pith. sign in

hub

Scaling laws for reward model overoptimization

10 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

10 Pith papers citing it

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 3

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 9 2025 1

roles

background 3

polarities

background 3

clear filters

representative citing papers

Learning from Language Feedback via Variational Policy Distillation

cs.LG · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

VPD frames language feedback learning as variational EM so the teacher policy refines itself via trust-region updates on outcomes while the student learns dense token distributions on its own rollouts, outperforming fixed-teacher baselines on reasoning and code tasks.

General Preference Reinforcement Learning

cs.LG · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 3 refs

GPRL carries a k-dimensional skew-symmetric preference structure into policy updates with per-dimension advantages and a drift monitor, yielding 56.51% length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0 from Llama-3-8B-Instruct while outperforming SimPO and SPPO on other benchmarks.

RVPO: Risk-Sensitive Alignment via Variance Regularization

cs.LG · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RVPO penalizes variance across multiple reward signals during RLHF advantage aggregation, using a LogSumExp operator as a smooth variance penalty to reduce constraint neglect in LLM alignment.

DanceGRPO: Unleashing GRPO on Visual Generation

cs.CV · 2025-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

DanceGRPO applies GRPO to visual generation tasks to achieve stable policy optimization across diffusion models, rectified flows, multiple tasks, and diverse reward models, outperforming prior RL methods.

Goal-Conditioned Supervised Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning

cs.LG · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

GCSL reframes LLM fine-tuning as supervised pursuit of quality thresholds using natural-language goals, outperforming SFT and DPO on toxicity, code, and recommendation tasks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 6 of 6 citing papers after filters.

  • Learning from Language Feedback via Variational Policy Distillation cs.LG · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · none · ref 7

    VPD frames language feedback learning as variational EM so the teacher policy refines itself via trust-region updates on outcomes while the student learns dense token distributions on its own rollouts, outperforming fixed-teacher baselines on reasoning and code tasks.

  • General Preference Reinforcement Learning cs.LG · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · none · ref 5 · 3 links

    GPRL carries a k-dimensional skew-symmetric preference structure into policy updates with per-dimension advantages and a drift monitor, yielding 56.51% length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0 from Llama-3-8B-Instruct while outperforming SimPO and SPPO on other benchmarks.

  • Preference Instability in Reward Models: Detection and Mitigation via Sparse Autoencoders cs.LG · 2026-05-07 · conditional · none · ref 12

    Sparse autoencoders isolate unstable features in reward model representations and enable two mitigation techniques that reduce preference errors on perturbed inputs without retraining.

  • RVPO: Risk-Sensitive Alignment via Variance Regularization cs.LG · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · none · ref 10

    RVPO penalizes variance across multiple reward signals during RLHF advantage aggregation, using a LogSumExp operator as a smooth variance penalty to reduce constraint neglect in LLM alignment.

  • Goal-Conditioned Supervised Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning cs.LG · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · none · ref 2

    GCSL reframes LLM fine-tuning as supervised pursuit of quality thresholds using natural-language goals, outperforming SFT and DPO on toxicity, code, and recommendation tasks.

  • Reward Hacking in the Era of Large Models: Mechanisms, Emergent Misalignment, Challenges cs.LG · 2026-04-15 · unverdicted · none · ref 16

    The paper introduces the Proxy Compression Hypothesis as a unifying framework explaining reward hacking in RLHF as an emergent result of compressing high-dimensional human objectives into proxy reward signals under optimization pressure.