Pith. sign in

Researcher Evidence Record

Abraham Glasser

This bounded record lists 10 Pith paper rows and 0 imported work rows attributed to this corpus identity. The enumerated, non-disputed paper rows include cs.HC, cs.CY, math.CO work dated 2019 to 2025. The record describes sources and coverage; it makes no judgment about the person.

Compiled coverage vector

Measured lane counts only. Not a trust score or person verdict.

Identity 2 canonical identity row plus typed public identifiers Pith papers 10 attributed paper rows in the Pith corpus, itemized below Imported works 0 imported works beyond the paper ledger Current reviews 6 of 10 papers carrying a current Pith review; presence, not outcome Sourced citations 3 of 10 works with a source-named citation count Coauthors 29 distinct coauthors across shared paper rows
Enumerated paper scope: 3 fields (cs.HC, cs.CY, math.CO) · 2019-2025 sources: authors, author_identifiers · paper_authors · author_works · current_verdicts · cited_works

A sourced case file for attributed work. It is neither a profile score nor a verdict about this researcher.

Attributed works

A bounded ledger from the Pith paper and imported-work queries. Counts and source confidence stay with each work.

  1. 2025 Pith paper

    Accessibility Considerations in the Development of an AI Action Plan

    cs.CY provisional measured, no current review

    paper citation record paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Abraham Glasser
    Author position
    5
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    • 1 pith inbound references from cited_work_pith_inbound_counts
  2. 2024 Pith paper

    Assessment of Sign Language-Based versus Touch-Based Input for Deaf Users Interacting with Intelligent Personal Assistants

    cs.HC provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Abraham Glasser
    Author position
    5
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  3. 2024 Pith paper

    How Users Experience Closed Captions on Live Television: Quality Metrics Remain a Challenge

    cs.HC provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Abraham Glasser
    Author position
    7
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  4. 2019 Pith paper

    RTTD-ID: Tracked Captions with Multiple Speakers for Deaf Students

    cs.HC provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Abraham Glasser
    Author position
    7
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  5. 2019 Pith paper

    Closed ASL Interpreting for Online Videos

    cs.HC provisional current review present

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Abraham Glasser
    Author position
    3
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: a current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  6. 2019 Pith paper

    Failed power domination on graphs

    math.CO provisional current review present

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Abraham Glasser
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: a current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  7. 2019 Pith paper

    Deaf, Hard of Hearing, and Hearing Perspectives on using Automatic Speech Recognition in Conversation

    cs.HC provisional current review present

    paper citation record paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Abraham Glasser
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: a current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    • 1 pith inbound references from cited_work_pith_inbound_counts
  8. 2019 Pith paper

    Feasibility of Using Automatic Speech Recognition with Voices of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Individuals

    cs.HC provisional current review present

    paper citation record paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Abraham Glasser
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: a current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    • 1 pith inbound references from cited_work_pith_inbound_counts
  9. 2019 Pith paper

    Automatic Speech Recognition Services: Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Usability

    cs.HC provisional current review present

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Abraham Glasser
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: a current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  10. 2019 Pith paper

    Artificial Intelligence Fairness in the Context of Accessibility Research on Intelligent Systems for People who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

    cs.HC provisional current review present

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Abraham Glasser
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: a current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.

Evidence apparatus

The machinery behind this record. Every lane states whether Pith measured it, did not query it, could not reach it, or withheld it.

LaneStateObservedBoundary and source
identity Measured 2 Canonical identity row plus public typed identifiers.
source=authors, author_identifiers
papers Measured 10 of 10 bounded rows Rows attributed to this author UUID in the Pith corpus.
source=paper_authors
works Measured zero 0 of 0 bounded rows Imported works not duplicated by the paper ledger.
source=author_works
reviews Measured 6 of 10 bounded rows Coverage count only. No review outcome is projected onto the person.
source=current_verdicts
citations Measured 3 of 10 bounded rows Counts remain itemized by work and source.
source=cited_works
coauthors Measured 29 of 10 bounded rows Shared-work edges from admitted paper rows.
source=paper_authors
account Unavailable No public count of 1 bounded rows Account metadata is separate from corpus evidence.
source=users.author_id
Public identity sources
  • name variant
    Abraham Glasser     backfill
    confidence 0.6

identity history

Enumerated research scope

Fields and dates come only from enumerated, non-disputed Pith paper rows. They do not claim career completeness.

  • cs.HC8 rows
  • cs.CY1 rows
  • math.CO1 rows
  • 20197 rows
  • 20242 rows
  • 20251 rows
Shared-work index
Record scope

The work queries are bounded. Missing rows may mean measured zero, an unavailable source, a query that did not run, or private data that Pith withheld. The lane table keeps those cases separate.

Paper findings remain attached to papers. They do not become findings about this researcher.