ExploitBench decomposes LLM exploitation into 16 oracle-verified capability flags and finds public frontier models trigger crashes but rarely reach arbitrary code execution on 41 V8 bugs.
super hub Canonical reference
SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
Canonical reference. 82% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
257
Pith papers citing it
Background
82% of classified citations
abstract
Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of $2,294$ software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across $12$ popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a language model is tasked with editing the codebase to address the issue. Resolving issues in SWE-bench frequently requires understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and even files simultaneously, calling for models to interact with execution environments, process extremely long contexts and perform complex reasoning that goes far beyond traditional code generation tasks. Our evaluations show that both state-of-the-art proprietary models and our fine-tuned model SWE-Llama can resolve only the simplest issues. The best-performing model, Claude 2, is able to solve a mere $1.96$% of the issues. Advances on SWE-bench represent steps towards LMs that are more practical, intelligent, and autonomous.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 56
dataset 10
baseline 3
method 3
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of $2,294$ software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across $12$ popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
EnergyAgentBench is a new benchmark with 70 task variants that evaluates LLM agents on live energy data for datacenter siting, long-horizon optimization, and causal grid diagnosis.
Agent-BRACE improves LLM agent performance on long-horizon partially observable tasks by 5.3-14.5% through a decoupled belief state of verbalized atomic claims with certainty labels that keeps context length constant.
A new native-runtime benchmark reveals that current frontier AI agents succeed on at most 62 percent of realistic long-horizon CLI tasks.
PDEAgent-Bench is the first multi-metric, multi-library benchmark for AI-generated PDE solvers, evaluating executability, numerical accuracy, and efficiency across DOLFINx, Firedrake, and deal.II.
SimWorld Studio deploys an evolving coding agent to create adaptive 3D environments that co-evolve with embodied learners, delivering 18-point success-rate gains over fixed environments in navigation benchmarks.
VibeServe demonstrates that AI agents can synthesize bespoke LLM serving systems end-to-end, remaining competitive with vLLM in standard settings while outperforming it in six non-standard scenarios involving unusual models, workloads, or hardware.
StabilizerBench is a new benchmark for evaluating AI agents on generating, optimizing, and making fault-tolerant stabilizer circuits for quantum error correction, with efficient verification and multi-tier scoring.
neuralCAD-Edit benchmark shows even the best foundation model (GPT 5.2) scores 53% lower than human CAD experts in acceptance trials for multimodal-instructed 3D model edits.
HWE-Bench is the first repository-level benchmark for LLM agents on real hardware bug repair, where the best agent fixes 70.7% of 417 tasks but drops below 65% on complex SoC projects.
SlopCodeBench shows coding agents degrade in structural quality and verbosity across iterative extensions, with no agent solving any problem completely and agent code 2x more eroded than human code.
MCP-Atlas is a new benchmark with 1000 tasks on production MCP servers that uses claim-level scoring to evaluate LLM agents on realistic multi-step tool-use competency.
ExCyTIn-Bench is the first benchmark of 7542 questions from Microsoft Sentinel threat investigation graphs, where the best LLM agent achieves a reward of 0.606.
The AI Scientist framework enables LLMs to independently conduct the full scientific process from idea generation to paper writing and review, demonstrated across three ML subfields with papers costing under $15 each.
OSWorld provides the first unified real-computer benchmark for open-ended multimodal agent tasks, exposing large performance gaps between humans and state-of-the-art LLM/VLM agents.
IdleSpec improves LLM agent accuracy by generating and aggregating speculative plans during idle time between tool calls and observations using complementary drafting strategies.
SpecBench shows frontier coding agents saturate visible test suites but exhibit persistent reward hacking on held-out tests, with the gap growing 28 percentage points per tenfold increase in code size.
DecisionBench supplies a fixed task suite, model pool, delegation interface, and multi-axis metrics to evaluate emergent delegation, showing similar quality across awareness conditions but 15-31 point headroom under perfect delegation.
PopPy combines an ahead-of-time compiler and runtime to extract parallelism from Python compound AI applications, delivering up to 6.4x end-to-end speedups while preserving sequential semantics.
Reversa is a reverse documentation engineering framework that deploys a multi-agent pipeline to extract implicit rules from legacy software and produce traceable specifications with confidence scores and explicit gaps for human review.
SCICONVBENCH is a new benchmark evaluating LLMs on multi-turn disambiguation and inconsistency resolution for task formulation in computational science, with frontier models reaching only 52.7% success on fluid mechanics disambiguation cases.
SaaSBench introduces a heterogeneous benchmark for enterprise SaaS engineering and shows that state-of-the-art coding agents fail over 95% of the time before reaching deep business logic due to setup and integration problems.
ConsumerSimBench evaluates 13 LLMs on reconstructing crowd reactions from 1,553 Chinese social-media topics using 23,122 auditable yes-no criteria, finding maximum coverage of 47.8% by Gemini-3.1-Pro.
AstraFlow decouples RL components into autonomous dataflow services to natively support multi-policy agentic LLM training, elastic scaling, and cross-region execution with 2.7x speedup on math, code, search, and AgentBench workloads.
citing papers explorer
-
Understanding the Mechanism of Altruism in Large Language Models
A small set of sparse autoencoder features in LLMs drives shifts between generous and selfish allocations in dictator games, with causal patching and steering confirming their role and generalization to other social games.
-
GLM-5V-Turbo: Toward a Native Foundation Model for Multimodal Agents
GLM-5V-Turbo integrates multimodal perception as a core part of reasoning and execution for agentic tasks, reporting strong results in visual tool use and multimodal coding while keeping text-only performance competitive.
-
LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods
A survey that organizes LLMs-as-judges research into functionality, methodology, applications, meta-evaluation, and limitations.