ExaGPT uses span-level similarity retrieval from human and LLM datastores to detect machine-generated text while supplying the matching spans as human-interpretable evidence, achieving up to 37-point accuracy gains over prior interpretable detectors at 1% FPR.
org/CorpusID:263834753
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.CL 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
DSIPA is a zero-shot black-box detector that uses sentiment distribution consistency and preservation metrics to identify LLM text, reporting up to 49.89% F1 gains over baselines across domains and models.
A maximum likelihood model estimates 6.5-16.9% of peer-review text at ICLR 2024, NeurIPS 2023, CoRL 2023 and EMNLP 2023 was substantially modified by LLMs, with elevated rates in low-confidence and deadline-close submissions.
citing papers explorer
-
ExaGPT: Example-Based Machine-Generated Text Detection for Human Interpretability
ExaGPT uses span-level similarity retrieval from human and LLM datastores to detect machine-generated text while supplying the matching spans as human-interpretable evidence, achieving up to 37-point accuracy gains over prior interpretable detectors at 1% FPR.
-
DSIPA: Detecting LLM-Generated Texts via Sentiment-Invariant Patterns Divergence Analysis
DSIPA is a zero-shot black-box detector that uses sentiment distribution consistency and preservation metrics to identify LLM text, reporting up to 49.89% F1 gains over baselines across domains and models.
-
Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews
A maximum likelihood model estimates 6.5-16.9% of peer-review text at ICLR 2024, NeurIPS 2023, CoRL 2023 and EMNLP 2023 was substantially modified by LLMs, with elevated rates in low-confidence and deadline-close submissions.