Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Pentestgpt: An llm-empowered automatic penetration testing tool

Canonical reference. 80% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

19 Pith papers citing it
30 external citations · Pith
Background 80% of classified citations
abstract

Penetration testing, a crucial industrial practice for ensuring system security, has traditionally resisted automation due to the extensive expertise required by human professionals. Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant advancements in various domains, and their emergent abilities suggest their potential to revolutionize industries. In this research, we evaluate the performance of LLMs on real-world penetration testing tasks using a robust benchmark created from test machines with platforms. Our findings reveal that while LLMs demonstrate proficiency in specific sub-tasks within the penetration testing process, such as using testing tools, interpreting outputs, and proposing subsequent actions, they also encounter difficulties maintaining an integrated understanding of the overall testing scenario. In response to these insights, we introduce PentestGPT, an LLM-empowered automatic penetration testing tool that leverages the abundant domain knowledge inherent in LLMs. PentestGPT is meticulously designed with three self-interacting modules, each addressing individual sub-tasks of penetration testing, to mitigate the challenges related to context loss. Our evaluation shows that PentestGPT not only outperforms LLMs with a task-completion increase of 228.6\% compared to the \gptthree model among the benchmark targets but also proves effective in tackling real-world penetration testing challenges. Having been open-sourced on GitHub, PentestGPT has garnered over 4,700 stars and fostered active community engagement, attesting to its value and impact in both the academic and industrial spheres.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 4 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 18 2023 1

representative citing papers

A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents

cs.AI · 2023-08-22 · accept · novelty 6.0

A survey of LLM-based autonomous agents that proposes a unified framework for their construction and reviews applications in social science, natural science, and engineering along with evaluation methods and future directions.

Synthetic APTs: the Collapse of TTP-Based Attribution

cs.CR · 2026-06-05 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

AI-emulated APTs compromise enterprise hosts and weaponize defender tools in 8/10 trials while military ranges resist, indicating TTP attribution fails when agents can be scaffolded to mimic threat actors.

Hephaestus: Toward a Cybersecurity AI Scientist

cs.CR · 2026-06-29 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

The paper proposes the Cybersecurity AI Scientist as a modular multi-agent architecture for automating cybersecurity research, distinguished by its focus on non-stationary threats and anchored in a four-zeros risk-trust-incident-energy frame.

Benchmarking Mythos-Linked Bug Rediscovery

cs.SE · 2026-05-17 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

A benchmarking experiment finds low rediscovery rates for three models on six Mythos-linked bug tasks, with only six target matches across 54 attempts under controlled prompting.

citing papers explorer

Showing 19 of 19 citing papers.