Pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

Swe-bench goes live!

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (60%).

22 Pith papers citing it
1 external citations · Pith
Background 60% of classified citations
abstract

The issue-resolving task, where a model generates patches to fix real-world bugs, has emerged as a critical benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). While SWE-bench and its variants have become standard in this domain, they suffer from key limitations: they have not been updated since their initial releases, cover a narrow set of repositories, and depend heavily on manual effort for instance construction and environment setup. These factors hinder scalability and introduce risks of overfitting and data contamination. In this work, we present SWE-bench-Live, a live-updatable benchmark designed to overcome these challenges. Our initial release consists of 1,319 tasks derived from real GitHub issues created since 2024, spanning 93 repositories. Each task is accompanied by a dedicated Docker image to ensure reproducible execution. Central to our benchmark is \method, an automated curation pipeline that streamlines the entire process from instance creation to environment setup, removing manual bottlenecks and enabling scalability and continuous updates. We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art agent frameworks and LLMs on SWE-bench-Live, revealing a substantial performance gap compared to static benchmarks like SWE-bench, even under controlled evaluation conditions. To better understand this discrepancy, we perform detailed analyses across repository origin, issue recency, and task difficulty. By providing a fresh, diverse, and executable benchmark grounded in live repository activity, SWE-bench-Live facilitates rigorous, contamination-resistant evaluation of LLMs and agents in dynamic, real-world software development settings.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 2 dataset 1 method 1 other 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 19 2025 3

representative citing papers

SWE-Explore: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Explore Repositories

cs.SE · 2026-06-05 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

SWE-Explore is a new benchmark evaluating repository exploration by coding agents on 848 issues across 203 repositories, using line-level ground truth from successful agent trajectories and showing agentic methods outperform classical retrieval on coverage and ranking.

PlayCoder: Making LLM-Generated GUI Code Playable

cs.SE · 2026-04-21 · conditional · novelty 7.0

PlayCoder raises the rate of LLM-generated GUI apps that can be played end-to-end without logic errors from near zero to 20.3% Play@3 by adding repository-aware generation, agent-driven testing, and iterative repair.

Toward Scalable Terminal Task Synthesis via Skill Graphs

cs.AI · 2026-04-28 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

SkillSynth uses a scenario-mediated skill graph to sample workflow paths and generate executable terminal tasks, enabling controlled diversity in training trajectories for agents.

You Don't Need Public Tests to Generate Correct Code

cs.SE · 2026-04-23 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

DryRUN lets LLMs create their own test inputs and run internal simulations for self-correcting code generation, matching the performance of test-dependent methods like CodeSIM on LiveCodeBench without public tests or external signals.

GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering

cs.LG · 2026-02-17 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

GLM-5 is a foundation model that claims state-of-the-art results on coding benchmarks and superior performance on end-to-end software engineering tasks via new asynchronous RL methods and cost-saving DSA.

citing papers explorer

Showing 22 of 22 citing papers.