pith. sign in

super hub Canonical reference

SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?

Canonical reference. 82% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

257 Pith papers citing it
Background 82% of classified citations
abstract

Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of $2,294$ software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across $12$ popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a language model is tasked with editing the codebase to address the issue. Resolving issues in SWE-bench frequently requires understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and even files simultaneously, calling for models to interact with execution environments, process extremely long contexts and perform complex reasoning that goes far beyond traditional code generation tasks. Our evaluations show that both state-of-the-art proprietary models and our fine-tuned model SWE-Llama can resolve only the simplest issues. The best-performing model, Claude 2, is able to solve a mere $1.96$% of the issues. Advances on SWE-bench represent steps towards LMs that are more practical, intelligent, and autonomous.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 56 dataset 10 baseline 3 method 3

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of $2,294$ software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across $12$ popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a

authors

co-cited works

representative citing papers

VibeServe: Can AI Agents Build Bespoke LLM Serving Systems?

cs.AI · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

VibeServe demonstrates that AI agents can synthesize bespoke LLM serving systems end-to-end, remaining competitive with vLLM in standard settings while outperforming it in six non-standard scenarios involving unusual models, workloads, or hardware.

AstraFlow: Dataflow-Oriented Reinforcement Learning for Agentic LLMs

cs.LG · 2026-05-15 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

AstraFlow decouples RL components into autonomous dataflow services to natively support multi-policy agentic LLM training, elastic scaling, and cross-region execution with 2.7x speedup on math, code, search, and AgentBench workloads.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 257 citing papers.