pith. sign in

Refined Lower Bounds for Adversarial Bandits

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

We provide new lower bounds on the regret that must be suffered by adversarial bandit algorithms. The new results show that recent upper bounds that either (a) hold with high-probability or (b) depend on the total lossof the best arm or (c) depend on the quadratic variation of the losses, are close to tight. Besides this we prove two impossibility results. First, the existence of a single arm that is optimal in every round cannot improve the regret in the worst case. Second, the regret cannot scale with the effective range of the losses. In contrast, both results are possible in the full-information setting.

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

clear filters

representative citing papers

Mean-based algorithms: A lower bound and regret

cs.LG · 2026-06-03 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Derives first lower bound on γ_t for mean-based algorithms in unknown-horizon bandit settings, proposes two new algorithms, and shows some are also no-regret.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.

  • Mean-based algorithms: A lower bound and regret cs.LG · 2026-06-03 · unverdicted · none · ref 21 · internal anchor

    Derives first lower bound on γ_t for mean-based algorithms in unknown-horizon bandit settings, proposes two new algorithms, and shows some are also no-regret.