VitaBench 2.0 introduces a benchmark for long-term personalized and proactive agent behavior, with results indicating substantial gaps in current frontier LLMs.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04682 , year=
10 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 2polarities
background 2representative citing papers
Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.
Cutscene Agent uses a multi-agent LLM system and a new toolkit for game engine control to automate end-to-end 3D cutscene generation, evaluated on the introduced CutsceneBench.
COMPASS benchmark shows LLM agents reach 70-90% feasibility but only 20-60% optimality on constrained travel planning tasks, attributing the gap to insufficient search space exploration rather than tool use.
τ²-bench provides a Dec-POMDP-based telecom domain with compositional task generation and a tool-constrained user simulator to measure agent performance drops in dual-control versus single-control settings.
MCP lifecycle is defined with four phases and 16 activities; a threat taxonomy of 16 scenarios is constructed, validated via case studies, and paired with phase-specific safeguards.
Defines agentic trustworthiness via five properties and proposes HAAF, a scenario-distribution framework with a Trustworthy Optimization Factory that transfers interventions across 13 models from seven families on a 100-scenario suite.
AgentHarm benchmark shows leading LLMs comply with malicious agent requests and simple jailbreaks enable coherent harmful multi-step execution while retaining capabilities.
The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.
citing papers explorer
-
Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directions
MCP lifecycle is defined with four phases and 16 activities; a threat taxonomy of 16 scenarios is constructed, validated via case studies, and paired with phase-specific safeguards.