Recognition: 1 theorem link
· Lean Theoremτ²-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 07:45 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Agents experience significant performance drops when users actively use tools in a shared environment.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
τ²-bench models a telecom domain as a Dec-POMDP in which both the conversational agent and the user employ tools to act within a shared, dynamic state. A compositional generator creates varied tasks, and the user simulator is bound to use only available tools and observed states. Fine-grained ablations distinguish reasoning errors from those in communication and coordination, with results indicating substantial performance reductions in the dual-control regime relative to no-user baselines.
What carries the argument
The Dec-POMDP formulation of the telecom dual-control domain, which requires the agent to reason jointly with an active user who also selects actions from the same tool set.
If this is right
- Agents must develop stronger strategies for communicating instructions and coordinating actions with users who hold independent agency.
- Benchmarks that include active user participation will expose coordination failures that single-control tests miss.
- Separating reasoning errors from communication errors supplies targeted diagnostics for improving either planning or interaction.
- The compositional task generator permits controlled increases in complexity while preserving verifiability of outcomes.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same dual-control structure could be applied to collaborative domains such as medical consultation or smart-home control to check for similar coordination shortfalls.
- Training agents inside simulated dual-control loops might narrow the performance gap that appears when user agency is added.
- Current language-model evaluation practices may systematically underestimate the communication load of real tasks.
- Direct comparison of simulator outputs against data from human users on identical telecom tasks would test the benchmark's external validity.
Load-bearing premise
The user simulator, whose actions are limited by the same tools and states available to humans, accurately reflects real decision-making in these scenarios.
What would settle it
If real human participants in the telecom dual-control tasks produce agent success rates comparable to the single-control case, the reported challenges would not hold.
read the original abstract
Existing benchmarks for conversational AI agents simulate single-control environments, where only the AI agent can use tools to interact with the world, while the user remains a passive information provider. This differs from real-world scenarios like technical support, where users need to actively participate in modifying the state of the (shared) world. In order to address this gap, we introduce $\tau^2$-bench, with four key contributions: 1) A novel Telecom dual-control domain modeled as a Dec-POMDP, where both agent and user make use of tools to act in a shared, dynamic environment that tests both agent coordination and communication, 2) A compositional task generator that programmatically creates diverse, verifiable tasks from atomic components, ensuring domain coverage and controlled complexity, 3) A reliable user simulator tightly coupled with the environment, whose behavior is constrained by tools and observable states, improving simulation fidelity, 4) Fine-grained analysis of agent performance through multiple ablations including separating errors arising from reasoning vs communication/coordination. In particular, our experiments show significant performance drops when agents shift from no-user to dual-control, highlighting the challenges of guiding users. Overall, $\tau^2$-bench provides a controlled testbed for agents that must both reason effectively and guide user actions.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper introduces τ²-bench, a benchmark for conversational AI agents operating in dual-control environments (e.g., telecom technical support) modeled as a Dec-POMDP in which both the agent and user can invoke tools to modify a shared dynamic state. It contributes a compositional task generator that builds verifiable tasks from atomic components, a tool- and state-constrained user simulator intended to improve fidelity over passive-user baselines, and ablations that separate reasoning errors from communication/coordination errors. Experiments report significant performance drops when agents move from no-user to dual-control settings, which the authors attribute to the difficulty of guiding user actions.
Significance. If the simulator's behavior is shown to be distributionally close to human users, the benchmark would address a genuine gap between existing single-control evaluations and real collaborative scenarios. The compositional generator and error-type ablations are concrete strengths that enable controlled, reproducible experimentation and could support future work on coordination-aware agents.
major comments (1)
- [Contribution 3 and Experiments section] The central claim that performance drops demonstrate 'challenges of guiding users' rests on the user simulator (contribution 3) producing actions that are representative of real human behavior under the same observations and tool constraints. The manuscript constrains the simulator via observable states and tools but provides no human-subject data, KL-divergence on action sequences, compliance rates, or other external validation metrics. Without this, the measured drop cannot be confidently interpreted as evidence about real dual-control telecom scenarios rather than simulator-specific artifacts.
minor comments (1)
- The abstract and experimental description would benefit from explicit reporting of the number of trials, confidence intervals or statistical tests supporting the 'significant performance drops,' and the precise definition of success metrics.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the constructive summary and for identifying a key limitation in how the results can be interpreted. We address the major comment point by point below and will incorporate revisions in the next version of the manuscript.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: The central claim that performance drops demonstrate 'challenges of guiding users' rests on the user simulator (contribution 3) producing actions that are representative of real human behavior under the same observations and tool constraints. The manuscript constrains the simulator via observable states and tools but provides no human-subject data, KL-divergence on action sequences, compliance rates, or other external validation metrics. Without this, the measured drop cannot be confidently interpreted as evidence about real dual-control telecom scenarios rather than simulator-specific artifacts.
Authors: We agree that the absence of human-subject validation limits the strength of the central claim. The user simulator is deliberately constrained to actions permitted by the current observable state and available tools, which narrows the behavior space relative to unconstrained or passive baselines and is intended to improve fidelity. However, the manuscript provides no human data, distributional comparisons (e.g., KL-divergence), or compliance metrics to confirm that the resulting action sequences match those of real users. Consequently, the reported performance drops demonstrate coordination challenges only within the simulated dual-control setting. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit Limitations subsection that states the simulator design assumptions, notes the lack of external validation, and qualifies the interpretation of the experimental results. We will also moderate the language in the abstract and Experiments section accordingly. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: empirical benchmark with independent task construction and measurements.
full rationale
The paper constructs a Dec-POMDP domain, compositional task generator, and tool-constrained user simulator as explicit design choices, then reports measured performance differences between no-user and dual-control settings. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are presented as load-bearing derivations that reduce the central claims (performance drops or coordination challenges) back to the inputs by construction. The simulator's fidelity is asserted via its coupling to observable states rather than any self-referential definition or renaming of known results. All reported outcomes are direct evaluations within the authored testbed and do not rely on external uniqueness theorems or prior author work for their validity.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Telecom domain can be modeled as a Dec-POMDP where both agent and user act with partial observability
invented entities (1)
-
τ²-bench benchmark and its user simulator
no independent evidence
Forward citations
Cited by 36 Pith papers
-
SEVerA: Verified Synthesis of Self-Evolving Agents
SEVerA uses Formally Guarded Generative Models and a three-stage Search-Verification-Learning process to synthesize self-evolving agents that satisfy hard formal constraints while improving task performance.
-
Learning Agentic Policy from Action Guidance
ActGuide-RL uses human action data as plan-style guidance in mixed-policy RL to overcome exploration barriers in LLM agents, matching SFT+RL performance on search benchmarks without cold-start training.
-
LLM Agents Already Know When to Call Tools -- Even Without Reasoning
LLMs encode tool necessity in pre-generation hidden states at AUROC 0.89-0.96, enabling Probe&Prefill to reduce tool calls 48% with 1.7% accuracy loss, outperforming prompt and reasoning baselines.
-
SalesSim: Benchmarking and Aligning Multimodal Language Models as Retail User Simulators
SalesSim benchmarks MLLMs as retail user simulators, finds gaps in persona adherence and over-persuasion, and introduces UserGRPO RL to raise decision alignment by 13.8%.
-
AgentEscapeBench: Evaluating Out-of-Domain Tool-Grounded Reasoning in LLM Agents
AgentEscapeBench shows LLM agents' success rates drop from 90% to 60% as tool-dependency depth increases from 5 to 25 steps, while humans drop only from 98% to 80%.
-
Tools as Continuous Flow for Evolving Agentic Reasoning
FlowAgent models tool chaining as continuous latent trajectory generation with conditional flow matching to deliver global planning, formal utility bounds, and better robustness on long-horizon tasks, plus a new plan-...
-
Star Elastic: Many-in-One Reasoning LLMs with Efficient Budget Control
Star Elastic trains N nested submodels in a single post-training job on a parent reasoning LLM, supporting elastic budget control that matches or exceeds independent baselines while cutting training compute by up to 360x.
-
MANTRA: Synthesizing SMT-Validated Compliance Benchmarks for Tool-Using LLM Agents
MANTRA automatically synthesizes SMT-validated compliance benchmarks for LLM agents from natural language manuals and tool schemas, producing 285 tasks across 6 domains with minimal human effort.
-
MAD-OPD: Breaking the Ceiling in On-Policy Distillation via Multi-Agent Debate
MAD-OPD recasts on-policy distillation teachers as a debating collective to supply better supervision, lifting agentic and code performance over single-teacher OPD across multiple model sizes.
-
Super Apriel: One Checkpoint, Many Speeds
A single 15B supernet checkpoint supports runtime switching between attention mixer placements for multiple decode speed presets while retaining 77-96% quality relative to the teacher model.
-
AutomationBench
AutomationBench is a new benchmark for AI agents on cross-application REST API workflows where even top models score below 10%.
-
Evaluating Tool-Using Language Agents: Judge Reliability, Propagation Cascades, and Runtime Mitigation in AgentProp-Bench
AgentProp-Bench shows substring judging agrees with humans at kappa=0.049, LLM ensemble at 0.432, bad-parameter injection propagates with ~0.62 probability, rejection and recovery are independent, and a runtime fix cu...
-
CompliBench: Benchmarking LLM Judges for Compliance Violation Detection in Dialogue Systems
CompliBench uses simulation and adversarial flaw injection to create labeled dialogue data showing that top proprietary LLMs perform poorly at spotting guideline violations while fine-tuned smaller models outperform t...
-
PRIME: Training Free Proactive Reasoning via Iterative Memory Evolution for User-Centric Agent
PRIME enables agents to proactively reason in user-centric tasks by iteratively evolving structured memories from interaction trajectories without gradient-based training.
-
When Attention Closes: How LLMs Lose the Thread in Multi-Turn Interaction
Attention to goal tokens declines in multi-turn LLM interactions while residual representations often retain decodable goal information, and the gap between these predicts whether goal-conditioned behavior survives.
-
Missing Old Logits in Asynchronous Agentic RL: Semantic Mismatch and Repair Methods for Off-Policy Correction
Missing old logits in async agentic RL entangle discrepancy and staleness terms in PPO off-policy correction; exact acquisition methods and revised PPO-EWMA restore decoupled updates with reported gains in speed and p...
-
ComplexMCP: Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dynamic, Interdependent, and Large-Scale Tool Sandbox
ComplexMCP benchmark shows current LLM agents achieve at most 60% success on interdependent tool tasks versus 90% for humans, due to tool retrieval saturation, over-confidence, and strategic defeatism.
-
Do Self-Evolving Agents Forget? Capability Degradation and Preservation in Lifelong LLM Agent Adaptation
Self-evolving LLM agents exhibit capability erosion under continual adaptation, which Capability-Preserving Evolution mitigates by raising retained simple-task performance from 41.8% to 52.8% in workflow evolution und...
-
PAAC: Privacy-Aware Agentic Device-Cloud Collaboration
PAAC aligns planner-executor decomposition with the device-cloud boundary via typed placeholders and on-device sanitization, delivering 15-36% higher accuracy and 2-6x lower leakage than prior device-cloud baselines o...
-
PrefixGuard: From LLM-Agent Traces to Online Failure-Warning Monitors
PrefixGuard induces typed step adapters from agent traces offline then trains prefix-risk scorers on terminal outcomes, reaching 0.900/0.710/0.533/0.557 AUPRC on four benchmarks and beating raw-text baselines by 0.137...
-
Agentic Coding Needs Proactivity, Not Just Autonomy
Coding agents require a three-level proactivity taxonomy (Reactive, Scheduled, Situation Aware) evaluated by insight policy quality using Insight Decision Quality, Context Grounding Score, and Learning Lift.
-
Robust Agent Compensation (RAC): Teaching AI Agents to Compensate
RAC adds a log-based safety net to AI agents via framework extensions, delivering 1.5-8X better latency and token use than LLM-based recovery on complex problems in τ-bench and REALM-Bench.
-
DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training
DORA's multi-version streaming rollout enables 2-3x higher throughput in asynchronous RL for LLMs while preserving convergence by maintaining policy consistency, data integrity, and bounded staleness.
-
Agent-World: Scaling Real-World Environment Synthesis for Evolving General Agent Intelligence
Agent-World autonomously synthesizes verifiable real-world tasks and uses continuous self-evolution to train 8B and 14B agents that outperform proprietary models on 23 benchmarks.
-
Democratizing Tool Learning with Environments Fully Simulated by a Free 8B Language Model
TRUSTEE uses an 8B LM to simulate complete dynamic environments for RL-based tool learning and outperforms baselines that require extra external resources.
-
Beyond RAG for Cyber Threat Intelligence: A Systematic Evaluation of Graph-Based and Agentic Retrieval
A hybrid graph-text retrieval system for cyber threat intelligence improves multi-hop question answering by up to 35% over vector-based RAG on a 3,300-question benchmark.
-
InCoder-32B-Thinking: Industrial Code World Model for Thinking
InCoder-32B-Thinking uses error-feedback synthesized thinking traces and a code world model to reach top open-source scores on general and industrial code benchmarks including 81.3% on LiveCodeBench and 84.0% on CAD-Coder.
-
Hybrid Inspection and Task-Based Access Control in Zero-Trust Agentic AI
A hybrid deterministic-plus-semantic interception layer for continuous task-based authorization of multi-turn LLM agent tool invocations, with new multi-turn datasets and initial experiments.
-
Qwen3.5-Omni Technical Report
Qwen3.5-Omni scales an omnimodal model to hundreds of billions of parameters with 256k context, introduces ARIA for stable speech synthesis, and reports SOTA performance on 215 audio-visual benchmarks while adding mul...
-
Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility
Symbolic guardrails enforce 74% of specified safety policies in agent benchmarks and boost safety without hurting utility.
-
AgentCE-Bench: Agent Configurable Evaluation with Scalable Horizons and Controllable Difficulty under Lightweight Environments
AgentCE-Bench is a lightweight grid-planning benchmark that controls task horizon via hidden slots H and difficulty via decoy budget B, validated across 13 models for consistent and discriminative evaluation.
-
Seed1.8 Model Card: Towards Generalized Real-World Agency
Seed1.8 is a new foundation model that adds unified agentic capabilities for search, code execution, and GUI interaction to existing LLM and vision strengths.
-
GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering
GLM-5 is a foundation model that claims state-of-the-art results on coding benchmarks and superior performance on end-to-end software engineering tasks via new asynchronous RL methods and cost-saving DSA.
-
MiMo-V2-Flash Technical Report
MiMo-V2-Flash is a 309B/15B MoE model trained on 27T tokens with hybrid attention and multi-teacher on-policy distillation that matches larger models like DeepSeek-V3.2 while enabling 2.6x faster decoding via repurpos...
-
DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models
DeepSeek-V3.2 adds sparse attention, scaled RL post-training, and large-scale agentic data synthesis to reach GPT-5-level performance and gold medals in 2025 IMO and IOI with its high-compute variant.
-
Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligence
Kimi K2 is a 1-trillion-parameter MoE model that leads open-source non-thinking models on agentic benchmarks including 65.8 on SWE-Bench Verified and 66.1 on Tau2-Bench.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Task-oriented dialogue as dataflow synthesis
Jacob Andreas, John Bufe, David Burkett, Charles Chen, Josh Clausman, Jean Crawford, Kate Crim, Jordan DeLoach, Leah Dorner, Jason Eisner, et al. Task-oriented dialogue as dataflow synthesis. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8:556–571, 2020
work page 2020
-
[2]
Anthropic. Claude 3.7 Sonnet, 2025. Model release: 2025-02-24
work page 2025
- [3]
-
[4]
arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.00278 , year =
Paweł Budzianowski, Tsung-Hsien Wen, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Inigo Casanueva, Stefan Ultes, Osman Ramadan, and Milica Gaši´c. Multiwoz–a large-scale multi-domain wizard-of-oz dataset for task-oriented dialogue modelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.00278, 2018
-
[5]
Derek Chen, Howard Chen, Yi Yang, Alex Lin, and Zhou Yu. Action-based conversations dataset: A corpus for building more in-depth task-oriented dialogue systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.00783, 2021
-
[6]
User modeling for task oriented dialogues
Izzeddin Gür, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Gokhan Tür, and Pararth Shah. User modeling for task oriented dialogues. In 2018 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), pages 900– 906, 2018
work page 2018
-
[7]
Decoupling strategy and generation in negotiation dialogues.arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.09637, 2018
He He, Derek Chen, Anusha Balakrishnan, and Percy Liang. Decoupling strategy and generation in negotiation dialogues. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.09637, 2018
-
[8]
Zhiyuan Hu, Yue Feng, Anh Tuan Luu, Bryan Hooi, and Aldo Lipani. Unlocking the potential of user feedback: Leveraging large language model as user simulators to enhance dialogue system. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM ’23. ACM, October 2023
work page 2023
-
[9]
MetaTool benchmark for large language models: Deciding whether to use tools and which to use, 2024
Yue Huang, Jiawen Shi, Yuan Li, Chenrui Fan, Siyuan Wu, Qihui Zhang, Yixin Liu, Pan Zhou, Yao Wan, Neil Zhenqiang Gong, et al. Metatool benchmark for large language models: Deciding whether to use tools and which to use. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03128, 2023. 11
-
[10]
SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
Carlos E Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, Kexin Pei, Ofir Press, and Karthik Narasimhan. Swe-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues? arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06770, 2023
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[11]
Large Language Models as User-Agents for Evaluating Task-Oriented-Dialogue Systems, November 2024
Taaha Kazi, Ruiliang Lyu, Sizhe Zhou, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, and Gokhan Tur. Large Language Models as User-Agents for Evaluating Task-Oriented-Dialogue Systems, November 2024. arXiv:2411.09972
-
[12]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.11067 , year=
Elad Levi and Ilan Kadar. Intellagent: A multi-agent framework for evaluating conversational ai systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.11067, 2025
-
[13]
AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents
Xiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu, Xuanyu Lei, Hanyu Lai, Yu Gu, Hangliang Ding, Kaiwen Men, Kejuan Yang, et al. Agentbench: Evaluating llms as agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03688, 2023
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[14]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04682 , year=
Jiarui Lu, Thomas Holleis, Yizhe Zhang, Bernhard Aumayer, Feng Nan, Felix Bai, Shuang Ma, Shen Ma, Mengyu Li, Guoli Yin, et al. Toolsandbox: A stateful, conversational, interactive evaluation benchmark for llm tool use capabilities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04682, 2024
-
[15]
A concise introduction to decentralized POMDPs, volume 1
Frans A Oliehoek, Christopher Amato, et al. A concise introduction to decentralized POMDPs, volume 1. Springer, 2016
work page 2016
- [16]
- [17]
-
[18]
A survey on metrics for the evaluation of user simulations
Olivier Pietquin and Helen Hastie. A survey on metrics for the evaluation of user simulations. The knowledge engineering review, 28(1):59–73, 2013. Publisher: Cambridge University Press
work page 2013
-
[19]
Apigen-mt: Agentic pipeline for multi-turn data generation via simulated agent-human interplay
Akshara Prabhakar, Zuxin Liu, Weiran Yao, Jianguo Zhang, Ming Zhu, Shiyu Wang, Zhiwei Liu, Tulika Awalgaonkar, Haolin Chen, Thai Hoang, et al. Apigen-mt: Agentic pipeline for multi- turn data generation via simulated agent-human interplay. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.03601, 2025
-
[20]
Toolllm: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world apis
Yujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu, Lan Yan, Yaxi Lu, Yankai Lin, Xin Cong, Xiangru Tang, Bill Qian, et al. Toolllm: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world apis. In ICLR, 2024
work page 2024
-
[21]
Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox
Yangjun Ruan, Honghua Dong, Andrew Wang, Silviu Pitis, Yongchao Zhou, Jimmy Ba, Yann Dubois, Chris J Maddison, and Tatsunori Hashimoto. Identifying the risks of lm agents with an lm-emulated sandbox. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15817, 2023
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
-
[22]
Evaluating agenda- based user simulation for reinforcement learning of dialogue management
Jost Schatzmann, Daniel Jurafsky, Michael Galley, and David Trevillian. Evaluating agenda- based user simulation for reinforcement learning of dialogue management. In Speech Communi- cation, volume 47, pages 95–121, 2007
work page 2007
-
[23]
Flowbench: Revisiting and benchmarking workflow-guided planning for llm-based agents
Ruixuan Xiao, Wentao Ma, Ke Wang, Yuchuan Wu, Junbo Zhao, Haobo Wang, Fei Huang, and Yongbin Li. Flowbench: Revisiting and benchmarking workflow-guided planning for llm-based agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14884, 2024
-
[24]
Patil, Ion Stoica, and Joseph E
Fanjia Yan, Huanzhi Mao, Charlie Cheng-Jie Ji, Tianjun Zhang, Shishir G. Patil, Ion Stoica, and Joseph E. Gonzalez. Berkeley function calling leaderboard.https://gorilla.cs.berkeley. edu/blogs/8_berkeley_function_calling_leaderboard.html, 2024
work page 2024
-
[25]
Webshop: Towards scalable real-world web interaction with grounded language agents
Shunyu Yao, Howard Chen, John Yang, and Karthik Narasimhan. Webshop: Towards scalable real-world web interaction with grounded language agents. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:20744–20757, 2022
work page 2022
-
[26]
$\tau$-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
Shunyu Yao, Noah Shinn, Pedram Razavi, and Karthik Narasimhan. τ-bench: A benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction in real-world domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12045, 2024
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[27]
WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents
Shuyan Zhou, Frank F Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou, Robert Lo, Abishek Sridhar, Xianyi Cheng, Yonatan Bisk, Daniel Fried, Uri Alon, et al. WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13854, 2023. 12
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[28]
Multiagentbench: Evaluating the collaboration and competition of llm agents,
Kunlun Zhu, Hongyi Du, Zhaochen Hong, Xiaocheng Yang, Shuyi Guo, Zhe Wang, Zhenhailong Wang, Cheng Qian, Xiangru Tang, Heng Ji, et al. Multiagentbench: Evaluating the collaboration and competition of llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01935, 2025. 13 Broader Impact The development of standardized benchmarks for Large Language Models (LLMs) and AI agent...
-
[29]
**Action**: set_user_info - **Env Type**: user - **Arguments**: - name: John Smith - phone_number: 555-123-2002
work page 2002
-
[30]
**Action**: turn_airplane_mode_on - **Env Type**: user - **Arguments**: {}
-
[31]
**Action**: unseat_sim_card 15 - **Env Type**: user - **Arguments**: {} ## Evaluation Criteria ### Actions
-
[32]
**Action ID**: toggle_airplane_mode_0 - **Requestor**: user - **Name**: toggle_airplane_mode - **Arguments**: {}
-
[33]
**Action ID**: reseat_sim_card_1 - **Requestor**: user - **Name**: reseat_sim_card - **Arguments**: {} ### Environment Assertions - **Env Type**: user - **Function**: assert_service_status - **Arguments**: - expected_status: connected - **Assert Value**: true A.3 Example Trajectory 1: Default mode Trajectory for the task in Appendix A.2 in the Default mod...
work page 2002
-
[41]
**check_wifi_calling_status** - Checks if Wi-Fi Calling is enabled on your device. This feature allows you to make and receive calls over a Wi-Fi network instead of using the cellular network
-
[49]
When ON, it disconnects all wireless communications including cellular, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth
**toggle_airplane_mode** - Turns Airplane Mode ON or OFF. When ON, it disconnects all wireless communications including cellular, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth. 33
-
[61]
**reboot_device** - Restarts your phone completely. This can help resolve many temporary software glitches by refreshing all running services and connections. # Understanding and Troubleshooting Your Phone 's Cellular Service This section details for agents how a user 's phone connects to the cellular network (often referred to as "service") and provides ...
-
[62]
**check_status_bar** - Shows what icons are currently visible in your phone 's status bar (the area at the top of the screen). - Airplane mode status ("Airplane Mode" when enabled) - Network signal strength ("No Signal", "Poor", "Fair", "Good", "Excellent") - Network technology (e.g., "5G", "4G", etc.) - Mobile data status ("Data Enabled" or "Data Disable...
-
[63]
**check_network_status** - Checks your phone 's connection status to cellular networks and Wi-Fi. Shows airplane mode status, signal strength, network type, whether mobile data is enabled, and whether data roaming is enabled. Signal strength can be "none", "poor" (1bar), "fair" (2 bars), "good" (3 bars), "excellent" (4+ bars)
-
[64]
Shows the type of cellular network your phone prefers to connect to (e.g., 5G, 4G, 3G, 2G)
**check_network_mode_preference** - Checks your phone 's network mode preference. Shows the type of cellular network your phone prefers to connect to (e.g., 5G, 4G, 3G, 2G)
-
[65]
Shows if the SIM is active, missing, or locked with a PIN or PUK code
**check_sim_status** - Checks if your SIM card is working correctly and displays its current status. Shows if the SIM is active, missing, or locked with a PIN or PUK code
-
[66]
Shows if Data Saver mode is on and whether background data usage is restricted globally
**check_data_restriction_status** - Checks if your phone has any data-limiting features active. Shows if Data Saver mode is on and whether background data usage is restricted globally
-
[67]
Shows current APN name and MMSC URL for picture messaging
**check_apn_settings** - Checks the technical APN settings your phone uses to connect to your carrier 's mobile data network. Shows current APN name and MMSC URL for picture messaging
-
[68]
Shows if Wi-Fi is turned on, which network you 're connected to (if any), and the signal strength
**check_wifi_status** - Checks your Wi-Fi connection status. Shows if Wi-Fi is turned on, which network you 're connected to (if any), and the signal strength
-
[69]
**check_wifi_calling_status** - Checks if Wi-Fi Calling is enabled on your device. This feature allows you to make and receive calls over a Wi-Fi network instead of using the cellular network. 38
-
[70]
Shows if a VPN is active, connected, and displays any available connection details
**check_vpn_status** - Checks if you 're using a VPN (Virtual Private Network) connection. Shows if a VPN is active, connected, and displays any available connection details
-
[71]
**check_installed_apps** - Returns the name of all installed apps on the phone
-
[72]
Shows its permissions and background data usage settings
**check_app_status** - Checks detailed information about a specific app. Shows its permissions and background data usage settings
-
[73]
Shows if the app has access to features like storage, camera, location, etc
**check_app_permissions** - Checks what permissions a specific app currently has. Shows if the app has access to features like storage, camera, location, etc
- [74]
-
[75]
**can_send_mms** - Checks if the messaging app can send MMS messages. ## Fix Actions (Write/Modify)
-
[76]
Higher-speed networks (5G, 4G) provide faster data but may use more battery
**set_network_mode_preference** - Changes the type of cellular network your phone prefers to connect to (e.g., 5G, 4G, 3G). Higher-speed networks (5G, 4G) provide faster data but may use more battery
-
[77]
When ON, it disconnects all wireless communications including cellular, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth
**toggle_airplane_mode** - Turns Airplane Mode ON or OFF. When ON, it disconnects all wireless communications including cellular, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth
-
[78]
This can help resolve recognition issues
**reseat_sim_card** - Simulates removing and reinserting your SIM card. This can help resolve recognition issues
-
[79]
Controls whether your phone can use cellular data for internet access when Wi-Fi is unavailable
**toggle_data** - Turns your phone 's mobile data connection ON or OFF. Controls whether your phone can use cellular data for internet access when Wi-Fi is unavailable
-
[80]
**toggle_roaming** - Turns Data Roaming ON or OFF. When ON, roaming is enabled and your phone can use data networks in areas outside your carrier 's coverage
-
[81]
When ON, it reduces data usage, which may affect data speed
**toggle_data_saver_mode** - Turns Data Saver mode ON or OFF. When ON, it reduces data usage, which may affect data speed
-
[82]
**set_apn_settings** - Sets the APN settings for the phone
-
[83]
**reset_apn_settings** - Resets your APN settings to the default settings
-
[84]
Controls whether your phone can discover and connect to wireless networks for internet access
**toggle_wifi** - Turns your phone 's Wi-Fi radio ON or OFF. Controls whether your phone can discover and connect to wireless networks for internet access
-
[85]
**toggle_wifi_calling** - Turns Wi-Fi Calling ON or OFF. This feature allows you to make and receive calls over Wi-Fi instead of the cellular network, which can help in areas with weak cellular signal
-
[86]
**connect_vpn** - Connects to your VPN (Virtual Private Network)
-
[87]
**disconnect_vpn** - Disconnects any active VPN (Virtual Private Network) connection. Stops routing your internet traffic through a VPN server, which might affect connection speed or access to content
-
[88]
Required for some app functions to work properly
**grant_app_permission** - Gives a specific permission to an app (like access to storage, camera, or location). Required for some app functions to work properly
-
[89]
**reboot_device** - Restarts your phone completely. This can help resolve many temporary software glitches by refreshing all running services and connections. # Understanding and Troubleshooting Your Phone 's Cellular Service This section details for agents how a user 's phone connects to the cellular network (often referred to as "service") and provides ...
work page 2024
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.