RiM trains LLMs to perform latent reasoning via fixed memory blocks processed in one forward pass using a two-stage curriculum, matching or exceeding prior latent methods on benchmarks.
Llm pretraining with continuous concepts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08524
10 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Next token prediction has been the standard training objective used in large language model pretraining. Representations are learned as a result of optimizing for token-level perplexity. We propose Continuous Concept Mixing (CoCoMix), a novel pretraining framework that combines discrete next token prediction with continuous concepts. Specifically, CoCoMix predicts continuous concepts learned from a pretrained sparse autoencoder and mixes them into the model's hidden state by interleaving with token hidden representations. Through experiments on multiple benchmarks, including language modeling and downstream reasoning tasks, we show that CoCoMix is more sample efficient and consistently outperforms standard next token prediction, knowledge distillation and inserting pause tokens. We find that combining both concept learning and interleaving in an end-to-end framework is critical to performance gains. Furthermore, CoCoMix enhances interpretability and steerability by allowing direct inspection and modification of the predicted concept, offering a transparent way to guide the model's internal reasoning process.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 2polarities
background 2representative citing papers
Latent prediction SSL recovers latent trees from PCFG data with sample complexity constant in hierarchy depth L (up to logs), unlike exponential for token-level or supervised methods.
CopT reverses CoT by eliciting a draft answer first then using continuous-embedding contrastive verification and on-policy thinking to reflect and correct, yielding up to 23% higher accuracy and 57% fewer tokens without training.
LatentRAG performs agentic RAG by generating latent tokens for thoughts and subqueries in one forward pass, matching explicit methods' accuracy on seven benchmarks while reducing latency by ~90%.
Latent reasoning faithfulness is a property of training stage and answer format, not of architecture or the final checkpoint alone.
Contribution Weights combine attention, value magnitude, and directional alignment to measure token influence more faithfully than attention alone, and show attention sinks actively suppress information via a convex sink-rate to output-norm relationship.
NITP augments next-token prediction with cosine alignment to stop-gradient shallow-layer features of the next token, improving geometry and downstream scores at ~2% extra training FLOPs.
A 22M-parameter hyperbolic model answers structured EHR questions with accuracy close to LLM-based systems (EHRXQA 89.5%, MIMIC-Instr 76.0%).
LEPO applies RL to continuous latent representations in LLMs by injecting Gumbel-Softmax stochasticity for diverse trajectory sampling and unified gradient estimation, outperforming existing discrete and latent RL methods.
A survey categorizing scaling in LLM reasoning across input size, steps, rounds, training, and future directions, noting that scaling can negatively affect performance.
citing papers explorer
-
Unlocking the Working Memory of Large Language Models for Latent Reasoning
RiM trains LLMs to perform latent reasoning via fixed memory blocks processed in one forward pass using a two-stage curriculum, matching or exceeding prior latent methods on benchmarks.
-
Learn from your own latents and not from tokens: A sample-complexity theory
Latent prediction SSL recovers latent trees from PCFG data with sample complexity constant in hierarchy depth L (up to logs), unlike exponential for token-level or supervised methods.
-
CopT: Contrastive On-Policy Thinking with Continuous Spaces for General and Agentic Reasoning
CopT reverses CoT by eliciting a draft answer first then using continuous-embedding contrastive verification and on-policy thinking to reflect and correct, yielding up to 23% higher accuracy and 57% fewer tokens without training.
-
LatentRAG: Latent Reasoning and Retrieval for Efficient Agentic RAG
LatentRAG performs agentic RAG by generating latent tokens for thoughts and subqueries in one forward pass, matching explicit methods' accuracy on seven benchmarks while reducing latency by ~90%.
-
Final Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Analyzing Latent Reasoning Faithfulness Along Training Trajectories
Latent reasoning faithfulness is a property of training stage and answer format, not of architecture or the final checkpoint alone.
-
Contribution Weights: A Geometrical Analysis of Self-Attention Transformers
Contribution Weights combine attention, value magnitude, and directional alignment to measure token influence more faithfully than attention alone, and show attention sinks actively suppress information via a convex sink-rate to output-norm relationship.
-
NITP: Next Implicit Token Prediction for LLM Pre-training
NITP augments next-token prediction with cosine alignment to stop-gradient shallow-layer features of the next token, improving geometry and downstream scores at ~2% extra training FLOPs.
-
HypEHR: Hyperbolic Modeling of Electronic Health Records for Efficient Question Answering
A 22M-parameter hyperbolic model answers structured EHR questions with accuracy close to LLM-based systems (EHRXQA 89.5%, MIMIC-Instr 76.0%).
-
LEPO: Latent Reasoning Policy Optimization for Large Language Models
LEPO applies RL to continuous latent representations in LLMs by injecting Gumbel-Softmax stochasticity for diverse trajectory sampling and unified gradient estimation, outperforming existing discrete and latent RL methods.
-
A Survey of Scaling in Large Language Model Reasoning
A survey categorizing scaling in LLM reasoning across input size, steps, rounds, training, and future directions, noting that scaling can negatively affect performance.