pith. sign in

arxiv: 1605.07416 · v2 · pith:JHTPUNHVnew · submitted 2016-05-24 · 🧮 math.ST · cs.LG· stat.ML· stat.TH

Refined Lower Bounds for Adversarial Bandits

classification 🧮 math.ST cs.LGstat.MLstat.TH
keywords boundsregretresultsadversarialcannotdependlosseslower
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We provide new lower bounds on the regret that must be suffered by adversarial bandit algorithms. The new results show that recent upper bounds that either (a) hold with high-probability or (b) depend on the total lossof the best arm or (c) depend on the quadratic variation of the losses, are close to tight. Besides this we prove two impossibility results. First, the existence of a single arm that is optimal in every round cannot improve the regret in the worst case. Second, the regret cannot scale with the effective range of the losses. In contrast, both results are possible in the full-information setting.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mean-based algorithms: A lower bound and regret

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives first lower bound on γ_t for mean-based algorithms in unknown-horizon bandit settings, proposes two new algorithms, and shows some are also no-regret.