LoHoSearch is a new benchmark of 544 KG-constructed questions across 11 domains where the strongest search agent scores 34.74% and context strategies add at most 6.8%.
Fact, fetch, and reason: A unified evaluation of retrieval-augmented generation
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
LiveBrowseComp shows search agents rely on intrinsic knowledge on standard benchmarks, with scores dropping 25-40 points and closed-book accuracy below 2% on questions about facts from the prior 90 days.
CERA fine-tunes a dense retriever with triplet contrastive learning plus attention alignment to human rationales, claiming better retrieval effectiveness and faithfulness on clinical trial reports than Contriever and standard hard-negative baselines.
citing papers explorer
-
LoHoSearch: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Search Agents Beyond the Human Difficulty Ceiling
LoHoSearch is a new benchmark of 544 KG-constructed questions across 11 domains where the strongest search agent scores 34.74% and context strategies add at most 6.8%.
-
LiveBrowseComp: Are Search Agents Searching, or Just Verifying What They Already Know?
LiveBrowseComp shows search agents rely on intrinsic knowledge on standard benchmarks, with scores dropping 25-40 points and closed-book accuracy below 2% on questions about facts from the prior 90 days.
-
Beyond Topical Similarity: Contrastive Evidence Retrieval with Interpretable Attention Alignment in RAG
CERA fine-tunes a dense retriever with triplet contrastive learning plus attention alignment to human rationales, claiming better retrieval effectiveness and faithfulness on clinical trial reports than Contriever and standard hard-negative baselines.