suggesting that quantum computers are more powerful than classical probabilistic computers. Following Shor's result that factoring and the extraction of discrete logarithms are both solvable in quantum polynomial time, it is natural to ask whether all of NP can be efficiently solved in quantum polynomial time. In this paper, we address this question by proving that relative to an oracle chosen uniformly at random, with probability 1, the class NP cannot be solved on a quantum Turing machine in time $o(2^{n/2})$. We also show that relative to a permutation oracle chosen uniformly at random, with probability 1, the class $NP \cap coNP$ cannot be solved on a quantum Turing machine in time $o(2^{n/3})$. The former bound is tight since recent work of Grover shows how to accept the class NP relative to any oracle on a quantum computer in time $O(2^{n/2})$.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Non-Hermitian Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm
A history-decoupled Hamiltonian mapping makes non-Hermitian adiabatic quantum optimization pseudospectrally stable, achieving polynomial-time (per configuration) evolution on the CK maximum-independent-set benchmarks.
-
Nested Grover's Algorithm for Tree Search
A nested Grover algorithm for tree search claims cost O(m*2^(m/4)) using partial candidate solutions, but the speedup relies on an unexamined assumption that the candidate set contains the solution.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.