Pith. sign in

mega hub Canonical reference

DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

Canonical reference. 71% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

1939 Pith papers citing it
24 external citations · Pith
Background 71% of classified citations
abstract

General reasoning represents a long-standing and formidable challenge in artificial intelligence. Recent breakthroughs, exemplified by large language models (LLMs) and chain-of-thought prompting, have achieved considerable success on foundational reasoning tasks. However, this success is heavily contingent upon extensive human-annotated demonstrations, and models' capabilities are still insufficient for more complex problems. Here we show that the reasoning abilities of LLMs can be incentivized through pure reinforcement learning (RL), obviating the need for human-labeled reasoning trajectories. The proposed RL framework facilitates the emergent development of advanced reasoning patterns, such as self-reflection, verification, and dynamic strategy adaptation. Consequently, the trained model achieves superior performance on verifiable tasks such as mathematics, coding competitions, and STEM fields, surpassing its counterparts trained via conventional supervised learning on human demonstrations. Moreover, the emergent reasoning patterns exhibited by these large-scale models can be systematically harnessed to guide and enhance the reasoning capabilities of smaller models.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 272 method 48 baseline 28 dataset 12 other 6

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract General reasoning represents a long-standing and formidable challenge in artificial intelligence. Recent breakthroughs, exemplified by large language models (LLMs) and chain-of-thought prompting, have achieved considerable success on foundational reasoning tasks. However, this success is heavily contingent upon extensive human-annotated demonstrations, and models' capabilities are still insufficient for more complex problems. Here we show that the reasoning abilities of LLMs can be incentivized through pure reinforcement learning (RL), obviating the need for human-labeled reasoning trajectorie

authors

mega hub controls

Recognition alignment

counterfactual ablation

If this work disappeared, these are the nearest dependency candidates in Pith, weighted toward method, dataset, baseline, and extension contexts where available. This is a structural signal, not a retraction verdict.

co-cited works

representative citing papers

LLMs Improving LLMs: Agentic Discovery for Test-Time Scaling

cs.CL · 2026-05-08 · conditional · novelty 8.0 · 2 refs

AutoTTS discovers width-depth test-time scaling controllers through agentic search in a pre-collected trajectory environment, yielding better accuracy-cost tradeoffs than hand-designed baselines on math reasoning tasks at low cost.

Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RL

cs.CV · 2025-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

Flow-GRPO is the first online RL method for flow matching models, raising GenEval accuracy from 63% to 95% and text-rendering accuracy from 59% to 92% with little reward hacking.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 1939 citing papers.